LGALS3 is encoded by a gene located on chromosome 14 (locus q21-q22) and is the only chimeric galectin containing a single carbohydrate recognition domain (CRD) linked to a non-lectin domain . The protein consists of approximately 250 amino acids, with the C-terminal region (residues 170-250) containing the CRD responsible for beta-galactoside binding . The N-terminal domain mediates protein-protein interactions and oligomerization. The CRD confers the protein's hemagglutination activity through bivalent carbohydrate binding capabilities .
LGALS3 interacts with multiple binding partners that affect its biological functions. Key interactions include:
BARD1: LGALS3 interacts with BARD1's tBRCT domain, as verified through yeast-two-hybrid screens and co-immunoprecipitation assays using HeLa nuclear extracts .
BRCA1: LGALS3 has been found in complexes with both BARD1 and BRCA1, suggesting its involvement in DNA damage response pathways. Notably, a mono-ubiquitinated form of LGALS3 (Ub-GAL3) is predominantly associated with these complexes .
Cell surface glycoproteins: Due to its carbohydrate-binding properties, LGALS3 can bind to various cell surface glycoproteins, with each galectin family member preferentially binding to unique subsets of these proteins .
LGALS3 plays a significant role in early events of DNA damage response (DDR), though its precise mechanism differs from canonical DDR proteins. Experimental evidence shows that:
LGALS3-silenced cells exhibit increased resistance to various DNA damaging agents including ionizing radiation, etoposide, carboplatin, and mitomycin C .
Cells lacking LGALS3 show delayed γH2AX foci formation (a marker of DNA damage) after ionizing radiation exposure compared to control cells. Control cells exhibited detectable foci 15 minutes after exposure, while LGALS3-silenced cells only showed foci after 30 minutes .
While LGALS3 affects early DDR events, it does not significantly alter ATM Ser1981 phosphorylation or CHK2 Thr68 phosphorylation following DNA damage .
LGALS3-silenced cells demonstrate impaired G2/M cell cycle arrest following ionizing radiation, with a 2-fold higher percentage of mitotic cells compared to control cells, indicating compromised checkpoint functionality .
Multiple complementary techniques have proven effective for investigating LGALS3 interactions:
Yeast-two-hybrid screening: Successfully used to identify the interaction between LGALS3 (residues 170-250) and BARD1's tBRCT domain .
Co-immunoprecipitation (Co-IP): Effective for validating interactions in mammalian cells. Both forward and reverse immunoprecipitations using anti-LGALS3, anti-BARD1, and anti-BRCA1 antibodies have confirmed these interactions in nuclear extracts .
Tandem affinity purification coupled with mass spectrometry (TAP-MS): This method provides a comprehensive approach to identify LGALS3 interaction partners:
Express tagged LGALS3 in HEK293FT cells (pNTAP-GAL3)
Lyse cells using NETN buffer (Nonidet P40 0.5% v/v, Tris pH8.0 20 mM, NaCl 50 mM, NaF 50 mM, Na3VO4 100 mM, DTT 1 mM, PMSF 50 μg/mL)
Perform tandem affinity purification
Resolve purified proteins by SDS-PAGE and stain with Coomassie blue
Excise bands, perform in-gel trypsin digestion
Analyze digested fragments by nano flow liquid chromatography coupled with mass spectrometry
Identify proteins using appropriate software (e.g., Scaffold v.3.2.0, Mascot v.2.2.04)
To investigate LGALS3's role in cellular stress response, researchers typically employ:
Gene silencing approaches: Lentiviral-mediated shRNA delivery has been effectively used to silence LGALS3 expression in cell lines:
Cell viability assays following stress induction:
Plate cells in 96-well plates (1×10^6 cells/well)
Allow attachment for 24 hours
Apply stress conditions: irradiation (10-40 Gy) or chemotherapeutic agents (carboplatin: 50-500 μM; etoposide: 10-200 nM; mitomycin C: 50-100 nM)
Assess viability using MTT assay (4,5-dimethylthiazol-2-yl)-2,5-diphenyltetrazolium bromide) after appropriate recovery periods (48-96 hours)
DNA damage markers analysis:
Recombinant LGALS3-His protein can be efficiently purified using the following approach:
Expression system selection: E. coli is commonly used as an expression host for LGALS3-His production due to high yield and relatively straightforward purification procedures .
Affinity chromatography: The His-tag enables single-step purification using immobilized metal affinity chromatography (IMAC):
Lyse bacteria in appropriate buffer containing imidazole (10-20 mM)
Load clarified lysate onto Ni-NTA or similar IMAC resin
Wash extensively to remove non-specifically bound proteins
Elute with increasing imidazole concentrations (250-500 mM)
Additional purification steps:
Size exclusion chromatography to remove aggregates and ensure monomeric protein
Endotoxin removal if the protein will be used in cell-based or in vivo experiments
Buffer exchange into a physiologically relevant buffer (PBS or similar)
Quality control assessments:
SDS-PAGE to confirm purity
Western blot to verify identity
Activity assays to confirm carbohydrate binding functionality
Endotoxin testing if required for downstream applications
LGALS3 has been implicated in heart failure and myocardial fibrosis. Research approaches include:
Genetic association studies:
Biomarker analysis:
Histological assessment:
Research has demonstrated that plasma LGALS3 levels correlate significantly with the degree of myocardial fibrosis (p < 0.001) and can predict increased risk of major adverse events in acute heart failure patients (p < 0.001) .
