The INSR (Ab-1375) Antibody is a polyclonal antibody targeting the insulin receptor (INSR) at a specific phosphorylation site (threonine 1375) within its cytoplasmic domain. This antibody serves as a critical tool for studying insulin receptor biology, particularly in conditions involving insulin resistance, diabetes, and receptoropathies .
Key properties of INSR (Ab-1375) Antibody are summarized below:
| Property | Detail |
|---|---|
| Host Species | Rabbit |
| Clonality | Polyclonal |
| Immunogen | Synthetic non-phosphopeptide around human INSR Thr1375 (I-L-T-P-L) |
| Target Specificity | Detects endogenous total INSR protein (phosphorylation-independent) |
| Applications | Western blot (WB) |
| Species Reactivity | Human |
| Molecular Weight (Observed) | 130 kDa (mature β-subunit) |
| Storage | -20°C in 50% glycerol, 0.02% sodium azide |
| Uniprot ID | P06213 |
The antibody recognizes a linear epitope near Thr1375 in the intracellular β-subunit of INSR, a region critical for downstream signaling cascades . Unlike phosphorylation-dependent antibodies, this reagent detects total INSR levels regardless of activation state.
Detects a single band at ~130 kDa under reducing conditions, corresponding to the mature β-subunit of INSR .
No cross-reactivity observed with INSR knockout HepG2 cell lines, confirming specificity .
INSR (Ab-1375) has been used to investigate receptor expression in:
Type B insulin resistance, where autoantibodies against INSR disrupt signaling .
Rabson-Mendenhall syndrome, caused by INSR mutations impairing insulin binding .
While primarily a research tool, this antibody’s epitope (Thr1375) lies near regions targeted by therapeutic monoclonal antibodies (e.g., 83-7, 83-14) that modulate INSR activity in receptoropathies .
Phosphorylation Independence: Cannot distinguish activated vs. basal INSR states .
Species Restriction: Reactivity confirmed only in humans; cross-species validation data limited .
Therapeutic Relevance: While epitope-specific antibodies like 83-7 show therapeutic potential, INSR (Ab-1375) remains a research-grade reagent .
INSR (Ab-1375) Antibody is a rabbit-derived polyclonal antibody that recognizes and binds to the insulin receptor (INSR). This antibody specifically targets a synthesized non-phosphopeptide derived from human Stathmin around the phosphorylation site of threonine 1375 (I-L-T(p)-L-P) . The antibody detects endogenous levels of total INSR protein, which is also known by alternative names including CD220 antigen, insulin receptor (IR), and kinase InsR .
The antibody has been affinity-purified from rabbit antiserum through affinity-chromatography using an epitope-specific immunogen, ensuring high specificity for the target protein . Understanding this epitope specificity is critical for experimental design, as it determines which regions of the INSR will be detectable using this antibody.
For optimal performance of INSR (Ab-1375) Antibody, researchers should adhere to the following storage and handling guidelines:
Store the antibody at -20°C to maintain its stability and activity over time
The antibody is supplied at a concentration of 1.0mg/ml in a formulation consisting of rabbit IgG in phosphate buffered saline (without Mg²⁺ and Ca²⁺), pH 7.4, 150mM NaCl, 0.02% sodium azide and 50% glycerol
Avoid repeated freeze-thaw cycles as this can diminish antibody performance, similar to other antibody products that show reduced stability under such conditions
Prior to use, allow the antibody to equilibrate to room temperature, and gently mix (do not vortex) to ensure homogeneity
When diluting for experiments, use appropriate buffer systems that maintain the antibody's native conformation
Proper handling is critical as antibody degradation can lead to inconsistent results and reduced sensitivity in experimental applications.
The INSR protein detected by the INSR (Ab-1375) Antibody has an SDS-PAGE molecular weight of approximately 130kDa . This corresponds to the mature β subunit of the insulin receptor as observed in Western blot applications. Researchers should expect to see a band at this molecular weight when using the antibody for immunoblotting.
The insulin receptor is encoded by the INSR gene (Gene ID: 3643; UniProt accession: P06213) , and understanding its molecular weight is essential for proper identification in experimental results. The receptor is a heterotetramer consisting of two α and two β subunits, with the β subunit containing the transmembrane domain and tyrosine kinase activity.
The primary validated application for INSR (Ab-1375) Antibody is Western blot (WB) . When using this antibody for Western blotting, researchers should follow these methodological guidelines:
Sample preparation: Properly lyse cells or tissues in an appropriate buffer containing protease inhibitors
Protein separation: Use SDS-PAGE with appropriate percentage gels (typically 7-10% for proteins of this size)
Transfer: Transfer proteins to a membrane (PVDF or nitrocellulose) using standard protocols
Blocking: Block non-specific binding sites with appropriate blocking buffer (typically 5% non-fat dry milk or BSA)
Primary antibody incubation: Dilute INSR (Ab-1375) Antibody according to manufacturer's recommendations (typically 1:1000 to 1:2000)
Detection: Use appropriate secondary antibodies and detection systems
While WB is the validated application, researchers interested in using this antibody for other applications such as immunoprecipitation, immunohistochemistry, or flow cytometry should perform validation studies to determine its suitability for these methods.
