lacY Antibody

Shipped with Ice Packs
In Stock

Description

Introduction to lacY Antibody

The lacY antibody is a specialized immunological reagent designed to target and bind the lactose permease (LacY) protein, a secondary transporter in Escherichia coli responsible for the coupled symport of β-galactosides and protons. LacY antibodies are critical tools for studying the protein’s structural dynamics, conformational changes, and functional mechanisms in membrane biology. These antibodies are widely used in applications such as Western blotting (WB), enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA), immunohistochemistry (IHC), and immunoprecipitation .

LacY’s topology and lipid-dependent structural rearrangements make it a model system for membrane protein studies. For example, LacY adopts a 12-transmembrane domain (TMD) structure in phosphatidylethanolamine (PE)-rich membranes but inverts its topology in PE-deficient environments, exposing extramembrane domains (EMDs) detectable via specific antibodies .

Research Applications of lacY Antibodies

Biochemical Assays

  • Cross-linking and SDS-PAGE: Site-directed polyclonal antibodies against LacY’s C-terminus are used to analyze cross-linked mutants in SDS-PAGE, revealing transport-defective conformations .

  • Fluorescence-based Binding Assays: Trp-substituted LacY variants (e.g., W151) combined with antibodies enable real-time monitoring of sugar-binding kinetics .

Key Research Findings Enabled by lacY Antibodies

DiscoveryMethodAntibody RoleSource
Lipid-dependent topology inversionMonoclonal anti-EMD P7Detected inverted vs. native TMD orientation
Outward-facing conformation stabilizationCamelid nanobodies (Nb 9047)Locked LacY in periplasmic-open state
Electrogenic H⁺ release during transportPolyclonal anti-C-terminal LacYValidated charge displacement in proteoliposomes
C154G mutant stabilizationCys-less LacY mutantsEnhanced thermal stability for crystallization

Critical Insights from Antibody-Based Studies

  • Dynamic Topology: LacY’s N-terminal TMD bundle inverts in PE-deficient membranes, a phenomenon validated using conformation-specific antibodies .

  • Mutant Stabilization: The C154G mutation improves LacY stability in detergents, enabling crystallography studies when paired with thermal shift assays and antibody validation .

  • Nanobody Applications: Camelid nanobodies increase substrate-binding affinity by >10-fold, providing tools to trap intermediate transport states .

Product Specs

Buffer
Preservative: 0.03% Proclin 300
Constituents: 50% Glycerol, 0.01M PBS, pH 7.4
Description

The lacY polyclonal antibody is developed through the immunization of a rabbit with a recombinant Escherichia coli (strain K12) lacY protein. This process triggers an immune response in the rabbit, leading to the production of lacY polyclonal antibodies. Subsequently, the lacY antibody is purified using protein G affinity chromatography. The antibody's effectiveness in detecting Escherichia coli (strain K12) lacY protein is validated through ELISA and WB assays.

The Escherichia coli (strain K12) lacY protein plays a crucial role in facilitating the transport of lactose across the bacterial cell membrane. This protein is an integral part of the lac operon, a genetic system that enables the bacteria to utilize lactose as a carbon source when glucose is limited. The lacY protein acts as a lactose symporter, coupling the transport of lactose into the cell with the movement of protons out of the cell. This mechanism allows E. coli to efficiently acquire lactose from the environment for metabolic processes.

Form
Liquid
Lead Time
Typically, we are able to dispatch the products within 1-3 working days after receiving your orders. The delivery time may vary depending on the chosen purchasing method or location. For specific delivery timeframes, please consult your local distributors.
Synonyms
Lactose permease (Lactose-proton symport) lacY b0343 JW0334
Target Names
lacY
Uniprot No.

Target Background

Function
The lacY protein is responsible for the transport of beta-galactosides into the bacterial cell, accompanied by the simultaneous import of a proton (symport system). It can transport lactose, melibiose, lactulose, or the analog methyl-1-thio-beta,D-galactopyranoside (TMG), but not sucrose or fructose. The substrate specificity is primarily directed towards the galactopyranosyl moiety of the substrate.
Gene References Into Functions
  1. Binding kinetics of alpha-galactopyranoside homologs with fluorescent aglycones of varying sizes or shapes were determined using Förster resonance energy transfer (FRET) from Trp151 in the LacY binding site to the fluorophores. The specificity of LacY is directed towards the galactopyranoside ring. The pathway for substrate entry from the periplasmic side is wider than the calculated pore diameters in periplasmic open X-ray structures. PMID: 29602806
  2. Glu325 exhibits a pKa of 10.5 +/- 0.1 that remains unaffected by the presence of galactopyranoside. Protonation of Glu325 is specifically required for effective sugar binding to LacY. PMID: 28154138
  3. Data indicate that the nanobodies (Nbs) bind stoichiometrically with nanomolar affinity to the periplasmic face of lactose permease (LacY), primarily to the C-terminal six-helix bundle. PMID: 27791182
  4. Molecular dynamics simulations suggest that the deprotonation of Glu325 induces the opening of the periplasmics side and partial closure of the cytoplasmic side of LacY, while protonation of Glu269 causes a stable cross-domain salt-bridge (Glu130-Arg344) and completely closes the cytoplasmic side. PMID: 27090495
  5. Double-replacement mutants of conserved Gly-Gly pairs bind galactoside with affinities 10-20-fold higher than that of the pseudo-wild-type or wild-type LacY. Additionally, site-directed alkylation of a periplasmic Cys replacement indicates that the periplasmic cavity becomes readily accessible in the double-replacement mutants. PMID: 27438891
  6. Wild-type LacY in complex with the majority of the Nbs exhibits varied increases in the accessibility of sugar to the binding site, with an increase in association rate constants (kon) of up to approximately 50-fold (reaching 10(7) M(-1) s(-1)). PMID: 25512549
  7. The lactose permease gene (lacY) was overexpressed in the septuple knockout mutant of Escherichia coli. This overexpression inactivates the lactose repressor, induces the lactose operon, and consequently stimulates overall lactose consumption and conversion. PMID: 23725289
  8. Data suggest that opening of the periplasmic cavity not only limits access of sugar to the binding site of lactose permease (LacY) but also controls the rate of closing of the cytoplasmic cavity. PMID: 24872451
  9. The study employed chemical denaturation to determine the unfolding free energy of LacY and utilized Trp residues as site-specific thermodynamic probes. Trp LacY mutants were created with individual Trps positioned at mirror image locations on the two LacY domains. PMID: 24530957
  10. Findings support the interpretation that the electrogenic reaction induced by sugar binding is due to rearrangement of charged residues in LacY. This reaction is blocked by mutation of each member of the Tyr236/Glu269/His322 triad. PMID: 24152072
  11. Trp replacements for tightly interacting Gly-Gly pairs in LacY stabilize an outward-facing conformation. PMID: 23671103
  12. Proper fatty acid composition, rather than an ionizable lipid amine, is essential for the full transport function of lactose permease from Escherichia coli. PMID: 23322771
  13. Data indicate that transmembrane domains (TMs) orientation for lactose permease LacY is influenced by membrane lipid composition. PMID: 22969082
  14. The study led to the discovery that LacY activity is a significant physiological source of expression costs in the lac operon. PMID: 22605776
  15. Analysis of the intermediate conformational state of LacY. PMID: 22355148
  16. Results suggest that LacY exhibits specificity directed towards the galactopyranosyl moiety of the glycoside to be transported. PMID: 22106930
  17. LacY is highly dynamic, and binding of a galactopyranoside causes closure of the inward-facing cavity with the opening of a complementary outward-facing cavity. PMID: 21995338
  18. Analysis of the interaction between helices V and I and its role in the transport mechanism of LacY protein. PMID: 21730060
  19. Data demonstrate that MTS-gal is bound covalently, forming a disulfide bond with Cys122 LacY and positioned between R144 and W151. PMID: 21593407
