IGFBP2 antibodies are immunoglobulin-based reagents designed to bind specifically to IGFBP2, a member of the insulin-like growth factor-binding protein family. These antibodies are produced in various host species (e.g., mouse, rabbit) and exist in monoclonal or polyclonal forms . Key features include:
Target Specificity: Recognizes epitopes within IGFBP2's functional domains, such as the heparin-binding domain (HBD) or nuclear localization signal (NLS) .
Applications: Utilized in techniques including Western blotting (WB), immunohistochemistry (IHC), enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA), and immunofluorescence (IF) .
IGFBP2 antibodies are indispensable in both basic and clinical research. Below are their primary uses:
Cancer Biomarker Detection: Elevated IGFBP2 levels in plasma correlate with metastatic progression in rhabdomyosarcoma (RMS) and poor prognosis in esophageal adenocarcinoma (EAC) .
Mechanistic Studies: Antibodies help elucidate IGFBP2’s role in angiogenesis (via VEGF upregulation) and immune evasion (via PD-L1 induction) .
Therapeutic Targeting: Used to validate IGFBP2’s interaction with integrins and receptor tyrosine phosphatases in cancer cell lines .
Prognostic Utility: In RMS, combining IGFBP2 protein levels with anti-IGFBP2 autoantibodies improves diagnostic accuracy (AUC = 0.85) .
Chemoresistance: IGFBP2 knockdown in EAC cell lines reduces proliferation and invasion by 40–60% .
Immune Modulation: IGFBP2 antibodies identify its colocalization with immunosuppressive molecules (e.g., TIMP1, LGALS3) in glioma microenvironments .
Validation: Antibodies like C-10 (mouse monoclonal) and bs-1108R (rabbit polyclonal) are validated across WB, IHC, and ELISA .
Limitations: Cross-reactivity with other IGFBPs (e.g., IGFBP3, IGFBP5) may occur due to structural homology .
Best Practices: Use tissue-specific blocking protocols to minimize background noise in IHC .
Recent studies highlight IGFBP2’s dual role as a tumor antigen and immune modulator, making it a promising target for antibody-based therapies. Ongoing research focuses on:
IGFBP2 is a 34.8 kDa protein belonging to the insulin-like growth factor binding protein family. It functions primarily as a regulator of IGF bioavailability and activity in the extracellular environment. IGFBP2 binds to IGF1 and IGF2 (with higher affinity for IGF2) and serves as a chaperone to facilitate their transport to target tissues . This protein plays crucial roles in multiple cellular processes including proliferation, differentiation, and apoptosis in a cell-type specific manner .
Beyond its canonical IGF-dependent functions, IGFBP2 exhibits several IGF-independent activities. It promotes cell migration through interaction with integrin alpha5 (ITGA5) via an RGD motif and enhances adhesion of endothelial progenitor cells to endothelial cells through ITGA5/ITGB1 interaction . IGFBP2 also functions coordinately with receptor protein tyrosine phosphatase beta/PTPRB and the IGF1 receptor to regulate IGF1-mediated signaling by promoting PTEN phosphorylation, which leads to AKT1 activation .
Research laboratories can utilize several types of IGFBP2 antibodies, each with specific applications:
Monoclonal antibodies: Highly specific antibodies targeting particular epitopes, such as the C-10 clone that detects IGFBP2 protein of human origin through various applications including western blotting, immunoprecipitation, immunofluorescence, and ELISA . The EPR18012-257 clone is another well-characterized monoclonal option .
Polyclonal antibodies: These recognize multiple epitopes on IGFBP2 protein, providing potentially higher sensitivity but possibly lower specificity than monoclonals .
Species-specific antibodies: Available with reactivity to human, mouse, rat, and other species' IGFBP2, allowing for comparative studies across model organisms .
Conjugated antibodies: Available in various forms including unconjugated, agarose-conjugated (for immunoprecipitation), HRP-conjugated (for direct detection in Western blots), and fluorophore-conjugated versions (FITC, PE, Alexa Fluor®) for flow cytometry and immunofluorescence applications .
Neutralizing antibodies: Specifically designed to block IGFBP2 function in experimental settings, enabling functional studies of IGFBP2's biological roles .
Thorough validation is critical to ensure reliable research results with IGFBP2 antibodies:
Positive and negative controls:
Multiple detection methods:
Confirm findings using different techniques (Western blot, IHC, ICC/IF)
Validate cellular localization patterns using subcellular fractionation followed by Western blotting
Genetic approaches:
Use IGFBP2 knockdown/knockout samples to confirm antibody specificity
Compare protein detection with mRNA expression levels
Cross-reactivity assessment:
Test for potential cross-reactivity with other IGFBP family members
Consider using multiple antibodies targeting different epitopes
Immunoprecipitation followed by mass spectrometry:
For definitive identification of the immunoprecipitated protein as IGFBP2
For successful Western blot detection of IGFBP2, consider the following optimized protocol:
Sample preparation:
Use appropriate lysis buffers that preserve protein integrity
Include protease inhibitors to prevent degradation
Denature samples properly, considering IGFBP2's predicted molecular weight of 35 kDa
Blocking and antibody incubation:
Antibody dilutions vary by product; for optimal results, follow manufacturer recommendations
Incubate with primary antibody overnight at 4°C
Controls and validation:
Include positive control samples known to express IGFBP2
Use isotype control antibodies to assess non-specific binding
Include IGFBP2 knockdown samples when possible
Detection and troubleshooting:
For enhanced sensitivity, use HRP-conjugated secondary antibodies with chemiluminescent detection
If detecting multiple bands, consider these may represent IGFBP2 fragments resulting from proteolysis
For optimal immunohistochemical detection of IGFBP2 in tissue sections:
Tissue preparation:
Fix tissues appropriately (4% paraformaldehyde is commonly used)
For paraffin-embedded sections, perform proper deparaffinization and rehydration
Antigen retrieval:
Heat-induced epitope retrieval using Tris-EDTA buffer (pH 9.0) is recommended for optimal antigen accessibility
Optimize retrieval time and temperature for specific tissues
Blocking and antibody incubation:
Antibody dilutions vary by product; for example, ab188200 has been successfully used at 1:200 dilution
Incubate primary antibody overnight at 4°C
Detection systems:
For chromogenic detection, use appropriate HRP-conjugated secondary antibody followed by DAB color development
For fluorescent detection, use fluorophore-conjugated secondary antibodies such as Alexa Fluor® 488
Controls:
Include positive control tissues (e.g., choroid plexus for mouse brain samples)
Use isotype control antibodies on serial sections
Include a secondary-only control to assess background
For successful flow cytometric analysis of IGFBP2 expression:
Cell preparation:
Fix cells with 4% paraformaldehyde
Permeabilize with an appropriate agent (90% methanol has been successfully used)
Antibody staining:
Use antibodies validated for flow cytometry
Optimal dilutions vary; for example, EPR18012-257 clone has been used at 1/60 dilution
Include appropriate isotype controls matched to the primary antibody
Controls and validation:
Include a negative control (cells without primary antibody incubation)
Use cells with known IGFBP2 expression levels as positive controls
Consider IGFBP2 knockdown cells as biological negative controls
Gating strategy:
Exclude debris and doublets
Use viability dyes to exclude dead cells
When examining immune cell populations, include additional markers to identify specific cell types
Data analysis:
Report results as mean/median fluorescence intensity
Compare to appropriate isotype controls
Consider dual staining with other markers to identify specific cell populations expressing IGFBP2
IGFBP2 antibodies have become essential tools for exploring this protein's complex roles in cancer:
Expression profiling:
Use IHC with IGFBP2 antibodies to characterize expression patterns across cancer types and correlate with clinical outcomes
IGFBP2 overexpression has been associated with glioblastoma progression and poor patient survival
Functional studies:
Apply neutralizing IGFBP2 antibodies (2.5-8 µg/ml) to cancer cell lines to study effects on proliferation, migration, and invasion
Compare results with genetic knockdown approaches (shRNA or siRNA)
Signaling pathway analysis:
Combine IGFBP2 antibodies with phospho-specific antibodies to study downstream signaling