For optimal Western blot results with INSR (Ab-1375) Antibody, researchers should consider the following optimization strategies:
Titration of antibody concentration: Test various dilutions to determine the optimal signal-to-noise ratio
Incubation time and temperature: Typically, overnight incubation at 4°C provides better results than shorter incubations at room temperature
Blocking reagent selection: Compare different blocking agents (BSA vs. non-fat dry milk) as they may affect background and specific signal differently
Sample preparation optimization: Ensure complete denaturation and reduction of samples for optimal epitope exposure
Signal detection system selection: Choose chemiluminescence, fluorescence, or colorimetric detection based on needed sensitivity
When troubleshooting poor results, consider the following common issues:
High background: Increase blocking time, use more stringent washing, or further dilute the antibody
Weak signal: Increase antibody concentration, protein loading, or exposure time
Non-specific bands: Optimize blocking, increase antibody specificity with longer washes, or consider using gradient gels
Proper experimental controls are essential when working with antibodies to ensure result validity. For INSR (Ab-1375) Antibody, researchers should include:
Positive control: Lysates from cells known to express INSR (e.g., HepG2, 3T3-L1 adipocytes)
Negative control: Lysates from cells with low or no INSR expression, or INSR-knockout cells
Loading control: Detection of housekeeping proteins (e.g., β-actin, GAPDH) to normalize for protein loading
Secondary antibody control: Omitting primary antibody to detect non-specific binding of secondary antibody
Peptide competition assay: Pre-incubation of antibody with the immunizing peptide to confirm specificity
These controls help validate that the observed signal is specific to INSR and not due to non-specific binding or technical artifacts.
INSR (Ab-1375) Antibody can be a valuable tool for studying insulin receptor mutations and signaling pathways. Based on research with anti-INSR antibodies:
Expression analysis: The antibody can be used to detect expression levels of wild-type versus mutant INSR in cell models
Autophosphorylation studies: After immunoprecipitation, the antibody can help assess whether mutations affect receptor autophosphorylation
Trafficking studies: Analysis of cell surface versus intracellular receptors can reveal trafficking defects in mutant receptors
Comparative signaling: The antibody can help determine if mutations affect downstream signaling via pathways such as Akt or ERK1/2
Research has shown that certain INSR mutations (e.g., P193L, F248C, R252C, S323L, F382V, D707A, P1178L) demonstrate diminished maximal autophosphorylation response to insulin, ranging from 0 to 27% of wild-type response . Using this antibody, researchers can assess whether similar defects are present in their models.
Cross-reactivity with mutant receptors is an important consideration when studying insulin receptor variants. Based on available research:
Most anti-INSR antibodies maintain binding to mutant receptors with single amino acid substitutions
Even mutations close to antibody epitopes may not abolish binding, as demonstrated with antibody 83-7, which maintained binding to multiple mutant receptors
Binding may be preserved even when receptor function is compromised
In studies of various INSR mutations, all expressed mutant receptors bound to the tested antibodies, even though some mutations were located near antibody epitopes . Flow cytometry analysis showed right-shifted peaks for all mutants relative to control IgG, indicating preserved antibody binding despite receptor mutations .
This suggests that INSR (Ab-1375) Antibody may be useful for detecting various mutant forms of INSR, though researchers should validate this for specific mutations of interest.
Recent research has explored the potential of anti-INSR antibodies as therapeutic agents for insulin receptoropathies caused by loss-of-function mutations:
Surrogate agonist activity: Some anti-INSR antibodies can act as insulin mimetics, activating mutant receptors with impaired insulin binding
Differential pathway activation: Antibodies may preferentially activate certain downstream pathways (e.g., Akt over ERK1/2), which could be therapeutically advantageous
Combination therapy: Antibodies combined with insulin may increase maximal receptor phosphorylation compared to insulin alone for certain mutations
The table below summarizes findings from studies on antibody activation of mutant insulin receptors:
| Mutation | Antibody-Induced Autophosphorylation | Enhanced Glucose Uptake with Antibodies |
|---|---|---|
| P193L | Yes | Yes |
| S323L | Yes | Yes |
| F382V | Yes | Yes |
| D707A | Yes | Yes (greater than insulin) |
| Others (varies) | Some show response | Variable |
While INSR (Ab-1375) Antibody has not been specifically tested for this application, these findings suggest potential research directions for investigating therapeutic applications of anti-INSR antibodies .
When using INSR (Ab-1375) Antibody, researchers should be aware of potential cross-reactivity issues:
Species cross-reactivity: The antibody is specifically validated for human INSR (Hu) , and cross-reactivity with other species should be empirically determined
Isoform specificity: INSR exists in two isoforms (A and B) due to alternative splicing of exon 11, and researchers should determine if the antibody detects both isoforms equally
Related receptors: The insulin receptor belongs to a family that includes the insulin-like growth factor 1 receptor (IGF1R), which shares structural homology and may show cross-reactivity
Non-specific binding: In certain cell types or under specific conditions, non-specific binding may occur
To address these concerns, researchers should:
Validate the antibody in their specific experimental system
Include appropriate controls as discussed in section 2.3
Consider peptide competition assays to confirm specificity
Compare results with alternative anti-INSR antibodies
Variability in INSR detection across different samples can stem from multiple factors:
Expression level differences: INSR expression varies naturally between tissues (highest in liver, muscle, and adipose tissue)
Isoform distribution: The ratio of INSR-A to INSR-B isoforms differs between tissues and may affect detection
Post-translational modifications: Glycosylation, phosphorylation, or other modifications may mask epitopes
Sample preparation effects: Different lysis methods may extract INSR with varying efficiency
Protein-protein interactions: Association with other proteins may block antibody access to epitopes
When analyzing such variability, researchers should:
Normalize detection based on total protein loading
Compare results with antibodies targeting different INSR epitopes
Consider complementary methods like qRT-PCR to assess INSR mRNA levels
Document tissue/cell-specific extraction conditions that optimize detection
Before using INSR (Ab-1375) Antibody in critical experiments, researchers should perform the following quality control tests:
Functional validation: Test the antibody on positive control samples with known INSR expression
Specificity testing: Perform peptide competition assays or test on INSR-knockout samples
Lot-to-lot consistency: When receiving a new lot, compare performance with previously validated lots
Sensitivity determination: Establish detection limits using dilution series of positive control samples
Stability assessment: Evaluate antibody performance after various storage conditions and durations
For long-term projects, researchers should consider:
Aliquoting antibody stock to minimize freeze-thaw cycles
Periodically testing aliquots to ensure consistent performance
Maintaining detailed records of antibody performance across experiments
Using the same lot number for experiments requiring direct comparison
For high-throughput applications involving INSR (Ab-1375) Antibody, researchers can consider these methodological approaches:
Automated Western blotting: Using capillary-based systems for higher throughput and reproducibility
Reverse phase protein arrays (RPPA): Spotting multiple samples on arrays for parallel antibody probing
Cell-based assays: Developing fixed-cell ELISA or high-content imaging workflows
Multiplexed detection: Combining with other antibodies for simultaneous analysis of multiple proteins
When adapting for high-throughput use, consider these optimization steps:
Determine minimum antibody concentration needed for reliable detection
Establish robust positive and negative controls for each plate or batch
Develop standardized protocols with minimal manual intervention
Implement quality control metrics to flag problematic samples or wells
Similar approaches have been used successfully with other antibodies, as described in the literature where high-throughput antibody assessments were integrated with structural analyses to identify optimal antibody candidates .
To study insulin signaling dynamics, INSR (Ab-1375) Antibody can be used alongside phospho-specific antibodies in the following approaches:
Sequential immunoblotting: Probe first for phosphorylated INSR, then strip and reprobe with INSR (Ab-1375) to normalize phosphorylation to total receptor levels
Dual-color Western blotting: Simultaneously detect total INSR and phospho-INSR using different fluorophore-conjugated secondary antibodies
Immunoprecipitation-Western blot: Immunoprecipitate with INSR (Ab-1375) Antibody, then blot for phosphotyrosine or specific phospho-sites
Proximity ligation assay: Combining INSR (Ab-1375) with phospho-specific antibodies to visualize phosphorylated receptor pools in situ
This approach allows researchers to:
Quantify the proportion of receptors that become activated
Track receptor activation kinetics after insulin stimulation
Compare activation efficiency between wild-type and mutant receptors
Assess the impact of drugs or genetic modifications on receptor phosphorylation
Genetic validation:
siRNA/shRNA knockdown of INSR
CRISPR-Cas9 editing to create INSR knockout or mutant lines
Rescue experiments with wild-type or mutant INSR expression constructs
Functional validation:
Insulin binding assays
Glucose uptake measurements
Downstream signaling assessments (Akt, ERK phosphorylation)
Metabolic phenotyping (glycolysis, lipogenesis)
Structural validation:
Mass spectrometry confirmation of INSR detection
Co-immunoprecipitation to verify protein interactions
Imaging techniques to confirm subcellular localization
Cross-antibody validation:
Comparison with other anti-INSR antibodies targeting different epitopes
Epitope mapping to confirm binding specificity
This multi-faceted approach helps ensure that observations are not artifacts of a particular antibody or technique, providing more robust and reproducible findings.