  20. The topology of both CscB & PheP permeases is dependent on PE. However, CscB topology is governed by a thermodynamic balance between opposing lipid-dependent electrostatic and hydrophobic interactions. PMID: 21454589
  21. Results describe a structural model of LacY generated by swapping the conformations of inverted-topology repeats identified in its two domains. PMID: 21315728
  22. Ser53, Gln60, and Phe354 are identified as crucial residues in sugar transport during the periplasmic-open stage of the sugar transport cycle. The sugar undergoes an orientational change to escape the protein lumen. PMID: 20875429
  23. LacY exhibits uphill transport and a native conformation of periplasmic domain P7 when expressed in a mutant where phosphatidylcholine completely replaces phosphatidylethanolamine. PMID: 20696931
  24. Electrogenic reactions accompanying downhill lactose/H(+) symport catalyzed by the lactose permease of Escherichia coli (LacY) have been assessed using solid-supported membrane-based electrophysiology with improved time resolution. PMID: 20568736
  25. The study demonstrates that sugar binding induces virtually the same global conformational change in LacY whether the protein is in the native bacterial membrane or solubilized and purified in detergent. PMID: 20457922
  26. Data report the insertion of E. coli lactose permease in supported lipid bilayers of 1-palmitoyl-2-oleoyl-sn-glycero-3-phosphoethanolamine (POPE) and 1-palmitoyl-2-oleoyl-sn-glycero-3-phosphoglycerol (POPG), in biomimetic molar proportions. PMID: 20096263
  27. Combined with results from previous mutagenesis and cross-linking studies, these findings suggest that replacement of Asp68 blocks a conformational transition involving helices II and IV that is essential for opening the periplasmic cavity. PMID: 20043916
  28. Analysis of sugar recognition by the LacY lactose permease of Escherichia coli. PMID: 15364943
  29. LacY activity is dependent on subtle interactions between the helices. Mutations that disrupt interactions between helix IV and loop 6-7 or between helices II and IV also rescue transport in the cysteine154glycine mutant. PMID: 15909981
  30. The reactivity of single-Cys mutants in helices I, III, VI, and XI of lactose permease with N-ethylmaleimide or methanethiosulfonate ethylsulfonate was studied in membrane vesicles. Most Cys replacements react with the membrane-permeant alkylating agent NEM. PMID: 16566592
  31. Functional analyses of mutants in the homologous key residues provide strong evidence that they play a similar critical role in the mechanisms of CscB and LacY. PMID: 16574149
  32. Structurally diverse lipids endow the membrane with similar properties necessary for the proper organization of protein domains in LacY. These domains are highly sensitive to lipids as topological determinants. PMID: 16698795
  33. Thermodynamic analysis of ligand-induced conformational flexibility in the lactose permease of Escherichia coli. PMID: 17003033
  34. A model is proposed where the single sugar-binding site in the approximate middle of the molecule is alternately exposed to either side of the membrane due to the opening and closing of cytoplasmic and periplasmic hydrophilic cavities. PMID: 17172438
  35. Analysis of the x-ray structure of wild-type lactose permease (LacY) from Escherichia coli determined by manipulating phospholipid content during crystallization. PMID: 17881559
  36. Double electron-electron resonance, in conjunction with molecular modeling based on the x-ray structure, provides strong support for the alternative access model and reveals a structure for the outward-facing conformer of LacY. PMID: 17925435
  37. The results provide direct support for the argument that transport via LacY involves the opening and closing of a large periplasmic cavity. PMID: 18319336
  38. The results are consistent with the conclusion that LacY is protonated before sugar binding during lactose/H(+) symport in either direction across the membrane. PMID: 18567672
  39. ProP activity increased as LacY activity decreased when osmotic stress (increasing osmolality) was imposed on right-side-out cytoplasmic membrane vesicles. PMID: 18620422
  40. LacY involves at least two electrogenic reactions: a minor electrogenic step and a major electrogenic step. PMID: 19383792
  41. The data indicate that residues Ile40 and Asn245 play a primary role in gating the periplasmic cavity and provide further support for the alternating-access model. PMID: 19781551