IGFBP2 has been shown to activate STAT3 signaling in cancer cells
Tumor microenvironment studies:
Use multi-color immunofluorescence with IGFBP2 and immune cell markers to study spatial relationships
IGFBP2 inhibition relieves immunosuppression by increasing CD8+ T and CD19+ B cells while decreasing CD163+ M2 macrophages in glioblastoma models
Biomarker development:
Quantify IGFBP2 in patient samples using ELISA or mass spectrometry-based approaches
Combined with other markers, IGFBP2 improves diagnostic performance for early-stage pancreatic cancer compared to CA19-9 alone
Neutralizing antibodies provide powerful tools for interrogating IGFBP2 function:
Experimental design:
Treat cells with neutralizing antibodies in serum-free medium to avoid interference
Use concentration ranges of 2.5-8 µg/ml, as has been reported in published studies
Include appropriate control IgG at equivalent concentrations
Functional readouts:
Cell proliferation assays (MTT, BrdU incorporation)
Colony formation assays
Migration and invasion assays
Signaling pathway activation (Western blotting for phosphorylated proteins)
Validation approaches:
Compare effects with IGFBP2 genetic knockdown
Assess specificity by attempting to rescue phenotypes with recombinant IGFBP2
Confirm neutralization by measuring downstream signaling events
Combination strategies:
Combine IGFBP2 neutralization with inhibitors of downstream pathways
For example, targeting both IGFBP2 and STAT3 could provide insights into their relationship in promoting cell migration and proliferation
In vivo applications:
Administration of neutralizing antibodies in animal models
Blocking IGFBP2 has been shown to suppress tumor growth and improve survival in mouse glioblastoma models
Differentiating between IGFBP2's IGF-dependent and IGF-independent functions requires careful experimental design:
Antibody-based approaches:
Use neutralizing antibodies targeting different IGFBP2 domains:
Antibodies targeting the IGF-binding domain
Antibodies targeting the RGD motif that mediates integrin binding
Compare effects to determine domain-specific functions
Genetic approaches:
Generate IGFBP2 mutants with impaired IGF binding but intact integrin binding capacity
Create IGFBP2 mutants with disrupted RGD motif but normal IGF binding
Compare functional effects of these mutants to wild-type IGFBP2
Pathway analysis:
Monitor both IGF receptor signaling (IGF1R/IR phosphorylation, IRS1/2 activation)
Simultaneously assess alternative pathways (integrin signaling, FAK/Src activation)
IGFBP2 has been shown to promote invasion and proliferation through integrin interactions independent of IGF binding
Co-factor considerations:
IGFBP2 functions cooperatively with receptor protein tyrosine phosphatase beta (PTPRB) and IGF1R
Assess the presence and role of such co-factors in your experimental system
Context dependency:
The relative importance of IGF-dependent versus independent functions may vary by:
Cell type
Growth conditions
Pathological state (normal vs. cancer cells)
Researchers working with IGFBP2 antibodies frequently encounter these challenges:
Non-specific binding:
Problem: Multiple unexpected bands in Western blot or non-specific tissue staining
Solution: Optimize blocking (5% NFDM/TBST recommended) , increase antibody specificity by using monoclonals, include appropriate controls including isotype controls
Weak or absent signal:
Problem: Insufficient detection despite expected IGFBP2 presence
Solution: Optimize antibody concentration, improve antigen retrieval for IHC (Tris-EDTA buffer, pH 9.0) , consider more sensitive detection systems, ensure sample preparation preserves IGFBP2 integrity
Inconsistent results between experiments:
Problem: Variable antibody performance across experiments
Solution: Standardize protocols, maintain consistent incubation times and temperatures, prepare fresh working solutions, validate each new antibody lot
Discrepancies between antibodies:
Problem: Different results obtained with different IGFBP2 antibodies
Solution: Map epitopes recognized by each antibody, consider whether biological conditions might affect epitope accessibility, validate findings using multiple detection methods
IGFBP2 proteolytic processing:
Problem: Detection of multiple fragments rather than full-length protein
Solution: Use protease inhibitors during sample preparation, analyze with antibodies targeting different IGFBP2 regions, interpret multiple bands in context of known IGFBP2 processing
When analyzing IGFBP2 expression data in cancer:
Contextual interpretation:
IGFBP2 is often overexpressed in various cancers, but its role may be context-dependent
In some contexts, IGFBP2 functions as a tumor suppressor through its ability to sequester IGFs
In other contexts, particularly through IGF-independent mechanisms, IGFBP2 may promote tumor progression
Expression patterns:
Consider both intensity and localization of IGFBP2 staining
Nuclear versus cytoplasmic localization may have different biological implications
Extracellular/secreted IGFBP2 may have distinct functions from intracellular protein
Correlation with clinical data:
Analyze associations between IGFBP2 expression and:
Patient survival
Disease progression
Response to therapy
Cancer subtype
Epigenetic regulation:
IGFBP2 expression can be regulated by promoter methylation
Hypermethylation resulting in reduced IGFBP2 expression has been observed in 30% of squamous cell lung cancers, 40% of colorectal cancers, >70% of lung adenocarcinomas, and 75% of hepatomas
Consider epigenetic mechanisms when interpreting expression data
Integration with other biomarkers:
IGFBP2 may provide more valuable information when analyzed together with other markers
For pancreatic cancer, combining CA19-9, IGFBP2, and IGFBP3 significantly improves diagnostic performance compared to CA19-9 alone
Recent evidence suggests IGFBP2 plays important roles in immune regulation:
Tumor immunology applications:
Multiplex immunofluorescence with IGFBP2 antibodies alongside immune cell markers to characterize the tumor immune microenvironment
IGFBP2 inhibition has been shown to relieve immunosuppression in glioblastoma by increasing CD8+ T and CD19+ B cells while decreasing CD163+ M2 macrophages
Mechanistic studies:
Investigation of IGFBP2's association with FcγRIIB phosphorylation on immune cells
Analysis of how IGFBP2-induced mesenchymal features in cancer cells contribute to immunosuppression
Experimental approaches:
Flow cytometry with IGFBP2 antibodies to analyze expression in specific immune cell populations
Neutralizing antibody studies to assess direct effects on immune cell function
Co-culture experiments with cancer cells and immune cells to study IGFBP2-mediated interactions
Therapeutic implications:
The finding that blocking IGFBP2 can relieve immunosuppression suggests potential for combining IGFBP2-targeting approaches with immunotherapies
Antibody-based in vivo studies can help evaluate such combination approaches in preclinical models
Emerging research highlights IGFBP2's involvement in therapy resistance mechanisms:
IGFBP2 in gefitinib resistance:
Recent studies demonstrate that IGFBP2/ITGA5 promotes acquired gefitinib resistance through STAT3 activation
This mechanism operates in resistance caused by non-EGFR secondary mutations
Experimental approaches:
IHC analysis with anti-IGFBP2 (1:200, ab188200) antibodies to assess expression in resistant tumors
Complementary staining for STAT3 and downstream targets such as CXCL1
Combination targeting strategies:
Investigating whether IGFBP2 inhibition can resensitize resistant cancer cells to therapy
Potential for combining IGFBP2 targeting with STAT3 pathway inhibitors
Biomarker development:
Assessment of whether IGFBP2 levels could predict response to targeted therapies
Evaluating IGFBP2 as a biomarker for resistance monitoring
IGFBP2 shows promise as a biomarker, particularly in combination with anti-IGFBP2 autoantibodies:
Quantification methodologies:
ELISA-based detection of IGFBP2 protein in biological fluids
Mass spectrometry-based selected reaction monitoring/multiple reaction monitoring (SRM/MRM) for precise IGFBP2 quantification in plasma
Indirect ELISA assay for measuring autoantibodies against IGFBP2:
Diagnostic and prognostic value:
IGFBP2 and anti-IGFBP2 antibodies serve as "independent negative prognostic markers"
In pancreatic cancer, IGFBP2 combined with CA19-9 and IGFBP3
improved diagnostic performance with higher AUC values than CA19-9 alone
IGFBP2 appears elevated in pancreatic cancer risk conditions like intraductal papillary mucinous neoplasms (IPMNs)
Analytical considerations:
Normalize anti-IGFBP2 antibody levels to total IgG concentration in each plasma sample
Perform assessments in triplicate across independent assays to ensure reliability
Include appropriate controls and standards in each assay
Multi-marker approach: