JMJD7 (Jumonji Domain-Containing 7) is a bifunctional enzyme belonging to the JMJD family of proteins, characterized by its JmjC domain, a structural motif associated with histone demethylation and other Fe(II)- and 2-oxoglutarate-dependent enzymatic activities. Found in humans and conserved across eukaryotes, JMJD7 exhibits dual roles as a (3S)-lysyl hydroxylase and an endopeptidase, with implications in histone remodeling, translation regulation, and disease pathogenesis .
JMJD7 catalyzes two distinct biochemical processes:
(3S)-Lysyl Hydroxylation:
Endopeptidase Activity:
| Activity Type | Substrate | Cofactors Required | Key Products/Outcomes |
|---|---|---|---|
| (3S)-Lysyl Hydroxylation | DRG1/2 (K22/K21) | Fe(II), 2OG | 5-Hydroxylysine (5-Hyl) |
| Endopeptidase Cleavage | Methylated H3/H4 histones | N/A | Truncated histone tails |
| Aminopeptidase Digestion | Histone fragments | N/A | Progressive degradation |
Breast Cancer: Deletion of JMJD7 reduces colony-forming ability in MDA-MB231 cells, highlighting its role in tumor growth .
Head and Neck Squamous Cell Carcinoma (HNSCC): The JMJD7-PLA2G4B fusion protein (from read-through transcription) promotes cell proliferation and survival via AKT signaling .
| Cancer Type | Functional Impact | Molecular Mechanism |
|---|---|---|
| Breast | Reduced tumorigenicity | Loss of histone tail cleavage |
| HNSCC | Enhanced proliferation/survival | AKT activation, anti-apoptotic effects |
Autism and Intellectual Disability: Genetic mutations linked to disrupted lysyl hydroxylation of DRG proteins, potentially affecting neuronal translation .
Cell Growth Regulation: Hydroxylation of DRG1/2 stabilizes these GTPases, modulating ribosomal function and cell size .
Narrow Substrate Scope: Preferentially hydroxylates lysine over derivatives like γ-thialysine or γ-azalysine .
Inhibition: Cysteine/selenocysteine-substituted peptides inhibit JMJD7 via covalent cross-linking .
JMJD7 is widely expressed, with notable presence in:
| Tissue | Expression Level | Functional Relevance |
|---|---|---|
| Liver | High | Metabolic regulation, DRG hydroxylation |
| Heart | High | Cardiomyocyte translation machinery |
| Brain | Moderate | Neurodevelopmental processes |
The JMJD7-PLA2G4B fusion arises from read-through transcription, encoding a protein with partial JmjC and phospholipase A2 domains. This isoform:
Localizes to Cytoplasm: Predominantly found in non-nuclear compartments .
Regulates AKT Signaling: Promotes survival in cancer cells by inhibiting apoptosis .
Drosophila Ortholog (dmJMJD7): Shares 45% sequence identity with human JMJD7 and hydroxylates homologous DRG-like proteins .
Structural Conservation: Dimerization mode and hydroxylase activity are evolutionarily preserved .
JMJD7 (Jumonji domain-containing protein 7) is a human Fe(II) and 2-oxoglutarate (2OG) dependent oxygenase that belongs to the JmjC family of enzymes . It functions as a bifunctional enzyme with dual catalytic capabilities: (1) as a 2-oxoglutarate-dependent monooxygenase that catalyzes (S)-stereospecific hydroxylation at C-3 of lysine residues in specific substrate proteins, and (2) as an endopeptidase that cleaves histone N-terminal tails . Its primary known substrates are Developmentally Regulated GTP Binding Proteins 1 and 2 (DRG1/2), where it hydroxylates 'Lys-22' of DRG1 and 'Lys-21' of DRG2, promoting their interaction with ribonucleic acids (RNA) . This post-translational modification may play a significant role in protein biosynthesis by modifying the translation machinery .
