Source: Rabbit-derived IgG.
Reactivity: Human samples (validated in HepG2 cells, intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma, and ovarian cancer tissue) .
Applications: Western blot (WB), immunohistochemistry (IHC), and enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA) .
Dilutions:
WB: 1:500–1:2000.
IHC: 1:100–1:500.
Source: Mouse IgG1.
Reactivity: Human samples.
Applications: Flow cytometry (FC), immunofluorescence (IF), IHC, and WB .
Dilutions:
WB: 1:2000.
IHC: 1:150.
IF: 1:100.
| Antibody Type | Host/Isotype | Applications | Reactivity |
|---|---|---|---|
| Polyclonal (14806-1-AP) | Rabbit/IgG | WB, IHC, ELISA | Human |
| Monoclonal (OTI1D11) | Mouse/IgG1 | FC, IF, IHC, WB | Human |
KCTD14 has been implicated in ovarian cancer, with studies identifying copy number variation (CNV) gains in 4.5% of cases and significant expression changes (FC = 1.5, p < 0.001) . Its expression is also elevated in intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma and stomach cancer tissues, as confirmed by IHC .
Optimal staining requires antigen retrieval with TE buffer (pH 9.0) or citrate buffer (pH 6.0) .
The polyclonal antibody (14806-1-AP) shows cross-reactivity with mouse tissues (skeletal muscle, brain, small intestine) , while the monoclonal variant (OTI1D11) is human-specific .
KCTD14 (Potassium Channel Tetramerisation Domain Containing 14) is a 255 amino acid protein that contains a BTB (Broad-Complex, Tramtrack and Bric a brac) domain, also known as POZ (Poxvirus and Zinc finger) domain. This structural feature plays a crucial role in homodimerization and is characterized by multiple kelch repeats and C2H2-type zinc fingers . The protein's molecular weight is approximately 16.6 kDa, though this may vary depending on post-translational modifications and the specific isoform being studied .
The BTB/POZ domain is significant as it suggests KCTD14's involvement in transcriptional regulation through modulation of chromatin structure and function, thereby influencing gene expression patterns . KCTD14 is encoded by a gene located on human chromosome 11, a region associated with various genetic disorders including Jervell and Lange-Nielsen syndrome and Jacobsen syndrome, highlighting its potential importance in both normal physiology and disease states .
When investigating KCTD14's cellular functions, researchers should consider employing multiple experimental approaches, including gene knockdown/knockout studies, co-immunoprecipitation to identify interaction partners, and chromatin immunoprecipitation to determine DNA binding sites if transcriptional regulation is suspected.
KCTD14 antibodies have been validated for multiple detection methods, with varying efficacy depending on experimental conditions and antibody properties. Based on available data, the following methodologies have demonstrated reliable results:
Western Blotting (WB): Most KCTD14 antibodies are optimized for western blotting, with recommended dilutions typically ranging from 1:500 to 1:2000 . This technique is particularly useful for confirming antibody specificity and determining molecular weight. Visualization of KCTD14 typically reveals a band at approximately 16.6-34 kDa, depending on post-translational modifications and the specific detection system .
Immunofluorescence (IF): Several monoclonal KCTD14 antibodies, including clones 3F5, 3A4, and 2A6, have been validated for immunofluorescence applications . This method is valuable for determining subcellular localization of KCTD14.
Flow Cytometry (FACS): Monoclonal antibodies such as clone 1A11 have been approved for flow cytometry at dilutions of approximately 1:100 . This approach is useful for quantifying KCTD14 expression in individual cells within heterogeneous populations.
Immunoprecipitation (IP): Some KCTD14 antibodies, particularly the A-6 monoclonal antibody, have demonstrated efficacy in immunoprecipitation experiments . This technique is valuable for studying protein-protein interactions involving KCTD14.
Enzyme-Linked Immunosorbent Assay (ELISA): Both monoclonal and polyclonal KCTD14 antibodies have applications in ELISA . This method can be employed for quantitative analysis of KCTD14 in solution.
