INPP5B (inositol polyphosphate-5-phosphatase B) is an enzyme that hydrolyzes phosphatidylinositol 4,5-bisphosphate (PI(4,5)P₂) and phosphatidylinositol 1,4,5-trisphosphate (PI(1,4,5)P₃), regulating cellular signaling pathways such as actin remodeling, B cell receptor (BCR) clustering, and cilia dynamics . The INPP5B antibody, FITC conjugated, is a fluorescently labeled reagent designed to detect INPP5B in techniques like immunofluorescence (IF), flow cytometry (FACS), and immunohistochemistry (IHC). FITC (fluorescein isothiocyanate) enables visualization of INPP5B localization and expression levels in cells and tissues.
Target: INPP5B (UniProt ID: P32019).
Conjugate: FITC (excitation/emission: 495/519 nm).
Molecular Weight: Predicted 113 kDa; observed ~75 kDa due to post-translational modifications .
INPP5B regulates actin dynamics during BCR clustering by hydrolyzing PI(4,5)P₂, enabling actin disassembly and signalosome formation . Studies using INPP5B-depleted DT40 B cells showed:
INPP5B compensates for OCRL (another 5-phosphatase) in cilia formation. Knockdown experiments in hTERT-RPE1 cells revealed:
Reduced ciliation: 50% fewer ciliated cells after 48-hour serum starvation .
Dependence on CAAX motif: Deletion disrupted ciliary localization .
| Supplier | Catalog Number | Conjugate | Applications | Species Reactivity |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Proteintech | 15141-1-AP | Unconjugated | WB, IHC, IF | Human, mouse, rat |
| Abcam | ab95995 | Unconjugated | WB | Human |
| Antibodies-Online | RB27636 | FITC | IF, FACS | Human, mouse |
Note: FITC-conjugated INPP5B antibodies are listed by suppliers like Antibodies-Online , though detailed validation data for the conjugate is limited in public studies.
Mechanistic Studies: INPP5B’s phosphatase activity is critical for actin remodeling via cofilin activation and ezrin delinking .
Therapeutic Potential: Aberrant INPP5B expression is linked to B cell malignancies, making it a drug target .
Technical Utility: FITC conjugation enhances resolution in live-cell imaging and high-throughput screening .
Specificity Concerns: Cross-reactivity with OCRL or other 5-phosphatases is possible due to structural similarities .
Quantitative Gaps: Few studies quantify INPP5B-FITC performance in multiplex assays or low-abundance samples.
Emerging Tools: Inhibitors like BiPh(3,3′,4,4′,5,5′)P₆ (IC₅₀ = 5.5 μM) could pair with INPP5B-FITC for functional studies .
INPP5B is a 75 kDa inositol polyphosphate-5-phosphatase that hydrolyzes phosphatidylinositol 4,5-bisphosphate (PtIns(4,5)P2) and phosphatidylinositol 1,4,5-trisphosphate (PtIns(1,4,5)P3), thereby modulating cellular signaling events . INPP5B is a key regulator of actin remodeling, B cell receptor (BCR) clustering, and downstream signaling in antigen-stimulated B cells. This regulation occurs through INPP5B-dependent hydrolysis of PI(4,5)P2, which controls cortical actin and B cell receptor dynamics . INPP5B is also localized to the early secretory pathway including the Golgi apparatus and ER-to-Golgi intermediate compartment (ERGIC), suggesting a potential role in membrane trafficking .
While INPP5B shares similar substrate specificity and domain organization with the Lowe syndrome protein OCRL1, they exhibit distinct functional characteristics. Unlike OCRL1, INPP5B does not interact with clathrin or α-adaptin and is largely absent from clathrin-coated intermediates . The function of INPP5B in BCR clustering and cell spreading is not shared with OCRL1 . Additionally, INPP5B expression affects the distribution of the cycling protein ERGIC53 in ways that OCRL1 does not, suggesting a unique role for INPP5B in retrograde ERGIC-to-ER transport . Despite these differences, INPP5B can compensate for loss of OCRL1 in knockout mice, highlighting their functional overlap in certain contexts .