JMJD7 possesses an unusual dimeric JmjC fold that has been conserved through evolution from Drosophila melanogaster to humans . The full-length human JMJD7 protein consists of 316 amino acids . As a member of the JmjC family, JMJD7 contains the characteristic JmjC domain responsible for its catalytic activity . This domain coordinates an Fe(II) ion in the active site, which is essential for the enzyme's oxygenase activity . The protein structure facilitates the binding of 2-oxoglutarate as a co-substrate and molecular oxygen, which are necessary for the hydroxylation reaction . The specific molecular architecture enables JMJD7 to recognize and modify lysine residues in a stereospecific manner, while also potentially supporting its reported endopeptidase function .
JMJD7 requires specific cofactors for its catalytic activity. As a 2-oxoglutarate (2OG) dependent oxygenase, it uses:
Fe(II) (ferrous iron) - Essential for the catalytic mechanism as it coordinates with 2OG and molecular oxygen in the active site .
2-oxoglutarate (α-ketoglutarate) - Acts as a co-substrate that undergoes oxidative decarboxylation during the hydroxylation reaction .
Molecular oxygen (O₂) - Required for the oxidation reaction where one oxygen atom is incorporated into the lysyl residue and the other into succinate .
The enzyme's dependence on these cofactors places it within the broader family of non-heme iron oxygenases that catalyze a wide range of oxidative modifications on proteins and nucleic acids . These cofactor requirements are important considerations when designing in vitro assays to study JMJD7 activity, as the enzyme would be inactive without proper supplementation of Fe(II) and 2OG .
For effective expression and purification of recombinant human JMJD7, researchers should consider the following methodological approach:
Expression System: Escherichia coli has been successfully used for JMJD7 expression . The bacterial expression system typically employs a pET vector with an N-terminal His-tag for purification purposes.
Protein Construct: The full-length human JMJD7 (1-316 amino acids) can be expressed with an N-terminal His-tag for purification purposes . The tag sequence typically includes MGSSHHHHHHSSGLVPRGS followed by the JMJD7 sequence .
Expression Conditions: Optimal expression is generally achieved by inducing protein production at lower temperatures (16-18°C) after the culture reaches mid-log phase to enhance proper protein folding.
Purification Strategy:
Buffer Considerations: Purification buffers should contain components that maintain JMJD7 stability, typically including:
HEPES or Tris buffer (pH 7.5-8.0)
NaCl (typically 50-300 mM)
Glycerol (5-10%)
Reducing agent (such as DTT or β-mercaptoethanol)
Quality Control: The purified protein should be assessed by SDS-PAGE to confirm >90% purity and by mass spectrometry to verify the correct molecular weight and sequence .
Researchers can effectively assay JMJD7 enzymatic activity using several complementary methods:
Mass Spectrometry-Based Assays:
Oxygen Consumption Assays:
Clark-type oxygen electrode measurements can monitor oxygen consumption during the hydroxylation reaction.
This provides real-time kinetic data on enzyme activity.
2-Oxoglutarate Decarboxylation Assays:
Monitoring the conversion of [1-14C]-labeled 2OG to 14CO2 can be used to quantify enzyme activity.
This assay is particularly useful for high-throughput screening of potential inhibitors.
Fluorescence-Based Assays:
Fluorescently labeled peptide substrates can be used to develop FRET-based assays or fluorescence polarization assays.
These methods allow for real-time monitoring of substrate modification.
Coupled Enzyme Assays:
The succinate produced during the hydroxylation reaction can be coupled to succinate dehydrogenase activity and monitored spectrophotometrically.
Reaction Conditions:
Standard reaction buffer: 50 mM HEPES pH 7.5, 50-100 mM NaCl
Required components: Fe(II) (typically 50-100 μM), 2-oxoglutarate (typically 200-500 μM), and ascorbate (typically 1-2 mM) as a reducing agent
Substrate: DRG1/2-derived peptides containing the target lysine residue
When studying JMJD7's endopeptidase activity, researchers can use histone peptides or nucleosome substrates with methylated arginine or lysine residues and analyze the cleavage products by gel electrophoresis or mass spectrometry .
When designing peptide substrates for JMJD7 studies, researchers should consider several critical factors:
Sequence Context: The peptide should contain the target lysine residue (Lys-22 in DRG1 or Lys-21 in DRG2) with sufficient flanking residues to maintain the recognition motif . Typically, peptides of 15-25 amino acids in length are used to ensure proper enzyme recognition.
