Diagnostic Value: KNSTRN expression distinguishes tumor tissues (AUC = 0.815) and predicts advanced T/N/M stages (P < 0.01) .
Survival Impact: High KNSTRN levels reduce median survival from 72 to 41 months (HR = 1.83, P < 0.001) .
Mutational Hotspot: Recurrent p.Ser24Phe mutations (19% of SCCs) disrupt chromatid cohesion, increasing aneuploidy (1.7-fold, P = 0.007) .
Therapeutic Resistance: Mutant KNSTRN enhances paclitaxel-induced chromosomal instability in keratinocytes .
Cell Cycle Dysregulation: KNSTRN overexpression accelerates mitotic progression by 22% in breast cancer cells through Aurora B kinase signaling .
Immune Microenvironment: In lung adenocarcinoma, KNSTRN expression associates with Th2 cell infiltration (ρ = 0.41, P = 0.003) and CD56dim NK cell depletion .
Genomic Instability: Mutant KNSTRN induces lagging chromosomes in 34% of anaphase cells versus 8% in controls (P < 0.001) .
KNSTRN (Kinetochore-Localized Astrin/SPAG5 Binding Protein) is an essential component of the mitotic spindle required for faithful chromosome segregation and progression into anaphase. It promotes the metaphase-to-anaphase transition and is required for chromosome alignment, normal timing of sister chromatid segregation, and maintenance of spindle pole architecture . The astrin (SPAG5)-kinastrin (SKAP) complex promotes stable microtubule-kinetochore attachments . KNSTRN is primarily localized in the nucleus and cytoplasm, with a canonical protein length of 316 amino acid residues and a mass of approximately 35.4 kDa in humans .
KNSTRN antibodies are primarily used for immunodetection of the kinetochore localized astrin (SPAG5) binding protein. The most common applications include:
Western Blot (WB): For detecting and quantifying KNSTRN protein expression in cell or tissue lysates
Immunocytochemistry (ICC): For visualizing subcellular localization in cultured cells
Immunohistochemistry (IHC): For detecting KNSTRN expression in tissue sections
These applications are essential for studying KNSTRN's role in mitotic spindle function, chromosome segregation, and various disease contexts.
Researchers can select from several types of KNSTRN antibodies based on their experimental needs:
Target regions: Antibodies targeting different epitopes including N-terminal region, middle region, and specific amino acid sequences (e.g., AA 31-80, AA 151-200)
Reactivity: Antibodies with varying species reactivity including human-specific and those cross-reactive with mouse, rat, cow, dog, guinea pig, horse, rabbit, and even yeast models
Conjugation status: Primarily unconjugated antibodies that require secondary detection
For optimal Western blot detection of KNSTRN:
Sample preparation:
Use appropriate lysis buffers (e.g., RIPA with protease inhibitors)
Load 20-40 μg of total protein per lane
Gel electrophoresis and transfer:
Use 10-12% SDS-PAGE gels
Transfer to PVDF or nitrocellulose membranes
Antibody incubation:
Detection considerations:
When performing IHC with KNSTRN antibodies:
Tissue preparation:
Formalin-fixed, paraffin-embedded (FFPE) sections (5 μm thickness)
Consider antigen retrieval methods (heat-induced epitope retrieval in citrate buffer pH 6.0)
Staining protocol:
Controls:
Evaluation:
KNSTRN primarily shows nuclear and cytoplasmic localization
Quantify staining intensity and percentage of positive cells
Antibody validation is crucial for reliable results. Methods include:
Genetic approaches:
KNSTRN knockdown/knockout: Compare antibody signal in wild-type vs. KNSTRN-depleted samples
KNSTRN overexpression: Verify increased signal in cells overexpressing KNSTRN
Technical approaches:
Western blot: Confirm single band at expected molecular weight (~35 kDa)
Peptide competition: Pre-incubate antibody with immunizing peptide to block specific binding
Cross-validation: Compare results from antibodies targeting different KNSTRN epitopes
Compare reactivity across multiple cell lines with varying KNSTRN expression levels
Functional correlation:
Several factors may contribute to molecular weight discrepancies:
Post-translational modifications:
Phosphorylation during mitosis may alter migration
Other modifications could impact apparent molecular weight
Protein isoforms:
Technical factors:
Gel percentage and running conditions affecting migration
Buffer systems and sample preparation methods
Protein standards calibration
Antibody specificity:
Different antibodies may recognize different isoforms or modified forms
Cross-reactivity with related proteins
To resolve discrepancies, researchers should compare results using antibodies targeting different epitopes and consider isoform-specific PCR to determine which variants are expressed in their experimental system.
When facing weak or absent KNSTRN signals:
Sample-related factors:
Verify KNSTRN expression in your sample (check literature/databases)
Increase protein loading (up to 50-60 μg)
Check protein extraction method (consider different lysis buffers)
Use fresh samples or add additional protease inhibitors
Antibody-related factors:
Increase antibody concentration (try 1:500 or more concentrated)
Extend primary antibody incubation (overnight at 4°C)
Try different KNSTRN antibodies targeting other epitopes
Check antibody storage conditions and expiration
Detection-related factors:
Use more sensitive detection methods (ECL Plus, fluorescent secondary antibodies)
Increase exposure time
Try signal enhancement systems
Technical optimizations:
Optimize blocking conditions (try BSA instead of milk)
Increase washing stringency to reduce background
Use fresh transfer buffer and ensure complete transfer
When analyzing KNSTRN expression patterns:
For investigating mitotic spindle dynamics:
Immunofluorescence microscopy approaches:
Co-stain with KNSTRN antibody and microtubule markers (α-tubulin)
Use cell cycle phase-specific markers (pH3, cyclin B1)
Employ super-resolution microscopy for detailed localization
Consider live-cell imaging with fluorescently tagged KNSTRN
Biochemical approaches:
Immunoprecipitate KNSTRN to identify interaction partners during different mitotic phases
Analyze phosphorylation status during mitotic progression
Study kinetochore association dynamics using chromatin immunoprecipitation
Functional studies:
Combine with KNSTRN knockdown/overexpression to assess effects on spindle stability
Evaluate microtubule-kinetochore attachments after KNSTRN perturbation
Analyze chromosome segregation errors in KNSTRN-depleted cells
Quantitative assessments:
Measure kinetochore oscillations and dynamics of microtubule plus-ends
Quantify metaphase-to-anaphase transition timing
Assess spindle pole architecture maintenance
To investigate KNSTRN's role in chromosomal instability:
Cytogenetic analyses:
Karyotyping to detect gross chromosomal abnormalities
Fluorescence in situ hybridization (FISH) to identify specific chromosomal translocations
Multiplex-FISH for comprehensive chromosomal analysis
Cell division assessments:
Time-lapse microscopy to monitor mitotic progression
Quantification of mitotic errors (lagging chromosomes, multipolar spindles)
Analysis of micronuclei formation as indicator of chromosomal instability
Genetic approaches:
CRISPR/Cas9-mediated knockout of KNSTRN
Introduction of cancer-associated KNSTRN mutations
Rescue experiments with wild-type vs. mutant KNSTRN
Clinical correlations:
For studying KNSTRN-immune infiltration relationships:
Bioinformatic approaches:
Multi-parameter immune profiling:
Multiplex immunohistochemistry for KNSTRN and immune markers
Flow cytometry analysis of tumor-infiltrating lymphocytes
Spatial transcriptomics to map KNSTRN expression relative to immune niches
Functional validation:
In vitro co-culture of cancer cells and immune cells with KNSTRN modulation
Analysis of cytokine production and immune activation markers
Assessment of tumor cell susceptibility to immune-mediated killing
Clinical integration:
Correlate KNSTRN expression with response to immunotherapy
Analyze relationship with immunosuppressive mechanisms
Stratify patients based on combined KNSTRN and immune signature
For prognostic applications:
The relationship between KNSTRN mutations and carcinogenesis:
Mutation profiling:
Functional consequences:
Mutations may disrupt chromosome segregation during mitosis
Can lead to chromosomal instability and aneuploidy
May affect interaction with binding partners (e.g., SPAG5)
Clinical correlations:
Mechanistic studies:
Introduction of cancer-associated mutations in cell models
Analysis of mitotic defects in mutant cells
Evaluation of downstream signaling pathway alterations
KNSTRN's role in cell cycle regulation:
Cell cycle protein interactions:
Experimental approaches:
Signaling pathway integration:
Therapeutic implications:
Potential synergy with cell cycle inhibitors (CDK4/6 inhibitors)
Possible synthetic lethality approaches
Identification of vulnerable nodes in KNSTRN-overexpressing tumors
| KNSTRN Expression in Different Cancer Types | Upregulation | Downregulation | No Significant Change |
|---|---|---|---|
| Number of Cancer Types | 20 | 1 (THCA) | 9 |
Table 1: KNSTRN expression patterns across 30 solid tumor types from TCGA database
| Application | Recommended Antibody Dilution | Expected Molecular Weight | Common Controls |
|---|---|---|---|
| Western Blot | 1:500-1:2000 | 34-35 kDa (observed) | Various cell lines |
| Immunohistochemistry | 1:200-1:500 | N/A | Breast cancer tissues with Ki67 co-staining |
| Immunofluorescence | 1:100-1:500 | N/A | Co-staining with microtubule markers |