LIMS1 Antibody, FITC conjugated

Shipped with Ice Packs
In Stock

Product Specs

Buffer
Preservative: 0.03% Proclin 300
Constituents: 50% Glycerol, 0.01M PBS, pH 7.4
Form
Liquid
Lead Time
Typically, we can ship your orders within 1-3 business days of receipt. Delivery times may vary depending on the method of purchase and your location. For specific delivery details, please consult your local distributors.
Synonyms
2310016J22Rik antibody; 4921524A02Rik antibody; AI507642 antibody; AU021743 antibody; AW551584 antibody; C430041B13Rik antibody; LIM and senescent cell antigen like domains 1 antibody; LIM and senescent cell antigen-like-containing domain protein 1 antibody; LIM zinc finger domain containing 1 antibody; LIM-type zinc finger domains 1 antibody; Lims1 antibody; LIMS1_HUMAN antibody; Lims1l antibody; Particularly interesting new Cys His protein 1 antibody; Particularly interesting new Cys His protein antibody; Particularly interesting new Cys-His protein 1 antibody; PINCH 1 antibody; PINCH antibody; PINCH-1 antibody; PINCH1 antibody; Renal carcinoma antigen NY REN 48 antibody; Renal carcinoma antigen NY-REN-48 antibody; senescent cell antigen antibody; wu:fc32c03 antibody; zgc:112533 antibody
Target Names
LIMS1
Uniprot No.

Target Background

Function
LIMS1 serves as an adapter protein within a cytoplasmic complex. This complex links beta-integrins to the actin cytoskeleton and acts as a bridge to cell surface receptor tyrosine kinases and growth factor receptors. LIMS1 plays a critical role in regulating cell survival, proliferation, and differentiation.
Gene References Into Functions
  1. Elevated LIMS1 expression has been linked to Neuroblastoma. PMID: 29695398
  2. Focal adhesion signaling to the actin cytoskeleton is implicated in human laryngeal carcinogenesis. PINCH1, a related protein, holds prognostic significance in this disease. PMID: 29755929
  3. Research suggests that PINCH-1 may play a crucial role in the etiopathogenesis of both subtypes of breast cancer. PMID: 29079319
  4. Mammalian cells possess two functional PINCH proteins, PINCH1 and PINCH2. PINCH not only binds to Nck2 and participates in growth factor receptor signaling but also forms a ternary complex with ILK and parvin (IPP complex). PMID: 27590440
  5. Our data indicates an essential role of PINCH1, ILK, and ILKAP in the radioresistance of p53-wildtype glioblastoma multiforme cells. PMID: 26460618
  6. Data suggests that PINCH1 and Nck2 are critically involved in regulating cellular radiosensitivity and EGFR function and downstream signaling in a human squamous cell carcinoma model. PMID: 26004008
  7. Downregulation of PINCH1 is associated with metastatic breast cancer. PMID: 25647720
  8. Changes in CSF levels of PINCH appear to correlate with variations in blood CD4 count and with alterations in CSF hyperphosphorylated Tau levels. PMID: 24817145
  9. PINCH predicts survival in rectal cancer patients receiving radiotherapy but not in those without. The expression of PINCH may be regulated by radiation and by the surrounding cellular environment. PMID: 23970013
  10. PINCH is elevated and binds to hyperphosphorylated Tau (hp-Tau). These studies highlight a new mechanism by which Alzheimer's disease (AD) and HIV may intersect, identifying PINCH as a contributing factor to the accumulation of hyperphosphorylated Tau. PMID: 23554879
  11. Pinch-1 mRNA and protein were significantly up-regulated in acute lymphoblastic leukemia and acute myeloid leukemia bone marrow stromal cells compared to normal bone marrow stromal cells (p<0.01). PMID: 22310984
  12. The PINCH protein might play a significant role in the tumourigenesis and metastasis of gastric adenocarcinoma. PMID: 22976000
  13. PINCH mRNA overexpression in colorectal carcinomas correlates with VEGF and FAS mRNA expression. PMID: 22199270
  14. PINCH may function as a neuron-specific host-mediated response to challenges posed by HIV-related factors in the central nervous system (CNS). PMID: 20689998
  15. PINCH1 can translocate from the cytoplasm to the nucleus in podocytes, where it interacts with WT1 and suppresses podocyte-specific gene expression. PMID: 21390327
  16. This review provides an overview of the current knowledge regarding the molecular interactions of PINCH with other components of focal adhesions and discusses its potential implications for human heart disease. PMID: 19952891
  17. Data reveals how specific domains of PINCH-1 direct two independent pathways: one utilizing ILK to allow cell attachment, and the other recruiting Rsu-1 to activate Rac1 in order to promote cell spreading. PMID: 20926685
  18. PINCH staining at the tumor invasive margin was associated with survival in poorly differentiated tumors but not in better differentiated tumors, indicating that the impact of PINCH on prognosis was dependent on differentiation status. PMID: 21426571
  19. Data suggests that the adapter protein PINCH1 critically participates in regulating the cellular radiosensitivity of normal and malignant cells under both adhesion and suspension conditions. PMID: 20927395
  20. Findings of increased PINCH protein in more advanced stages of human pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma, as well as in metastatic tumors in the animal model, support the hypothesis that PINCH is an important regulator of cell survival and migration. PMID: 20590912
  21. PINCH expression markedly increased in tumor-associated stroma in endometrioid carcinoma compared to normal endometrium and atypical endometrial hyperplasia; results suggest that PINCH seems to play a role in tumorigenesis and development of endometrial cancer. PMID: 20714146
  22. The assembly of the PINCH-ILK-CH-ILKBP complex precedes and is essential for the localization of each component to cell-matrix adhesion sites. PMID: 12432066
  23. PINCH1 and ILK are essential for prompt cell spreading and motility; PINCH1 and ILK, like alpha-parvin, are crucial for cell survival; PINCH1 and ILK are required for optimal activating phosphorylation of PKB/Akt in the survival pathway. PMID: 14551191
  24. PINCH-1 functions as a molecular platform for coupling and uncoupling diverse cellular processes through overlapping but distinct domain interactions. PMID: 15941716
  25. Up-regulation of PINCH protein in the stroma may be involved in promoting invasion and metastasis in oral squamous cell carcinoma. PMID: 16273248
  26. PINCH-1, through its interaction with integrin-linked kinase, plays a significant role in regulating TGF-beta1-mediated epithelial-to-mesenchymal transition and could be a potential future therapeutic target to prevent the progression of renal disease. PMID: 17656471
  27. PINCH-1 contributes to apoptosis resistance through the suppression of Bim. Mechanistically, PINCH-1 suppresses Bim both transcriptionally and post-transcriptionally. PMID: 18063582
  28. PINCH expression may be involved in glioma development and differentiation. PMID: 18187956
  29. Observations that PINCH is robustly expressed in the CNS of HIV patients suggest an important role for PINCH in HIV-associated neurodegenerative processes. PMID: 18459134
  30. The PINCH protein is overexpressed in the tumor-associated stroma of esophageal squamous cell carcinoma. PMID: 18957717
  31. Zinc ions are coordinated by PINCH1 LIM1, suggesting that conformational flexibility and twisting between the two zinc fingers within the LIM1 domain may be essential for ILK binding. PMID: 19074270