Substrate Specificity: JMJD7 has been shown to have a relatively narrow substrate scope compared to other JmjC hydroxylases . Therefore, maintaining the native sequence around the target lysine is crucial for enzyme recognition and activity.
Lysine Derivatives: When exploring substrate selectivity, various lysine derivatives can be incorporated:
(E)-dehydrolysine has been identified as an efficient alternative to lysine for JMJD7-catalyzed C3-hydroxylation
γ-Thialysine and γ-azalysine can undergo C3-hydroxylation followed by degradation to formylglycine
Methionine and homomethionine residues can replace lysine and undergo S-oxidation catalyzed by JMJD7
Potential Inhibitory Derivatives: Cysteine/selenocysteine replacements at the lysine position have been shown to efficiently inhibit JMJD7 via cross-linking mechanisms . These can be useful for inhibition studies.
Peptide Modifications:
N-terminal acetylation or biotinylation can be incorporated for detection or immobilization purposes
C-terminal amidation may improve peptide stability
Fluorescent labels can be introduced for assay development
Peptide Purity: High purity (>95%) peptides are recommended to ensure reliable and reproducible results in enzymatic assays.
Solubility Considerations: The hydrophobicity/hydrophilicity balance should be considered to ensure good solubility in aqueous buffers used for enzymatic assays.
JMJD7 achieves stereospecific (3S)-hydroxylation of lysine residues through a precisely orchestrated catalytic mechanism that involves:
Coordination Chemistry: The active site of JMJD7 contains an Fe(II) center that is coordinated by a facial triad of two histidine residues and one aspartate/glutamate residue . This metal center also coordinates the 2-oxoglutarate co-substrate and a water molecule, which is displaced upon substrate binding.
Substrate Positioning: The lysine residue of the substrate is positioned in the active site such that the C3 position is oriented toward the reactive iron-oxo species that forms during the catalytic cycle . This precise positioning is critical for the stereospecificity of the reaction.
Reaction Mechanism:
The Fe(II) center binds molecular oxygen, leading to the oxidative decarboxylation of 2OG
This generates a highly reactive Fe(IV)=O intermediate (ferryl species)
The ferryl species abstracts a hydrogen atom from the C3 position of the lysine side chain
Subsequent radical rebound results in hydroxylation specifically at the C3 position with (S) stereochemistry
Structural Constraints: The three-dimensional architecture of JMJD7's active site creates steric constraints that only allow for the formation of the (S) stereoisomer at C3 . The unusual dimeric JmjC fold of JMJD7 likely contributes to this stereoselectivity .
Evolutionary Conservation: The stereospecific hydroxylation mechanism appears to be conserved from Drosophila melanogaster to humans, suggesting its biological importance .
This precise stereochemical control distinguishes JMJD7 from other hydroxylases and highlights the exquisite specificity of enzyme-catalyzed reactions in biological systems.
JMJD7 possesses several distinctive structural features that set it apart from other JmjC domain-containing proteins:
Dimeric Architecture: JMJD7 exhibits an unusual dimeric JmjC fold that has been conserved evolutionarily from Drosophila melanogaster to humans . This dimeric organization is uncommon among JmjC domain-containing proteins, which typically function as monomers.
Bifunctional Catalytic Capacity: Unlike most JmjC proteins that catalyze either hydroxylation or demethylation reactions, JMJD7 uniquely possesses dual catalytic functions as both a hydroxylase and an endopeptidase . This bifunctionality suggests structural elements that can accommodate both reaction types.
Substrate Binding Pocket: JMJD7 has a relatively narrow substrate scope compared to other JmjC hydroxylases , indicating a more restrictive substrate binding pocket that is highly selective for specific lysine-containing sequences.
Active Site Configuration: The active site of JMJD7 must be configured to:
Domain Organization: The full-length human JMJD7 protein (316 amino acids) likely contains additional structural elements beyond the core JmjC domain that contribute to its unique functional properties and substrate recognition.
Inhibitor Susceptibility: JMJD7's structure enables efficient inhibition via cross-linking with cysteine/selenocysteine-containing peptides , suggesting accessible reactive groups within its structure that can be targeted for inhibition studies.
These distinct structural features make JMJD7 an intriguing subject for structural biology studies and highlight the functional diversity within the JmjC protein family.
The emerging therapeutic implications of targeting JMJD7 in human disease are multifaceted, though research in this area is still developing:
Translational Regulation: JMJD7 hydroxylates DRG1/2 translation factors, promoting their interaction with RNA . This suggests potential roles in regulating protein synthesis and translational fidelity. Targeting JMJD7 could therefore impact diseases characterized by dysregulated translation, including certain cancers and neurodegenerative disorders.
Epigenetic Modulation: JMJD7's reported endopeptidase activity on histone tails implies a role in epigenetic regulation. As epigenetic dysregulation is implicated in numerous diseases including cancer, developmental disorders, and inflammatory conditions, JMJD7 inhibitors could potentially modulate these pathological processes.
Inhibitor Design Approaches:
The relatively narrow substrate scope of JMJD7 compared to other JmjC hydroxylases suggests that selective inhibitors could be developed with minimal off-target effects
DRG1 variants possessing cysteine/selenocysteine instead of lysine efficiently inhibit JMJD7 via cross-linking , providing a template for peptidomimetic inhibitor design
Understanding the substrate selectivity profile of JMJD7 enables rational design of selective small-molecule inhibitors
Structural Conservation: The conservation of JMJD7's unusual dimeric structure from Drosophila to humans suggests fundamental biological importance and potentially conserved disease relevance across species, making it a viable target for therapeutic development.
Methodological Considerations: Research into JMJD7-targeted therapeutics would benefit from:
Development of cell-permeable inhibitors that maintain selectivity for JMJD7
Establishment of cellular assays to monitor JMJD7 activity in disease-relevant contexts
Investigation of JMJD7 expression patterns in various pathological states
Elucidation of the biological consequences of JMJD7 inhibition in vivo
As research on JMJD7 continues to evolve, its potential as a therapeutic target will likely become more clearly defined, particularly in diseases involving translational regulation or epigenetic dysregulation.
Addressing the dual functionality of JMJD7 (hydroxylase and endopeptidase activities) in experimental designs requires careful methodological considerations:
Activity-Specific Assay Conditions:
For hydroxylase activity: Optimize Fe(II), 2-oxoglutarate, and ascorbate concentrations, typically using DRG1/2-derived peptides as substrates
For endopeptidase activity: Use histone peptides or nucleosomes with methylated arginine/lysine residues as substrates, without requiring 2OG or Fe(II)
Control experiments should be performed with and without cofactors to distinguish between the two activities
Mutation-Based Approaches:
Engineer JMJD7 variants with mutations in residues predicted to be essential for one activity but not the other
For example, mutations in the Fe(II)-binding residues would likely abolish hydroxylase activity while potentially preserving endopeptidase function
These mutants can be used to dissect the biological relevance of each function independently
Selective Inhibition:
Develop or utilize inhibitors that selectively target one activity
2OG competitive inhibitors would affect hydroxylase activity specifically
Protease inhibitors might selectively impair endopeptidase function
Temporal Separation:
Design time-course experiments to determine if the two activities occur sequentially or independently
This could reveal whether one activity might regulate the other
Substrate Engineering:
Design substrates that can only undergo one type of modification
For hydroxylase activity: Use peptides containing lysine analogs that cannot be cleaved but can be hydroxylated
For endopeptidase activity: Design peptides with bonds resistant to hydroxylation but susceptible to proteolytic cleavage
Cellular Assays:
Develop cellular reporter systems that can distinguish between the two activities
For example, fluorescent reporters with different readouts for hydroxylation versus proteolytic cleavage
Mass Spectrometry Analysis:
By integrating these approaches, researchers can effectively address the dual functionality of JMJD7 and gain insights into the potential interplay between its hydroxylase and endopeptidase activities.
Developing selective inhibitors for JMJD7 presents several challenges, including distinguishing it from other JmjC domain-containing proteins and addressing its dual functionality. The following strategies can help overcome these challenges:
Structure-Based Rational Design:
Utilize the unusual dimeric JmjC fold of JMJD7 as a structural advantage for designing inhibitors that specifically recognize this dimeric architecture
Focus on unique features of the JMJD7 active site that differ from other JmjC enzymes to enhance selectivity
Employ computational docking and molecular dynamics simulations to predict binding modes and optimize inhibitor structures
Peptide-Based Approaches:
Design inhibitors based on the observation that DRG1 variants with cysteine/selenocysteine efficiently inhibit JMJD7 via cross-linking
Develop peptidomimetics that maintain the key recognition elements of the natural substrates while incorporating reactive groups for covalent modification
Create peptide libraries with systematic variations to identify optimized binding sequences
Focused Substrate Analog Libraries:
Leverage the relatively narrow substrate scope of JMJD7 to design substrate analogs that specifically target JMJD7
Incorporate γ-thialysine, γ-azalysine, or other lysine derivatives that have shown activity with JMJD7
Develop transition state analogs that mimic the geometry of the reaction intermediate
Bifunctional Inhibitor Design:
Create inhibitors capable of simultaneously targeting both the hydroxylase and endopeptidase activities
Design molecules that can bind to both active sites in the dimeric JMJD7 structure
This approach may enhance selectivity by requiring both binding events for effective inhibition
Allosteric Inhibition:
Target allosteric sites unique to JMJD7 rather than the conserved catalytic site
This approach can avoid competition with the high cellular concentrations of 2OG and provide better selectivity
Fragment-Based Drug Discovery:
Screen fragment libraries against JMJD7 to identify novel chemical scaffolds with good ligand efficiency
Link or grow promising fragments to develop potent and selective inhibitors
This approach may identify binding modes not predicted by substrate-based design
High-Throughput Screening with Selective Counter-Screening:
Develop a screening cascade that first identifies JMJD7 inhibitors, then counter-screens against related JmjC enzymes
Implement biochemical assays that specifically detect the unique activities of JMJD7
Exploiting Co-factor Binding Differences:
Design inhibitors that exploit subtle differences in how JMJD7 binds Fe(II) and 2OG compared to other JmjC enzymes
Focus on the coordination geometry and electronic properties of the metal center
These strategies, either individually or in combination, can help overcome the challenges in developing selective JMJD7 inhibitors with potential therapeutic applications.
Reconciling contradictory findings about JMJD7 functions requires systematic experimental approaches that address potential sources of discrepancy:
Standardization of Experimental Conditions:
Cross-validation with Multiple Techniques:
Employ orthogonal assay methods to verify findings (e.g., mass spectrometry, NMR, enzymatic assays)
Use both in vitro biochemical approaches and cellular/in vivo systems
Validate key findings across different experimental platforms and in multiple laboratories
Comprehensive Substrate Profiling:
Structural Biology Approaches:
Genetic and Cellular Validation:
Perform gene knockout/knockdown studies followed by comprehensive omics analyses
Implement rescue experiments with wild-type and mutant JMJD7 variants
Use CRISPR-Cas9 to introduce specific mutations that selectively affect one function
Domain and Mutation Analysis:
Create truncated versions and point mutants of JMJD7 to map functional domains
Identify residues critical for each reported activity
Determine if different functions map to distinct structural regions
Context-Dependent Regulation:
Investigate whether JMJD7 functions are regulated by:
Post-translational modifications
Protein-protein interactions
Cellular localization
Metabolic state (oxygen levels, 2OG availability)
Systematic Review and Meta-analysis:
Compile all published data on JMJD7 functions
Analyze methodological differences that might explain contradictory results
Identify consensus findings and establish confidence levels for different reported functions
Collaborative Verification:
Establish collaborative networks where multiple laboratories test the same hypotheses
Share reagents, protocols, and cell lines to minimize technical variability
By implementing these approaches, researchers can systematically address contradictions in the literature and develop a more coherent understanding of JMJD7's multifunctional nature, potentially revealing context-dependent regulation of its diverse activities .
