JASON Antibody

Shipped with Ice Packs
In Stock

Product Specs

Buffer
Preservative: 0.03% Proclin 300
Constituents: 50% Glycerol, 0.01M PBS, pH 7.4
Form
Liquid
Lead Time
Made-to-order (14-16 weeks)
Synonyms
JASON antibody; At1g06660 antibody; F12K11.5 antibody; Protein JASON antibody
Target Names
JASON
Uniprot No.

Target Background

Function
JASON antibody is essential for normal spindle orientation during male meiosis II and the proper formation of the tetrad of microspores. It acts as a positive regulator of PS1 during male sporogenesis. Notably, JASON is not involved in female meiosis.
Gene References Into Functions
  1. JASON is expressed in two forms, a long version targeted to the Golgi apparatus and a short version targeted to the plasma membrane. This variation arises from leaky ribosome scanning and alternative translation initiation sites (TISs), and the ratio of these forms is developmentally regulated. PMID: 28922756
  2. Studies on jason and ps1 mutants have revealed that disruptions in spindle positioning during male meiosis II lead to the abnormal incorporation of separated chromosome groups into a single cell. PMID: 25757555
  3. JASON positively regulates the expression of AtPS1, facilitating the proper organization and orientation of the metaphase II spindle plates in meiosis II. PMID: 21257792
Database Links

KEGG: ath:AT1G06660

STRING: 3702.AT1G06660.1

UniGene: At.26217

Q&A

What are the fundamental principles behind multiplexed serology assays in antibody research?

Multiplexed serology assays represent a significant advancement in antibody profiling by allowing scientists to test antibody binding against hundreds of thousands of protein targets simultaneously, rather than testing one at a time. This approach has been pioneered through technologies like PepSeq, which uses DNA-barcoded peptide libraries to conduct highly multiplexed serology assays.

The fundamental principles include:

  • DNA-barcoding: Each peptide target is linked to a unique DNA barcode for identification

  • Parallel testing: Multiple antibody-antigen interactions can be assessed in a single reaction vessel

  • Readout via sequencing: The binding results are quantified through DNA sequencing of the barcodes

  • Customization potential: Libraries can be designed for specific research questions or pathogen sets

This technology significantly accelerates research in infectious disease diagnostics, vaccine development, and understanding immune responses to pathogens. For example, these assays help identify which proteins most commonly stimulate antibody responses during infection and which epitopes are specific for particular pathogens rather than being cross-reactive across related pathogens .

How do antibodies contribute to our understanding of past infections and disease tracking?

Antibodies serve as biological markers that provide evidence of a host's past infections, offering valuable insights for epidemiological studies and disease surveillance. When the body encounters a pathogen, it produces specific antibodies that can persist for months or years after the infection has cleared.

Key methodological approaches in using antibodies for disease tracking include:

  • Serological testing: Screens for antibodies against specific pathogens to determine past exposure

  • Epidemiological mapping: Helps track the spread of diseases through populations by analyzing antibody prevalence

  • Cross-reactivity analysis: Determines whether antibodies are specific to one pathogen or react with related pathogens

  • Temporal profiling: Measures antibody levels over time to understand duration of immunity

These approaches have proven vital in tracking outbreaks of various infectious diseases and understanding population-level exposure. The data generated can inform public health responses and vaccination strategies. For example, antibody profiling was instrumental during the COVID-19 pandemic to determine community exposure levels and immunity status .

What is the basic framework for antibody affinity enhancement?

Antibody affinity enhancement involves modifying antibodies to improve their binding strength to target antigens. The ADAPT (Assisted Design of Antibody and Protein Therapeutics) platform provides a systematic framework for this process, demonstrating remarkable success across various antibody systems.

The methodological framework includes:

  • Computational prediction: Using three scoring functions to generate a consensus z-score for evaluating potential mutations

  • Interleaved approach: Alternating between computational predictions and experimental validation

  • Progressive mutation strategy: Starting with single mutations, then combining successful mutations to create double and triple mutants

  • Diverse interaction types: Introducing both long-range electrostatic interactions and short-range nonpolar interactions

This framework has proven highly effective, with studies showing over 90% of designed single and double mutants exhibiting higher affinities than parent sequences. In one example, novel triple mutants demonstrated 104-fold, 46-fold, and 32-fold improvements in binding affinity for three different antibody-antigen systems respectively .