For optimal results, researchers should validate each antibody's performance in their specific experimental system, as effectiveness may vary based on sample preparation methods, fixation protocols, and detection systems.
Selecting the appropriate KCTD14 antibody requires careful consideration of multiple factors to ensure experimental success:
Antibody Type Considerations:
| Antibody Type | Advantages | Recommended Applications |
|---|---|---|
| Monoclonal (e.g., 1A11, A-6) | High specificity, consistent lot-to-lot reliability | Western blotting, flow cytometry, immunofluorescence |
| Polyclonal | Broader epitope recognition, potentially higher sensitivity | Western blotting, ELISA |
Host Species Selection: Consider the host species (mouse, rabbit) in relation to your experimental design, particularly when performing multi-color immunostaining. Mouse monoclonal antibodies (like clones 1A11 and A-6) are available for KCTD14 , while rabbit polyclonal options also exist . Select a host species that will minimize cross-reactivity with other antibodies in your experimental panel.
Application-Specific Requirements: Different applications require antibodies with specific properties:
For western blotting: Antibodies recognizing denatured epitopes (e.g., ABIN1499009, sc-393876)
For immunofluorescence: Antibodies that maintain reactivity in fixation conditions (e.g., clones 3F5, 3A4, 2A6)
For flow cytometry: Fluorophore-conjugated antibodies or primary antibodies with proven flow compatibility (e.g., clone 1A11 at 1:100 dilution)
Epitope Specificity: The A-6 monoclonal antibody (sc-393876) targets an epitope mapping between amino acids 132-157 within an internal region of human KCTD14 . Consider whether the research question requires targeting a specific domain of the protein.
Conjugation Requirements: KCTD14 antibodies are available in various conjugated forms, including unconjugated, agarose, HRP, PE, FITC, and multiple Alexa Fluor® conjugates . Select conjugations based on your detection system and experimental design.
Always validate the antibody in your specific experimental system before proceeding with critical experiments, ideally using positive and negative controls to confirm specificity and sensitivity.
Effective detection of KCTD14 requires optimized sample preparation protocols tailored to the specific application. Based on the available data, the following methodological approaches are recommended:
For Western Blotting:
Cell Lysis: Use a buffer containing PBS, pH 7.3, supplemented with 1% BSA and protease inhibitors . For challenging samples, consider RIPA buffer with complete protease inhibitor cocktail.
Sample Handling: Process samples at 4°C to minimize protein degradation.
Protein Concentration: Determine using Bradford or BCA assay; load 20-50 μg of total protein per lane.
Denaturation: Heat samples at 95°C for 5 minutes in Laemmli buffer containing SDS and β-mercaptoethanol.
Gel Selection: Use 12-15% polyacrylamide gels given KCTD14's relatively small size (16.6 kDa) .
Transfer Optimization: For small proteins like KCTD14, use PVDF membranes with 0.2 μm pore size rather than 0.45 μm.
For Immunofluorescence:
Fixation: 4% paraformaldehyde for 15 minutes at room temperature preserves most epitopes.
Permeabilization: 0.1-0.5% Triton X-100 for 10 minutes allows antibody access to intracellular KCTD14.
Blocking: 5% normal serum (matched to secondary antibody host) in PBS with 0.1% Tween-20 for 1 hour.
Primary Antibody Incubation: Use antibodies validated for IF (e.g., clones 3F5, 3A4, or 2A6) at manufacturer-recommended dilutions, typically overnight at 4°C.
For Flow Cytometry:
Cell Preparation: Single-cell suspensions fixed with 2% paraformaldehyde.
Permeabilization: If detecting intracellular KCTD14, use 0.1% saponin or commercial permeabilization buffers.
Antibody Dilution: Use KCTD14 antibodies approved for flow cytometry (e.g., clone 1A11) at 1:100 dilution .
Controls: Include fluorescence-minus-one (FMO) controls to establish gating strategies.
For Immunoprecipitation:
Lysis Buffer: Use non-denaturing buffer (e.g., 50 mM Tris-HCl pH 7.4, 150 mM NaCl, 1% NP-40, 0.5% sodium deoxycholate) with protease inhibitors.
Pre-clearing: Pre-clear lysates with protein A/G beads to reduce non-specific binding.
Antibody Selection: Use agarose-conjugated KCTD14 antibodies (e.g., sc-393876 AC) or protein A/G beads with unconjugated antibodies.
These methodological approaches should be optimized for specific experimental conditions, with particular attention to antibody dilution, incubation time, and buffer composition.
Incorporating appropriate controls is essential for ensuring the validity and reliability of experiments using KCTD14 antibodies. The following control strategies are recommended based on standard research practices and available KCTD14-specific data:
Positive Controls:
Recombinant KCTD14 Protein: Use purified recombinant KCTD14 protein (such as ABIN7124529, containing amino acids 74-225 with His tag) as a positive control for western blotting and ELISA applications . This allows verification of antibody binding to the target protein.
KCTD14-Expressing Cell Lines: The search results indicate that HEK293T cells transfected with human KCTD14 (sc-174405) provide a reliable positive control, as do Hep G2 cells which naturally express KCTD14 . These cells can be used as positive controls for western blotting, immunofluorescence, and flow cytometry applications.
Negative Controls:
Non-Transfected Cells: Use non-transfected 293T cells (sc-117752) as a negative control to demonstrate antibody specificity . The search results show clear differential detection between transfected and non-transfected cells.
Isotype Controls: For monoclonal antibodies like clone 1A11 (IgG1) or A-6 (IgG2b), use matching isotype controls at equivalent concentrations to identify potential non-specific binding, particularly important in flow cytometry and immunohistochemistry applications .
Blocking Peptide Competition: Where available, use specific blocking peptides containing the target epitope to confirm antibody specificity. When the antibody is pre-incubated with its specific blocking peptide, the signal should be abolished or significantly reduced.
Method-Specific Controls:
For Western Blotting: Include molecular weight markers to confirm the detected band matches the expected size of KCTD14 (approximately 16.6-34 kDa) . Additionally, use loading controls (β-actin, GAPDH) to ensure equal protein loading across samples.
For Immunofluorescence: Include secondary-only controls (omitting primary antibody) to identify background fluorescence. For co-localization studies, include single-stained controls to account for spectral overlap.
For Flow Cytometry: Implement fluorescence-minus-one (FMO) controls to establish accurate gating strategies, particularly when using conjugated KCTD14 antibodies like FITC, PE, or Alexa Fluor conjugates .
For Immunoprecipitation: Include a control IP using non-specific IgG of the same isotype and species as the KCTD14 antibody to identify non-specific pull-downs.
Incorporating these controls systematically will enhance experimental rigor and facilitate accurate interpretation of results when working with KCTD14 antibodies.
The presence of the BTB/POZ (Broad-Complex, Tramtrack and Bric a brac/Poxvirus and Zinc finger) domain in KCTD14 introduces several critical considerations for experimental design that researchers should address to ensure meaningful results:
Protein-Protein Interaction Studies:
The BTB/POZ domain plays a crucial role in homodimerization and potentially in recruiting protein complexes involved in transcriptional regulation . When designing co-immunoprecipitation experiments, researchers should consider:
Buffer Conditions: The BTB domain's structural integrity depends on pH and ionic strength. Use physiological buffers (pH 7.3-7.4) with moderate salt concentrations (150-300 mM NaCl) to maintain native interactions .
Detergent Selection: Use mild, non-ionic detergents (0.5-1% NP-40 or Triton X-100) that preserve protein-protein interactions while solubilizing membrane components.
Epitope Accessibility: Consider whether the antibody epitope (e.g., amino acids 132-157 for the A-6 antibody) might be masked by BTB domain-mediated interactions . Use antibodies targeting different epitopes to validate results.
Chromatin Studies:
Since BTB domain-containing proteins like KCTD14 are implicated in transcriptional regulation via chromatin structure and function , researchers investigating these aspects should consider:
Chromatin Immunoprecipitation (ChIP) Protocol Optimization: For ChIP applications, formaldehyde fixation times may need adjustment to preserve BTB-mediated chromatin associations without overfixing.
Sequential ChIP: To identify co-regulatory complexes, design sequential ChIP experiments targeting KCTD14 followed by known transcriptional regulators or chromatin modifiers.
DNA Binding Site Analysis: Design experiments to distinguish between direct DNA binding (if KCTD14 exhibits this property through its C2H2-type zinc fingers) versus indirect chromatin association through protein partners.
Domain-Specific Functional Analyses:
To dissect the specific contributions of the BTB/POZ domain to KCTD14 function:
Expression System Considerations:
The BTB domain's propensity for protein-protein interactions may affect expression and purification strategies:
For bacterial expression (e.g., E. coli), consider using solubility-enhancing tags and optimizing induction conditions to prevent inclusion body formation caused by BTB domain-mediated aggregation .
For mammalian expression, evaluate whether overexpression disrupts endogenous protein complexes through competitive binding of the BTB domain.
By addressing these BTB domain-specific considerations in experimental design, researchers can more effectively investigate KCTD14's functional role in transcriptional regulation and chromatin biology.
Co-immunoprecipitation (Co-IP) experiments with KCTD14 require careful optimization to preserve protein-protein interactions while ensuring specific detection. Based on the structural and functional properties of KCTD14, the following methodological approach is recommended:
Lysis and Buffer Optimization:
Buffer Composition: Use a non-denaturing lysis buffer that preserves native protein interactions:
Base buffer: 50 mM Tris-HCl (pH 7.4), 150 mM NaCl
Detergent: 0.5-1% NP-40 or 0.5% Triton X-100 (mild non-ionic detergents)
Protease inhibitors: Complete protease inhibitor cocktail
Phosphatase inhibitors: If investigating phosphorylation-dependent interactions
DTT or β-mercaptoethanol (1-5 mM): To maintain reduced cysteines in zinc finger motifs
Lysis Conditions: Perform cell lysis at 4°C with gentle agitation for 30 minutes to minimize protein denaturation and preserve KCTD14's BTB domain-mediated interactions .
Clearance: Centrifuge lysates at 14,000 × g for 15 minutes at 4°C to remove cellular debris before proceeding with immunoprecipitation.
Antibody Selection and Immobilization:
Antibody Options: For pull-down of KCTD14, the A-6 monoclonal antibody has been validated for immunoprecipitation applications . Alternative options include agarose-conjugated KCTD14 antibodies (sc-393876 AC) .
Pre-clearing Strategy: Pre-clear lysates with protein A/G beads (25 μL of 50% slurry per 1 mg of protein) for 1 hour at 4°C to reduce non-specific binding.
Antibody Immobilization: For unconjugated antibodies, immobilize 2-5 μg of KCTD14 antibody onto 25-50 μL of protein A/G beads for 1-2 hours at 4°C before adding to pre-cleared lysates.
Immunoprecipitation Protocol:
Incubation Parameters: Incubate antibody-bead complexes with pre-cleared lysates overnight at 4°C with gentle rotation to maximize capture of specific complexes while minimizing non-specific interactions.
Washing Stringency: Perform 4-5 washes with decreasing detergent concentrations (starting from lysis buffer concentration and reducing to 0.1% in the final wash) to remove non-specific binding while preserving specific interactions.
Elution Strategy: Elute protein complexes using low pH buffer (100 mM glycine, pH 2.5) followed by immediate neutralization, or by boiling in Laemmli sample buffer for 5 minutes if proceeding directly to SDS-PAGE.
Detection Optimization:
Western Blotting Parameters: When detecting co-precipitated proteins by western blotting, use antibodies at dilutions of 1:500 to 1:2000 as recommended for KCTD14 antibodies .
Signal Enhancement: For weak interactions, consider using high-sensitivity detection systems such as HRP-conjugated secondary antibodies with enhanced chemiluminescence substrates.
Controls Implementation: Always include negative controls (non-specific IgG of matching isotype) and positive controls (input lysate) in parallel to confirm specificity of interactions.