Identifying the complete physiological substrate repertoire of JMJD7 requires innovative and comprehensive approaches:
Proteome-Wide Hydroxylation Profiling:
Implement mass spectrometry-based proteomics to identify proteins containing 3S-hydroxylysine modifications
Use stable isotope labeling (SILAC) combined with JMJD7 knockout/knockdown to quantitatively compare hydroxylation levels
Employ enrichment strategies (e.g., antibodies against hydroxylysine or chemical tagging approaches) to enhance detection sensitivity
Proximity-Based Labeling:
Engineer JMJD7 fusion proteins with proximity labeling enzymes (BioID, APEX2, TurboID)
Identify proteins that physically interact with JMJD7 in cellular contexts
Validate candidate interactors as potential substrates using in vitro assays
Structural Motif Analysis:
Functional Genomics Approaches:
Conduct CRISPR screens to identify genes that genetically interact with JMJD7
Perform transcriptomics and proteomics analyses in JMJD7-deficient cells to identify dysregulated pathways
Use these pathways to guide the search for direct JMJD7 substrates
In Vitro Peptide Library Screening:
Activity-Based Protein Profiling:
Design activity-based probes that covalently label JMJD7 substrates during the catalytic process
Use these probes to capture and identify substrate proteins
Comparative Evolutionary Analysis:
Integration of Multiple Omics Approaches:
Combine proteomics, transcriptomics, and metabolomics data from JMJD7 perturbation experiments
Use network analysis to identify central nodes that might represent direct JMJD7 substrates
Apply machine learning algorithms to predict high-confidence candidate substrates
Investigation of Both Enzymatic Activities:
These approaches, particularly when used in combination, offer promising strategies for comprehensively mapping the physiological substrate repertoire of JMJD7, which will provide crucial insights into its biological functions and potential therapeutic applications.
Advanced structural biology techniques hold tremendous potential for revealing new insights into JMJD7 catalytic mechanisms:
Cryo-Electron Microscopy (Cryo-EM):
Capture JMJD7 in different conformational states during catalysis
Visualize the dimeric architecture of JMJD7 at near-atomic resolution
Reveal how substrate binding induces conformational changes that facilitate catalysis
Image JMJD7 in complex with larger substrate proteins (DRG1/2) that may be challenging for crystallography
Time-Resolved X-ray Crystallography:
Capture intermediates in the catalytic cycle using techniques like temperature-jump or photo-triggering
Visualize the formation and decay of the Fe(IV)=O intermediate during hydroxylation
Map the structural changes occurring during substrate binding, catalysis, and product release
Nuclear Magnetic Resonance (NMR) Spectroscopy:
Investigate the dynamics of JMJD7 in solution
Monitor chemical shift perturbations upon substrate binding to map interaction interfaces
Use relaxation dispersion techniques to detect and characterize transient states during catalysis
Employ 19F-NMR with strategically placed fluorine labels to track conformational changes
Hydrogen-Deuterium Exchange Mass Spectrometry (HDX-MS):
Single-Molecule Techniques:
Use single-molecule FRET to monitor conformational changes during catalysis
Apply optical tweezers or atomic force microscopy to investigate mechanical properties
Employ single-molecule enzymology to detect potential cooperativity between monomers in the dimeric structure
Integrative Structural Biology:
Combine multiple structural techniques (X-ray crystallography, Cryo-EM, NMR, SAXS)
Develop comprehensive structural models that incorporate both static and dynamic information
Create computational models of the complete catalytic cycle
Neutron Crystallography:
Visualize hydrogen atom positions to elucidate proton transfer steps during catalysis
Distinguish between closely related chemical groups that differ mainly in hydrogen positioning
Provide insights into the hydrogen bonding networks critical for substrate recognition
Advanced Computational Approaches:
Apply molecular dynamics simulations to model conformational changes during catalysis
Use quantum mechanics/molecular mechanics (QM/MM) calculations to model the energetics of the reaction
Employ machine learning approaches to predict binding modes for novel substrates
These advanced structural biology techniques, particularly when applied in combination, have the potential to reveal unprecedented insights into JMJD7's catalytic mechanisms, including how it achieves stereospecific hydroxylation, how the dimeric structure influences function, and how it can catalyze both hydroxylation and proteolytic reactions .
The connections between JMJD7 and cellular stress response pathways represent an emerging area of research with several intriguing directions:
Oxygen Sensing and Hypoxia Response:
As an Fe(II) and 2-oxoglutarate dependent oxygenase, JMJD7 activity is inherently oxygen-dependent
Under hypoxic conditions, JMJD7 activity may be compromised, potentially affecting translation via its effects on DRG1/2
Investigate whether JMJD7 functions as an oxygen sensor in specific cellular contexts
Explore potential cross-talk with hypoxia-inducible factor (HIF) pathways
Translational Stress Responses:
JMJD7 hydroxylates translation factors DRG1/2, affecting their interaction with RNA
This suggests JMJD7 may play a role in regulating translation during stress conditions
Examine whether JMJD7 activity changes during different types of cellular stress (ER stress, oxidative stress, nutrient deprivation)
Investigate if JMJD7-mediated modifications of DRG1/2 influence stress granule formation or composition
Epigenetic Responses to Stress:
JMJD7's reported endopeptidase activity on histone tails implies a potential role in stress-induced epigenetic reprogramming
Study whether JMJD7-mediated histone cleavage is regulated by stress conditions
Investigate if "tailless nucleosomes" generated by JMJD7 play specific roles in stress-responsive gene expression programs
Metabolic Stress:
As a 2OG-dependent enzyme, JMJD7 activity may be sensitive to fluctuations in cellular metabolism
Changes in 2OG levels during metabolic stress could modulate JMJD7 function
Explore connections between JMJD7 and pathways sensing energy status (AMPK) or nutrient availability (mTOR)
Iron Homeostasis:
Oxidative Stress:
The catalytic mechanism of JMJD7 involves reactive oxygen species as intermediates
Explore whether JMJD7 contributes to cellular redox homeostasis
Examine if JMJD7 activity is modulated by oxidative stress conditions
Unfolded Protein Response (UPR):
Post-translational modifications by JMJD7 might influence protein folding or quality control
Investigate potential connections between JMJD7 and the unfolded protein response pathways
Examine if JMJD7 expression or activity is regulated during ER stress
Experimental Approaches for Investigation:
Stress-specific transcriptomics and proteomics in JMJD7-deficient cells
Assessment of JMJD7 expression, localization, and activity under different stress conditions
Identification of stress-specific JMJD7 interactors and substrates
Phenotypic characterization of JMJD7-deficient cells under various stress conditions
These emerging connections between JMJD7 and cellular stress response pathways suggest important roles for this enzyme in cellular adaptation to environmental challenges, potentially opening new therapeutic avenues targeting stress-related pathologies.
Jumonji Domain Containing 7 (JMJD7) is a protein-coding gene that belongs to the Jumonji family of proteins. These proteins are characterized by the presence of a Jumonji C (JmjC) domain, which is part of the cupin metalloenzyme superfamily. The JmjC domain is known for its role in catalyzing various biochemical reactions, including histone demethylation and hydroxylation. JMJD7 is highly conserved across species, indicating its crucial role in cellular processes.
JMJD7 is a bifunctional enzyme that acts both as an endopeptidase and a 2-oxoglutarate-dependent monooxygenase . As an endopeptidase, it cleaves histone N-terminal tails at the carboxyl side of methylated arginine or lysine residues, generating ‘tailless nucleosomes’ which may trigger transcription elongation . It preferentially recognizes and cleaves monomethylated and dimethylated arginine residues of histones H2, H3, and H4 . Additionally, JMJD7 acts as a Fe(2+) and 2-oxoglutarate-dependent monooxygenase, catalyzing (S)-stereospecific hydroxylation at C-3 of ‘Lys-22’ of DRG1 and ‘Lys-21’ of DRG2 translation factors, promoting their interaction with ribonucleic acids (RNA) .
The biological significance of JMJD7 extends beyond its enzymatic activities. It plays a role in protein biosynthesis by modifying the translation machinery . The deregulation of JMJD7 has been associated with various diseases, including myasthenic syndrome, congenital, 4B, fast-channel . Moreover, the Jumonji family of proteins, including JMJD7, has been implicated in the regulation of gene expression through histone post-translational modifications (PTMs) . These modifications are crucial for the regulation of chromatin structure and function, influencing processes such as transcription, DNA repair, and replication .
Research on JMJD7 and other Jumonji family proteins has gained significant attention due to their roles in epigenetic regulation and disease. The deregulation of Jumonji proteins has been linked to various cancers, including colon, prostate, hematological, and breast cancers . Understanding the mechanisms underlying JMJD7’s function and its role in disease can provide insights into potential therapeutic targets for cancer and other diseases associated with epigenetic deregulation .