Show More

Hide All

Database Links
Protein Families
Major facilitator superfamily, Oligosaccharide:H(+) symporter (OHS) (TC 2.A.1.5) family
Subcellular Location
Cell inner membrane; Multi-pass membrane protein.

Q&A

What is lacY and why are antibodies against it important in research?

The lacY gene encodes lactose permease in Escherichia coli, a membrane protein that catalyzes the coupled stoichiometric translocation of a galactopyranoside and a proton (H+) across the bacterial membrane . As a paradigm for membrane proteins that transduce free energy stored in electrochemical ion gradients into solute concentration gradients (or vice versa), lacY has become a crucial model system in membrane transport research .

Antibodies against lacY are important research tools because they enable:

  • Visualization of protein localization within bacterial cells

  • Quantification of protein expression levels

  • Isolation of the protein for structural and functional studies

  • Investigation of conformational changes during transport cycles

  • Validation of genetic manipulations affecting lacY expression

These applications make lacY antibodies invaluable for understanding fundamental aspects of membrane transport, bacterial physiology, and protein structure-function relationships.

Which experimental applications can lacY antibodies be optimized for?

Based on available research reagents, lacY antibodies can be optimized for multiple experimental applications:

ApplicationCommon UsageTypical Antibody Format
Western Blotting (WB)Detection of denatured lacY protein in cell lysatesPolyclonal or monoclonal unconjugated antibodies
ELISAQuantitative measurement of lacY expressionPolyclonal antibodies with high specificity
Immunocytochemistry (ICC)Localization of lacY in fixed cellsPolyclonal antibodies, sometimes fluorescently conjugated
Immunofluorescence (IF)Visualization of lacY distribution in bacterial populationsFluorophore-conjugated antibodies
Immunoprecipitation (IP)Isolation of lacY and interacting partnersHigh-affinity antibodies against specific epitopes

Most commercial lacY antibodies are validated for Western blotting and ELISA applications, with a smaller subset optimized for microscopy techniques . For advanced structural studies, researchers often require custom antibodies targeting specific regions of the protein.

How does the structure of lacY influence antibody selection and experimental design?

LacY is a complex membrane protein with 12 transmembrane α-helices arranged in two pseudosymmetrical 6-helix bundles, with a single sugar-binding site in the approximate middle of the molecule . This structure creates several challenges for antibody-based detection:

  • Limited accessibility of epitopes buried in the membrane

  • Conformational changes that alter epitope exposure during transport cycles

  • Potential cross-reactivity with other membrane transporters

  • Difficulty in maintaining native conformation during sample preparation

When designing experiments, researchers should select antibodies targeting epitopes that remain accessible in their experimental context. For experiments investigating native lacY, antibodies recognizing cytoplasmic or periplasmic loops are preferable. For denatured applications (like Western blotting), antibodies targeting regions within transmembrane domains may be suitable.

The alternating access model of lacY function, where the binding site is alternately exposed to either side of the membrane through opening and closing of cytoplasmic and periplasmic hydrophilic cavities , means that certain epitopes may only be accessible in specific conformational states.

How can site-directed mutagenesis studies inform lacY antibody epitope mapping?

Research has demonstrated that systematic cysteine-scanning mutagenesis provides valuable insights into lacY structure and dynamics. When individual residues in lacY are replaced with cysteine and tested for reactivity with alkylating agents like N-ethylmaleimide, the pattern of reactivity reveals information about solvent accessibility and conformational changes .

This approach can be adapted for epitope mapping:

  • Generate a series of lacY variants with mutations in potential antibody binding regions

  • Test each variant for antibody recognition via Western blotting or ELISA

  • Identify regions where mutations abolish antibody binding

  • Correlate these findings with structural data to map the precise epitope

Notably, research has shown that certain regions of lacY demonstrate increased or decreased reactivity in the presence of substrate ligands . This suggests that epitope accessibility can change dynamically during the transport cycle, which has important implications for experimental design and interpretation.

What are the implications of the alternating access model for designing lacY antibody experiments?

The alternating access model of lacY function provides a framework for understanding how epitope accessibility changes during transport cycles. Key findings from site-directed alkylation studies have shown that:

  • In the presence of substrate, increased reactivity is observed with cysteine replacements located predominantly on the periplasmic side of the sugar-binding site

  • Conversely, decreased reactivity is observed with replacements on the cytoplasmic side of the binding site

  • Both sets of reactive sites are distributed in a pseudosymmetrical manner, corresponding to the opening and closing of hydrophilic cavities

For antibody-based studies, this means:

  • Antibodies targeting periplasmic domains may show enhanced binding when lacY is in substrate-bound conformations

  • Antibodies targeting cytoplasmic domains may show reduced binding in the same conditions

  • Dynamic conformational changes may lead to variable antibody accessibility depending on the experimental conditions

Researchers should consider using antibody panels targeting different regions of lacY for more comprehensive analysis, or selecting antibodies strategically based on which conformational state they wish to detect.

