The KPNA6 Antibody (catalog 12366-2-AP) is a rabbit-derived polyclonal antibody designed to detect the human KPNA6 protein, also known as importin subunit alpha-7 . KPNA6 facilitates nuclear transport by binding cargo proteins containing nuclear localization signals (NLS) and partnering with KPNB1 (importin beta-1) .
The antibody is validated for:
Tissue Reactivity: Human breast and prostate cancer tissues (antigen retrieval recommended with TE buffer pH 9.0) .
KPNA6 Antibody has been instrumental in uncovering KPNA6’s role in viral replication and host-pathogen interactions:
KPNA6 interacts with ANP32A/B proteins and viral ribonucleoproteins (vRNPs) to stabilize influenza polymerase activity .
Mechanism: Overexpression or knockout of KPNA6 disrupts ANP32-vRNP binding, impairing viral replication .
Key Experiment: Co-immunoprecipitation (Co-IP) using KPNA6 Antibody demonstrated that KPNA6 competes with ANP32 for vRNP binding, reducing polymerase activity .
The KPNA6-Δ147–239 mutant (lacking the NLS-binding domain) retains the ability to inhibit ANP32-vRNP interactions, suggesting KPNA6’s regulatory role extends beyond nuclear import .
KPNA6 (karyopherin alpha 6, also known as importin alpha 7) is a critical component of the nucleocytoplasmic transport machinery. It functions as part of a heterodimeric complex with importin beta to facilitate the import of proteins containing nuclear localization signals (NLS) through nuclear pore complexes. The process occurs in several steps: KPNA6 binds to the NLS-containing cargo in the cytoplasm, importin beta then docks this complex at the cytoplasmic side of the nuclear pore complex, and in the presence of nucleoside triphosphates and the GTP-binding protein Ran, the complex moves through the nuclear pore. Once inside, the importin subunits dissociate—KPNA6 enters the nucleoplasm with its cargo protein while importin beta remains at the pore .
Research significance stems from KPNA6's role in multiple cellular processes and disease mechanisms, particularly in viral infections where it has been identified as a cofactor for viral replication. For instance, KPNA6 interacts with ANP32 proteins to support influenza virus polymerase activity and is required for the replication of viruses such as PRRSV and ZIKV .
KPNA6 antibody detection offers several advantages over alternative methods for studying importin family proteins. Unlike genetic approaches that may affect cell viability, antibody-based detection allows for direct observation of endogenous KPNA6 protein levels and localization without disrupting cellular function. The specificity of KPNA6 antibodies allows researchers to distinguish between different importin alpha family members, which share structural similarities but may have distinct functions.
Current commercially available KPNA6 antibodies show high specificity, with observed molecular weights consistently within the expected range (55-60 kDa) . When comparing detection methods, it's important to note that while techniques like fluorescently-tagged recombinant KPNA6 expression can track protein movement in real-time, antibody-based methods provide more accurate information about endogenous protein levels and modifications.
KPNA6 antibodies serve multiple essential applications in basic research settings:
| Application | Recommended Dilution | Key Research Use |
|---|---|---|
| Western Blot (WB) | 1:500-1:2000 | Protein level quantification, molecular weight confirmation |
| Immunohistochemistry (IHC) | 1:50-1:500 | Tissue localization, expression patterns in disease states |
| ELISA | Application-dependent | Quantitative protein detection in solution |
Western blotting is particularly valuable for quantifying changes in KPNA6 expression during viral infection, with research demonstrating that PRRSV infection increases KPNA6 levels in a dose-dependent manner (1.7 to 3.9-fold increases at varying MOIs) . Immunohistochemistry has proven useful for studying KPNA6 expression in cancer tissues, with positive results documented in human breast cancer and prostate cancer samples .
For experimental consistency, it's recommended to optimize antibody concentration for each specific experimental system, as factors like cell type, fixation method, and detection system can influence optimal antibody performance .
KPNA6 antibodies are powerful tools for investigating virus-host interactions across multiple experimental platforms. Research has demonstrated that KPNA6 serves as a critical host factor for various viruses, making its detection essential for understanding viral replication mechanisms. When designing virus-host interaction studies:
For temporal expression analysis: KPNA6 antibodies can track changes in protein levels throughout the infection cycle. Studies with PRRSV showed that virus-infected MARC-145 cells exhibited a 2-fold increase in KPNA6 protein levels compared to mock-infected cells at 24 hours post-infection . This temporal dimension provides insight into how viruses manipulate host transport machinery.
