KRT8 (keratin 8) belongs to the type II (basic) subfamily of high molecular weight cytokeratins and typically exists in combination with cytokeratin 18 (KRT18). It functions as a crucial intermediate filament component in simple epithelia, including glandular epithelium of the thyroid, female breast, gastrointestinal tract, respiratory tract, and urogenital tract including transitional epithelium .
KRT8 is essential for maintaining cellular structural integrity while also participating in signal transduction and cellular differentiation processes . Together with KRT19, it helps link the contractile apparatus to dystrophin at the costameres of striated muscle . The importance of KRT8 in epithelial research stems from its tissue-specific expression pattern, making it valuable for studying epithelial differentiation, transformation, and carcinogenesis.
KRT8 antibodies are versatile tools employed across multiple experimental techniques:
These applications are particularly valuable in cancer research, where KRT8 serves as a biomarker for adenocarcinomas and certain squamous carcinomas . Additionally, KRT8 antibodies are useful for studying epithelial-to-mesenchymal transition (EMT) in cancer progression and metastasis .
The selection depends on your specific experimental needs:
Monoclonal antibodies (e.g., KRT8/803, UMAB1, KRT8/2174R):
Offer high specificity targeting a single epitope
Provide consistent lot-to-lot reproducibility
Ideal for detecting specific KRT8 forms or modifications
Excellent for immunohistochemistry applications with less background
Recognize multiple epitopes on KRT8 protein
Potentially higher sensitivity for low abundance targets
Better for protein detection after denaturation (e.g., Western blot)
May show higher cross-reactivity with related keratins
When studying KRT8 alongside KRT18, consider cocktail antibodies like KRT8/803 + KRT18/835 that recognize both proteins simultaneously, which is useful for detecting simple epithelia and adenocarcinomas .
Species reactivity is crucial for experimental validity. Based on the search results, many commercially available KRT8 antibodies demonstrate cross-reactivity with multiple species:
| Antibody Clone | Human | Mouse | Rat | Other Species |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| UMAB1 | ✓ | ✓ | ✓ | Monkey |
| KRT8/803 | ✓ | - | - | Not specified |
| 8G8 | ✓ | ✓ | ✓ | Not specified |
| LBI1B9 | ✓ | ✓ | ✓ | Dog, Monkey |
When conducting comparative or translational studies across multiple species, select antibodies with verified cross-reactivity. For species not explicitly listed, sequence homology analysis and validation experiments should be performed before proceeding with full-scale studies .
KRT8 phosphorylation represents a critical post-translational modification that significantly alters its functional properties. Research shows that phosphorylation of KRT8 on Ser43 by overloading-activated RHOA-PKN (protein kinase N) impedes trafficking of Golgi resident small GTPase RAB33B, suppressing autophagosome initiation and contributing to intervertebral disc degeneration (IDD) .
For antibody detection considerations:
Phospho-specific antibodies are required to detect specific phosphorylated forms of KRT8
Standard KRT8 antibodies may show altered binding affinity to heavily phosphorylated KRT8
Dephosphorylation treatments prior to immunodetection may be necessary in certain contexts
When studying KRT8 phosphorylation, it's advisable to use both phospho-specific and total KRT8 antibodies to compare relative proportions of modified versus unmodified protein .
KRT8 has been shown to attenuate necrotic cell death by facilitating mitophagy under oxidative stress conditions. Research demonstrates that KRT8 decreases the generation of paraquat-induced mitochondrial reactive oxygen species (ROS) in retinal pigment epithelial (RPE) cells .
Methodological approach for studying KRT8's role in mitochondrial homeostasis:
Visualization techniques:
Functional assays:
Genetic manipulation:
The research indicates that KRT8 is present at sites of mitochondrial fission in RPE cells under oxidative stress, suggesting a direct role in modulating mitochondrial dynamics .
Optimizing multiple immunofluorescence protocols involving KRT8 requires careful consideration of several factors:
Antibody selection:
Fluorophore selection:
Staining protocol optimization:
Sequential rather than simultaneous antibody incubation to minimize cross-reactivity
Include appropriate blocking steps with normal serum from the secondary antibody host species
Validate antibody specificity with single-stain controls
Image acquisition considerations:
Use sequential scanning to minimize bleed-through
Include proper negative controls and single-stained samples for setting acquisition parameters
For detecting KRT8 alongside other cytokeratins or epithelial markers, optimizing antibody concentration is critical - excessive primary antibody can result in non-specific staining or cross-reactivity .
KRT8 expression has significant implications in cancer biology, particularly in lung adenocarcinoma (LUAD). Research demonstrates that KRT8 is upregulated in LUAD tissues compared to normal tissues, with expression increasing from stage I to stage III .
Key findings on KRT8's role in cancer:
Experimental approaches for studying KRT8 in cancer:
These findings suggest KRT8 could serve as both a biomarker and therapeutic target in lung adenocarcinoma and potentially other epithelial cancers .
Inconsistent KRT8 staining across tissues can result from several factors:
Tissue-specific expression levels:
Fixation and processing variables:
Optimize fixation time (overfixation can mask epitopes)
Use appropriate antigen retrieval methods (heat-induced vs. enzymatic)
Consider tissue-specific permeabilization requirements
Antibody selection factors:
Different antibody clones may recognize different epitopes that are variably accessible across tissues
Some antibodies perform better in frozen sections while others are optimized for formalin-fixed paraffin-embedded (FFPE) tissues
Protocol optimization by tissue type:
For tissues with minimal KRT8 expression (like normal epidermis), more sensitive detection systems may be required. Alternatively, consider using KRT8/18 cocktail antibodies which can enhance detection of simple epithelia and some pathological cells like Paget cells in the epidermis .
When investigating KRT8's role in EMT, comprehensive controls are essential:
Positive tissue controls:
Negative tissue controls:
Experimental controls for KRT8 manipulation studies:
EMT marker validation:
Pathway activation controls:
These controls ensure the observed effects are specifically related to KRT8's function in EMT rather than non-specific experimental artifacts or pathway cross-talk.
Distinguishing between closely related cytokeratins requires careful experimental design:
Antibody selection strategies:
Choose monoclonal antibodies with verified specificity for KRT8
Validate antibodies using Western blot against purified cytokeratin standards
Consider the specific epitope targeted by the antibody (N-terminal, rod domain, or C-terminal)
Cross-reactivity testing:
Test antibodies on samples with known expression of different cytokeratins
Include knockout/knockdown controls to confirm specificity
Consider using recombinant cytokeratin proteins as competition controls
Multiple detection methods:
Complement immunodetection with mRNA analysis (qPCR or RNA-seq)
Use multiple antibody clones targeting different KRT8 epitopes
Employ mass spectrometry for definitive protein identification
Co-expression analysis:
When studying heteropolymers like KRT8/KRT18, consider using cocktail antibodies specifically designed to recognize both partners simultaneously, which provides more reliable identification of the functional cytokeratin unit in tissues .
KRT8 has recently emerged as an important regulator of autophagy and mitophagy processes. Experimental approaches to investigate this relationship include:
Co-localization studies:
Functional mitophagy assays with KRT8 manipulation:
Mechanistic pathway analysis:
Research indicates that KRT8 facilitates mitophagy flux, which suppresses the accumulation of damaged mitochondria and consequently diminishes necrotic cell death under oxidative stress conditions . This protective role suggests KRT8 as a potential therapeutic target in conditions involving mitochondrial dysfunction.
Working with KRT8 antibodies across different experimental animal models requires attention to several factors:
Sequence homology and epitope conservation:
Species-specific validation protocols:
Western blot validation using species-specific tissue lysates
Immunohistochemistry on known KRT8-expressing tissues from target species
Include knockout/knockdown controls when available
Application-specific considerations:
For xenograft models, select antibodies that distinguish between human and host KRT8
In transgenic models, consider antibodies that recognize specific KRT8 mutations or tags
For immunoprecipitation studies, validate antibody efficiency in the species of interest
Cross-reactivity assessment:
Test for cross-reactivity with other cytokeratin family members in the target species
Validate with appropriate negative controls (tissues known to lack KRT8 expression)
The research demonstrates successful use of KRT8 antibodies in various experimental models, including human cell lines (ARPE-19, HCC827, H1975), mouse models (LLC cells in lung cancer studies), and rat models for intervertebral disc degeneration studies .
Recent research has revealed KRT8's involvement in cellular responses to mechanical stress, particularly in intervertebral disc degeneration. To investigate this role:
In vivo mechanical stress models:
In vitro compression studies:
Molecular pathway analysis:
Experimental design considerations:
The research indicates that KRT8 expression initially increases under mechanical stress (up to 36 hours) followed by a significant drop, suggesting complex transcriptional and post-translational regulation mechanisms that can be targeted therapeutically .
Several cutting-edge technologies are expanding the utility of KRT8 antibodies in research:
Advanced imaging technologies:
Multiplexed detection systems:
Multi-color immunofluorescence with spectral unmixing
Cyclic immunofluorescence (CycIF) for simultaneous detection of multiple markers
Mass cytometry (CyTOF) for high-dimensional protein analysis
Conjugation chemistry advancements:
High-throughput applications:
Tissue microarray analysis for KRT8 expression in large sample cohorts
Automated image analysis algorithms for quantitative assessment of KRT8 staining
Single-cell techniques for heterogeneity analysis in complex tissues
Proximity labeling approaches:
BioID or APEX2 fusion with KRT8 to identify proximity interactors
Visualization of KRT8 interaction networks using proximity ligation assays
These technologies enable researchers to address increasingly complex questions about KRT8's dynamic behavior and functional interactions in normal and pathological contexts .
Based on current research, several promising therapeutic directions involving KRT8 are emerging:
Cancer therapeutics:
Protection against oxidative stress:
Intervertebral disc degeneration therapy:
Future therapeutic strategies may involve:
Small molecule inhibitors of KRT8 phosphorylation
Gene therapy approaches to modulate KRT8 expression
Targeted delivery systems for KRT8-modulating compounds to specific tissues