How do different bacterial expression systems affect lacY antibody recognition?

Expression system considerations for lacY antibody experiments include:

Expression SystemAdvantagesPotential Complications for Antibody Recognition
Native E. coliNatural expression levels and processingLow expression may require signal amplification
Overexpression in E. coliHigher protein yieldsPotential misfolding or aggregation affecting epitope presentation
Tagged lacY constructsFacilitates purification and detectionTags may alter conformation or antibody accessibility
Heterologous expressionStudy in different membrane environmentsPost-translational modifications may differ

When using lacY antibodies with different expression systems, validation experiments should verify that antibody recognition is maintained. Comparison of detection patterns between native and overexpressed systems can help identify potential artifacts caused by expression-induced conformational changes.

What are the optimal sample preparation protocols for immunodetection of lacY?

LacY, as a hydrophobic membrane protein, requires careful sample preparation to maintain its structure while ensuring antibody accessibility. Recommended protocols differ by application:

For Western Blotting:

  • Extract bacterial membranes with mild detergents (e.g., DDM or LDAO)

  • Avoid boiling samples (use 37°C incubation instead)

  • Include reducing agents to maintain cysteine residues in reduced state

  • Use gradient gels (10-15%) to optimize resolution

  • Transfer to PVDF membranes (preferred over nitrocellulose for hydrophobic proteins)

For Immunofluorescence:

  • Gentle fixation with 2-4% paraformaldehyde

  • Careful permeabilization with detergents (0.1% Triton X-100 or 0.01% digitonin)

  • Extended blocking (2+ hours) to reduce non-specific binding

  • Antibody incubation at 4°C overnight to enhance specificity

  • Multiple washing steps to remove unbound antibody

For each application, researchers should verify that sample preparation conditions maintain antibody recognition of lacY while minimizing background.

How can researchers validate the specificity of lacY antibodies?

Comprehensive validation of lacY antibodies should include:

  • Genetic controls: Compare antibody reactivity in wild-type vs. lacY knockout strains

  • Peptide competition: Pre-incubate antibody with purified lacY or epitope peptides to block specific binding

  • Cross-reactivity testing: Test against related transporters or in non-E. coli species

  • Multiple detection methods: Confirm findings using orthogonal techniques (e.g., mass spectrometry)

  • Antibody dilution series: Establish optimal concentration showing specific signal without background

Researchers should be particularly cautious when working with polyclonal antibodies, which may contain subpopulations recognizing epitopes beyond the intended target. Monoclonal antibodies typically offer higher specificity but may be more sensitive to conformational changes in the target protein.

What controls should be included when using lacY antibodies for experimental applications?

Essential controls for lacY antibody experiments include:

Control TypePurposeImplementation
Positive ControlVerify antibody functionalityInclude known lacY-expressing sample
Negative ControlEstablish background levelsUse lacY knockout or unrelated bacterial species
Loading ControlNormalize quantitative dataInclude antibody against stable reference protein
Secondary-only ControlDetect non-specific bindingOmit primary antibody
Competition ControlConfirm epitope specificityPre-incubate with immunizing peptide
Isotype ControlIdentify Fc-mediated bindingUse non-specific antibody of same isotype

For quantitative studies, researchers should also include a standard curve using purified lacY protein to establish the linear range of detection and to facilitate accurate quantification.

What are common causes of weak or absent signals when using lacY antibodies?

When researchers encounter weak or absent signals in lacY immunodetection experiments, several factors may be responsible:

  • Low expression levels: Native lacY expression may be insufficient for detection without signal amplification

  • Inaccessible epitopes: Membrane embedding may restrict antibody access to certain regions

  • Conformational changes: Transport cycle dynamics may alter epitope presentation

  • Protein degradation: Proteolysis during sample preparation may destroy epitopes

  • Fixation artifacts: Excessive fixation can mask epitopes or create cross-links

  • Detergent effects: Inappropriate detergents may denature the protein or disrupt antibody binding

Optimization strategies include:

  • Enriching membrane fractions before analysis

  • Testing multiple antibodies targeting different epitopes

  • Using mild detergents suitable for membrane proteins

  • Optimizing fixation and permeabilization protocols

  • Employing signal enhancement methods (e.g., tyramide signal amplification)

How should researchers address contradictory results between different detection methods?

