ILI7 Antibody

Shipped with Ice Packs
In Stock

Product Specs

Buffer
Preservative: 0.03% Proclin 300
Constituents: 50% Glycerol, 0.01M Phosphate Buffered Saline (PBS), pH 7.4
Form
Liquid
Lead Time
Made-to-order (14-16 weeks)
Synonyms
ILI7 antibody; BHLH173 antibody; LOC_Os10g26460 antibody; Os10g0404300 antibody; Transcription factor ILI7 antibody; OsILI7 antibody; Basic helix-loop-helix protein 173 antibody; OsbHLH173 antibody; Protein INCREASED LEAF INCLINATION 7 antibody; bHLH transcription factor bHLH173 antibody
Target Names
ILI7
Uniprot No.

Target Background

Function
This antibody targets an atypical and likely non-DNA-binding bHLH transcription factor. This protein integrates signals from multiple pathways to regulate cell elongation and plant development.
Database Links
Protein Families
BHLH protein family

Q&A

What is the biological significance of IL-7R in hematological malignancies?

The interleukin-7 receptor (IL-7R) plays a pivotal role in the development and progression of several hematological malignancies, particularly T-cell acute lymphoblastic leukemia (T-ALL). IL-7 and its receptor IL-7Rα actively promote T-ALL development, and mutational activation of IL-7Rα has been associated with a very high risk in relapsed disease. Studies have demonstrated that approximately 85% of acute lymphoblastic leukemia (ALL) cases express surface CD127, the IL-7Rα chain, making it a significant therapeutic target . The receptor functions by mediating IL-7 signaling, which promotes survival, proliferation, and metabolic fitness of leukemic cells. Understanding this pathway is crucial for developing targeted therapeutic approaches that can overcome the limitations of current treatments, which often result in incomplete therapeutic efficacy and long-term side-effects .

How do IL-7R antibodies differ from other therapeutic approaches for leukemia?

IL-7R antibodies represent a targeted immunotherapeutic approach that differs fundamentally from conventional chemotherapy by specifically interfering with the IL-7/IL-7R signaling axis rather than broadly affecting all rapidly dividing cells. These antibodies can work through multiple mechanisms of action that conventional therapies cannot achieve. For instance, the fully human IgG1 monoclonal antibody B12 impairs IL-7/IL-7R-mediated signaling, sensitizes T-ALL cells to treatment with dexamethasone, and can induce cell death independently . Additionally, antibodies like lusvertikimab (LUSV) operate through a dual mode of action: direct IL-7R antagonistic activity and induction of macrophage-mediated antibody-dependent cellular phagocytosis (ADCP) . This targeted approach potentially allows for more effective treatment with fewer side effects compared to conventional polychemotherapy, which remains the standard but is associated with significant toxicity, especially in high-risk and relapsed/refractory cases .

What are the key characteristics of current IL-7R-targeting antibodies in research?

Several IL-7R-targeting antibodies have been developed with distinct characteristics:

  • B12: A fully human IgG1 monoclonal antibody that targets both wild-type and mutant human IL-7Rα. It forms a stable complex with IL-7Rα at a different binding site from IL-7. B12 is rapidly internalized and traffics to the lysosome, making it suitable for antibody-drug conjugate development .

  • Lusvertikimab (LUSV): An IL-7Rα chain (CD127)–targeting IgG4 antibody that functions as a full antagonist of the IL-7R pathway. It has demonstrated a good safety profile in healthy volunteers and shows significant efficacy in patient-derived xenograft models .

  • GSK2618960: An IL-7 receptor-α subunit monoclonal antibody with a half-life of approximately 5 (±1) days and nonlinear pharmacokinetics. It achieves full receptor occupancy (>95%) and effectively inhibits IL-7-mediated signal transducer and activator of transcription 5 (STAT5) phosphorylation .

These antibodies differ in their antibody class, binding characteristics, pharmacokinetic profiles, and mechanisms of action, offering researchers various tools for investigating IL-7R-targeted therapies.

What are the optimal methods for assessing IL-7R antibody target engagement?

Optimal assessment of IL-7R antibody target engagement involves multiple complementary approaches:

  • Receptor Occupancy Analysis: Measure the percentage of receptors bound by the antibody using flow cytometry. Full receptor occupancy (>95%) indicates optimal target engagement, as observed with GSK2618960 until day 8 (0.6 mg/kg) and day 22 (2.0 mg/kg) in clinical studies .

  • Signaling Inhibition Assays: Evaluate inhibition of IL-7-mediated signal transduction, particularly STAT5 phosphorylation. This can be done by stimulating cells with IL-7 after antibody treatment and measuring phospho-STAT5 levels by flow cytometry or western blotting. Maximal inhibition indicates effective target engagement, as demonstrated with GSK2618960 .

  • Biomarker Monitoring: Track circulating IL-7 and soluble receptor (CD127) levels, which typically increase above baseline during effective IL-7R blockade. For example, mean circulating IL-7 and soluble CD127 levels increased during days 2-15 (0.6 mg/kg) and days 2-22 (2.0 mg/kg) with GSK2618960 treatment .

  • Cellular Trafficking Analysis: For antibodies known to be internalized, like B12, assess intracellular trafficking using immunofluorescence microscopy with markers for clathrin, early endosomes (EEA-1), and lysosomes (LAMP-2) .

These methods should be combined to provide a comprehensive assessment of target engagement across different time points and dose levels.

How should researchers design studies to evaluate antibody-dependent cellular mechanisms?

When designing studies to evaluate antibody-dependent cellular mechanisms such as antibody-dependent cellular phagocytosis (ADCP) or antibody-dependent cellular cytotoxicity (ADCC), researchers should implement the following methodological approaches:

This comprehensive approach allows for rigorous evaluation of antibody-dependent cellular mechanisms that contribute to the therapeutic efficacy of IL-7R antibodies.

What considerations are important when developing antibody-drug conjugates (ADCs) targeting IL-7R?

Development of IL-7R-targeting antibody-drug conjugates requires careful consideration of several critical factors:

  • Internalization Dynamics: Select antibodies with efficient internalization properties. For example, B12 antibody was chosen for ADC development partly because it "is rapidly internalized and traffics to the lysosome," making it an effective vehicle for intracellular drug delivery .

  • Linker-Payload Selection: Choose appropriate linker chemistry and cytotoxic payload based on the cellular trafficking pathway. For the B12-MMAE conjugate, researchers used a protease-cleavable valine-citrulline linker with a carbonyl acrylic acid head-group, which is cleaved in the lysosomal compartment where B12 traffics .

  • Drug-to-Antibody Ratio (DAR) Optimization: Determine the optimal number of drug molecules per antibody. The B12-MMAE conjugate was developed with an average DAR of 4:1 as determined by native mass spectrometry, balancing potency with pharmaceutical properties .

  • Control Experiments: Include unconjugated antibody controls to distinguish between antibody-mediated effects and those resulting from the delivered payload. Research showed that B12-MMAE had "increased leukemia cell killing abilities as compared with the naked antibody," demonstrating the added value of the conjugate .

  • Target Expression Heterogeneity: Consider the variable expression of IL-7R across patient samples. Approximately 85% of ALL cases express surface CD127, but expression levels vary, potentially affecting ADC efficacy .

  • Off-Target Toxicity Assessment: Carefully evaluate potential off-target effects on normal CD127-expressing cells, including developing T cells and memory T cells, which could lead to immunosuppression.

These considerations are essential for developing effective IL-7R-targeting ADCs with maximal therapeutic efficacy and minimal toxicity.

How do IL-7R antibodies affect the tumor microenvironment and immune response?

The impact of IL-7R antibodies on the tumor microenvironment and immune response is multifaceted and extends beyond direct effects on leukemic cells:

  • Modulation of T Cell Populations: IL-7 signaling is crucial for T cell development and homeostasis. Blocking this pathway could potentially affect different T cell subsets. Interestingly, GSK2618960 treatment showed "no meaningful changes in absolute numbers or proportions of immune cell populations" in healthy subjects, suggesting a complex relationship between IL-7R blockade and immune cell dynamics .

  • Cytokine Network Perturbation: IL-7R blockade may alter the wider cytokine network. Studies with GSK2618960 showed no significant changes in inflammatory cytokine profiles (IL-6, TNF-α, IFN-γ, IL-2) , but effects may differ in disease states where immune activation is already present.

  • Enhanced Phagocytic Activity: Antibodies like lusvertikimab induce macrophage-mediated antibody-dependent cellular phagocytosis (ADCP) , potentially reprogramming tumor-associated macrophages toward a more anti-tumor phenotype and altering the myeloid component of the microenvironment.

  • Synergy with Other Therapies: IL-7R antibodies can sensitize leukemic cells to other treatments. For example, B12 "sensitizes T-ALL cells to treatment with dexamethasone" , which may involve alterations in the apoptotic threshold of malignant cells.

  • Potential Indirect Effects: By reducing tumor burden, these antibodies may indirectly restore normal immune architecture and function in the bone marrow and lymphoid organs, though this requires further investigation in appropriate models.

Methodologically, researchers should employ multiparameter flow cytometry, cytokine profiling, spatial transcriptomics, and immune cell functional assays in both in vitro and in vivo models to comprehensively assess these complex interactions.

What mechanisms underlie the development of resistance to IL-7R-targeted therapies?

Understanding resistance mechanisms to IL-7R-targeted therapies requires investigation of several potential pathways:

To comprehensively study resistance, researchers should establish resistant cell lines through chronic exposure to IL-7R antibodies, perform comparative genomic, transcriptomic, and proteomic analyses, and validate findings in patient-derived xenograft models before and after treatment failure.

How can combination strategies with IL-7R antibodies be optimally designed and evaluated?

Designing and evaluating optimal combination strategies with IL-7R antibodies requires a systematic approach:

  • Rational Selection Based on Mechanism: Combine IL-7R antibodies with agents targeting complementary pathways. For example, lusvertikimab (LUSV) demonstrated enhanced efficacy "when combined with polychemotherapy" in patient-derived xenograft models, "leading to MRD-negativity in >50% of mice treated with combination therapy" for samples with high CD127 expression .

  • Sequential vs. Concurrent Administration: Determine whether sequential or concurrent administration provides superior outcomes. For B12, which "sensitizes T-ALL cells to treatment with dexamethasone" , investigating the optimal sequence (pre-treatment with B12 followed by dexamethasone or concurrent administration) is crucial.

  • Dose-Response Matrix Experiments: Conduct comprehensive dose-response matrix experiments in vitro to identify synergistic, additive, or antagonistic interactions between IL-7R antibodies and combination agents. Calculate combination indices using methods such as Chou-Talalay analysis.

  • Pharmacokinetic and Pharmacodynamic Considerations: Assess potential drug-drug interactions that might affect the pharmacokinetics or pharmacodynamics of either agent. For example, understand how the 5-day half-life of antibodies like GSK2618960 influences combination scheduling.

  • Biomarker Integration: Identify and validate predictive biomarkers for combination response. CD127 expression levels have been shown to correlate with LUSV efficacy , and such markers should be evaluated for combination approaches.

  • Resistant Model Testing: Test combinations in models resistant to single-agent IL-7R antibody therapy to assess potential for overcoming resistance mechanisms.

  • Preclinical to Clinical Translation: Design clinically relevant endpoints in preclinical models, such as minimal residual disease (MRD) assessment, which was successfully applied in LUSV combination studies .

This methodical approach enables researchers to develop evidence-based combination strategies that maximize therapeutic efficacy while minimizing toxicity, particularly important for treating high-risk and relapsed/refractory leukemias.

What are the most appropriate patient populations and disease contexts for IL-7R antibody trials?

Based on available research, the most appropriate populations and disease contexts for IL-7R antibody trials include:

  • CD127-Expressing Hematological Malignancies: Patient selection should focus on confirmed CD127 (IL-7Rα) expression, as approximately "85% of ALL cases express surface CD127" . Flow cytometry screening for CD127 expression should be a standard inclusion criterion.

  • Relapsed/Refractory (R/R) Disease: Patients with R/R leukemia represent a high unmet medical need. Lusvertikimab demonstrated "significant in vivo efficacy of LUSV immunotherapy in a heterogeneous cohort of BCP- and T-ALL patient-derived xenografts (PDX)... including R/R and HR leukemias" , suggesting these difficult-to-treat populations may benefit.

  • T-Cell Acute Lymphoblastic Leukemia: T-ALL patients are particularly suitable candidates as "IL-7 and its receptor IL-7Rα promote T-ALL development and mutational activation of IL-7Rα associates with very high risk in relapsed disease" . Especially relevant are patients with IL-7R mutations or high IL-7R expression.

  • Minimal Residual Disease (MRD) Setting: Both B12 and lusvertikimab have shown efficacy in reducing tumor burden , with lusvertikimab being "particularly effective when combined with polychemotherapy in a phase 2-like PDX study with CD127high samples leading to MRD-negativity in >50% of mice" . Therefore, patients with detectable MRD after initial therapy represent a rational population.

  • High-Risk Leukemias: Patients with high-risk features who typically have poor outcomes with conventional therapy may benefit from IL-7R-targeted approaches. Lusvertikimab showed efficacy in "HR leukemias" .

  • Integration with Risk Stratification: Clinical trials should stratify patients based on IL-7R expression levels, as LUSV efficacy correlated with "CD127 expression levels" , suggesting a potential predictive biomarker for response.

Methodologically, initial trials should include comprehensive biomarker analyses to refine patient selection for subsequent studies and identify those most likely to benefit from IL-7R-targeted therapies.

How should researchers interpret and manage the development of antidrug antibodies in IL-7R antibody trials?

The development of antidrug antibodies (ADAs) in IL-7R antibody trials requires careful interpretation and management:

  • Systematic Monitoring Protocol: Implement regular ADA assessment timepoints throughout clinical trials. In the GSK2618960 study, "persistent antidrug antibodies (ADAs) were detected in 5/6 subjects administered a dose of 0.6 mg/kg (neutralizing in 2/6) and in 6/6 subjects administered 2.0 mg/kg (neutralizing in 5/6)" , demonstrating the importance of comprehensive monitoring.

  • Distinguish Neutralizing from Non-Neutralizing ADAs: Develop assays that can differentiate between neutralizing and non-neutralizing ADAs, as they have different implications for efficacy. Neutralizing antibodies directly interfere with target binding, while non-neutralizing ADAs may primarily affect pharmacokinetics.

  • Correlation with Pharmacokinetics and Pharmacodynamics: Analyze the relationship between ADA development and drug concentrations, half-life, and target engagement. For GSK2618960, the "relatively short half-life is likely the result of target-mediated rather than ADA-mediated clearance" , highlighting the importance of carefully attributing clearance mechanisms.

  • Clinical Outcome Correlation: Assess whether ADA development correlates with efficacy outcomes or adverse events. This requires statistical comparison of response rates and duration in ADA-positive versus ADA-negative patients.

  • Risk Mitigation Strategies:

    • Consider immunological characteristics when selecting antibody formats (e.g., fully human versus humanized)

    • Evaluate concomitant immunosuppressive medications when appropriate

    • Develop modified antibodies with reduced immunogenicity

    • Consider alternative dosing schedules to minimize ADA development

  • Context-Specific Interpretation: Recognize that the significance of ADAs may vary based on disease context, patient immune status, and therapeutic goals. For example, in short-term therapy for acute conditions, transient ADAs may be less consequential than in chronic treatment scenarios.

By implementing these approaches, researchers can better understand the clinical significance of ADAs and develop strategies to maintain therapeutic efficacy despite their potential development.

What biomarkers are most informative for monitoring IL-7R antibody efficacy and predicting response?

Several biomarkers have demonstrated value for monitoring IL-7R antibody efficacy and predicting treatment response:

  • Target Expression Levels: CD127 (IL-7Rα) surface expression is a primary determinant of response. Research with lusvertikimab showed that "LUSV-mediated in vitro ADCP levels significantly correlated with CD127 expression levels and the reduction of leukemia burden upon treatment of PDX animals in vivo" . Flow cytometric quantification of CD127 should be standardized to enable comparison across studies.

  • Receptor Occupancy: Measuring the percentage of IL-7R bound by therapeutic antibody provides direct evidence of target engagement. With GSK2618960, "full receptor occupancy (>95%) was observed until day 8 (0.6 mg/kg) and day 22 (2.0 mg/kg)" , providing a pharmacodynamic marker of antibody activity.

  • Signaling Inhibition: Assessing inhibition of downstream signaling provides functional confirmation of antibody activity. "Maximal inhibition of IL-7-mediated signal transducer and activator of transcription 5 (STAT5) phosphorylation" served as a key biomarker in GSK2618960 trials .

  • Circulating IL-7 and Soluble Receptor Levels: These serve as indirect indicators of receptor blockade. "Mean circulating IL-7 and soluble receptor (CD127) levels were increased above baseline" during effective treatment periods with GSK2618960 .

  • Minimal Residual Disease (MRD): For leukemia applications, MRD measurement by flow cytometry or molecular methods provides a sensitive measure of treatment efficacy. Lusvertikimab studies demonstrated that combination therapy led to "MRD-negativity in >50% of mice treated with combination therapy" in high CD127-expressing samples .

  • Immune Cell Phenotyping: Although GSK2618960 showed "no meaningful changes in absolute numbers or proportions of immune cell populations" in healthy volunteers, monitoring specific T-cell subsets might be informative in disease settings.

  • Tumor Burden Assessment: Using appropriate imaging or molecular techniques to quantify disease burden over time provides a direct measure of therapeutic efficacy. B12 antibody was shown to delay "T-cell leukemia development in vivo, reducing tumor burden and promoting mouse survival" .

A multi-parameter approach incorporating these biomarkers will provide the most comprehensive assessment of IL-7R antibody efficacy and enable prediction of which patients are most likely to benefit from treatment.

What novel IL-7R antibody formats or engineering approaches might enhance therapeutic efficacy?

Several innovative antibody formats and engineering approaches hold promise for enhancing the therapeutic efficacy of IL-7R-targeting strategies:

  • Bispecific Antibodies: Designing bispecific antibodies that simultaneously target IL-7R and another relevant antigen (such as CD3 to engage T cells, or a second tumor-associated antigen to increase specificity) could enhance therapeutic efficacy through dual-targeting mechanisms.

  • Advanced Antibody-Drug Conjugates: Building upon the promising results of the B12-MMAE conjugate, which demonstrated "increased leukemia cell killing abilities as compared with the naked antibody" , researchers should explore novel linker chemistries and alternative payloads with different mechanisms of action. The rapid internalization and lysosomal trafficking of B12 make it "an attractive vehicle for targeted intracellular delivery of cytotoxic cargo" .

  • Fc Engineering: Modifying the Fc region to enhance effector functions like ADCP and ADCC could improve efficacy. Since lusvertikimab's efficacy correlates with its ability to "induce macrophage-mediated antibody-dependent cellular phagocytosis" , engineering the Fc region to optimize this interaction could enhance therapeutic outcomes.

  • pH-Dependent Binding Antibodies: Developing antibodies with pH-dependent binding properties that maintain target engagement at physiological pH but release in the acidic endosomal environment could improve antibody recycling and extend half-life, addressing the "relatively short half-life" observed with GSK2618960 .

  • Combination with Immune Checkpoint Inhibitors: Creating fusion proteins that combine IL-7R blocking with immune checkpoint inhibition could simultaneously block pro-tumor IL-7 signaling while enhancing anti-tumor immune responses.

  • Antibody Fragments and Alternative Scaffolds: Smaller antibody formats may offer improved tissue penetration, particularly important for solid tumors expressing IL-7R. These formats could also be engineered for blood-brain barrier penetration in cases of central nervous system involvement.

  • Cell-Type Specific Activation: Designing antibodies that selectively antagonize IL-7R signaling in malignant cells while preserving beneficial effects in normal immune cells could improve the therapeutic window.

These approaches should be evaluated methodically in preclinical models that accurately recapitulate the disease microenvironment before advancing to clinical testing.

How might artificial intelligence and computational approaches accelerate IL-7R antibody research?

Artificial intelligence and computational approaches can significantly accelerate IL-7R antibody research through multiple avenues:

  • Antibody Design Optimization: Machine learning algorithms can analyze the structure-function relationships of existing IL-7R antibodies like B12, lusvertikimab, and GSK2618960 to predict modifications that might enhance binding affinity, specificity, or functional properties. This could streamline the optimization process that traditionally requires extensive experimental testing.

