IPO4 mediates nuclear import of CCAAT/enhancer-binding protein delta (CEBPD), which upregulates PRKDC—a kinase critical for DNA damage repair. In cervical cancer:
Mechanism: IPO4 binds CEBPD via nuclear localization signals (NLS), stabilizing it and enhancing PRKDC transcription .
Functional Impact:
High IPO4 expression predicts poor survival in cervical cancer patients treated with cisplatin .
Linked to gastric cancer progression via chromatin assembly dysregulation .
IPO4 (Importin-4) is a nuclear transport receptor belonging to the importin β family that mediates the import of specific proteins into the nucleus. It functions by recognizing nuclear localization signals (NLS) in cargo substrates and facilitating their docking to the nuclear pore complex (NPC). The importin/substrate complex is subsequently translocated through the nuclear pore via an energy-dependent, Ran-regulated mechanism .
At the nucleoplasmic side of the NPC, Ran binds to importin, causing dissociation of the importin/substrate complex. Importin is then re-exported from the nucleus to the cytoplasm, where GTP hydrolysis releases Ran . IPO4 plays a crucial role in transporting histones H3 and H4 into the nucleus for chromatin assembly and has been implicated in gastric cancer progression and poor prognosis .
IPO4 antibodies are available in both polyclonal and monoclonal formats from various manufacturers:
The choice between monoclonal and polyclonal antibodies depends on the specific research requirements. Polyclonal antibodies often provide higher sensitivity by recognizing multiple epitopes, while monoclonal antibodies offer greater specificity and consistency .
Optimal dilutions vary by application and specific antibody product:
| Application | Polyclonal Antibody (11679-1-AP) | Monoclonal Antibody (67549-1-Ig) |
|---|---|---|
| Western Blot (WB) | 1:500-1:2000 | 1:5000-1:50000 |
| Immunohistochemistry (IHC) | 1:50-1:500 | 1:250-1:1000 |
| Immunofluorescence (IF)/ICC | 1:200-1:800 | 1:200-1:800 |
| Immunoprecipitation (IP) | 0.5-4.0 μg for 1.0-3.0 mg of total protein lysate | Not specified |
It is recommended to titrate the antibody in each testing system to obtain optimal results, as the ideal concentration may be sample-dependent . For Western blotting, starting with mid-range dilutions and adjusting based on signal strength is advisable.
When optimizing Western blot protocols for IPO4 detection, consider the following parameters:
Sample preparation: IPO4 has been successfully detected in various cell lines including HeLa, A549, LNCaP, HEK-293, Jurkat, K-562, HL-60, and THP-1 cells .
Protein loading: Since IPO4 is a relatively large protein (observed molecular weight: 118-120 kDa), use freshly prepared samples and avoid repeated freeze-thaw cycles to prevent degradation.
Gel percentage: Use 8-10% SDS-PAGE gels for optimal separation of proteins in the 118 kDa range.
Transfer conditions: For large proteins like IPO4, longer transfer times or lower voltage may be necessary for complete transfer to the membrane.
Blocking: Use 5% non-fat milk or BSA in TBST as blocking buffer.
Primary antibody incubation: Incubate with the appropriate dilution of IPO4 antibody (see recommended dilutions in section 1.3) overnight at 4°C for optimal results.
Expected band size: Look for a band at approximately 118-120 kDa, which is the observed molecular weight of IPO4 .
Positive controls: HeLa cells and human brain tissue have been validated as positive controls for Western blot .
For successful immunohistochemistry (IHC) with IPO4 antibody, consider these critical factors:
Antigen retrieval: The recommended method is TE buffer pH 9.0, though citrate buffer pH 6.0 can serve as an alternative. This step is crucial for exposing epitopes that may be masked during fixation .
Positive tissue controls: Human stomach cancer tissue has been validated as a positive control for IHC with IPO4 antibody .
Antibody dilution: Use dilutions ranging from 1:50-1:500 for polyclonal antibodies and 1:250-1:1000 for monoclonal antibodies .
Detection system: Choose an appropriate detection system based on host species (rabbit or mouse) and experiment requirements.
Counterstaining: Use hematoxylin for nuclear counterstaining to provide contrast and allow proper visualization of IPO4 localization.
Negative controls: Include controls without primary antibody or with isotype control antibodies to assess non-specific binding.
Expected staining pattern: Since IPO4 is a nuclear transport protein, expect predominant cytoplasmic staining with potential nuclear membrane accentuation.
For optimal immunofluorescence (IF) staining with IPO4 antibody:
Cell line selection: HepG2 and MCF-7 cells have been validated for positive IF detection of IPO4 .
Fixation method: Use 4% paraformaldehyde (PFA) for 15-20 minutes at room temperature. Methanol fixation may serve as an alternative if membrane permeabilization is required.
Permeabilization: If using PFA fixation, permeabilize cells with 0.1-0.5% Triton X-100 in PBS for 10 minutes.
Blocking: Block with 1-5% BSA or normal serum from the species of the secondary antibody for 30-60 minutes.
Antibody dilution: Use dilutions ranging from 1:200-1:800 for both polyclonal and monoclonal IPO4 antibodies .
Incubation conditions: Incubate with primary antibody overnight at 4°C or for 1-2 hours at room temperature.
Nuclear counterstain: Use DAPI or Hoechst dyes to visualize nuclei and assess IPO4 localization relative to nuclear structures.
Expected localization pattern: As a nuclear transport protein, IPO4 typically shows predominantly cytoplasmic distribution with potential enrichment at the nuclear envelope and partial nuclear localization.
Validation of IPO4 antibody specificity through knockout (KO) or knockdown (KD) approaches is essential for ensuring reliable experimental results:
KO-validated antibodies: Consider using pre-validated antibodies like the KO-validated IPO4 Rabbit Polyclonal Antibody (CAB19902), which has been tested in knockout systems to confirm specificity .
CRISPR-Cas9 knockout validation:
Generate IPO4 knockout cell lines using CRISPR-Cas9 technology
Perform Western blot analysis comparing wild-type and knockout cells
A specific antibody will show a band at the expected molecular weight (118-120 kDa) in wild-type cells but not in knockout cells
siRNA/shRNA knockdown validation:
Transfect cells with IPO4-specific siRNA/shRNA and appropriate controls
Harvest cells 48-72 hours post-transfection
Confirm knockdown efficiency at the mRNA level using qRT-PCR
Perform Western blot to demonstrate reduced IPO4 protein levels with your antibody
Published validation: According to search results, there are at least 3 publications demonstrating KD/KO validation for certain IPO4 antibodies .
Signal specificity: In addition to band presence/absence, evaluate whether non-specific bands appear in your control samples.
Several challenges may arise when detecting IPO4, and researchers should be aware of potential solutions:
High molecular weight detection issues:
IPO4's large size (118 kDa) can make complete transfer during Western blotting difficult
Use longer transfer times, lower percentage gels (8-10%), and optimize transfer buffer conditions
Consider wet transfer systems for large proteins instead of semi-dry methods
Epitope masking in fixed tissues:
Background signal:
Increase blocking time/concentration
Optimize antibody concentrations by titration
Include additional washing steps
For immunofluorescence, use confocal microscopy to reduce out-of-focus signal
Reproducibility issues:
Use consistent lot numbers when possible
Include appropriate positive controls (e.g., HeLa cells for WB, human stomach cancer tissue for IHC)
Document exact protocols including buffer compositions, incubation times, and temperatures
Antibody cross-reactivity:
IPO4 antibodies can be valuable tools for investigating protein-protein interactions within nuclear transport pathways:
Co-immunoprecipitation (Co-IP):
Proximity ligation assay (PLA):
Detect in situ protein-protein interactions with spatial resolution
Combine IPO4 antibody with antibodies against suspected interaction partners
Visualize interactions as fluorescent dots indicating molecular proximity
Immunofluorescence co-localization:
Perform double immunofluorescence staining with IPO4 antibody and antibodies against potential interacting proteins
Analyze co-localization using confocal microscopy
Calculate correlation coefficients (e.g., Pearson's, Manders') to quantify co-localization
FRET/BRET studies:
Use antibodies to validate FRET/BRET results for protein interactions
Confirm proximity relationships detected through fluorescence/bioluminescence resonance energy transfer
Pull-down assays:
Use IPO4 antibodies in conjunction with tagged recombinant proteins
Analyze IPO4-cargo interactions under different conditions (e.g., with/without RanGTP)
Fractionation studies:
Separate nuclear and cytoplasmic fractions
Detect IPO4 and interacting partners in different cellular compartments
Monitor changes in localization under different conditions
IPO4 has been implicated in several disease contexts, with antibodies playing a crucial role in elucidating its involvement:
Cancer research:
IPO4 has been reported to contribute to gastric cancer progression and poor prognosis
Antibodies enable immunohistochemical assessment of IPO4 expression in tumor tissues
Western blot analysis can quantify IPO4 expression levels across different cancer types
Positive IHC has been detected in human stomach cancer tissue
Nuclear transport dysregulation:
As a nuclear transport receptor, IPO4 dysfunction may affect the transport of critical proteins
Antibodies allow researchers to study subcellular localization changes in disease states
Immunofluorescence techniques reveal alterations in transport dynamics
Histone transport and chromatin assembly:
IPO4 transports histones H3 and H4 into the nucleus for chromatin assembly
Antibodies can help study this process and its potential dysregulation in diseases involving chromatin structure
Methodological approaches:
Tissue microarrays using IPO4 antibodies for screening across multiple cancer tissues
Co-localization studies to identify changes in IPO4-cargo interactions in disease states
Quantitative analysis of IPO4 expression in patient samples compared to normal controls
Recent technological advances have significantly improved antibody-based IPO4 research:
Knockout validation:
Phage display libraries:
Deep mutational scanning phage display libraries have revolutionized antibody epitope mapping
This technology allows for high-resolution characterization of antibody-antigen interactions
Although not specific to IPO4 in the search results, this approach could potentially be applied to IPO4 antibodies
Active learning algorithms:
Multi-parameter analysis:
Combined approaches such as antibody library-on-library screening
Machine learning models for predicting antibody-antigen interactions
These methods could be adapted for IPO4 research to better understand binding specificity
Recombinant antibody technology:
Production of recombinant antibody fragments with potentially improved binding properties
Engineering antibodies with enhanced specificity for particular IPO4 epitopes
Humanized antibodies for potential therapeutic applications
Effective comparison and integration of results from different IPO4 antibodies require careful consideration of several factors:
Epitope mapping and antibody characteristics:
Antibody validation metrics:
Create a standardized validation table for all antibodies used:
| Antibody ID | Type | Host | Epitope | Validated Applications | Positive Controls | KO/KD Validation | Cross-Reactivity |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 11679-1-AP | Poly | Rabbit | Fusion protein Ag2281 | WB, IHC, IF/ICC, IP, CoIP | HeLa cells, human brain | Yes (3 publications) | Human, mouse, rat |
| 67549-1-Ig | Mono | Mouse | Fusion protein Ag2281 | WB, IHC, IF/ICC | A549, LNCaP, HeLa cells | Not specified | Human |
| CAB19902 | Poly | Rabbit | aa 728-1081 | WB, ELISA | 293T | KO validated | Human, mouse, rat |
Parallel validation experiments:
Run side-by-side comparisons using multiple antibodies on the same samples
Document concordant and discordant results
Investigate discrepancies to determine whether they represent technical issues or true biological differences
Integration strategies:
Use multiple antibodies targeting different epitopes to confirm findings
Combine monoclonal and polyclonal approaches for complementary information
Validate key findings with at least two independent antibodies
Consider using antibodies from different host species for co-localization studies
Data normalization and reporting:
Standardize quantification methods across different antibodies
Report antibody details explicitly in publications, including catalog numbers and dilutions
Include appropriate positive and negative controls for each antibody
Document lot numbers used, as antibody performance can vary between lots
Several emerging research areas could significantly benefit from advances in IPO4 antibody technologies:
Single-cell protein analysis:
Development of highly sensitive IPO4 antibodies compatible with single-cell Western blotting or CyTOF
Investigation of cell-to-cell variability in IPO4 expression and localization
Single-cell spatial proteomics to understand IPO4 distribution in heterogeneous tissues
Live-cell imaging of nuclear transport:
Creation of cell-permeable IPO4 antibody fragments or nanobodies
Real-time visualization of IPO4-mediated cargo transport
Dynamic studies of IPO4 trafficking under different cellular conditions
Therapeutic applications:
Development of antibodies that can modulate IPO4 function
Targeted approaches for diseases with aberrant nuclear transport
Combination with emerging drug delivery technologies
Structural biology integration:
Antibodies that recognize specific conformational states of IPO4
Integration with cryo-EM studies to understand IPO4-cargo complex structures
Structure-function relationship studies of IPO4 in nuclear transport
Systems biology approaches:
High-throughput screening of IPO4 cargo proteins using antibody-based techniques
Network analysis of IPO4-dependent nuclear transport pathways
Integration with multi-omics datasets to understand IPO4 regulation
Researchers can contribute to improving validation standards for IPO4 antibodies through several approaches:
Comprehensive validation reporting:
Document and publish detailed validation procedures
Include negative controls (IPO4 knockout or knockdown samples)
Share raw validation data in public repositories
Report both successful and unsuccessful antibody applications
Cross-laboratory validation:
Establish collaborative networks for antibody validation
Compare antibody performance across different laboratory settings
Develop consensus protocols for IPO4 detection in various applications
Integration of multiple validation methods:
Combine genetic approaches (CRISPR knockout, siRNA) with antibody testing
Use orthogonal methods to confirm antibody specificity
Implement both Western blot and immunofluorescence validation
Consider mass spectrometry validation of immunoprecipitated proteins
Development of standardized positive controls:
Create reference cell lines with defined IPO4 expression levels
Develop recombinant IPO4 standards for quantitative applications
Share well-characterized positive control tissues or cell lines
Community resources and databases: