irld-34 Antibody

Shipped with Ice Packs
In Stock

Product Specs

Buffer
Preservative: 0.03% ProClin 300; Constituents: 50% Glycerol, 0.01M Phosphate Buffered Saline (PBS), pH 7.4
Form
Liquid
Lead Time
14-16 week lead time (made-to-order)
Synonyms
irld-34 antibody; F54G8.1 antibody; Protein irld-34 antibody
Target Names
irld-34
Uniprot No.

Q&A

What is the IRLD-34 antibody and what is its target in C. elegans?

The IRLD-34 antibody is a polyclonal antibody developed against the insulin receptor-like domain protein 34 (IRLD-34) in Caenorhabditis elegans. This antibody specifically recognizes recombinant C. elegans IRLD-34 protein (UniProt accession number Q03599). It is generated in rabbits using purified recombinant IRLD-34 protein as the immunogen, resulting in IgG-class antibodies that bind specifically to epitopes present on the target protein . The antibody is primarily used in C. elegans research to study insulin-like signaling pathways and receptor function.

What are the optimal storage conditions for IRLD-34 antibody?

For optimal preservation of IRLD-34 antibody activity, the recommended storage conditions are:

  • Long-term storage: -20°C to -80°C

  • Avoid repeated freeze-thaw cycles which can degrade antibody quality

  • The antibody is typically supplied in a buffer containing preservatives (such as 0.03% Proclin 300)

  • For working solutions, store at 2-8°C for up to one month

  • The antibody is typically provided in a liquid formulation containing glycerol (often 50%) to prevent freeze-thaw damage

What are the validated applications for IRLD-34 antibody in C. elegans research?

Based on available data, the IRLD-34 antibody has been validated for the following experimental applications:

  • ELISA (Enzyme-Linked Immunosorbent Assay): For quantitative detection of the target protein

  • Western Blotting (WB): For detection of denatured IRLD-34 protein

When designing experiments with this antibody, researchers should consider:

  • Optimal dilutions must be determined empirically for each application

  • Positive and negative controls should be included to validate specificity

  • The antibody is intended for research use only, not diagnostic applications

What is the recommended protocol for Western blot analysis using IRLD-34 antibody?

While specific optimization is required for each laboratory setting, a general Western blot protocol for IRLD-34 antibody includes:

  • Sample preparation:

    • Prepare C. elegans protein extracts using standard methods (e.g., sonication, freeze-thaw)

    • Include appropriate positive controls

  • Gel electrophoresis and transfer:

    • Separate proteins on 10-12% SDS-PAGE gels

    • Transfer to PVDF or nitrocellulose membrane

  • Blocking and antibody incubation:

    • Block with 5% non-fat milk or BSA in TBST for 1 hour at room temperature

    • Dilute primary IRLD-34 antibody (optimal dilution typically between 1:500-1:2000)

    • Incubate overnight at 4°C with gentle agitation

    • Wash 3-5 times with TBST

  • Detection:

    • Incubate with HRP-conjugated anti-rabbit secondary antibody

    • Visualize using appropriate chemiluminescent detection reagents

Note: Always perform preliminary titration experiments to determine optimal antibody concentration for your specific experimental conditions.

How can researchers validate the specificity of IRLD-34 antibody in their experimental systems?

Validating antibody specificity is crucial for meaningful research outcomes. For IRLD-34 antibody, consider these approaches:

  • Positive controls:

    • Use purified recombinant IRLD-34 protein

    • Test samples with known IRLD-34 expression

  • Negative controls:

    • Test in irld-34 knockout or RNAi-treated C. elegans samples

    • Pre-absorption controls: Pre-incubate antibody with excess purified antigen before use

  • Cross-reactivity assessment:

    • Test against closely related IRLD family proteins

    • Verify signal absence in non-expressing tissues

  • Multiple detection methods:

    • Compare results across different applications (WB, ELISA)

    • Validate with orthogonal techniques (RT-PCR, RNA-seq data)

What are common troubleshooting strategies when working with IRLD-34 antibody?

When encountering difficulties with IRLD-34 antibody experiments, consider these troubleshooting approaches:

IssuePotential CausesSolutions
Weak or no signal- Insufficient antibody concentration
- Target protein degradation
- Low target expression
- Increase antibody concentration
- Add protease inhibitors during extraction
- Enrich target protein (immunoprecipitation)
High background- Insufficient blocking
- Excessive antibody concentration
- Cross-reactivity
- Optimize blocking conditions
- Titrate antibody
- Increase washing steps
Non-specific bands- Cross-reactivity
- Protein degradation
- Secondary antibody issues
- Use different blocking reagent
- Optimize sample preparation
- Test different secondary antibody
Variable results- Antibody degradation
- Inconsistent technique
- Sample variability
- Aliquot antibody to avoid freeze-thaw
- Standardize protocols
- Improve sample preparation consistency

How can IRLD-34 antibody be optimized for immunohistochemistry in C. elegans tissues?

While not explicitly validated for immunohistochemistry (IHC) in the provided information, researchers interested in adapting IRLD-34 antibody for this application should consider:

  • Fixation optimization:

    • Compare multiple fixatives (paraformaldehyde, Bouin's, methanol/acetone)

    • Test different fixation durations and temperatures

  • Antigen retrieval methods:

    • Heat-induced epitope retrieval (citrate buffer, pH 6.0)

    • Enzymatic retrieval (proteinase K)

    • Test multiple retrieval conditions

  • Detection system optimization:

    • Compare direct fluorescent conjugates vs. multi-step detection

    • Evaluate signal amplification methods (tyramide signal amplification)

  • Validation strategies:

    • Co-localization with known markers

    • Comparison with mRNA expression patterns

    • Confirmation with fluorescent reporter strains

What approaches can be used to analyze IRLD-34 expression across different developmental stages in C. elegans?

For developmental studies of IRLD-34 expression, researchers should consider:

  • Stage-specific sample collection:

    • Synchronize worm populations using standard methods

    • Collect samples at key developmental timepoints (embryo, L1-L4, adult)

  • Quantitative analysis methods:

    • Western blot with densitometry for relative quantification

    • Quantitative ELISA for absolute quantification

    • Compare protein levels with developmental transcriptome data

  • Spatial expression analysis:

    • Optimize IHC protocols for different developmental stages

    • Consider tissue-specific extraction methods

    • Combine with transgenic reporter strains

  • Experimental design considerations:

    • Include appropriate loading controls for each developmental stage

    • Account for total protein content differences between stages

    • Incorporate biological and technical replicates

How does IRLD-34 relate to insulin signaling pathways in C. elegans compared to other model organisms?

While specific information about IRLD-34's role is limited in the provided sources, researchers should consider:

  • Evolutionary context:

    • C. elegans contains approximately 40 insulin-like peptides (ILPs) and several receptor-like proteins

    • IRLD family proteins may represent divergent insulin receptor-related molecules

    • Compare homology with insulin receptor domains across species

  • Functional considerations:

    • Potential role in metabolism, development, or stress response

    • Possible functional redundancy with other IRLD family members

    • Integration with DAF-2 (the canonical insulin receptor) signaling

  • Experimental approaches:

    • RNAi or CRISPR-based functional studies combined with antibody detection

    • Co-immunoprecipitation to identify binding partners

    • Phosphorylation studies to examine signaling activity

What methodological considerations are important when using antibodies like IRLD-34 in multi-omics research approaches?

When integrating antibody-based detection with other omics approaches:

  • Sample preparation harmonization:

    • Develop protocols compatible with multiple downstream analyses

    • Consider protein-RNA co-extraction methods

    • Implement consistent sample handling across techniques

  • Data integration strategies:

    • Correlate protein levels with transcriptomic data

    • Integrate with metabolomic profiles in insulin signaling studies

    • Develop computational frameworks for multi-omics data integration

  • Technical validation across platforms:

    • Verify consistency between antibody-based quantification and MS-based proteomics

    • Cross-validate with orthogonal techniques

    • Implement appropriate normalization methods

  • Experimental design considerations:

    • Include shared controls across platforms

    • Account for different dynamic ranges between techniques

    • Consider temporal aspects of transcript vs. protein expression

What reporting standards should researchers follow when publishing work using IRLD-34 antibody?

For reproducible research with antibodies, adhere to these reporting standards:

  • Complete antibody information:

    • Full product details (manufacturer, catalog number, lot number)

    • Clone type (polyclonal) and host species (rabbit)

    • RRID (Research Resource Identifier) when available

  • Validation evidence:

    • Document specificity tests performed

    • Include representative images of controls

    • Report all optimization steps

  • Methodological details:

    • Complete protocols with all buffer compositions

    • Antibody dilutions and incubation conditions

    • Image acquisition and analysis parameters

  • Limitations disclosure:

    • Acknowledge potential cross-reactivity

    • Note any inconsistent results

    • Discuss alternative interpretations of findings

Following these guidelines ensures research reproducibility and facilitates method adoption by other laboratories .

What emerging techniques might enhance the utility of IRLD-34 antibody in C. elegans research?

Researchers should consider these emerging approaches:

  • Advanced imaging applications:

    • Super-resolution microscopy for subcellular localization

    • Expansion microscopy for improved spatial resolution in C. elegans

    • Live-cell imaging with membrane-permeable antibody fragments

  • Single-cell applications:

    • Adaptation for single-cell western blotting

    • Integration with single-cell proteomics approaches

    • Development of highly sensitive detection methods

  • Antibody engineering approaches:

    • Generation of recombinant antibody fragments

    • Development of nanobodies against specific epitopes

    • Creation of bifunctional antibody reagents for proximity labeling

  • Novel functional applications:

    • Intrabody approaches for protein function disruption

    • Targeted protein degradation using antibody-based techniques

    • Combinatorial approaches with CRISPR-based genome editing

These emerging methods could expand the utility of IRLD-34 antibody beyond traditional applications and enable new experimental paradigms in C. elegans research.

Quick Inquiry

Personal Email Detected
Please use an institutional or corporate email address for inquiries. Personal email accounts ( such as Gmail, Yahoo, and Outlook) are not accepted. *
© Copyright 2025 TheBiotek. All Rights Reserved.