lgals3bpb Antibody

Shipped with Ice Packs
In Stock

Product Specs

Buffer
Preservative: 0.03% Proclin 300
Constituents: 50% Glycerol, 0.01M Phosphate Buffered Saline (PBS), pH 7.4
Form
Liquid
Lead Time
Made-to-order (14-16 weeks)
Synonyms
lgals3bpb antibody; zgc:77059 antibody; Galectin-3-binding protein B antibody; Lectin galactoside-binding soluble 3-binding protein B antibody
Target Names
lgals3bpb
Uniprot No.

Target Background

Function
This antibody promotes integrin-mediated cell adhesion.
Database Links
Subcellular Location
Secreted. Secreted, extracellular space, extracellular matrix.

Q&A

What is lgals3bpb and what is its significance in research models?

Lgals3bpb (Galectin-3 binding protein b) is a paralogous gene that encodes a protein with an approximate molecular weight of 65 kDa in zebrafish. This protein has emerged as a significant biomarker in neuroscience and immunology research, particularly for its selective expression in microglia within the brain parenchyma throughout the zebrafish lifespan. The 4C4 monoclonal antibody specifically targeting lgals3bpb has become a gold standard for prospective detection and isolation of microglial cells in zebrafish models . Importantly, transcriptomic studies consistently show strong expression of the gene in both embryonic and adult microglia/macrophages, with enrichment demonstrated in single-cell profiling of juvenile zebrafish brain immune cells .

How can I verify the specificity of anti-lgals3bpb antibodies in my experimental system?

Verification of anti-lgals3bpb antibody specificity requires a multi-step approach:

  • Expression validation: Clone the coding sequence of zebrafish lgals3bpb and transiently express it in mammalian cells (e.g., HEK-293T). Compare antibody binding between transfected and non-transfected controls using immunofluorescence .

  • Paralog specificity testing: Express other Lgals3bp paralogs (such as zgc:112492 which shares ~80% identity with lgals3bpb) to confirm the antibody doesn't cross-react with closely related proteins .

  • Western blot validation: Perform western blot analysis to confirm the antibody recognizes the denatured form of the protein at the expected molecular weight, using beta-actin as a loading control .

  • Immunoprecipitation followed by mass spectrometry: This approach can definitively identify the protein target by pulling down the antigen and analyzing the enriched proteins via LC-MS/MS .

What are the recommended applications for anti-lgals3bpb antibodies in zebrafish research?

Anti-lgals3bpb antibodies, particularly the 4C4 monoclonal antibody, have demonstrated versatility across multiple applications:

  • Immunofluorescence: For visualizing microglia in both embryonic and adult zebrafish brain tissue .

  • Flow cytometry: For isolation and quantification of lgals3bpb-expressing cells .

  • Western blotting: For detecting denatured lgals3bpb, with the 4C4 antibody demonstrating recognition of the linear epitope .

  • Immunoprecipitation: For isolating native lgals3bpb protein complexes, suggesting the epitope is accessible in the native protein structure .

This versatility makes anti-lgals3bpb antibodies valuable tools for comprehensive characterization of microglia and specific macrophage populations in zebrafish models.

How should I optimize immunostaining protocols for lgals3bpb detection in different tissue types?

Optimizing immunostaining for lgals3bpb requires tissue-specific considerations:

  • Brain tissue:

    • Fixation: 4% paraformaldehyde is typically effective

    • Permeabilization: Use Triton X-100 (0.2-0.5%) to ensure antibody access

    • Blocking: Extended blocking (2+ hours) with serum-based solutions to reduce non-specific binding

    • Primary antibody incubation: Overnight at 4°C with 4C4 antibody (1:200 dilution)

    • Counterstaining: Consider co-staining with neuronal or other glial markers to establish cellular context

  • Peripheral tissues:

    • For gut and liver tissues where discrete populations of mpeg1+ immune cells show lgals3bpb expression, extend permeabilization time and optimize antibody concentration

    • When examining non-macrophage populations, include mpeg1:GFP or equivalent transgenic markers to distinguish cell types

  • Controls: Include both transgenic macrophage reporter lines (e.g., mpeg1:GFP) as positive controls and secondary-only controls to assess background .

What are the key considerations when using anti-lgals3bpb antibodies for flow cytometry of microglia?

When using anti-lgals3bpb antibodies for flow cytometric analysis:

  • Cell preparation:

    • Gentle tissue dissociation is critical to preserve cell viability and surface epitopes

    • Filter cell suspensions to remove aggregates that could confound analysis

  • Antibody titration:

    • Perform careful titration experiments to determine optimal antibody concentration

    • Test fixation conditions, as some epitopes may be sensitive to specific fixatives

  • Gating strategy:

    • Include fluorescence-minus-one (FMO) controls to set accurate gates

    • When working with transgenic lines, validate that all 4C4+ cells are properly captured within expected populations

  • Sorting considerations:

    • When isolating 4C4+ microglial populations, optimize buffer composition to maintain viability during and after sorting

    • For downstream applications like RNA-seq, minimize sort time and maintain cells at appropriate temperature

How can I troubleshoot weak or inconsistent lgals3bpb antibody signal in immunoblotting applications?

When encountering signal issues with lgals3bpb antibody in western blotting:

  • Sample preparation optimization:

    • Ensure complete protein extraction using appropriate lysis buffers containing protease inhibitors

    • For membrane-associated proteins like lgals3bpb, consider detergent-based extraction methods

    • Avoid repeated freeze-thaw cycles of samples

  • Technical adjustments:

    • Increase antibody concentration (for 4C4, try 1:100 instead of 1:200)

    • Extend primary antibody incubation to overnight at 4°C

    • Use enhanced chemiluminescence methods for visualization (e.g., LumiGLO, Cell Signaling)

    • Optimize transfer conditions for high molecular weight proteins

    • Consider nitrocellulose membranes for better protein binding and lower background

  • Validation approaches:

    • Run positive control samples from tissues known to express high levels of lgals3bpb (brain tissue)

    • Include recombinant lgals3bpb protein as a reference standard

How can anti-lgals3bpb antibodies be utilized to investigate microglia-specific functions in neuroinflammatory models?

Anti-lgals3bpb antibodies offer sophisticated approaches for investigating microglia in neuroinflammation:

  • Temporal analysis of microglial activation:

    • Monitor changes in lgals3bpb expression levels as an indicator of microglial activation status

    • Compare with other activation markers to develop a comprehensive profile of microglial states

  • Selective depletion studies:

    • Use 4C4 antibody conjugated to toxins for targeted depletion of lgals3bpb-expressing microglia

    • Assess functional consequences of microglial depletion in neuroinflammatory contexts

  • Fate mapping and lineage tracing:

    • Combine with photoconvertible transgenic lines to track specific microglial populations over time

    • Determine whether lgals3bpb expression changes during microglial responses to neuroinflammatory stimuli

  • Functional blocking studies:

    • Investigate whether lgals3bpb itself has functional roles by using 4C4 as a blocking antibody

    • Determine if interrupting lgals3bpb interactions affects microglial migration, phagocytosis, or cytokine production

This approach provides insights into microglia-specific contributions to neuroinflammatory processes that may be distinct from peripheral macrophage responses.

What are the methodological approaches for investigating lgals3bpb as a potential therapeutic target, similar to Gal-3BP in cancer research?

Drawing parallels from Gal-3BP research in cancer, several methodological approaches can be applied:

  • Antibody-mediated blockade assessment:

    • Develop blocking antibodies against lgals3bpb similar to the approach used for Gal-3BP in pancreatic cancer

    • Evaluate antibody binding affinity, epitope mapping, and functional blocking using biochemical assays

  • Signaling pathway analysis:

    • Investigate whether lgals3bpb, like Gal-3BP in cancer, influences signaling pathways such as EGFR-Myc signaling

    • Use phospho-specific antibodies to detect changes in downstream effectors following lgals3bpb modulation

  • In vivo functional validation:

    • Develop zebrafish disease models where lgals3bpb may play a role

    • Assess whether antibody-mediated blockade affects disease progression metrics

  • Therapeutic development pipeline:

    • Screen antibody clones for optimal target engagement and functional effects

    • Perform detailed characterization of lead candidates including binding kinetics, epitope mapping, and cross-reactivity testing

These approaches should be guided by the finding that antibody-mediated blockade of Gal-3BP has shown promise in abrogating metastasis in pancreatic cancer models .

How does lgals3bpb expression pattern compare between zebrafish and mammalian models, and what are the implications for translational research?

Comparative analysis of lgals3bpb expression across species has important translational implications:

  • Cross-species expression analysis:

    • While lgals3bpb shows strong microglial expression in zebrafish, mammalian orthologs may have different cell-type specificities

    • Perform systematic comparison of expression patterns using species-specific antibodies and RNA-seq data

    • Consider evolutionary conservation of protein structure and function

  • Functional conservation assessment:

    • Determine whether the function of lgals3bpb is conserved between zebrafish and mammals

    • Investigate binding partners and signaling pathways across species

  • Methodological considerations for translational studies:

    • Develop cross-reactive antibodies or species-specific antibodies targeting conserved epitopes

    • Establish equivalent experimental paradigms in zebrafish and mammalian models to enable direct comparisons

    • Consider the higher specificity of 4C4 for lgals3bpb compared to mammalian antibodies when interpreting data

  • Data integration approaches:

    • Use bioinformatic analyses to align zebrafish and mammalian datasets

    • Create cross-species gene regulatory networks to identify conserved and divergent pathways

This comparative approach facilitates appropriate extrapolation of zebrafish findings to mammalian systems while acknowledging species-specific differences.

How can I distinguish between closely related paralogs of lgals3bpb when using antibodies for research?

Distinguishing between closely related paralogs requires careful experimental design:

  • Epitope mapping and sequence analysis:

    • Perform detailed sequence alignment between lgals3bpb and its paralogs (e.g., zgc:112492 which shares ~80% identity)

    • Identify unique peptide regions that could serve as discriminating epitopes

    • Use epitope mapping techniques to determine the precise binding site of antibodies like 4C4

  • Validation in expression systems:

    • Express individual paralogs in heterologous systems (e.g., HEK-293T cells)

    • Compare antibody reactivity across paralogs under identical conditions

    • As demonstrated with 4C4, observe whether the antibody shows specificity for lgals3bpb over related proteins like zgc:112492

  • Mass spectrometry verification:

    • Use parallel reaction monitoring or multiple reaction monitoring mass spectrometry (MRM-MS) to distinguish paralog-specific peptides

    • Compare spectral counts between paralogs in immunoprecipitation experiments

    • Focus on unique peptides that map exclusively to lgals3bpb, as demonstrated in research where 18 peptides mapped exclusively to lgals3bpb versus only one for zgc:112492

  • Complementary RNA-based approaches:

    • Use paralog-specific RNA probes for in situ hybridization to correlate with antibody staining patterns

    • Consider single-cell transcriptomics to resolve paralog expression at cellular resolution

What are the critical factors to consider when using anti-lgals3bpb antibodies in co-labeling experiments with other immune markers?

Co-labeling experiments with anti-lgals3bpb antibodies require careful consideration of several factors:

  • Antibody compatibility assessment:

    • Evaluate host species of primary antibodies to avoid cross-reactivity

    • When using multiple mouse-derived antibodies, consider directly conjugated antibodies or sequential immunostaining protocols

    • Test antibody combinations on control tissues before proceeding to experimental samples

  • Signal optimization for multichannel imaging:

    • Balance signal intensity across channels by optimizing antibody concentrations

    • Consider spectral unmixing for fluorophores with overlapping emission spectra

    • Use appropriate controls for autofluorescence, especially in tissues like liver where endogenous fluorescence can be problematic

  • Fixation and epitope preservation:

    • Different antigens may require different fixation conditions; optimize to preserve all targets

    • Test multiple fixation protocols (PFA concentrations, duration) to find optimal conditions for multi-epitope preservation

    • Consider antigen retrieval methods when necessary

  • Interpretation guidelines:

    • Establish quantitative methods for assessing co-localization

    • Account for differences in subcellular localization of different markers

    • As observed in research, not all mpeg1:GFP+ cells are labeled with 4C4 antibody in peripheral tissues, highlighting the importance of careful interpretation

How can RNA-seq and proteomics data be integrated with anti-lgals3bpb antibody labeling to provide comprehensive cellular phenotyping?

Integrating multi-omics data with antibody labeling enables sophisticated cellular phenotyping:

  • Complementary single-cell approaches:

    • Use FACS with anti-lgals3bpb antibodies to isolate specific cell populations for single-cell RNA-seq

    • Compare transcriptomic profiles of lgals3bpb-high versus lgals3bpb-low cells

    • Correlate protein expression detected by antibody with mRNA levels to identify post-transcriptional regulation

  • Spatial transcriptomics integration:

    • Combine in situ hybridization for lgals3bpb with antibody labeling to correlate transcript and protein localization

    • Use multiplexed imaging methods to simultaneously visualize multiple mRNAs and proteins

  • Proteomics workflow integration:

    • Use anti-lgals3bpb antibodies for immunoprecipitation followed by mass spectrometry to identify protein interaction networks

    • Compare results with predicted interactions from transcriptomic data

    • As demonstrated in research, identify proteins with significant enrichment in antibody pull-downs compared to controls

  • Data visualization and integration tools:

    • Develop computational pipelines to integrate antibody-based imaging data with transcriptomic and proteomic datasets

    • Use dimension reduction techniques like UMAP or t-SNE to visualize relationships between multi-modal data

    • Apply trajectory analysis to understand temporal dynamics of lgals3bpb expression in developmental or disease contexts

This integrated approach provides a more comprehensive understanding of lgals3bpb biology than any single method alone.

How might anti-lgals3bpb antibodies contribute to understanding microglia-neuron interactions in neurodevelopmental disorders?

Anti-lgals3bpb antibodies offer unique opportunities for investigating microglia-neuron interactions:

  • Developmental timeline analysis:

    • Use anti-lgals3bpb antibodies to track microglial dynamics throughout neurodevelopment

    • Correlate microglial positioning with developing neural circuits

    • Investigate whether developmental disruptions alter lgals3bpb expression patterns

  • Synaptic pruning investigation:

    • Combine anti-lgals3bpb labeling with synaptic markers to visualize microglia-synapse interactions

    • Develop quantitative metrics for assessing microglial engulfment of synaptic material

    • Compare pruning activity between normal development and disease models

  • Functional perturbation studies:

    • Use lgals3bpb blocking antibodies to determine if interfering with this protein affects microglial functions

    • Assess consequences for circuit formation and behavioral outcomes

    • Compare results with genetic manipulation approaches (e.g., CRISPR/Cas9 targeting of lgals3bpb)

  • Translational relevance:

    • Correlate findings in zebrafish models with human data from postmortem brain tissue or induced pluripotent stem cell-derived microglia

    • Assess whether lgals3bpb homologs show altered expression in human neurodevelopmental disorders

These approaches could provide fundamental insights into how microglial dysfunction contributes to neurodevelopmental pathologies.

What are the emerging applications of anti-lgals3bpb antibodies in identifying novel therapeutic targets for neuroinflammatory diseases?

Anti-lgals3bpb antibodies can facilitate target discovery for neuroinflammatory diseases:

  • Microglial state characterization:

    • Use anti-lgals3bpb antibodies to isolate pure microglial populations for multi-omics profiling

    • Compare lgals3bpb expression levels across different microglial activation states

    • Identify correlations between lgals3bpb levels and disease severity metrics

  • Therapeutic screening platforms:

    • Develop high-content screening assays using anti-lgals3bpb antibodies to monitor microglial responses

    • Identify compounds that modulate microglial phenotypes in disease models

    • Assess whether targeting lgals3bpb directly has therapeutic potential, similar to findings with Gal-3BP in cancer

  • Biomarker development:

    • Investigate whether soluble forms of lgals3bpb could serve as biomarkers for neuroinflammatory conditions

    • Drawing parallels from cancer research where Gal-3BP was detectable in liquid biopsies

    • Develop sensitive assays using anti-lgals3bpb antibodies for quantification in cerebrospinal fluid

  • Cross-disease comparative analysis:

    • Apply anti-lgals3bpb antibodies across multiple disease models to identify common and distinct microglial responses

    • Use this information to develop disease-specific targeting strategies

This research direction could significantly advance the development of microglial-targeted therapeutics for neurological disorders.

What are the latest methodological advances in using anti-lgals3bpb antibodies for live imaging of microglia?

Recent methodological advances have expanded live imaging capabilities:

  • Antibody fragment development:

    • Engineer smaller antibody formats (Fab fragments, nanobodies) derived from anti-lgals3bpb antibodies

    • Optimize these formats for improved tissue penetration and reduced immunogenicity

    • Validate specificity using approaches similar to those used for the original 4C4 antibody

  • Live labeling approaches:

    • Develop non-toxic fluorescently conjugated anti-lgals3bpb antibody fragments for in vivo imaging

    • Optimize delivery methods that preserve blood-brain barrier integrity

    • Establish protocols for repetitive imaging sessions to track the same cells over time

  • Complementary transgenic strategies:

    • Create knock-in reporter lines where fluorescent proteins are expressed under the lgals3bpb promoter

    • Compare reporter expression with antibody labeling to validate fidelity

    • Use these tools in combination to distinguish between transcriptional and post-transcriptional regulation

  • Advanced imaging platforms integration:

    • Adapt anti-lgals3bpb labeling for two-photon microscopy and light-sheet microscopy

    • Develop image analysis pipelines specifically optimized for microglial morphology and dynamics

These advances facilitate longitudinal studies of microglial behavior in intact neural circuits.

How can computational approaches enhance the analysis of anti-lgals3bpb antibody staining patterns in complex tissues?

Computational methods significantly enhance the utility of anti-lgals3bpb antibody data:

  • Automated cell identification and morphological analysis:

    • Develop machine learning algorithms to identify lgals3bpb-positive cells and classify morphological states

    • Train these algorithms on expert-annotated data sets

    • Validate algorithm performance across different tissue types and experimental conditions

  • Spatial distribution analysis:

    • Apply spatial statistics to quantify the distribution patterns of lgals3bpb-positive cells relative to anatomical landmarks

    • Develop methods to detect significant clustering or dispersion

    • Compare spatial metrics across developmental stages, disease states, or treatment conditions

  • Multi-channel integration approaches:

    • Develop pipelines for co-localization analysis across multiple channels

    • Use graph theory to map cellular interaction networks based on proximity and contact

    • Integrate with spatial transcriptomics data to correlate protein expression with local gene expression patterns

  • Temporal dynamics analysis:

    • For time-lapse data, develop tracking algorithms specifically optimized for microglial motility

    • Implement methods to quantify process extension/retraction and target engagement

    • Correlate dynamic behaviors with lgals3bpb expression levels

These computational approaches transform descriptive observations into quantitative metrics suitable for statistical analysis.

What quality control measures should be implemented when working with anti-lgals3bpb antibodies in a research laboratory?

Comprehensive quality control ensures reliable antibody performance:

  • Initial validation protocol:

    • Confirm antibody specificity using multiple techniques (western blot, immunostaining, immunoprecipitation)

    • Validate across different sample types (cell lines, tissue sections)

    • Document lot-to-lot variability by testing new lots against reference standards

  • Routine experimental controls:

    • Include positive controls (tissues known to express lgals3bpb, such as brain tissue)

    • Incorporate negative controls (secondary antibody only, tissues from knockout models if available)

    • Use blocking peptides to confirm specificity of staining

  • Storage and handling practices:

    • Establish standard operating procedures for antibody storage (temperature, aliquoting to minimize freeze-thaw cycles)

    • Monitor antibody performance over time to detect deterioration

    • Document optimal working concentrations for each application

  • Documentation system:

    • Maintain detailed records of antibody source, lot number, validation results, and experimental conditions

    • Create a standardized validation checklist for all antibodies entering the laboratory

    • Implement regular performance reviews of key antibodies

Rigorous quality control significantly improves reproducibility and reliability of research findings.

How should researchers interpret and report lgals3bpb antibody results in scientific publications to ensure reproducibility?

Best practices for reporting antibody-based results include:

  • Detailed methods documentation:

    • Provide complete antibody information (source, catalog number, lot number, RRID)

    • Describe validation experiments performed in your specific experimental system

    • Detail all experimental conditions (fixation, permeabilization, blocking, antibody concentration, incubation time/temperature)

  • Controls and validation reporting:

    • Present both positive and negative control data

    • Include validation experiments demonstrating specificity (e.g., reactivity with recombinant lgals3bpb but not with related paralogs)

    • Document all optimization steps undertaken

  • Image acquisition and processing transparency:

    • Report detailed imaging parameters (microscope specifications, exposure settings, filter sets)

    • Clearly state any image processing steps applied

    • Present representative images that accurately reflect the complete dataset

  • Quantification methods:

    • Explain in detail all quantification methods and analysis pipelines

    • Report all statistical methods used for data analysis

    • Consider sharing raw data and analysis code through repositories

These practices enhance reproducibility and enable other researchers to build upon your findings.

Quick Inquiry

Personal Email Detected
Please use an institutional or corporate email address for inquiries. Personal email accounts ( such as Gmail, Yahoo, and Outlook) are not accepted. *
© Copyright 2025 TheBiotek. All Rights Reserved.