ITGA8 antibodies target the alpha-8 subunit of integrins, which form heterodimers with beta-1 subunits to regulate processes like wound healing, organogenesis, and fibrotic disease progression . The HRP conjugate facilitates chromogenic or chemiluminescent detection in:
Western blotting (e.g., detecting ITGA8 in lung, spleen, or kidney tissues) .
Immunohistochemistry (e.g., identifying ITGA8 expression in renal mesangial cells or lung stromal cells) .
Immunofluorescence and flow cytometry (e.g., quantifying ITGA8-positive extracellular vesicles in plasma) .
Western Blot: ITGA8 (∼140 kDa) detected in lung and spleen tissues using Proteintech’s 30714-1-AP antibody . Boster Bio’s A06636 showed specificity in Hela, Raw264.7, and PC12 cell lysates .
Immunohistochemistry: ITGA8 localized to renal mesangial cells and lung stromal cells, co-expressed with PDGFRβ .
Functional Studies:
ITGA8 regulates TGF-β1 activation in fibrotic pathways, influencing fibroblast proliferation and immune cell infiltration .
In ovarian cancer, ITGA8 overexpression correlates with poor prognosis, driven by M2 macrophage-derived exosomes .
ITGA8 (Integrin alpha-8) is a transmembrane protein that forms the integrin alpha-8/beta-1 heterodimer. This integrin plays crucial roles in kidney development by regulating the recruitment of mesenchymal cells into epithelial structures . In mature tissues, ITGA8 contributes to the regulation of cell proliferation and apoptosis in renal glomerular cells .
Research has demonstrated that ITGA8 functions as an important attenuator of chronic renal fibrosis. When ITGA8 is deficient, mice exhibit more severe renal fibrosis following unilateral ureteral obstruction (UUO), suggesting its protective role in kidney injury models . The protein's molecular weight is approximately 117.5 kilodaltons, and it undergoes post-translational cleavage into heavy and light chains .
ITGA8 antibodies are valuable tools for investigating mechanisms of renal fibrosis. Studies have shown that ITGA8 deficiency leads to enhanced TGF-β signaling and increased fibroblast activation in obstructive nephropathy models . When working with these antibodies, researchers can:
Detect changes in ITGA8 expression during disease progression
Analyze the spatial distribution of ITGA8 in kidney tissue sections
Investigate relationships between ITGA8 and fibrotic markers
Examine differences between wild-type and ITGA8-deficient models
Research has revealed that ITGA8 deficiency correlates with increased phospho-SMAD2/3-positive cells and more α-smooth muscle actin-positive cells in the tubulointerstitium after UUO, indicating enhanced TGF-β signaling and myofibroblast activation .
Western blot analysis (0.01-2μg/mL concentration range)
Immunohistochemistry (5-20μg/mL concentration range)
Immunocytochemistry (5-20μg/mL concentration range)
Each application requires specific optimization of antibody concentration, incubation conditions, and detection methods to achieve optimal signal-to-noise ratio.
To maintain the activity of ITGA8 antibody, HRP conjugated, proper storage is essential:
Upon receipt, store at -20°C or -80°C
Avoid repeated freeze-thaw cycles that can degrade the antibody and reduce specific binding
The antibody is provided in a buffer containing 50% glycerol, 0.01M PBS (pH 7.4), and 0.03% Proclin 300 as a preservative
For working solutions, aliquoting the antibody into single-use volumes before freezing is recommended to prevent degradation from multiple freeze-thaw cycles.
Rigorous validation of the ITGA8 antibody is crucial for reliable results:
Positive controls: Use recombinant human ITGA8 protein or tissues known to express ITGA8 (kidney tissue)
Negative controls: Include samples from ITGA8-knockout models or tissues that don't express ITGA8
Peptide competition: Pre-incubate the antibody with immunizing peptide (recombinant human integrin alpha-8 protein, particularly amino acids 114-131) to confirm specific binding
Multiple detection methods: Compare results across different techniques (e.g., western blot, IHC, ELISA)
Cross-reactivity assessment: Test antibody reactivity across relevant species when working with animal models
Proper sample preparation is critical for detecting ITGA8 accurately:
For protein extraction:
Use buffers containing protease inhibitors to prevent degradation
Include phosphatase inhibitors when studying phosphorylation-dependent interactions
Optimize tissue homogenization methods to maximize protein recovery
For tissue sections:
Use fresh-frozen or properly fixed tissues (avoid overfixation which may mask epitopes)
For paraffin-embedded sections, optimize antigen retrieval methods
Consider thickness of sections (typically 4-6μm) for optimal antibody penetration
ITGA8 plays a complex role in modulating TGF-β pathway activation during fibrotic responses:
Research indicates that ITGA8 can bind to latent TGF-β, potentially inhibiting its activation
In ITGA8-deficient mice, phospho-SMAD2/3 levels (indicators of active TGF-β signaling) are significantly increased following UUO compared to wild-type controls
ITGA8 deficiency is associated with increased expression of latent TGF-β binding protein 1 (LTBP-1), which potentially supports TGF-β activation
The relationship between ITGA8 and TGF-β pathway components is summarized in the following data table from research on wild-type and ITGA8-deficient mice:
| Marker | Itga8+/+ co | Itga8-/- co | Itga8+/+ UUO | Itga8-/- UUO |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Tgf-β1 | 1.00±0.13 | 0.75±0.13 | 6.47±0.64 # | 6.40±0.45 # |
| Tgf-β2 | 1.00±0.14 | 0.80±0.15 | 7.02±1.36 # | 10.27±1.53 # |
| Ltbp-1 | 1.01±0.13 | 0.73±0.08 | 1.46±0.10 | 1.60±0.19 # |
| Tgf-βR1 | 1.00±0.07 | 0.94±0.09 | 1.85±0.11 # | 1.91±0.19 # |
| Tgf-βR2 | 1.00±0.13 | 1.03±0.15 | 3.29±0.10 # | 3.12±0.33 # |
Data presented as fold induction (means±SEM). # p< 0.05 in unilateral ureter obstruction (UUO) versus control tissue (co) .
Several methodological approaches can be employed to detect alterations in ITGA8 expression during kidney injury:
Quantitative PCR: For measuring changes in ITGA8 mRNA expression
Include appropriate housekeeping genes for normalization
Design primers specific to ITGA8 regions unaffected by splicing variants
Western blotting: For quantifying protein levels
Immunohistochemistry: For spatial localization analysis
Flow cytometry: For cell-specific expression analysis
Combine with cell-type specific markers
Use appropriate permeabilization for intracellular epitopes
To distinguish ITGA8 expression patterns in different renal cell populations:
Dual immunofluorescence staining:
Combine ITGA8 antibody with markers for:
Tubular epithelial cells (e.g., E-cadherin, aquaporins)
Fibroblasts (e.g., FSP-1, PDGFRβ)
Myofibroblasts (α-SMA)
Immune cells (CD45, F4/80)
Cell isolation approaches:
Magnetic or flow cytometry-based cell sorting using cell-specific markers
Analysis of ITGA8 expression in isolated cell populations
Single-cell RNA sequencing:
Correlate ITGA8 expression with cell-type specific markers
Identify new cell populations expressing ITGA8
High background is a common challenge with HRP-conjugated antibodies. To minimize non-specific signal:
Optimal blocking:
Use 3-5% BSA or 5-10% normal serum from the same species as the secondary antibody
Include 0.1-0.3% Triton X-100 or Tween-20 in blocking solutions
Block for at least 1 hour at room temperature
Antibody dilution optimization:
Washing optimization:
Increase number and duration of washes
Use PBS-T (PBS with 0.05-0.1% Tween-20) for effective washing
Endogenous peroxidase quenching:
For tissue sections, pretreat with 0.3-3% hydrogen peroxide solution
For cells with high peroxidase activity, use peroxidase blocking reagents
Inconsistent staining can undermine research reliability. Address this issue through:
Standardized sample processing:
Use consistent fixation times and conditions
Standardize antigen retrieval methods
Process all experimental samples in parallel
Antibody storage and handling:
Controls for each experiment:
Include positive and negative controls in every staining batch
Use internal controls (structures within the sample known to express or lack ITGA8)
Detection system optimization:
Ensure HRP substrate is fresh and properly prepared
Standardize development times
Consider signal amplification systems for low-abundance targets
Accurate quantification of ITGA8-positive cells requires systematic approaches:
Representative sampling:
Analyze multiple fields (at least 10) per section
Examine multiple sections per sample
Use systematic random sampling to avoid bias
Digital image analysis:
Capture images using standardized microscope settings
Use software (ImageJ, QuPath, etc.) for automated counting
Set consistent thresholds for all samples
Reporting metrics:
Calculate percentage of positive cells (positive cells/total cells)
Measure staining intensity using optical density
Consider semi-quantitative scoring systems (0-3+ scale)
Statistical analysis:
Use appropriate statistical tests based on data distribution
Account for multiple comparisons
Consider hierarchical analysis when examining multiple fields and sections
To gain comprehensive insights into fibrosis mechanisms:
Correlation analysis:
Compare ITGA8 expression with established fibrosis markers (collagen, α-SMA)
Correlate with TGF-β pathway components (pSMAD2/3) and regulators (LTBP-1)
Examine relationships with inflammatory markers
Multivariate analysis:
Use principal component analysis or cluster analysis to identify patterns
Build regression models to determine predictive value of combined markers
Temporal analysis:
Track changes in ITGA8 and related markers across disease progression
Determine whether ITGA8 changes precede or follow other markers
The following data table illustrates correlations between ITGA8 and fibrosis-related markers in experimental models:
| Marker | Itga8+/+ co | Itga8-/- co | Itga8+/+ UUO | Itga8-/- UUO |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Biglycan | 1.00±0.06 | 0.85±0.14 | 6.65±0.49 # | 7.39±0.52 # |
| Pai-1 | 1.00±0.45 | 0.40±0.08 | 10.78±3.11 # | 12.91±2.60 # |
| Mmp-2 | 1.00±0.12 | 0.70±0.16 | 15.44±1.87 # | 17.08±1.95 # |
| Mmp-9 | 1.00±0.21 | 0.75±0.33 | 3.99±0.71 # | 4.71±0.78 # |
| Timp-1 | 1.01±0.20 | 0.98±0.33 | 237.50±39.54 # | 320.26±59.06 # |
| Timp-2 | 1.00±0.07 | 0.76±0.11 | 4.87±0.29 # | 5.20±0.39 # |
Data presented as fold induction (means±SEM). # p< 0.05 in unilateral ureter obstruction (UUO) versus control tissue (co) .