Inconsistencies in LGALS3 localization studies may arise from several factors:
Cell type-specific expression patterns: Different cell types may express varying levels of LGALS3 and exhibit different subcellular distribution patterns. Always verify localization in your specific cell type of interest.
Stimulation-dependent translocation: LGALS3 can shuttle between cellular compartments in response to stimuli such as DNA damage. Time-course experiments following stimulation can help capture these dynamic changes.
Antibody specificity issues: Different antibodies may recognize different epitopes or forms of LGALS3:
Post-translational modifications: Modified forms of LGALS3, such as the mono-ubiquitinated form (Ub-GAL3), may show different localization patterns. Using antibodies specific to modified forms or western blot analysis to distinguish these forms can clarify results .
When analyzing LGALS3 knockdown experiments:
Verify knockdown efficiency: Assess protein levels via western blot to confirm significant reduction. The research shows that effective LGALS3 silencing should result in nearly undetectable protein levels in whole cell lysates .
Consider compensatory mechanisms: Other galectin family members may compensate for LGALS3 loss. Measuring expression levels of related galectins following LGALS3 knockdown can help identify compensatory upregulation.
Evaluate off-target effects: Include appropriate controls (scrambled shRNA) and consider rescue experiments with shRNA-resistant LGALS3 constructs to confirm phenotype specificity.
Context-dependent functions: LGALS3 may exhibit different functions depending on:
Cell type (cancer vs. normal cells)
Stress conditions (type and intensity of DNA damage)
Protein interaction partners present in the specific cellular context
Interpretation of seemingly paradoxical results: For example, LGALS3-silenced cells show increased resistance to DNA damage despite delayed DDR response, suggesting complex roles in cell fate decisions following DNA damage .
Current research has opened several promising avenues for future LGALS3 investigations:
Therapeutic targeting in cancer:
The findings that LGALS3 silencing confers resistance to DNA-damaging agents suggests potential for combination therapies targeting LGALS3 alongside conventional chemotherapy or radiation .
Further research should explore whether LGALS3 inhibition could protect normal tissues while sensitizing cancer cells to treatment.
Biomarker development in cardiovascular disease:
Building on the correlation between LGALS3, myocardial fibrosis, and clinical outcomes, developing standardized LGALS3 assays for risk stratification in heart failure patients .
Investigating whether genetic polymorphisms in LGALS3 could predict treatment response in personalized medicine approaches.
Non-classical secretion mechanisms:
Post-translational modifications:
Emerging technologies likely to advance LGALS3 research include:
CRISPR/Cas9 gene editing:
Creating precise LGALS3 knockout or knockin cell lines and animal models
Introducing specific mutations to study structure-function relationships
Developing conditional knockout systems to study temporal aspects of LGALS3 function
Proximity labeling proteomics (BioID, APEX):
Identifying transient or weak interaction partners of LGALS3 that may be missed by conventional co-IP approaches
Mapping compartment-specific interactomes in different cellular locations
Advanced imaging techniques:
Super-resolution microscopy to visualize LGALS3 localization at nanoscale resolution
Live-cell imaging with fluorescently tagged LGALS3 to monitor dynamic changes in localization and interactions
Single-cell analyses:
Single-cell RNA-seq to uncover cell type-specific expression patterns and responses
Single-cell proteomics to identify heterogeneity in LGALS3 protein levels and modifications
These technological advances will enable researchers to address fundamental questions about LGALS3 biology and potentially develop novel therapeutic strategies targeting this multifunctional protein.
Galectin-3 is a 31-kDa protein that contains one carbohydrate recognition domain (CRD) and a proline- and glycine-rich N-terminal domain, which allows it to form oligomers . It is widely expressed in many normal tissues and a variety of tumors . The recombinant form of Galectin-3, tagged with a polyhistidine (His) tag, is typically expressed in Escherichia coli cells .
Galectin-3 is involved in several biological processes, including:
In the nucleus, Galectin-3 acts as a pre-mRNA splicing factor . It is also involved in acute inflammatory responses, including neutrophil activation and adhesion, chemoattraction of monocytes and macrophages, opsonization of apoptotic neutrophils, and activation of mast cells .
Galectin-3 has been implicated in various diseases, including cancer, heart disease, and inflammatory conditions. Its role in cancer progression is particularly notable, as it is involved in tumor cell adhesion, migration, and angiogenesis . Additionally, Galectin-3 is a potential biomarker for heart failure and other cardiovascular diseases .
Recombinant Human Galectin-3 (His Tag) is used in various research applications, including: