ELISA: Used for quantitative analysis of LARP6 in biological samples, leveraging biotin-streptavidin amplification for high sensitivity .
Western Blot (WB): Validates LARP6 expression (~70 kDa observed molecular weight) in human tissues such as lung fibroblasts and cancer cell lines .
Collagen Biosynthesis: LARP6 binds the 5’ stem-loop (5’SL) of collagen α1(I) and α2(I) mRNAs to regulate their translation. The antibody detects LARP6 in complexes with RNA helicase A (RHA) and collagen mRNAs .
Cancer Metastasis: LARP6 knockdown in colorectal cancer (CRC) models increases liver metastasis, while overexpression suppresses invasion. The antibody identifies LARP6 in CRC patient tissues and cell lines .
RNA-Protein Interactions: Used in RNA immunoprecipitation (RIP) assays to study LARP6’s binding to ribosomal protein (RP) mRNAs and other targets .
LARP6 coordinates collagen mRNA translation by forming a complex with RHA and STRAP (serine-threonine kinase receptor-associated protein) .
Mutations in LARP6’s RNK motif (Arg-308, Asn-309, Lys-310) disrupt 5’SL binding, reducing collagen synthesis .
Colorectal Cancer: Low LARP6 expression correlates with poor survival and increased metastasis. The antibody confirms LARP6’s role in stabilizing ZNF267 mRNA and inhibiting sphingomyelin synthesis via SGMS2 regulation .
Breast Cancer: LARP6 promotes invasion by localizing RP-mRNAs to protrusions in migrating cells. Biotin-conjugated antibodies enable proteomic profiling of LARP6-associated complexes .
LARP6 (La Ribonucleoprotein Domain Family Member 6) is an RNA-binding protein belonging to the La-related protein family, which includes seven members: LARP1, LARP1b, SSB, LARP4, LARP4b, LARP6, and LARP7. All members possess a highly conserved La Module that confers RNA-binding capabilities . LARP6 has been identified as a key regulator in multiple biological processes including type-I collagen synthesis, cell survival, angiogenesis, and cellular motility . Recent research has demonstrated LARP6's significant role in cancer progression, particularly in colorectal cancer where its expression is downregulated compared to normal tissues . The protein's ability to bind numerous mRNA targets and regulate their stability and translation makes it a critical subject for research in both normal cellular processes and disease states. LARP6 antibodies are essential tools for investigating protein expression, localization, and interactions in these research contexts.
Biotin-conjugated LARP6 antibodies are particularly valuable for several experimental applications:
RNA Immunoprecipitation (RIP): These antibodies excel in RIP assays where the biotin tag facilitates efficient pull-down of LARP6-RNA complexes using streptavidin-coated beads. This application has been instrumental in identifying LARP6's RNA targets, as demonstrated in studies examining LARP6's binding to ZNF267 mRNA and collagen mRNAs .
Immunofluorescence microscopy: The biotin tag enables versatile detection systems through fluorophore-conjugated streptavidin, providing excellent signal amplification for visualizing LARP6 subcellular localization.
Flow cytometry: When studying LARP6 expression in heterogeneous cell populations, biotin-conjugated antibodies offer advantages through streptavidin-based secondary detection systems.
Chromatin immunoprecipitation (ChIP): For investigating potential roles of LARP6 in transcriptional regulation.
Western blotting: Biotin conjugation facilitates highly sensitive detection through streptavidin-HRP systems, which has been valuable in measuring LARP6 protein levels in colorectal cancer tissues compared to normal mucosa .
Validating antibody specificity is crucial for obtaining reliable research results. For biotin-conjugated LARP6 antibodies, consider these validation approaches:
Positive and negative control samples: Compare LARP6 expression in tissues/cells known to express high levels (like normal colon mucosa) versus those with low expression (like colorectal cancer tissues) .
Knockdown/knockout validation: Perform western blotting using samples from LARP6 knockdown or knockout cells alongside wild-type controls to confirm specificity.
Immunoprecipitation followed by mass spectrometry: This approach can verify that the antibody specifically pulls down LARP6 rather than other proteins. This technique was used to identify LARP6-interacting proteins like STRAP .
Peptide competition assay: Pre-incubate the antibody with excess LARP6 peptide before application to samples, which should abolish specific binding signals.
Cross-reactivity testing: Test the antibody against recombinant proteins from the LARP family (LARP1, LARP4, etc.) to ensure it doesn't cross-react with related proteins.
Proper sample preparation significantly impacts the success of experiments using LARP6 antibodies:
Cell lysate preparation: For protein extraction, use RIPA buffer supplemented with protease inhibitors to prevent degradation of LARP6. When studying LARP6-RNA interactions, RNase inhibitors should be included to preserve RNA integrity .
Tissue sample processing: Fresh-frozen tissue samples are preferred over formalin-fixed paraffin-embedded (FFPE) samples for most applications, as demonstrated in studies examining LARP6 expression in colorectal cancer tissues .
Fixation for immunocytochemistry: For studying LARP6 subcellular localization, 4% paraformaldehyde fixation has been successfully employed in autophagy studies involving LARP6 .
Preservation of protein-RNA interactions: When studying LARP6's RNA-binding activities, UV crosslinking prior to cell lysis helps preserve these interactions, as utilized in individual-nucleotide resolution UV crosslinking and immunoprecipitation (iCLIP) experiments .
Nuclear/cytoplasmic fractionation: Given LARP6's involvement in both nuclear and cytoplasmic processes, separate analysis of these fractions can provide insights into its compartment-specific functions.
RNA immunoprecipitation (RIP) is critical for studying LARP6's RNA targets, as demonstrated in research identifying its interaction with ZNF267 mRNA and collagen mRNAs . When using biotin-conjugated LARP6 antibodies for RIP, consider these optimization strategies:
Crosslinking approach: UV crosslinking at 254 nm is recommended for capturing direct RNA-protein interactions. For LARP6, which contains intrinsically disordered regions (IDRs) that interact with RNA, this step is particularly important to preserve transient interactions .
Lysate preparation: Use gentle lysis conditions (e.g., 0.5% NP-40) supplemented with RNase inhibitors and protease inhibitors. Consider DNase treatment to reduce chromatin contamination.
Antibody concentration titration: Perform a titration series (1-10 μg antibody per reaction) to determine optimal antibody concentration that maximizes specific pull-down while minimizing background.
Streptavidin bead selection: For biotin-conjugated antibodies, magnetic streptavidin beads typically provide better results than agarose beads due to lower background and more efficient washing.
Washing stringency: Implement a step-wise washing protocol beginning with low-stringency buffers (150 mM NaCl) and progressing to higher stringency (500 mM NaCl) to reduce non-specific binding while preserving specific interactions.
Negative controls: Include parallel IgG isotype controls as performed in published LARP6 RIP experiments and consider including LARP6-knockout/knockdown samples as additional controls.
RNA extraction and analysis: Use TRIzol for RNA extraction following manufacturer's instructions, as employed in published LARP6 studies . qPCR analysis should include both suspected targets and negative controls (like GAPDH).
LARP6 contains both structured RNA-binding domains (La-module) and intrinsically disordered regions (IDRs) that contribute to RNA binding . To investigate domain-specific functions:
Domain-specific antibody selection: When available, use antibodies targeting specific domains of LARP6 (N-terminal IDR, La-module, or C-terminal IDR).
Complementary mutant expression approach: Express domain deletion mutants (La-module only, IDR deletions) in cells with reduced endogenous LARP6 expression, then perform comparative RIP experiments to identify domain-specific RNA targets .
Crosslinking optimization: Different crosslinking methods may preferentially capture interactions involving structured domains versus IDRs. UV crosslinking at 254 nm is effective for capturing interactions with both the La-module and IDRs of LARP6 .
Sequential immunoprecipitation: When using multiple domain-specific antibodies, sequential IP can help identify RNAs that interact with multiple domains simultaneously.
In vitro binding studies: Combine antibody-based approaches with in vitro studies using recombinant domain fragments to validate domain-specific interactions identified in cellular contexts.
Research has shown that while the La-module is indispensable for LARP6 binding to RNA, deletion of IDRs broadens LARP6's interaction footprints on target RNAs, suggesting IDRs provide local selectivity in RNA binding .
LARP6 interacts with various proteins, including STRAP and potentially others in regulatory complexes . To map these interaction networks:
Sequential co-IP strategy: Use biotin-conjugated LARP6 antibodies for initial pulldown, followed by specific antibodies against suspected interacting proteins. This approach revealed the LARP6-STRAP interaction .
Protein-protein interaction preservation: To preserve protein-protein interactions during IP, use gentle lysis conditions (0.5% NP-40 or 1% Triton X-100) and conduct experiments at 4°C.