By implementing these optimized conditions, researchers can effectively investigate KCTD14's protein interaction network, particularly focusing on potential transcriptional regulatory complexes involving the BTB/POZ domain.
KCTD14's structural features, particularly its BTB/POZ domain and C2H2-type zinc fingers, strongly suggest its involvement in transcriptional regulation through chromatin structure modulation . Researchers can leverage KCTD14 antibodies to investigate these mechanisms through several sophisticated approaches:
Chromatin Immunoprecipitation (ChIP) Studies:
ChIP Protocol Optimization:
Crosslinking: Use 1% formaldehyde for 10 minutes at room temperature, followed by quenching with 125 mM glycine
Sonication: Optimize sonication conditions to generate 200-500 bp DNA fragments
Immunoprecipitation: Use 3-5 μg of KCTD14 antibody (preferably monoclonal such as A-6)
Elution and Reversal: Elute protein-DNA complexes with SDS buffer and reverse crosslinks at 65°C
ChIP-seq Implementation:
Adapt the optimized ChIP protocol for next-generation sequencing
Use bioinformatic tools to identify KCTD14 binding sites genome-wide
Perform motif analysis to determine if KCTD14 binds specific DNA sequences through its zinc finger domains
ChIP-qPCR Validation:
Design primers targeting promoter regions of suspected KCTD14-regulated genes
Quantify enrichment using qPCR compared to IgG control immunoprecipitations
Normalize to input DNA and a non-binding control region
Protein Complex Analysis:
Sequential ChIP (Re-ChIP):
Perform first immunoprecipitation with KCTD14 antibody
Elute under non-denaturing conditions
Perform second immunoprecipitation with antibodies against known transcriptional regulators
This approach identifies genomic regions where KCTD14 co-localizes with other regulatory factors
Proximity Ligation Assay (PLA):
Mass Spectrometry Analysis:
Functional Transcriptional Studies:
Reporter Gene Assays:
Design luciferase reporters driven by promoters of suspected KCTD14 target genes
Manipulate KCTD14 levels (overexpression or knockdown) and measure reporter activity
Use KCTD14 antibodies in parallel western blots to confirm expression changes
Chromatin Accessibility Assays:
Combine KCTD14 ChIP with ATAC-seq or DNase-seq
Correlate KCTD14 binding with changes in chromatin accessibility
This approach reveals whether KCTD14 promotes open or closed chromatin states
RNA Polymerase II Occupancy:
Perform ChIP-seq for both KCTD14 and RNA Polymerase II
Analyze correlation between KCTD14 binding and RNA Polymerase II recruitment
This determines whether KCTD14 functions as an activator or repressor
Gene Expression Analysis:
RNA-seq Following KCTD14 Manipulation:
Single-Cell Approaches:
Combine immunofluorescence for KCTD14 with RNA-FISH for target transcripts
This technique correlates KCTD14 protein levels with target gene expression at the single-cell level
By implementing these methodological approaches using well-characterized KCTD14 antibodies, researchers can systematically investigate KCTD14's role in transcriptional regulation, from genome-wide binding patterns to functional outcomes on gene expression.