INPP5B antibodies are primarily used in Western blotting for detecting endogenous INPP5B protein, with effectiveness demonstrated in human samples . While standard antibodies are valuable for protein detection, FITC-conjugated variants offer additional applications in immunofluorescence studies, particularly for investigating INPP5B localization within the secretory pathway and at the B cell receptor signalosome. These antibodies can be instrumental in studying INPP5B's role in actin remodeling during B cell activation, where researchers can visualize the spatial and temporal dynamics of INPP5B in relation to the cytoskeleton and BCR clusters.
FITC-conjugated INPP5B antibodies provide a powerful tool for visualizing the dynamics of INPP5B during B cell receptor activation. When designing experiments to investigate BCR signaling, researchers should consider the following methodology:
Use surface-bound anti-IgM antibodies as surrogate antigen to stimulate B cells
Apply FITC-conjugated INPP5B antibodies to track INPP5B redistribution during BCR clustering
Implement TIRF microscopy to visualize events at the plasma membrane interface
Incorporate phalloidin staining to simultaneously visualize F-actin remodeling
This approach enables analysis of how INPP5B regulates actin dynamics and BCR clustering in response to antigen stimulation . Quantitative metrics should include BCR cluster counts, cell spreading area, and colocalization coefficients between INPP5B and BCR clusters.
When investigating INPP5B's role in phosphoinositide metabolism, researchers should design experiments that:
Track multiple phosphoinositide species simultaneously
Account for the specific subcellular localization of INPP5B
Consider temporal dynamics of PI(4,5)P2 and PI(3,4,5)P3 hydrolysis
The established degradation system for endogenous INPP5B protein used in the DT40 cell line provides an excellent model for studying these dynamics . This system demonstrated that INPP5B depletion results in significant decreases in PI(3,4,5)P3 abundance following BCR stimulation, consistent with reduced PI3K signaling . When using FITC-conjugated INPP5B antibodies in such studies, consider dual labeling with PI(4,5)P2-specific probes to correlate INPP5B localization with its substrate.
To study INPP5B's function in retrograde ERGIC-to-ER transport, implement the following methodology:
Utilize temperature manipulation (15°C incubation) to slow transport between compartments
Apply brefeldin A treatment to examine ERGIC53 distribution patterns
Use FITC-conjugated INPP5B antibodies to track enzyme localization
Compare INPP5B localization with markers for ERGIC and Golgi compartments
Experimental evidence indicates that expression of INPP5B alters the distribution of cycling protein ERGIC53 under these conditions, causing ERGIC53 to accumulate in the ERGIC with concomitant loss from the ER . This suggests INPP5B plays a role in retrograde transport distinct from that of OCRL1.
For optimal Western blot results with INPP5B antibodies, follow these technical parameters:
| Parameter | Recommended Condition |
|---|---|
| Gel percentage | 7.5% SDS-PAGE |
| Antibody dilution | 1/1000 |
| Sample loading | 30 μg whole cell lysate |
| Expected band size | 113 kDa |
| Validated sample type | Human cell lysates (e.g., H1299) |
These conditions have been validated for unlabeled INPP5B antibodies . When using FITC-conjugated variants, additional optimization may be necessary, particularly regarding exposure settings to account for the fluorescent signal. Consider running a dilution series (1/500-1/2000) to determine optimal signal-to-noise ratio for your specific experimental system.
To ensure specificity of FITC-conjugated INPP5B antibodies, incorporate these critical controls:
Knockdown/knockout validation: Utilize INPP5B-depleted cells as negative controls, such as the auxin-inducible degradation system described in DT40 cells
Competitive inhibition: Pre-incubate antibody with purified INPP5B protein before application
Cross-reactivity assessment: Test antibody against related inositol 5-phosphatases, particularly OCRL1
Secondary antibody-only control: Exclude primary antibody to identify non-specific binding
Isotype control: Use FITC-conjugated antibodies of the same isotype but different specificity
This comprehensive validation approach ensures that observed signals are specific to INPP5B rather than artifacts from non-specific binding.