RNase treatment control: Include parallel samples treated with RNase A to distinguish RNA-dependent from direct protein-protein interactions. This approach confirmed that LARP6-STRAP interaction is not RNA-dependent .
Validation of novel interactions: For newly identified interactions, confirm bidirectional pulldown (IP with LARP6 antibody pulls down partner; IP with partner antibody pulls down LARP6).
Domain mapping: Use deletion mutants of LARP6 to map interaction domains. For example, the STRAP binding sequence (SBS) in the C-terminal domain of LARP6 (last 27 amino acids) was identified as essential for interaction with STRAP .
Proximity ligation assay (PLA): This technique can visualize protein-protein interactions in situ, providing spatial information about where interactions occur within cells.
LARP6 has been implicated in cancer progression, particularly in colorectal cancer where it suppresses invasion and metastasis . When investigating its role:
LARP6 has been shown to enhance autophagy activity in colorectal cancer cells . To investigate this function:
Autophagy marker co-localization: Combine LARP6 immunostaining with autophagy markers (LC3B, p62) to assess co-localization and potential direct involvement in autophagosome formation.
Autophagy flux measurement: Use RFP-GFP-LC3B reporter systems as described in LARP6 research to measure autophagy flux in cells with modulated LARP6 expression, quantifying red and yellow puncta formation.
Co-immunoprecipitation with autophagy components: Use LARP6 antibodies to pull down protein complexes and probe for autophagy-related proteins to identify potential interactions.
mRNA target identification: Perform RIP with LARP6 antibodies followed by RT-qPCR or RNA-seq to identify autophagy-related mRNAs that might be regulated by LARP6.
Pathway inhibitor studies: Combine LARP6 expression modulation with autophagy inhibitors (bafilomycin A1, chloroquine) or inducers (rapamycin) to place LARP6 within the autophagy regulatory network.
Ceramide/sphingomyelin measurement: Given LARP6's role in regulating SGMS2 (which affects ceramide/sphingomyelin balance and consequently autophagy), use lipidomic approaches alongside LARP6 expression analysis to correlate these parameters .
For researchers conducting immunofluorescence or immunohistochemistry with LARP6 antibodies:
Signal amplification optimization: For biotin-conjugated antibodies, test different streptavidin-fluorophore conjugates to determine optimal signal-to-noise ratio for your specific application.
Confocal microscopy settings: When analyzing subcellular localization, use appropriate confocal settings to distinguish nuclear versus cytoplasmic LARP6 distribution.
Quantitative analysis parameters: For autophagy studies, quantify at least 10 cells per group when counting LC3B puncta, as practiced in published LARP6 research .
Co-localization analysis: When studying LARP6 interaction with RNA or other proteins, use appropriate co-localization statistics (Pearson's correlation, Manders' overlap coefficient) rather than simple visual assessment.
Standardized scoring system: For tissue samples, develop standardized scoring systems for LARP6 expression (e.g., H-score or Allred score) to ensure consistent evaluation across samples.
3D analysis consideration: For complex subcellular structures, consider Z-stack imaging and 3D reconstruction to fully capture the spatial relationship between LARP6 and cellular components.
Automated analysis validation: If using automated image analysis software, validate results against manual scoring on a subset of samples to ensure accuracy.
| Problem | Possible Causes | Solutions |
|---|---|---|
| Low signal in Western blot | Inadequate protein extraction | Try different lysis buffers (RIPA, NP-40, urea-based) |
| Protein degradation | Add fresh protease inhibitors; keep samples cold | |
| Inefficient transfer | Optimize transfer conditions for LARP6's molecular weight | |
| Low LARP6 expression | Increase sample loading; use positive control samples | |
| Poor immunoprecipitation efficiency | Insufficient antibody | Increase antibody concentration |
| Weak antibody-protein interaction | Try different incubation temperatures/times | |
| Inefficient streptavidin binding | Check biotin conjugation quality; use different streptavidin beads | |
| High background in immunofluorescence | Non-specific binding | Increase blocking time; try different blocking agents |
| Autofluorescence | Include quenching steps; use appropriate filters | |
| Excess primary antibody | Titrate antibody concentration | |
| No RNA enrichment in RIP | RNA degradation | Add RNase inhibitors; minimize sample handling time |
| Inefficient crosslinking | Optimize UV crosslinking parameters | |
| Weak LARP6-RNA interaction | Consider formaldehyde crosslinking for protein complexes |