When different detection methods yield contradictory results with lacY antibodies, researchers should systematically investigate potential causes:

  • Conformation-dependent recognition: Determine if the antibody recognizes native or denatured forms

  • Epitope accessibility: Assess whether sample preparation affects epitope exposure

  • Method sensitivity: Compare detection limits across methods

  • Antibody specificity: Evaluate cross-reactivity with related proteins

  • Sample heterogeneity: Consider variations in lacY conformation or modification

A methodical approach to resolving contradictions includes:

  • Using multiple antibodies targeting different epitopes

  • Comparing native vs. denatured detection systems

  • Implementing orthogonal detection methods (e.g., mass spectrometry)

  • Testing in multiple strain backgrounds to control for genetic factors

  • Employing tagged lacY constructs as internal controls

What strategies can overcome membrane protein solubilization challenges for lacY antibody applications?

Working with membrane proteins like lacY presents unique challenges for immunodetection. Research has shown that lacY can be solubilized from membranes and purified to homogeneity while maintaining functionality , but this requires careful optimization:

Solubilization ChallengeRecommendationScientific Rationale
Maintaining native conformationUse mild detergents (DDM, LMNG, digitonin)Preserve protein-protein and protein-lipid interactions
Preventing aggregationInclude glycerol (10-15%) in buffersStabilizes hydrophobic domains
Enhancing epitope accessibilityTest detergent screening panelsDifferent detergents expose different epitopes
Reducing non-specific bindingUse detergent-compatible blocking agentsPrevent antibody interactions with detergent micelles
Preserving antibody reactivityValidate antibodies in each detergent systemDetergents may affect antibody binding properties

The optimal solubilization approach depends on the specific application and antibody characteristics. For structural studies requiring native conformation, milder conditions are preferred; for applications like Western blotting, stronger detergents may be acceptable.

Recent advances in membrane protein research, including the use of nanodiscs, styrene maleic acid copolymer lipid particles (SMALPs), and amphipols, offer alternative approaches to traditional detergent solubilization that may better preserve native structure for certain applications.

How can computational approaches aid in designing better lacY antibodies?

Artificial intelligence and computational biology are transforming antibody design. Recent work has demonstrated how AI-backed platforms combined with supercomputing can redesign antibodies to restore effectiveness compromised by evolution . Similar approaches could be applied to lacY antibody design:

  • Structural modeling of lacY epitopes in different conformational states

  • Prediction of optimal antibody binding regions based on accessibility and uniqueness

  • Virtual screening of antibody candidates before experimental validation

  • Molecular dynamics simulations to assess antibody-antigen interactions

As demonstrated in the research on pandemic antibodies, computational approaches can dramatically reduce the experimental search space, evaluating just hundreds of candidates from a theoretical space of over 10^17 possibilities . This efficiency could accelerate the development of highly specific lacY antibodies for challenging research applications.

How might single-molecule techniques enhance lacY antibody applications?

Emerging single-molecule techniques offer new possibilities for lacY research using antibodies:

  • Single-molecule FRET: Using fluorescently labeled antibodies to detect conformational changes during transport cycles

  • Super-resolution microscopy: Visualizing lacY distribution and dynamics at nanometer resolution

  • Single-molecule pull-down: Identifying transient interaction partners during different transport stages

  • Optical tweezers: Measuring forces associated with conformational changes when antibodies bind to different epitopes

These approaches could provide unprecedented insights into the dynamics of the alternating access mechanism and how substrate binding affects the exposure of different regions of the protein to either side of the membrane.

This research direction represents the frontier of membrane transport protein studies, combining antibody-based detection with single-molecule biophysical techniques.

Quick Inquiry

Personal Email Detected
Please use an institutional or corporate email address for inquiries. Personal email accounts ( such as Gmail, Yahoo, and Outlook) are not accepted. *
© Copyright 2025 TheBiotek. All Rights Reserved.