The choice of fixation and permeabilization methods can significantly impact FITC-conjugated INPP5B antibody performance in immunofluorescence studies:
Paraformaldehyde fixation (4%): Preserves cytoskeletal structures but may reduce epitope accessibility
Methanol fixation: Enhances detection of certain epitopes but disrupts membrane structures
Mild detergent permeabilization (0.1% Triton X-100): Balances epitope accessibility with structural preservation
Saponin permeabilization (0.1%): Preferred for studying membrane-associated proteins like INPP5B
Consider that INPP5B associates with membrane compartments including the Golgi apparatus and ERGIC , so fixation methods that best preserve these structures while maintaining epitope accessibility will yield optimal results.
To study INPP5B's interaction with Rab proteins in the secretory pathway, implement this methodological approach:
Generate INPP5B constructs with mutations in the Rab-binding domain
Compare localization of wild-type and mutant INPP5B using FITC-conjugated antibodies
Perform co-immunoprecipitation studies with specific Rab proteins
Assess functional consequences of disrupting INPP5B-Rab interactions on secretory pathway dynamics
Research has established that Rab binding is required for efficient Golgi targeting of INPP5B , making this interaction critical for understanding INPP5B's function in the secretory pathway. When designing these experiments, consider that INPP5B binds specifically to certain Rab proteins within this pathway.
To investigate INPP5B's role in actin remodeling during B cell activation, employ these methodological strategies:
Utilize FITC-conjugated INPP5B antibodies alongside actin visualization (phalloidin staining)
Design time-course experiments capturing early events (0-5 minutes) after BCR stimulation
Implement quantitative image analysis measuring:
Cortical actin density
Cofilin activation state (phospho-specific antibodies)
Ezrin recruitment to the plasma membrane
Compare INPP5B-depleted cells with control cells during BCR activation
This approach will help elucidate how INPP5B-mediated PI(4,5)P2 hydrolysis affects actin severing by cofilin and actin linking to the plasma membrane by ezrin, both of which are sensitive to INPP5B-dependent PI(4,5)P2 changes .
For multiplexed imaging studies with FITC-conjugated INPP5B antibodies, consider these methodological strategies:
Spectral compatibility: Pair FITC (excitation ~495nm, emission ~520nm) with spectrally distinct fluorophores such as:
Cy3 (ex: ~550nm, em: ~570nm) for BCR labeling
Alexa 647 (ex: ~650nm, em: ~665nm) for subcellular compartment markers
Sequential imaging protocols: To minimize bleed-through between channels:
Acquire FITC signal first (as it is more susceptible to photobleaching)
Follow with longer-wavelength fluorophores
Apply appropriate background subtraction between acquisitions
Co-staining optimization: When studying BCR dynamics alongside INPP5B:
Label BCR with monovalent anti-IgM Fab fragments conjugated to a red fluorophore
Visualize F-actin with far-red fluorophore-conjugated phalloidin
Use DAPI for nuclear counterstaining
This approach enables simultaneous visualization of INPP5B, BCR clustering, and actin remodeling during B cell activation, providing comprehensive insights into the spatial and temporal relationships between these components.
INPP5B has been identified as a potential therapeutic target for B cell malignancies caused by aberrant BCR signaling . Research using FITC-conjugated INPP5B antibodies could:
Compare INPP5B expression and localization patterns between normal and malignant B cells
Correlate INPP5B levels with BCR signaling strength in various B cell lymphoma subtypes
Assess how pharmacological inhibition of INPP5B affects malignant B cell survival and proliferation
Investigate the relationship between INPP5B activity and resistance to current B cell lymphoma therapies
This research direction may yield valuable insights into the pathogenesis of B cell malignancies and potentially identify new therapeutic approaches targeting INPP5B-dependent signaling pathways.
For live-cell imaging applications studying INPP5B dynamics:
Consider alternative conjugates to FITC that offer greater photostability (e.g., Alexa 488)
Implement fluorescent protein tagging strategies (GFP-INPP5B) as complementary approaches
Develop nanobody-based detection systems that can access intracellular INPP5B without permeabilization
Employ FRAP (Fluorescence Recovery After Photobleaching) techniques to study INPP5B mobility
When designing these experiments, consider that INPP5B localization changes during BCR stimulation, with implications for both endocytic and secretory pathway functions .
Through proper experimental design and methodological rigor, FITC-conjugated INPP5B antibodies can provide valuable insights into the complex roles of this phosphoinositide phosphatase in cellular signaling and membrane trafficking.