How do researchers develop site-specific antibody prodrugs for targeted therapeutic delivery?

Site-specific antibody prodrugs represent an advanced approach to improve the therapeutic window of antibodies by creating masked versions that only become active in specific microenvironments. This methodology addresses the challenge of antibody cross-reactivity with healthy tissues.

The development process involves:

  • Target selection: Identifying critical amino acids in the complementary determining region (CDR) that can be modified without permanently disrupting function

  • Masking group design: Creating protease-cleavable groups that can mask binding activity until removed

  • Site-specific conjugation: Using palladium-based bioconjugation approaches to introduce masked tyrosine mimics at specific sites

  • Protease-responsive elements: Engineering linkers that respond to tumor-associated proteases

  • Validation testing: Confirming reduced binding in normal conditions and restored binding (>90%) upon protease exposure

This approach has been demonstrated with ipilimumab, where researchers achieved a 47-fold reduction in binding to cells expressing CTLA-4 when masked, with binding restored upon exposure to tumor-associated proteases . This strategy significantly improves the selectivity of antibody therapeutics, potentially reducing off-target effects while maintaining efficacy at disease sites.

What methodologies exist for generating homogeneous antibody-drug conjugates (ADCs) with improved therapeutic indices?

Generating homogeneous antibody-drug conjugates with controlled drug-to-antibody ratios (DAR) and site-specific conjugation is critical for developing next-generation therapeutics with improved efficacy and safety profiles.

Advanced methodological approaches include:

  • Genetic code expansion: Incorporating non-canonical amino acids like cyclopropene derivatives of lysine (CypK) into antibodies during expression

  • Bioorthogonal conjugation chemistry: Using tetrazine-cyclopropene click chemistry for site-specific attachment of cytotoxic payloads

  • Stable linkage chemistry: Developing dihydropyridazine linkages that demonstrate stability in serum conditions

  • Expression system optimization: Creating high-yielding expression systems that efficiently incorporate the non-canonical amino acids

A specific example of this approach involves expressing trastuzumab bearing CypK and conjugating tetrazine derivatives to generate an ADC with monomethyl auristatin E that selectively kills cells expressing high levels of HER2 . This method overcomes limitations of traditional ADC production techniques, which often suffer from heterogeneity, low yields, or restricted conjugation sites.

How does the energy landscape of antibodies influence their stability and formulation development?

Understanding the energy landscape and conformational transitions of antibodies is crucial for developing stable formulations and potentially rescuing therapeutic candidates that failed due to stability issues.

Advanced research approaches in this area include:

  • Conformational transition pathway analysis: Using experimental methods including variable temperature circular dichroism and bio-layer interferometry to map conformational changes

  • Ionic liquid effects exploration: Studying how ionic liquids like choline dihydrogen phosphate influence protein thermal and structural stability

  • Molecular dynamics simulations: Conducting simulations on antibody fragments in different formulations at varying temperatures to rationalize observed conformational changes

  • Excipient effect quantification: Determining how different excipients (sugars, amino acids, surfactants) with and without ionic liquids impact protein stability

Research has shown that increased propensity for conformational change can be driven by preferential binding of ions (like dihydrogen phosphate anion) to antibody fragments. Formulations containing ionic liquids with sugar, amino acids, and surfactant have demonstrated promise for stabilizing proteins against conformational destabilization and aggregation .

What are the key factors in designing protein microarray platforms for antibody profiling?

Designing effective protein microarray platforms for antibody profiling requires careful consideration of protein presentation, detection sensitivity, and background reduction.

Critical experimental design elements include:

  • Protein attachment chemistry: Developing covalent capture methods, such as HaloTag fusion proteins and ligand, to ensure stable protein presentation

  • Protein expression systems: Using optimized in vitro transcription translation (IVTT) systems, like HeLa cell lysates, to enhance protein yield

  • Background reduction strategies: Incorporating E. coli lysates in plasma blocking buffers to minimize nonspecific signals

  • Protein conformation control: Creating platforms capable of presenting both native and denatured forms of proteins to capture different antibody responses

  • Validation protocols: Implementing rigorous protocols to confirm microarray performance with control antibodies

Research has demonstrated that protein microarrays using covalent attachment chemistry can withstand denaturing conditions, allowing for the display of both natural and denatured proteins. This versatility offers a new dimension for biomarker discovery by broadening the repertoire of detectable antibodies, potentially yielding clinical diagnostics with greater performance .

How can structure-based design principles be applied to develop stabilized antibody targets for vaccine development?

Structure-based design represents a powerful approach for developing stabilized antibody targets, particularly for challenging pathogens like respiratory syncytial virus (RSV) and SARS-CoV-2.

Key methodological steps include:

  • Structural determination of target antigens: Obtaining high-resolution structures of viral proteins in their native conformations11

  • Identification of conformational states: Determining pre-fusion and post-fusion conformations and understanding the transition mechanisms11

  • Epitope mapping: Localizing neutralizing antibody binding sites to identify critical stabilization regions11

  • Strategic mutation design: Introducing disulfide bonds, cavity-filling mutations, or other modifications to lock proteins in desired conformations11

  • Validation through antibody binding: Confirming that engineered proteins maintain binding to conformation-specific neutralizing antibodies11

This approach has been successfully applied to RSV F protein, where researchers identified that the fusion protein undergoes dramatic conformational changes between pre-fusion and post-fusion states. By introducing strategic modifications, they could lock the protein in its pre-fusion conformation, which is the primary target of potent neutralizing antibodies, resulting in more effective vaccine antigens11.

How do researchers interpret antibody binding data from multiplexed assays to identify disease-specific signatures?

Interpreting data from multiplexed antibody binding assays presents unique challenges due to the high dimensionality and complexity of the results.

Advanced analytical approaches include:

  • Background normalization: Implementing computational methods to account for technical variations and non-specific binding

  • Statistical threshold determination: Establishing significance thresholds that account for multiple hypothesis testing

  • Cross-reactivity analysis: Identifying and filtering signals that represent cross-reactivity rather than specific binding

  • Machine learning classification: Applying supervised and unsupervised learning algorithms to identify antibody signatures associated with specific disease states

  • Temporal profiling: Analyzing changes in antibody profiles over time to understand disease progression

Researchers have found that plasma samples probed on denatured protein arrays produced autoantibody profiles distinct from those probed on natively displayed proteins, highlighting the importance of protein conformation in antibody recognition . These distinct profiles can potentially reveal different aspects of immune responses to diseases, expanding the range of potential biomarkers.

What approaches exist for integrating antibody functional genomics data across species to identify conserved mechanisms?

Integrating antibody data across species is essential for translating basic research findings into clinical applications and understanding conserved immune mechanisms.

Methodological approaches include:

  • Cross-species analysis: Utilizing databases and tools like GeneWeaver to integrate diverse datasets across numerous species

  • Graph-based algorithms: Employing sophisticated algorithms to identify convergent evidence from diverse datasets

  • Pathway analysis: Mapping antibody-related genes to conserved biological pathways

  • Ortholog identification: Systematically identifying functional equivalents of antibody-related genes across species

  • Phenotype correlation: Linking genetic variations to phenotypic differences in antibody responses across species

This integrative approach allows researchers to elucidate and validate genes' roles in disease by leveraging data from multiple experimental systems. It positions research at the interface between in silico and in vivo studies, whereby data are mined and integrated, then tested using animal models to validate findings .

How are therapeutic antibodies being developed to address the opioid crisis?

The development of therapeutic antibodies for addressing opioid misuse represents an innovative approach to combating the opioid crisis.

Key methodological strategies include:

  • Target selection: Identifying appropriate opioid molecules (fentanyl, analogs) as targets for antibody binding

  • Antibody engineering: Optimizing monoclonal antibodies through affinity maturation using display libraries

  • In silico optimization: Employing computational approaches to optimize antibody candidates and extend their half-life

  • mRNA-based approaches: Exploring mRNA-encoded immune modulators to boost the efficacy of opioid vaccines

  • Emerging threat response: Developing monoclonal antibodies against emerging drugs of abuse like xylazine

This research addresses a critical public health challenge by creating biologics that can potentially bind to opioids in the bloodstream, preventing them from crossing the blood-brain barrier and reducing their effects. This approach could complement existing therapies like naloxone for overdose prevention and potentially serve as a treatment option for opioid use disorders .

What are the advanced characterization techniques for antibody quality assessment in vaccine and biologic development?

Advanced characterization of antibodies and antibody-based biologics is essential for ensuring their safety, efficacy, and consistency during development.

Sophisticated methodological approaches include:

  • Multi-attribute biophysical analysis: Characterizing antibodies in terms of amino acid sequence, post-translational modifications, and structural properties

  • Drug-to-antibody ratio (DAR) determination: For antibody-drug conjugates, precisely measuring the number of drug molecules attached per antibody

  • Mass spectrometry-based techniques: Using advanced MS approaches to analyze antibody structure and modifications at high resolution

  • Quality attribute assessment: Identifying and monitoring critical quality attributes that influence biological activity and stability

  • Data interpretation of large datasets: Applying sophisticated data analysis techniques to extract meaningful insights from complex analytical data

These advanced characterization techniques provide crucial data for the development of new biological drugs, ensuring they meet rigorous quality standards. The Vaccine Production Program (VPP) exemplifies this approach, applying cutting-edge science to plasmid design, cell expression, purification, formulation, and analytics for a diverse array of vaccine technologies and biologics .

How do researchers balance antibody specificity and cross-reactivity when developing diagnostic tests?

Balancing antibody specificity and cross-reactivity represents a fundamental challenge in developing effective diagnostic tests that are both sensitive and specific.

Methodological approaches to address this challenge include:

  • Epitope mapping: Detailed characterization of antibody binding sites to identify unique versus conserved regions

  • Competitive binding assays: Evaluating potential cross-reactivity through competitive binding with related antigens

  • Orthogonal validation: Confirming antibody specificity using multiple independent methods

  • Machine learning classification: Using computational approaches to identify antibody features that correlate with specificity

  • Structural analysis: Examining the three-dimensional structure of antibody-antigen complexes to understand binding determinants

The PepSeq approach has been instrumental in addressing this challenge by helping researchers identify which epitopes are specific for pathogens of interest rather than being cross-reactive across related pathogens . This is particularly valuable for diagnosing infections caused by closely related pathogens, such as different coronaviruses or flaviviruses, where cross-reactivity has historically complicated serological testing.

What are the key considerations when developing monoclonal antibodies against emerging infectious diseases?

Developing monoclonal antibodies against emerging infectious diseases requires addressing unique challenges related to pathogen evolution, safety, and efficacy.

Critical methodological considerations include:

  • Rapid isolation techniques: Implementing technologies that accelerate the identification of neutralizing antibodies from convalescent patients

  • Variant coverage: Designing antibodies that target conserved epitopes to maintain efficacy against evolving pathogens

  • Affinity optimization: Enhancing binding strength while maintaining specificity using platforms like ADAPT

  • Fc effector function engineering: Modifying the Fc region to enhance or suppress specific immune functions based on therapeutic goals

  • Manufacturing scalability: Designing antibodies with characteristics amenable to large-scale production

Research has demonstrated that effective monoclonal antibodies can reduce bacterial burden and mitigate inflammatory responses in murine models of bacterial infection . The development of comprehensive panels of monoclonal antibodies targeting viral proteins (like the SARS-CoV-2 spike protein) has enabled detailed characterization studies that inform therapeutic development strategies .

Quick Inquiry

Personal Email Detected
Please use an institutional or corporate email address for inquiries. Personal email accounts ( such as Gmail, Yahoo, and Outlook) are not accepted. *
© Copyright 2025 TheBiotek. All Rights Reserved.