  • Epitope Mapping and Prediction: Computational approaches can predict optimal epitopes on IL-7Rα that, when targeted, would most effectively disrupt IL-7 signaling without interfering with beneficial functions. This is particularly relevant given that B12 was "predicted to form a stable complex with IL-7Rα at a different site from IL-7" .

  • Patient Stratification Algorithms: Machine learning models could integrate multiple data types (IL-7R expression levels, genetic background, disease characteristics) to predict which patients would most likely benefit from IL-7R antibody therapy, building on observations that efficacy correlates with "CD127 expression levels" .

  • Resistance Mechanism Prediction: Computational approaches can analyze genomic, transcriptomic, and proteomic data from resistant models to identify patterns and predict potential resistance mechanisms before they emerge clinically, enabling proactive development of countermeasures.

  • Combination Therapy Optimization: AI algorithms can process large-scale drug combination screening data to identify synergistic combinations with IL-7R antibodies, potentially improving upon the success seen when lusvertikimab was "combined with polychemotherapy" .

  • Pharmacokinetic/Pharmacodynamic Modeling: Advanced computational models can predict antibody distribution, target engagement, and efficacy in different tissues and disease states, helping optimize dosing regimens to maintain "full receptor occupancy (>95%)" while minimizing adverse effects.

  • Adverse Event Prediction: Machine learning can identify patterns in preclinical and early clinical data that might predict adverse events, allowing for prophylactic management strategies.

  • Clinical Trial Design Optimization: AI-driven simulations can inform optimal trial design, including sample size calculations, endpoint selection, and patient stratification strategies based on biomarker data such as CD127 expression levels.

Implementation of these approaches requires interdisciplinary collaboration between computational scientists, immunologists, and clinical researchers to ensure that computational predictions are biologically meaningful and clinically relevant.

What lessons from IL-7R antibody development can be applied to targeting other cytokine receptors in cancer?

The development of IL-7R antibodies offers several valuable lessons applicable to targeting other cytokine receptors in cancer:

  • Dual Mechanism Exploitation: IL-7R antibodies like lusvertikimab demonstrate efficacy through "a dual mode of action comprising direct IL-7R antagonistic activity and induction of macrophage-mediated antibody-dependent cellular phagocytosis (ADCP)" . This suggests that designing antibodies with multiple mechanisms of action can enhance therapeutic efficacy when targeting other cytokine receptors.

  • Receptor Trafficking Considerations: The observation that B12 "is rapidly internalized and traffics to the lysosome" enabled its development as an effective antibody-drug conjugate. When targeting other cytokine receptors, understanding receptor internalization and trafficking patterns is crucial for determining potential as ADC targets.

  • Expression-Efficacy Correlation: The correlation between CD127 expression levels and lusvertikimab efficacy highlights the importance of thorough target validation and patient stratification based on receptor expression levels for any cytokine receptor-targeted therapy.

  • Combination Strategy Development: The enhanced efficacy of lusvertikimab "when combined with polychemotherapy" suggests that cytokine receptor antibodies may be particularly valuable as sensitizing agents in combination approaches, rather than as monotherapies.

  • Pharmacodynamic Biomarker Integration: The use of multiple pharmacodynamic markers with GSK2618960, including "receptor occupancy," "inhibition of IL-7-mediated STAT5 phosphorylation," and "circulating IL-7 and soluble receptor levels" , provides a template for comprehensive pharmacodynamic assessment of other cytokine receptor-targeted therapies.

  • Target-Mediated Drug Disposition: The observation that GSK2618960's "relatively short half-life is likely the result of target-mediated rather than ADA-mediated clearance" highlights the importance of accounting for target-mediated drug disposition when designing dosing regimens for antibodies targeting abundantly expressed receptors.

  • Epitope Selection Significance: The specific binding site of B12, "predicted to form a stable complex with IL-7Rα at a different site from IL-7" , demonstrates that careful epitope selection can enable unique functional properties of cytokine receptor antibodies.

These lessons provide a valuable framework for the rational development of antibodies targeting other cytokine receptors, potentially accelerating the translation of basic research into effective cancer therapeutics.

Quick Inquiry

Personal Email Detected
Please use an institutional or corporate email address for inquiries. Personal email accounts ( such as Gmail, Yahoo, and Outlook) are not accepted. *
© Copyright 2025 TheBiotek. All Rights Reserved.