KAKU4 Antibody

Shipped with Ice Packs
In Stock

Description

KAKU4 Protein Overview

KAKU4 (AT4G31430) is a plant-specific nuclear lamina-associated protein that interacts with CRWN1/4 lamin-like proteins . It regulates:

  • Nuclear shape and size via membrane invaginations

  • Chromatin state transitions (H3K27me3 and H3K9me2 dynamics)

  • Pollen tube nuclear migration through vegetative nucleus deformation

Experimental Tools for KAKU4 Detection

While direct antibody applications are not detailed, studies use:

Table 1: Key Methodologies for KAKU4 Analysis

MethodApplicationKey FindingsSource
GFP/YFP FusionLocalization via confocal microscopyKAKU4 localizes at the nuclear periphery and colocalizes with SUN2 .
Yeast Two-HybridProtein-protein interaction mappingKAKU4 binds CRWN1/4 and nucleoporins (NUP82, NUP136) .
Pull-Down AssaysIdentification of interaction partnersCRWN1/4, chromatin modifiers (e.g., PRC2 components) co-purify with KAKU4 .
ChIP-seq/RNA-seqEpigenomic profiling in kaku4 mutantsH3K27me3 redistribution links KAKU4 to hormone signaling and cell death .

Functional Domains of KAKU4

Three conserved motifs drive its activity:

Table 2: KAKU4 Functional Motifs

MotifRegionRoleInteraction Partners
M1N-terminalSelf-associationKAKU4 oligomerization
M2N-terminalCRWN bindingCRWN1/2/3
M3N-terminalNuclear envelope deformationIndirectly promotes invagination

Deletion of these motifs disrupts nuclear periphery localization and lamin interactions .

Table 3: Phenotypes in kaku4 Mutants

Phenotype CategoryObserved DefectsAssociated PathwaysSource
Nuclear MorphologySpherical vegetative nuclei in pollen Nuclear migration defects
Chromatin StateH3K27me3 loss at PLAD regions; H3K9me2 gains Gene silencing dysregulation
Developmental DefectsReduced plant size; hormone signaling alterationsAuxin/ABA pathways

Future Directions for KAKU4 Antibody Development

Existing studies rely on epitope tags (e.g., GFP) rather than direct antibodies. A KAKU4-specific antibody could enable:

  • Native protein localization without genetic fusion artifacts

  • Chromatin immunoprecipitation (ChIP) to map direct DNA interactions

  • Quantitative assays for KAKU4 expression under stress conditions (e.g., heat shock)

Product Specs

Buffer
**Preservative:** 0.03% Proclin 300
**Constituents:** 50% Glycerol, 0.01M PBS, pH 7.4
Form
Liquid
Synonyms
Protein KAKU4 KAKU4 At4g31430 F3L17.8 F8F16
Target Names
KAKU4
Uniprot No.

Target Background

Function
Essential for maintaining the structural integrity of the nucleus, including its size and shape.
Database Links

KEGG: ath:AT4G31430

STRING: 3702.AT4G31430.2

UniGene: At.1858

Subcellular Location
Nucleus inner membrane.

Q&A

What is KAKU4 and why is it significant in plant cell biology?

KAKU4 is a plant-specific protein that localizes to the inner nuclear membrane and plays a crucial role in modulating nuclear shape and size in Arabidopsis thaliana. The protein functions as part of a unique lamina-like structure that plants have evolved to control nuclear morphology. KAKU4 has been shown to physically interact with CRWN1 and CRWN4, other nuclear envelope proteins, and can deform the nuclear envelope in a dose-dependent manner. The study of KAKU4 is significant because it provides insights into plant-specific mechanisms of nuclear organization, which differ from the lamin-based systems found in animal cells .

What cellular phenotypes are associated with KAKU4 mutation or deficiency?

KAKU4-deficient mutants (kaku4-1, kaku4-2, kaku4-3, and kaku4-4) exhibit strikingly spherical nuclei compared to the characteristic spindle-shaped nuclei of wild-type Arabidopsis. Quantitative analysis reveals that kaku4 mutant nuclei have a significantly higher circularity index and smaller cross-sectional area. These phenotypic changes are consistent across various tissues, including cotyledons, hypocotyls, and roots, indicating the fundamental role of KAKU4 in maintaining normal nuclear architecture throughout the plant .

How is KAKU4 protein localization typically studied?

KAKU4 localization is primarily studied using fluorescent protein fusions. Researchers have successfully employed KAKU4-GFP, KAKU4-tRFP, and KAKU4-EYFP constructs expressed under the control of the endogenous promoter for localization studies. These fluorescent fusions consistently show that KAKU4 localizes to the nuclear envelope in all examined plant tissues. Co-localization studies with inner nuclear membrane markers like SUN2-tRFP confirm KAKU4's presence at the nuclear periphery. For more precise localization, immunoelectron microscopy with anti-GFP antibodies has been used on KAKU4-EYFP expressing plants, revealing that KAKU4 predominantly localizes to the inner nuclear membrane .

What methods are recommended for validating KAKU4 antibody specificity?

For rigorous KAKU4 antibody validation, a multi-pronged approach is recommended:

  • CRISPR-Cas9 knockout validation: Generate KAKU4 knockout lines in Arabidopsis using CRISPR-Cas9 technology. The absence of signal in these knockout lines when probed with the KAKU4 antibody would confirm specificity. This can be assessed via Western blot, immunofluorescence, or immunoprecipitation analyses .

  • Multiple mutant allele testing: Validate antibody specificity across several independent kaku4 mutant lines (such as kaku4-1, kaku4-2, kaku4-3, and kaku4-4) to ensure consistent loss of signal across different genetic lesions affecting the KAKU4 gene .

  • Cross-validation with tagged proteins: Compare antibody staining patterns with the localization of fluorescently tagged KAKU4 proteins in transgenic lines to ensure concordance of localization patterns .

  • Signal peptide blocking: Pre-incubate the antibody with purified KAKU4 antigen before immunostaining to confirm that the signal is successfully competed away.

How can I determine the optimal fixation and permeabilization conditions for KAKU4 immunostaining?

Nuclear envelope proteins like KAKU4 require careful optimization of fixation and permeabilization protocols. Based on established protocols for nuclear envelope proteins:

  • Fixation optimization: Test multiple fixatives including 4% paraformaldehyde (10-15 minutes), methanol (-20°C for 10 minutes), or a combination of paraformaldehyde followed by methanol. Different fixatives may preserve different epitopes.

  • Permeabilization testing: Evaluate different detergents including 0.1% Triton X-100, 0.5% Tween-20, or 0.1% saponin, applied for varied durations (5-15 minutes). For inner nuclear membrane proteins like KAKU4, stronger permeabilization may be necessary to allow antibody access .

  • Antigen retrieval: Consider incorporating an antigen retrieval step by incubating slides in boiling sodium citrate solution (10 mM, pH 6.0) for approximately 12 minutes at 700W if initial protocols yield weak signals .

  • Blocking conditions: Test various blocking agents (1-5% BSA, 5-10% normal serum, or commercial blocking reagents) to reduce background and enhance specific staining.

A systematic comparison of these conditions is recommended, documenting signal-to-noise ratio for each protocol variation.

How can KAKU4 antibodies be used to investigate nuclear envelope dynamics during stress responses?

Recent research indicates that KAKU4 proteins detach from the nuclear envelope in response to certain stresses . To investigate this phenomenon:

  • Time-course immunostaining: Apply selected stressors (heat, osmotic stress, mechanical pressure) to Arabidopsis tissues and fix samples at defined intervals (0, 15, 30, 60, 120 minutes). Process all samples for KAKU4 immunostaining using validated antibodies.

  • Co-immunostaining protocol: Perform dual-labeling with KAKU4 antibodies and markers for nuclear envelope integrity (e.g., antibodies against other NE proteins like SUN2) to distinguish between KAKU4-specific responses and general nuclear envelope disruption.

  • Quantitative analysis: Measure the nuclear envelope/nucleoplasm signal ratio across multiple nuclei (n>50) per timepoint using confocal microscopy and image analysis software. This ratio will decrease as KAKU4 detaches from the nuclear envelope.

  • Western blot fractionation: Complement imaging with biochemical fractionation into nuclear envelope and nucleoplasmic fractions, followed by Western blotting with KAKU4 antibodies to quantify redistribution.

This approach can reveal the dynamics and triggers of KAKU4 redistribution during stress responses, providing insights into plant-specific nuclear envelope remodeling mechanisms.

What are the recommended protocols for using KAKU4 antibodies in chromatin immunoprecipitation (ChIP) experiments?

KAKU4 has been reported to interact with chromatin at the nuclear periphery . To identify KAKU4-associated genomic regions:

  • Sample preparation and crosslinking:

    • Harvest 1-2g of Arabidopsis tissue and crosslink with 1% formaldehyde in MC buffer under vacuum for 10 minutes

    • Quench with 125mM glycine for 5 minutes

    • Isolate nuclei using the nuclear isolation buffer containing 20mM HEPES (pH 8.0), 250mM sucrose, 1mM MgCl₂, 5mM KCl, 40% glycerol, 0.25% Triton X-100, 0.1mM PMSF, and 0.1% 2-mercaptoethanol

  • Chromatin shearing:

    • Resuspend isolated nuclei in sonication buffer (10mM potassium phosphate pH 7.0, 0.1mM NaCl, 0.5% sarkosyl, 10mM EDTA)

    • Sonicate to achieve fragments of approximately 200-500bp

    • Add Triton X-100 to a final concentration of 1% to improve antibody accessibility

  • Immunoprecipitation:

    • Pre-clear chromatin with protein A/G beads and non-immune IgG

    • Incubate cleared chromatin with KAKU4 antibody overnight at 4°C

    • Include appropriate controls: input sample, IgG control, and where possible, chromatin from kaku4 mutants

  • Analysis options:

    • Perform qPCR for candidate loci suspected to associate with the nuclear periphery

    • Conduct ChIP-seq to identify genome-wide KAKU4-associated regions

    • Compare KAKU4 binding profiles before and after stress treatment to detect changes in chromatin association

This protocol can help identify genomic regions that interact with KAKU4 at the nuclear periphery, providing insights into how nuclear envelope proteins influence chromatin organization in plants.

What are the most common causes of non-specific binding when using KAKU4 antibodies, and how can they be addressed?

When working with KAKU4 antibodies, several factors can contribute to non-specific binding:

IssuePotential CausesSolutions
High background signalInsufficient blockingIncrease blocking time (2-3 hours) and concentration (3-5% BSA); consider adding 0.1-0.3% Triton X-100 to blocking buffer
Nuclear envelope-like signal in knockout controlsCross-reactivity with other nuclear envelope proteinsPre-absorb antibody with nuclear extracts from kaku4 mutants; use more stringent washing (higher salt concentration in wash buffers)
Cytoplasmic stainingFixation artifacts or KAKU4 degradation productsOptimize fixation time; add protease inhibitors during sample preparation; test methanol fixation as an alternative
Inconsistent signal intensityVariable epitope accessibilityIncorporate antigen retrieval step; test different permeabilization methods; optimize antibody concentration
Signal in unexpected cell typesNon-specific binding to abundant proteinsValidate results with multiple antibodies targeting different KAKU4 epitopes; perform peptide competition assays

For definitive validation, always compare results with CRISPR-Cas9 knockout lines or well-characterized kaku4 mutants to confirm signal specificity .

How can I optimize KAKU4 antibody performance for co-immunoprecipitation of interaction partners?

KAKU4 forms complexes with proteins like CRWN1 and CRWN4 . For successful co-immunoprecipitation:

  • Extraction buffer optimization:

    • Test various extraction conditions to preserve protein-protein interactions while efficiently extracting KAKU4

    • Start with a buffer containing 50mM Tris-HCl pH 7.5, 150mM NaCl, 1% NP-40, 0.5% sodium deoxycholate, and protease inhibitors

    • For nuclear envelope proteins, consider adding 1-2% digitonin instead of stronger detergents to better preserve membrane-associated complexes

  • Crosslinking considerations:

    • For transient or weak interactions, incorporate a mild crosslinking step (0.5-1% formaldehyde for 5-10 minutes) before extraction

    • For stronger interactions, avoid crosslinking as it may reduce antibody accessibility

  • Antibody coupling strategy:

    • Direct coupling of KAKU4 antibodies to magnetic beads (using commercial coupling kits) can reduce background from IgG chains

    • If using protein A/G beads, pre-clear lysates thoroughly and include appropriate IgG controls

  • Elution method selection:

    • For mass spectrometry analysis, consider native elution with competing peptides

    • For Western blot analysis, standard SDS elution is usually sufficient

  • Validation of interactions:

    • Confirm interactions by reverse co-IP using antibodies against suspected interaction partners

    • Include kaku4 mutant samples as negative controls to identify non-specific binding

This optimized protocol increases the likelihood of capturing genuine KAKU4 interaction partners while minimizing artifacts.

How should I interpret changes in KAKU4 localization during plant development and differentiation?

KAKU4 localization patterns may change during development and cell differentiation. To properly interpret these changes:

  • Establish a developmental baseline:

    • Perform systematic immunostaining across different developmental stages and tissues

    • Quantify parameters such as signal intensity at the nuclear envelope, nucleoplasmic signal ratio, and co-localization with other nuclear envelope markers

    • Generate developmental maps of KAKU4 distribution to identify stage-specific patterns

  • Correlation with nuclear morphology metrics:

    • Measure nuclear shape parameters (circularity index, surface area) alongside KAKU4 localization

    • Calculate correlation coefficients between KAKU4 levels/distribution and nuclear morphology parameters

    • Test whether KAKU4 distribution changes precede or follow nuclear shape changes

  • Differentiation-specific analysis:

    • Compare KAKU4 levels and localization between undifferentiated cells (meristems) and specialized cell types

    • Note that KAKU4 overexpression causes nuclear envelope deformations in most tissues except meristematic tissues

    • Investigate whether differential KAKU4 regulation contributes to tissue-specific nuclear architecture

  • Gene expression correlation:

    • Perform RNA-seq on tissues with different KAKU4 localization patterns

    • Identify genes whose expression correlates with changes in KAKU4 distribution

    • Examine whether genes located at the nuclear periphery show altered expression when KAKU4 localization changes

This integrative approach can reveal how KAKU4 dynamics contribute to developmental regulation of nuclear architecture and potentially gene expression.

What experimental approaches can distinguish between direct and indirect effects of KAKU4 on nuclear morphology?

KAKU4 influences nuclear shape, but determining causality requires sophisticated approaches:

  • Inducible system design:

    • Create an estradiol-inducible KAKU4 expression system

    • Monitor nuclear shape changes at short time intervals (15, 30, 60, 120 minutes) after induction

    • Early responses (within 30-60 minutes) more likely represent direct effects

  • Structure-function analysis:

    • Generate a series of KAKU4 deletion constructs to map domains responsible for different functions

    • The C-terminal Arg- and Gly-rich region is of particular interest, as variants lacking this region still localize to the nuclear periphery

    • Test each construct's ability to: (a) localize to the nuclear envelope, (b) interact with CRWN proteins, and (c) influence nuclear shape

  • Interaction disruption experiments:

    • Design peptides that specifically disrupt KAKU4-CRWN interactions without affecting localization

    • Observe whether nuclear morphology changes occur when interactions are selectively blocked

    • Generate point mutations in interaction domains to create separation-of-function alleles

  • In vitro reconstitution:

    • Purify KAKU4 and test its membrane-binding and membrane-deforming properties using artificial membrane systems

    • This can determine whether KAKU4 alone is sufficient to induce membrane curvature

  • Micromechanical measurements:

    • Perform atomic force microscopy on nuclei from wild-type, kaku4 mutant, and KAKU4-overexpressing lines

    • Measure nuclear envelope stiffness, elasticity, and response to mechanical forces

    • Determine whether KAKU4 directly influences the biophysical properties of the nuclear envelope

These approaches collectively can establish the mechanistic basis of KAKU4's effects on nuclear morphology and distinguish between structural and regulatory functions.

Quick Inquiry

Personal Email Detected
Please use an institutional or corporate email address for inquiries. Personal email accounts ( such as Gmail, Yahoo, and Outlook) are not accepted. *
© Copyright 2025 TheBiotek. All Rights Reserved.