For co-immunoprecipitation assays: KPNA6 antibodies can identify interaction partners during infection. Research with influenza virus demonstrated that KPNA6 associates with the vRNP-ANP32A complex, suggesting a mechanism by which KPNA6 supports viral polymerase activity . When designing such experiments, it's crucial to use lysis conditions that preserve protein-protein interactions.
For viral protein-induced modulation: Studies using KPNA6 antibodies revealed that specific viral proteins (PRRSV nsp1β, nsp7α, nsp7β, and nsp12) elevate KPNA6 levels, with nsp12 producing a 2.1-fold increase in protein expression . This approach helps identify viral determinants that manipulate nuclear transport pathways.
When investigating KPNA6's role in cancer using antibody-based techniques, researchers should consider several experimental variables that influence data quality and interpretation:
Tissue preparation for IHC requires careful optimization. For KPNA6 detection in cancer tissues, antigen retrieval with TE buffer (pH 9.0) is generally recommended, though citrate buffer (pH 6.0) may serve as an alternative . This critical step significantly impacts staining quality and should be systematically optimized for each tissue type.
Expression heterogeneity across cancer types necessitates careful control selection. KPNA6 antibodies have shown positive results in human breast and prostate cancer tissues , but expression patterns may vary significantly between cancer types and even within tumor regions. Including adjacent normal tissue controls and multiple tumor regions is essential for accurate interpretation.
Research demonstrates that maintaining appropriate KPNA6 levels is critical for viral replication, with both overexpression and knockdown producing inhibitory effects. This complex relationship requires careful experimental design when studying KPNA6's role in viral infection cycles.
Overexpression studies have shown that elevated KPNA6 levels significantly inhibit virus replication. In influenza virus studies, cells with KPNA6 overexpression exhibited reduced virus titers and diminished NP content in cell supernatants . This counterintuitive finding suggests that excessive KPNA6 may disrupt the stoichiometry of transport complexes.
Conversely, KPNA6 knockout/knockdown experiments demonstrated that KPNA6 deficiency also impairs viral polymerase activity and replication. CRISPR/Cas9-generated KPNA6 knockout cell lines showed reduced polymerase activity and inhibited virus replication in multicycle growth kinetics experiments .
These bidirectional effects highlight the importance of precise KPNA6 levels for optimal viral function, suggesting that the protein's role extends beyond simple transport to include regulatory functions in viral replication complexes. When designing experiments to study KPNA6 modulation, researchers should include:
Multiple modulation approaches (RNAi, CRISPR/Cas9, overexpression)
Dose-response assessments
Time-course analyses to capture temporal dynamics
Complementation studies to confirm specificity
KPNA6 antibodies require specific storage and handling conditions to preserve their activity and specificity over time. Based on manufacturer recommendations, researchers should observe the following guidelines:
Storage temperature: Store KPNA6 antibodies at -20°C for long-term stability. When properly stored, these antibodies typically remain stable for one year after shipment . Room temperature exposure should be minimized during experimental procedures.
Buffer composition: Commercial KPNA6 antibodies are typically provided in PBS containing 0.02% sodium azide and 50% glycerol at pH 7.3 . This formulation helps prevent microbial contamination while stabilizing the antibody proteins. For small volume antibodies (20μl sizes), preparations may contain 0.1% BSA for additional stability .
Freeze/thaw considerations: Repeated freeze/thaw cycles significantly decrease antibody performance. While aliquoting is unnecessary for -20°C storage according to some manufacturers , it remains a recommended practice for antibodies that will be used multiple times over extended periods.
Working stock preparation: When preparing working dilutions for experimental use, dilute only the amount needed for immediate use and store in conditions appropriate for the buffer system used. Working stocks should generally not be stored for extended periods.
Cross-contamination prevention: Use sterile technique when handling antibody solutions to prevent microbial contamination, which can degrade antibody quality and introduce experimental artifacts.
Rigorous experimental design for KPNA6 antibody applications requires comprehensive controls to ensure validity and reproducibility:
For Western blotting applications:
Positive control samples with known KPNA6 expression (BxPC-3 cells and HeLa cells have been validated for KPNA6 detection)
Negative controls using KPNA6 knockout/knockdown cells generated through CRISPR/Cas9 or RNAi methods
Loading controls (typically housekeeping proteins) to normalize expression levels
Molecular weight markers to confirm the observed band corresponds to KPNA6's expected size (55-60 kDa)
For immunohistochemistry applications:
Positive tissue controls (human breast cancer or prostate cancer tissues have shown consistent KPNA6 expression)
Negative controls omitting primary antibody to assess background staining
Isotype controls using non-specific rabbit IgG at equivalent concentrations
Absorption controls using the immunizing peptide to demonstrate specificity
For virus infection studies:
Mock-infected controls processed identically to infected samples
Time-matched controls for temporal studies
Dose-response controls using varying MOIs (0.1, 1, and 10) to establish relationship between infection levels and KPNA6 expression
Multiple virus strains to distinguish strain-specific from general viral effects
Optimization of KPNA6 antibody dilutions is essential for generating reliable, reproducible results across different experimental platforms. While manufacturers provide recommended dilution ranges (WB: 1:500-1:2000, IHC: 1:50-1:500) , these should be considered starting points rather than definitive values.
For Western blotting optimization:
Perform an initial dilution series testing 3-4 concentrations within the recommended range (e.g., 1:500, 1:1000, 1:2000)
Evaluate signal-to-noise ratio, background levels, and specific band intensity
If results are suboptimal, expand the dilution series above or below the recommended range
Consider cell/tissue type differences—KPNA6 detection may require different optimizations for different experimental systems
For immunohistochemistry optimization:
Begin with a median dilution (e.g., 1:200) for initial testing
Adjust based on staining intensity, with special attention to background levels
Optimize antigen retrieval methods in parallel (TE buffer pH 9.0 is recommended, with citrate buffer pH 6.0 as an alternative)
Test fixation conditions, as these significantly impact epitope accessibility
Document optimization parameters systematically for reproducibility
The optimization process should be considered sample-dependent, with results verified against the validation data provided by manufacturers . Additionally, researchers should be aware that different detection systems (chemiluminescence, fluorescent secondary antibodies) may require further optimization of primary antibody concentrations.
Researchers frequently encounter several challenges when detecting KPNA6 across different experimental platforms. These challenges and their solutions include:
Inconsistent band patterns in Western blotting: While KPNA6's expected molecular weight is 60 kDa (calculated from its 536 amino acids), observed weights typically range from 55-60 kDa . This variation may stem from post-translational modifications or differential processing. To address this issue:
Always include positive control samples with known KPNA6 expression (BxPC-3 or HeLa cells)
Run longer SDS-PAGE gels for better resolution of closely migrating bands
Consider phosphatase treatment to eliminate phosphorylation-based mobility shifts
Variable immunohistochemistry results: Tissue-specific factors can influence KPNA6 detection in IHC applications. To optimize results:
Test multiple antigen retrieval methods, comparing TE buffer (pH 9.0) with citrate buffer (pH 6.0)
Optimize blocking conditions to reduce background in specific tissue types
Consider tissue-specific fixation modifications, as overfixation can mask epitopes
Employ amplification systems for tissues with low KPNA6 expression
Interference in viral infection studies: During infection experiments, viral proteins may cross-react with detection systems or alter KPNA6 epitope accessibility. To mitigate these issues:
Include appropriate mock-infected controls processed identically to infected samples
Consider time-course experiments to track KPNA6 changes throughout infection
Validate antibody specificity in the presence of viral proteins
Use multiple detection methods to confirm findings (WB, IF, co-IP)
Interpreting KPNA6 expression changes during viral infection requires careful consideration of multiple factors that influence experimental outcomes:
Dose-dependent responses: Research demonstrates that KPNA6 upregulation correlates with viral input levels. In PRRSV infection studies, KPNA6 protein levels increased by 1.7-, 2.2-, and 3.9-fold in cells inoculated with virus at MOIs of 0.1, 1, and 10, respectively . When interpreting such data, researchers should:
Establish clear dose-response relationships through multiple MOIs
Correlate KPNA6 changes with viral RNA levels and percentage of infected cells
Consider that maximum cellular infection may not produce maximum KPNA6 induction
Temporal dynamics: KPNA6 expression changes follow specific temporal patterns during infection. Standard harvest timepoints (often 24 hours post-infection) may not capture peak expression or important transitional states. Researchers should:
Perform time-course experiments with multiple sampling points
Correlate KPNA6 changes with viral replication cycle stages
Consider that early and late changes may reflect different biological processes
Viral protein effects: Specific viral proteins can independently modulate KPNA6 levels. Studies identified that PRRSV nsp1β, nsp7α, nsp7β, and nsp12 increased KPNA6 expression, with nsp12 producing the strongest effect . When interpreting whole-virus infection data:
Consider the combined effects of multiple viral components
Use individual viral protein expression systems as complementary approaches
Recognize that protein-specific effects may differ from whole-virus outcomes
KPNA6 functions within the complex nuclear transport machinery, requiring nuanced interpretation of antibody-derived data:
Subcellular localization interpretation: KPNA6 shuttles between cytoplasmic and nuclear compartments as part of its normal function. When analyzing localization data:
Consider that observed distribution represents a dynamic equilibrium rather than static localization
Compare subcellular fractionation results with immunofluorescence imaging to confirm localization patterns
Recognize that fixation methods can artificially alter KPNA6 distribution
Interaction partner analysis: KPNA6 functions through interactions with cargo proteins, importin beta, and nucleoporins. When studying these interactions:
Optimize co-immunoprecipitation conditions to preserve weak or transient interactions
Consider that antibody binding may compete with or disrupt certain protein-protein interactions
Use multiple antibodies targeting different KPNA6 epitopes to validate interaction data
Functional redundancy considerations: KPNA6 belongs to the importin alpha family, which exhibits partial functional redundancy. When interpreting knockdown/knockout experiments:
Assess compensatory changes in other importin alpha family members
Consider that phenotypic effects may be masked by redundant transport factors
Evaluate cargo-specific effects, as different importin alphas have preferential cargo specificity
Transport kinetics assessment: Changes in KPNA6 levels may alter nuclear transport rates for specific cargoes. When measuring such effects:
Use multiple timepoints to establish transport kinetics rather than single endpoints
Compare multiple cargo proteins to identify KPNA6-specific versus general transport effects
Consider that altered localization may reflect changed transport rates or retention mechanisms
Recent research suggests KPNA6 plays crucial roles in viral immune evasion mechanisms, with antibody-based detection offering valuable insights into these processes. Studies demonstrate that KPNA6 interacts with ANP32 proteins and affects polymerase activity supported by ANP32 during influenza virus infection . This finding suggests that viruses may manipulate nuclear transport factors to optimize their replication environment.
To investigate immune evasion mechanisms using KPNA6 antibodies, researchers should:
Examine KPNA6's interaction with immune signaling proteins during infection using co-immunoprecipitation
Track changes in KPNA6-dependent nuclear localization of immune transcription factors (e.g., STATs, IRFs, NF-κB) during infection
Compare KPNA6 manipulation across different virus families to identify conserved evasion strategies
Correlate KPNA6 modulation with specific immune pathway inhibition
The discovery that African Swine Fever Virus MGF360-12L inhibits type I interferon responses suggests potential involvement of nuclear transport pathways in this process . KPNA6 antibodies can help elucidate whether altered trafficking of immune signaling proteins contributes to this inhibition.
Advancing our understanding of nucleocytoplasmic transport requires sophisticated detection systems that can simultaneously track multiple components of transport complexes. KPNA6 antibodies can serve as foundation elements in developing such systems:
For multiplexed immunofluorescence approaches:
Pair KPNA6 antibodies with antibodies against cargo proteins, importin beta, and nucleoporins
Utilize antibodies raised in different species to enable simultaneous detection
Incorporate proximity ligation assays (PLA) to visualize KPNA6-cargo interactions with spatial resolution
For live-cell transport tracking:
Develop systems combining fluorescently-tagged cargo proteins with post-fixation KPNA6 antibody detection
Establish correlative light-electron microscopy approaches using KPNA6 antibodies for ultrastructural localization
Create split-fluorescent protein systems that report on KPNA6-cargo interactions in living cells
For quantitative transport analyses:
Design microfluidic systems coupled with KPNA6 immunodetection to measure transport kinetics
Develop biosensor arrays detecting multiple transport factors simultaneously, including KPNA6
Establish high-content screening platforms using KPNA6 antibodies to identify transport modulators
The involvement of KPNA6 in viral replication and potentially in cancer progression suggests that targeting nucleocytoplasmic transport may offer therapeutic opportunities. KPNA6 antibodies can facilitate research in this direction through several approaches:
For therapeutic target validation:
Use KPNA6 antibodies to confirm target presence and accessibility in disease models
Develop cell-based assays coupling KPNA6 detection with functional readouts to screen potential inhibitors
Employ competitive binding assays with KPNA6 antibodies to identify compounds interfering with cargo interactions
For mechanism of action studies:
Track changes in KPNA6 localization and interaction partners following treatment with candidate therapeutics
Correlate KPNA6 functional inhibition with antiviral or anticancer effects
Distinguish between direct KPNA6 targeting and indirect effects through pathway analysis
For resistance mechanism investigation:
Monitor KPNA6 expression and modification changes in resistant cell populations
Identify compensatory transport factor upregulation through comparative antibody-based detection
Characterize altered KPNA6 interaction networks in treatment-resistant versus sensitive contexts
The observation that both KPNA6 overexpression and deficiency inhibit virus replication suggests complex dose-response relationships that must be carefully considered when developing therapeutic approaches targeting this pathway.