KCTD14's location on chromosome 11, a region associated with several genetic disorders including Jervell and Lange-Nielsen syndrome and Jacobsen syndrome , presents unique opportunities and challenges for researchers. The following considerations should guide the application of KCTD14 antibodies in studying these chromosome 11-associated disorders:
Tissue-Specific Expression Analysis:
Immunohistochemistry Optimization:
Select KCTD14 antibodies validated for IHC applications (clones 3A4, 2A6)
Optimize antigen retrieval methods for different tissue types (heat-induced versus enzymatic retrieval)
Compare KCTD14 expression patterns in normal versus disease-affected tissues
Use consistent antibody concentrations and develop tissue-specific positive controls
Matched Tissue Comparisons:
Developmental Time Course:
For developmental disorders, analyze KCTD14 expression at multiple developmental time points
This approach requires carefully staged samples and consistent immunostaining protocols
Genetic Variation Impact Assessment:
Variant-Specific Antibody Considerations:
Standard KCTD14 antibodies may not distinguish between wild-type and variant proteins
For known pathogenic variants, consider generating variant-specific antibodies
Alternatively, implement epitope tagging strategies in cellular models
Epitope Accessibility Concerns:
Allele-Specific Expression:
In heterozygous cases, combine immunostaining with fluorescence in situ hybridization (FISH)
This approach can correlate KCTD14 protein expression with specific alleles
Patient-Derived Sample Analysis:
Limited Sample Considerations:
For rare patient samples, prioritize antibodies with validated sensitivity
Consider signal amplification systems for immunohistochemistry
Implement western blotting protocols optimized for minimal protein input
Biobank Sample Compatibility:
For fixed archival samples, select antibodies validated for formalin-fixed paraffin-embedded (FFPE) tissues
Test antibody performance on control FFPE tissues of similar age and fixation method
Non-Invasive Sample Potential:
Evaluate KCTD14 antibody performance in detecting the protein in accessible samples (blood, urine)
Validate findings with matched tissue controls where possible
Model System Implementation:
Cell Line Models:
Animal Model Validation:
iPSC-Derived Models:
By carefully considering these factors, researchers can effectively employ KCTD14 antibodies to investigate the protein's potential role in chromosome 11-associated genetic disorders, potentially revealing new insights into disease mechanisms and therapeutic opportunities.
Detecting KCTD14 in challenging tissue samples requires systematic troubleshooting and optimization. The following comprehensive approach addresses common issues and provides methodological solutions for researchers working with difficult specimens:
Signal Sensitivity Optimization:
Epitope Retrieval Enhancement:
For FFPE tissues with potential cross-linking issues:
Test multiple antigen retrieval methods (citrate pH 6.0, EDTA pH 8.0, Tris-EDTA pH 9.0)
Extend retrieval time incrementally (10, 20, 30 minutes)
Consider enzymatic retrieval (proteinase K, trypsin) for heavily fixed samples
For frozen tissues with potential epitope masking:
Test mild detergent permeabilization (0.1-0.5% Triton X-100)
Explore different fixation protocols (4% PFA, methanol, acetone)
Signal Amplification Strategies:
Implement tyramide signal amplification (TSA) for immunohistochemistry
Use high-sensitivity ECL substrates for western blotting
Consider biotin-streptavidin amplification systems if direct detection is insufficient
Increase antibody concentration incrementally while monitoring background
Detection System Optimization:
Background Reduction Strategies:
Blocking Optimization:
Test different blocking agents (5% normal serum, 3% BSA, commercial blocking reagents)
Extend blocking time (1-2 hours at room temperature or overnight at 4°C)
Include additives to reduce non-specific binding (0.1-0.3% Triton X-100, 0.05% Tween-20)
Antibody Dilution Refinement:
Wash Protocol Enhancement:
Increase wash duration and volume
Include detergents in wash buffers (0.1% Tween-20 or 0.1% Triton X-100)
Implement additional wash steps between critical incubations
Sample-Specific Optimizations:
High Lipid Content Tissues (Brain, Adipose):
Pre-extract lipids using brief chloroform-methanol treatment before antibody incubation
Increase detergent concentration in blocking and wash buffers
Consider using Sudan Black B to reduce lipofuscin autofluorescence in fluorescence applications
High Collagen Content Tissues (Skin, Connective Tissue):
Implement hyaluronidase or collagenase pre-treatment
Extend protease digestion time during antigen retrieval
Use pressure cooker antigen retrieval for enhanced penetration
Necrotic or Degraded Tissues:
Protocol Validation Approaches:
Positive Control Implementation:
Sequential Antibody Testing:
Compare results from multiple KCTD14 antibodies targeting different epitopes
This approach helps distinguish between technical issues and true absence of expression
Alternative Detection Methods:
If immunohistochemistry proves challenging, attempt western blotting of tissue lysates
For very low abundance, consider implementing immunoprecipitation before western blotting
Use flow cytometry for cell suspensions derived from tissues
Advanced Troubleshooting Framework: