The term "FAA3" does not correspond to any established antibody, antigen, or biomarker in current immunological or biochemical nomenclature. Possible explanations include:
Typographical error: Potential confusion with similar terms (e.g., "FA3," "FAAH," or "AP3" antibodies, the latter of which targets galactomannan antigens in Aspergillus species ).
Proprietary designation: FAA3 might represent an internal code for a research antibody not yet published or cataloged publicly.
Miscommunication: The term could refer to a non-antibody compound or a hypothetical target under investigation.
While FAA3 is unidentifiable, the search results highlight critical advances in antibody engineering and characterization that may guide future work on novel antibodies:
To resolve the ambiguity surrounding "FAA3 Antibody," consider the following steps:
Verify nomenclature: Confirm the spelling and context of "FAA3" with the original source.
Explore repositories: Query antibody databases such as:
Collaborative consultation: Contact the NIH/NCI Antibody Interest Group (ABIG) or the Antibody Engineering Program (AEP) for specialized guidance .
Validation: Always use knockout (KO) cell lines or orthogonal assays to confirm antibody specificity .
Reproducibility: Share characterization data publicly to address the ongoing "antibody characterization crisis" .
Collaboration: Leverage platforms like the Recombinant Antibody Network (RAN) for high-quality reagent development .
KEGG: sce:YIL009W
STRING: 4932.YIL009W
FAA3 (also known as HNPCC6) is one of several alternative names for the TGFBR2 gene (Transforming Growth Factor Beta Receptor II). FAA3 is consistently listed among the gene aliases for TGFBR2 across multiple antibody resources . The TGFBR2 protein (which FAA3 antibodies target) functions as a transmembrane serine/threonine kinase receptor that binds TGF-beta ligands, playing crucial roles in cellular signaling pathways related to growth, differentiation, and apoptosis . When researchers reference FAA3 antibody, they are specifically referring to antibodies targeting the protein encoded by the TGFBR2 gene.
FAA3/TGFBR2 antibodies are utilized across multiple experimental applications with varying degrees of validation. Based on comprehensive antibody validation data, the primary applications include:
Western Blot (WB) - Consistently validated across multiple antibody products
Immunohistochemistry (IHC) - Particularly effective with paraffin-embedded sections
Immunofluorescence (IF) - Validated for cellular localization studies
Enzyme-Linked Immunosorbent Assay (ELISA) - Used for quantitative detection
Immunoprecipitation (IP) - Applied for protein complex isolation
The experimental utility varies by antibody source and preparation method, with most products being validated for multiple applications rather than a single technique .
The predominant host organism for FAA3/TGFBR2 antibody production is rabbit, with multiple commercial sources using rabbit-derived polyclonal antibodies . This consistent pattern suggests rabbit immune systems generate effective antibody responses against TGFBR2 epitopes. The antibodies are typically purified through affinity chromatography methods, including peptide affinity purification and immunogen affinity purification . These purification strategies enhance specificity while reducing background noise in experimental applications.
Sample preparation varies by application but follows these general principles:
For Western Blot:
Use RIPA or NP-40 based lysis buffers containing protease inhibitors
Include phosphatase inhibitors when studying receptor phosphorylation states
Perform tissue homogenization in cold buffer to prevent protein degradation
Typically load 20-50 μg of total protein per lane
Use reducing conditions as specified for most FAA3/TGFBR2 antibodies
For Immunohistochemistry:
Immersion fixation in paraformaldehyde is recommended
Paraffin-embedded sections show consistent results at 3-5 μm thickness
Antigen retrieval (typically heat-mediated) is essential for most applications
Overnight incubation at 4°C with primary antibody concentration of 3-5 μg/mL provides optimal staining in human tissues
The detection strategy should be tailored to the specific application:
| Application | Recommended Detection Method | Working Dilution | Incubation Conditions |
|---|---|---|---|
| Western Blot | HRP-conjugated secondary antibodies | 1:1000-1:5000 | 1-2 hours at room temperature |
| IHC-Paraffin | HRP-DAB staining systems | 3-5 μg/mL | Overnight at 4°C |
| Immunofluorescence | Fluorophore-conjugated secondary antibodies | 1:200-1:500 | 1-2 hours at room temperature |
| ELISA | HRP-conjugated detection antibodies | As per kit instructions | As per kit instructions |
HRP-DAB staining systems have been validated for FAA3/TGFBR2 antibody-based detection in paraffin-embedded tissue sections with counterstaining using hematoxylin .
Multiple validation approaches should be employed:
Positive Control Testing - Use tissues with known TGFBR2 expression (small intestine, breast epithelial cells) to confirm expected staining patterns
Molecular Weight Verification - Confirm detection of the expected molecular weight band (~70-80 kDa for full-length TGFBR2, or ~19 kDa for specific fragments depending on antibody epitope)
Peptide Competition Assay - Pre-incubate antibody with immunizing peptide to confirm signal reduction
Genetic Controls - Use TGFBR2 knockout or knockdown systems to verify signal loss
Orthogonal Method Validation - Compare antibody results with mRNA expression data or alternative detection methods
Phospho-specific antibodies targeting TGFBR2 (such as anti-TGFBR2 pS225) enable detailed mechanistic studies of receptor activation and signaling dynamics . These specialized antibodies detect specific phosphorylation events that occur during receptor activation.
Recommended Protocol:
Stimulate cells with TGF-β ligands (1-5 ng/mL) for varying time points (5 min to 2 hours)
Rapidly lyse cells in buffer containing phosphatase inhibitors (sodium fluoride, sodium orthovanadate)
Perform Western blot analysis using phospho-specific antibodies
Strip and reprobe membranes with total TGFBR2 antibodies
Calculate phosphorylation-to-total protein ratios to quantify activation levels
This approach allows researchers to track the kinetics of receptor activation and compare signaling efficiency across experimental conditions or cell types.
Co-immunoprecipitation (Co-IP) experiments using FAA3/TGFBR2 antibodies can reveal physical interactions with:
Type I TGF-β receptors (ALK5/TGFBR1)
TGF-β ligands
Downstream SMAD proteins
Regulatory proteins (FKBP12, BAMBI)
Methodological Considerations:
Use mild lysis conditions (1% NP-40 or Digitonin-based buffers)
Include protease inhibitors and phosphatase inhibitors
Perform IP at 4°C overnight with antibodies confirmed for IP applications
Use protein A/G beads for rabbit-derived antibodies
Include isotype controls to identify non-specific interactions
This approach enables researchers to map the dynamic protein complexes that form during TGF-β signaling.
Several factors can contribute to false positive results:
Cross-reactivity with related receptors - TGFBR2 shares structural similarities with other TGF-β family receptors, potentially leading to cross-reactivity. Always verify antibody specificity against related proteins.
Non-specific binding to Fc receptors - Particularly problematic in immune cells and tissues. Include proper blocking steps (using 5-10% normal serum from the secondary antibody species) before primary antibody incubation.
Endogenous peroxidase activity - For IHC applications, treat sections with hydrogen peroxide (0.3-3% for 10-30 minutes) before antibody incubation to quench endogenous peroxidase activity.
Endogenous biotin - When using biotinylated detection systems, biotin blocking steps are essential, particularly with kidney, liver, and brain tissues.
Excessive antibody concentration - Titrate antibodies carefully, as concentrations that are too high increase background staining.
Inconsistencies between antibodies targeting the same protein may arise from several factors:
Epitope differences - Different antibodies may target distinct regions of TGFBR2 (N-terminal, C-terminal, or middle regions) . Document the specific epitope for each antibody used.
Post-translational modifications - Some antibodies may have reduced binding to glycosylated, phosphorylated, or proteolytically processed forms of TGFBR2.
Isoform specificity - TGFBR2 has multiple isoforms, and antibodies may have varying reactivity to each.
Recommended approach:
Use multiple antibodies targeting different epitopes
Document all experimental conditions precisely
Compare results with orthogonal methods (mRNA expression, reporter systems)
Consider the specific application - some antibodies perform better in certain applications than others
For quantitative analysis of FAA3/TGFBR2 expression:
Western blot quantification:
Always normalize to appropriate loading controls (β-actin, GAPDH, α-tubulin)
Use standard curves with recombinant proteins for absolute quantification
Report fold-changes relative to controls rather than absolute densitometry values
ELISA quantification:
IHC/IF quantification:
Use digital image analysis with standardized acquisition parameters
Score staining intensity on defined scales (0-3+) for semi-quantitative analysis
For fluorescence quantification, use mean fluorescence intensity with background subtraction
FAA3/TGFBR2 antibodies serve as valuable tools in cancer research due to the protein's dual role as both tumor suppressor and promoter depending on cancer stage and context. Key research applications include:
Diagnostic biomarker assessment - Evaluating TGFBR2 expression patterns across tumor types and correlating with clinical outcomes
Therapeutic response monitoring - Tracking changes in TGFBR2 expression and activation following treatment with TGF-β pathway inhibitors
EMT studies - Investigating TGFBR2's role in epithelial-mesenchymal transition, a critical process in metastasis
Genetic instability analysis - TGFBR2 mutations (including microsatellite instability in the FAA3/TGFBR2 gene) are associated with certain cancer types, particularly colorectal cancers
When designing multiplexing experiments:
Antibody compatibility - Ensure primary antibodies are raised in different host species to avoid secondary antibody cross-reactivity
Signal separation - Choose fluorophores with minimal spectral overlap when conducting multiplex immunofluorescence
Sequential staining - For complex co-localization studies, consider sequential rather than simultaneous staining approaches
Complementary markers - Pair TGFBR2 detection with other pathway components:
TGFBR1 (type I receptor partner)
SMAD2/3 (downstream signaling proteins)
SMAD4 (common mediator SMAD)
TGF-β ligands (TGFB1, TGFB2, TGFB3)