Show More

Hide All

Database Links

HGNC: 6616

OMIM: 602567

KEGG: hsa:3987

STRING: 9606.ENSP00000446121

UniGene: Hs.597715

Subcellular Location
Cell junction, focal adhesion. Cell membrane; Peripheral membrane protein; Cytoplasmic side.
Tissue Specificity
Expressed in most tissues except in the brain.

Q&A

What is LIMS1 and why is it relevant for research?

LIMS1, also known as PINCH1, is a widely expressed protein in mammalian cells that plays crucial roles in cytoskeletal organization and cell-cell junctions. It contains LIM and senescent cell antigen-like domains that facilitate protein-protein interactions . LIMS1 is particularly important for research because of its involvement in several physiological and pathological processes. Recent studies have identified LIMS1 as a potential target for pathogenic autoimmunity in conditions such as pathologic myopia and kidney allograft rejection . Its highest expression has been observed in retinal pigment epithelial (RPE) cells, suggesting its critical role in maintaining the outer blood-retinal barrier .

What are the key specifications to consider when selecting a LIMS1 antibody?

When selecting a LIMS1 antibody for research, consider these critical parameters:

ParameterConsiderations
Epitope regionSpecific amino acid sequences (e.g., AA 68-303, AA 1-325)
Host speciesTypically rabbit or mouse, affecting secondary antibody selection
ClonalityPolyclonal offers broader epitope recognition; monoclonal provides higher specificity
ReactivityHuman, mouse, and/or rat specificity depending on your model system
Validated applicationsWB, IHC, ICC, IF, or FACS depending on experimental needs
Purification methodAntigen-specific affinity chromatography enhances specificity

Antibodies targeting different epitopes may yield different results depending on protein conformation and accessibility in your experimental system.

What advantages does FITC conjugation offer for LIMS1 detection?

FITC conjugation provides several methodological advantages for LIMS1 detection:

  • Direct visualization without secondary antibodies, reducing background and cross-reactivity issues

  • Simplified protocols with fewer washing steps and incubation periods

  • Compatibility with standardized filter sets on most fluorescence microscopes and flow cytometers

  • Strong fluorescence signal (excitation ~495 nm, emission ~519 nm) that pairs well with other fluorophores in multi-color analyses

  • Elimination of secondary antibody cross-reactivity concerns in multi-species co-staining experiments

  • Quantitative capabilities for flow cytometry and digital image analysis of expression levels

Which experimental approaches benefit most from FITC-conjugated LIMS1 antibodies?

FITC-conjugated LIMS1 antibodies are particularly valuable for:

  • Immunocytochemistry and immunohistochemistry to visualize LIMS1 distribution in tissues and cells, especially in RPE cells where LIMS1 is highly expressed

  • Flow cytometry for quantifying LIMS1 expression across cell populations

  • Live-cell imaging applications where minimal processing is preferred

  • Tissue sections where penetration of multiple antibodies might be challenging

  • Co-localization studies with proteins detected by antibodies from the same host species

How can I validate the specificity of a FITC-conjugated LIMS1 antibody?

Thorough validation is essential for ensuring reliable results with FITC-conjugated LIMS1 antibodies:

  • Western blot validation: First test an unconjugated version of the same antibody clone on cell lysates known to express LIMS1 (e.g., ARPE-19 cells) to confirm correct molecular weight detection (~37 kDa)

  • Positive and negative controls: Include tissues/cells with known high LIMS1 expression (e.g., RPE cells) and those with minimal expression

  • Peptide competition assay: Pre-incubate antibody with excess purified LIMS1 protein (Ala68-Cys303) to confirm signal reduction in immunostaining

  • siRNA knockdown: Perform parallel staining on LIMS1-knockdown cells to demonstrate specificity through signal reduction

  • Orthogonal detection methods: Compare results with antibodies targeting different LIMS1 epitopes or with mRNA expression by in situ hybridization

  • Immunoprecipitation followed by mass spectrometry: Confirm that the antibody pulls down LIMS1 protein specifically

Proper validation protocols increase confidence in experimental results and support reproducibility across studies.

What is the optimal protocol for conjugating LIMS1 antibodies with FITC in-house?

For researchers wanting to perform their own FITC conjugation:

  • Recommended method: Use a Lightning-Link® FITC Conjugation Kit for rapid and efficient labeling with minimal hands-on time (approximately 30 seconds)

  • Protocol overview:

    • Prepare antibody in appropriate buffer (typically PBS) at 1-4 mg/ml

    • Add LL-Modifier reagent to the antibody

    • Transfer to the lyophilized FITC mix

    • Incubate for 3-4 hours at room temperature

    • Add LL-Quencher if the conjugate will not be used immediately

  • Advantages: 100% antibody recovery, conjugation in less than 4 hours, and compatibility with small quantities of antibody

  • Quality control: After conjugation, verify success by spectrophotometric analysis (absorption at 495 nm for FITC and 280 nm for protein)

  • Storage: Store conjugated antibody at 4°C protected from light for short-term use, or aliquot and freeze at -20°C for long-term storage

Studies by Lim et al. have successfully used this approach for conjugating antibodies for immunohistochemistry in neural tissue research .

How does LIMS1 expression pattern correlate with pathological conditions?

Recent research has revealed significant correlations between LIMS1 expression/autoimmunity and pathological conditions:

  • Pathologic myopia: Anti-LIMS1 autoantibodies have been identified as potential biomarkers specifically in pathologic myopia characterized by myopic macular degeneration (MMD), rather than simple high myopia

  • Autoimmune profile: In pathologic myopia, anti-LIMS1 autoantibodies primarily belong to IgG1/IgG2/IgG3 subclasses, suggesting a specific immune response

  • Mechanism of action: These autoantibodies appear to disrupt the blood-retinal barrier by interfering with cytoskeletal organization and cellular tight junctions in RPE cells

  • Inflammatory response: Anti-LIMS1 autoantibodies induce upregulation of inflammatory markers such as ICAM-1 and IL-9, creating a pro-inflammatory state in RPE cells

  • Kidney allograft rejection: LIMS1 has been implicated in this autoimmune disorder, resulting from hypoxia-induced upregulation of the LIMS1 antigen in human kidney cells

These findings suggest that FITC-conjugated LIMS1 antibodies may be valuable tools in investigating the role of this protein in various disease processes.

What optimization steps improve FITC-LIMS1 antibody performance in confocal microscopy?

For optimal confocal microscopy results with FITC-conjugated LIMS1 antibodies:

  • Fixation optimization:

    • For cytoskeletal structures: 4% paraformaldehyde for 15 minutes at room temperature

    • For membrane structures: Methanol fixation at -20°C for 10 minutes

  • Signal preservation:

    • Minimize photobleaching by using antifade mounting media

    • Store slides at 4°C in darkness

    • Image samples promptly after preparation

  • Background reduction:

    • Include a 30-minute blocking step with 5% serum from the same species as the secondary antibody

    • Add 0.1-0.3% Triton X-100 for effective permeabilization

    • Include 0.05% Tween-20 in wash buffers

  • Imaging parameters:

    • Use appropriate excitation wavelength (488 nm laser)

    • Set emission collection around 515-530 nm

    • Optimize pinhole settings (1 Airy unit recommended)

    • Adjust detector gain to avoid saturation while maximizing signal

  • Counterstaining compatibility:

    • DAPI works well for nuclear counterstaining with FITC

    • For co-localization studies with cytoskeletal elements, consider phalloidin-rhodamine for F-actin

These optimizations are particularly important when studying LIMS1's role in cytoskeletal organization and cellular junctions.

How can I use FITC-conjugated LIMS1 antibodies to investigate blood-retinal barrier function?

Based on recent findings linking LIMS1 to blood-retinal barrier integrity, researchers can implement these methodological approaches:

  • Immunolocalization in retinal cross-sections:

    • Process human or animal eye tissue with standard fixation

    • Perform immunostaining with FITC-conjugated LIMS1 antibody

    • Counterstain with markers for tight junction proteins (ZO-1, claudin-5)

    • Analyze co-localization at the RPE layer using confocal microscopy

  • In vitro barrier function assays:

    • Culture ARPE-19 cells on transwell inserts until confluent

    • Assess barrier integrity by transepithelial electrical resistance (TEER) measurements

    • Perform FITC-dextran permeability assays before and after treatment with potential barrier disruptors

    • Correlate changes with LIMS1 localization using the FITC-conjugated antibody

  • Manipulation of LIMS1 expression:

    • Use siRNA knockdown or CRISPR-Cas9 to modify LIMS1 expression in RPE cells

    • Monitor effects on tight junction formation and barrier function

    • Confirm protein reduction using FITC-conjugated LIMS1 antibodies in flow cytometry

  • Autoantibody effect studies:

    • Isolate IgG from patients with pathologic myopia

    • Treat RPE cell monolayers with these antibodies

    • Visualize changes in LIMS1 distribution and barrier integrity

    • Deplete anti-LIMS1 autoantibodies to confirm specificity of effects

This approach has revealed that anti-LIMS1 autoantibodies can disrupt RPE barrier function, potentially contributing to macular degeneration in pathologic myopia .

What protocols enable effective dual immunofluorescence with FITC-conjugated LIMS1 antibodies?

For successful multi-color immunofluorescence incorporating FITC-conjugated LIMS1 antibodies:

  • Companion fluorophore selection:

    • Choose fluorophores with minimal spectral overlap with FITC (e.g., TRITC, Cy5)

    • For triple labeling, consider DAPI (blue), FITC-LIMS1 (green), and Cy5 (far-red)

  • Sequential staining protocol:

    • Fix cells/tissues appropriately (4% PFA for 15 minutes)

    • Block with 5% normal serum + 0.3% Triton X-100 for 1 hour

    • Apply FITC-conjugated LIMS1 antibody first (typically 1:100-1:200 dilution)

    • Wash extensively (3-5 times with PBS-T)

    • Apply unconjugated primary antibody for second target

    • Wash again thoroughly

    • Apply appropriate secondary antibody with compatible fluorophore

    • Perform final washes and mount with antifade medium

  • Controls for multi-color experiments:

    • Single-color controls to assess bleed-through

    • Secondary-only control to evaluate background

    • Isotype control to confirm specificity

  • Example multi-label combination in RPE research:

    • FITC-LIMS1 antibody

    • Anti-ZO-1 (tight junction marker) with Cy5-conjugated secondary

    • DAPI for nuclear counterstaining

This approach has been successfully employed to study traumatic nerve injury and hypoxia, using FITC-conjugated antibodies alongside other markers .

How should FITC-conjugated LIMS1 antibodies be used in flow cytometry?

For optimal flow cytometry results with FITC-conjugated LIMS1 antibodies:

  • Cell preparation:

    • Harvest cells using enzymatic methods (trypsin/EDTA) or mechanical dissociation

    • Fix with 2-4% paraformaldehyde for 10-15 minutes

    • Permeabilize with 0.1% saponin or 0.1% Triton X-100 if detecting intracellular LIMS1

  • Staining protocol:

    • Block with 2% BSA in PBS for 30 minutes

    • Incubate with FITC-conjugated LIMS1 antibody (typically 1 μg per 10^6 cells)

    • Incubate for 45-60 minutes at room temperature in darkness

    • Wash 3 times with PBS containing 0.1% BSA

    • Resuspend in appropriate buffer for analysis

  • Controls and optimization:

    • Include unstained cells for autofluorescence assessment

    • Use isotype control (FITC-conjugated non-specific IgG) at same concentration

    • Titrate antibody to determine optimal concentration

    • Include compensation controls if performing multi-color analysis

  • Analysis considerations:

    • Gate on viable cells using appropriate exclusion dye

    • Analyze FITC signal on FL1 channel (typically 530/30 nm bandpass filter)

    • Present data as histogram or dot plot against other parameters

    • Calculate percent positive cells and mean fluorescence intensity

This approach has been effectively used with FITC-conjugated antibodies to examine membrane protein expression in lung, breast, and colorectal cancer cell lines .

What factors should be considered when interpreting LIMS1 immunohistochemistry results?

Critical considerations for accurate interpretation of LIMS1 immunohistochemistry:

  • Cellular localization interpretation:

    • LIMS1 typically localizes to focal adhesions and cell-cell junctions

    • Aberrant cytoplasmic or nuclear localization may indicate pathology

    • In RPE cells, LIMS1 is strongly expressed and involved in maintaining barrier function

  • Expression pattern variations:

    • Higher expression is normal in certain tissues (e.g., RPE cells)

    • Consider regional variation within tissues

    • Compare pathological samples to appropriate normal controls

  • Quantitative assessment approaches:

    • Use digital image analysis for objective quantification

    • Measure both intensity and distribution patterns

    • Consider area fraction of positive staining

  • Technical artifacts vs. true signal:

    • Edge artifacts in tissue sections can be misinterpreted

    • Autofluorescence, particularly in eye tissues, may confound results

    • Fixation differences can affect epitope accessibility and signal strength

  • Validation through multiple approaches:

    • Confirm key findings with alternative techniques (Western blot, qPCR)

    • Use in situ hybridization to correlate protein with mRNA expression

    • Consider co-localization with known interaction partners

These considerations are particularly important given LIMS1's involvement in pathologic myopia and its potential role as a biomarker .

How can I resolve weak or inconsistent signal when using FITC-conjugated LIMS1 antibodies?

When encountering signal issues with FITC-conjugated LIMS1 antibodies:

  • Antibody-related troubleshooting:

    • Check antibody viability (FITC is sensitive to light and pH)

    • Titrate antibody concentration (try 2-5X higher concentration)

    • Consider alternative clones targeting different epitopes of LIMS1

    • Verify antibody reactivity matches species being studied

  • Sample preparation optimization:

    • Test different fixation methods (4% PFA, methanol, or acetone)

    • Optimize permeabilization (vary Triton X-100 concentration from 0.1-0.5%)

    • Try antigen retrieval (citrate buffer pH 6.0, 95°C for 20 minutes)

    • Extend primary antibody incubation time (overnight at 4°C)

  • Signal amplification options:

    • Use anti-FITC antibodies conjugated to brighter fluorophores

    • Implement tyramide signal amplification system

    • Consider biotin-streptavidin amplification

  • Technical adjustments:

    • Increase exposure time or detector gain during imaging

    • Reduce washing stringency (use gentler buffers, shorter wash times)

    • Optimize mounting media (use one specifically designed to preserve FITC)

    • Protect from photobleaching during all steps

  • Experimental controls:

    • Include positive control samples known to express high levels of LIMS1 (e.g., RPE cells)

    • Process all samples in parallel to identify technical variables

What are the best practices for quantifying LIMS1 expression using immunofluorescence?

For reliable quantification of LIMS1 expression in immunofluorescence studies:

  • Image acquisition standardization:

    • Use identical microscope settings for all experimental groups

    • Capture multiple random fields per sample (minimum 5-10)

    • Include exposure settings in metadata

    • Collect z-stacks for three-dimensional samples

  • Quantification methodologies:

    • Mean fluorescence intensity (MFI) within defined regions of interest

    • Integrated density (area × mean intensity)

    • Colocalization coefficients when performing dual staining

    • Cell-by-cell analysis for population distributions

  • Software tools:

    • ImageJ/FIJI with appropriate plugins

    • CellProfiler for automated multi-parameter analysis

    • Commercial options: MetaMorph, Imaris, or ZEN software

  • Normalization approaches:

    • Use internal controls (unchanging housekeeping proteins)

    • Include fluorescent beads as intensity standards

    • Express results as fold change relative to control samples

  • Statistical analysis:

    • Determine appropriate statistical tests based on data distribution

    • Consider both biological and technical replicates

    • Present results with suitable error bars (SEM or SD)

    • Include sample size and p-values

This quantitative approach has been valuable in studies examining the role of LIMS1 in pathologic myopia and other conditions .

How can I design experiments to investigate LIMS1's role in cytoskeletal organization?

To investigate LIMS1's role in cytoskeletal organization:

  • Co-localization studies:

    • Perform dual immunofluorescence with FITC-conjugated LIMS1 antibody and markers for:

      • Actin filaments (phalloidin-TRITC)

      • Focal adhesions (vinculin, paxillin)

      • Cell-cell junctions (β-catenin, E-cadherin)

    • Analyze using confocal microscopy and quantitative colocalization metrics

  • Functional perturbation approaches:

    • siRNA knockdown of LIMS1 expression

    • CRISPR-Cas9 gene editing to create LIMS1 mutants

    • Overexpression of wild-type or mutant LIMS1

    • Treatment with cytoskeletal disruptors (cytochalasin D, nocodazole)

  • Protein-protein interaction analysis:

    • Co-immunoprecipitation with LIMS1 antibodies followed by Western blotting for interaction partners

    • Proximity ligation assay to visualize protein interactions in situ

    • FRET or BRET analysis for dynamic interactions

  • Live-cell imaging:

    • Express LIMS1-GFP fusion proteins to track dynamics

    • Perform fluorescence recovery after photobleaching (FRAP) to assess mobility

    • Use photoactivatable or photoconvertible LIMS1 constructs to track protein movement

  • Mechanical stress response:

    • Apply mechanical strain to cell monolayers

    • Observe LIMS1 redistribution using FITC-conjugated antibodies

    • Correlate with changes in cytoskeletal architecture and cell-cell junctions

These approaches can provide insights into LIMS1's role in maintaining RPE barrier function and cytoskeletal organization, relevant to pathologic myopia pathogenesis .

What strategies can detect autoantibodies against LIMS1 in patient samples?

Based on recent research on anti-LIMS1 autoantibodies in pathologic myopia, these methodological approaches are recommended:

  • ELISA-based detection:

    • Coat plates with purified LIMS1 protein (50 ng/well)

    • Incubate with patient serum (typically 1:100 dilution)

    • Detect using HRP-conjugated anti-human IgG

    • Include controls from healthy individuals

    • Normalize results to mean values from emmetropia group

  • Immunoglobulin class and subclass profiling:

    • Perform parallel ELISAs with isotype-specific secondary antibodies:

      • Anti-human IgG, IgM, IgA, and IgE

      • Anti-human IgG1, IgG2, IgG3, and IgG4

    • Quantify relative levels of each antibody type

  • Western blot confirmation:

    • Separate LIMS1 protein by SDS-PAGE

    • Transfer to PVDF membrane

    • Incubate with patient serum followed by HRP-conjugated anti-human IgG

    • Compare band intensity to positive and negative controls

  • Functional assays:

    • Purify IgG from patient serum

    • Test effects on ARPE-19 cells in culture

    • Monitor barrier function via TEER measurements

    • Visualize cytoskeletal changes with appropriate stains

    • Include control conditions with anti-LIMS1 depleted IgG

  • Immunofluorescence on transfected cells:

    • Express LIMS1 in suitable cell lines

    • Incubate with patient serum

    • Detect with fluorophore-conjugated anti-human IgG

    • Compare to known positive and negative controls

These methods have successfully identified anti-LIMS1 autoantibodies as potential biomarkers for pathologic myopia .

What are the emerging applications of FITC-conjugated LIMS1 antibodies in clinical research?

FITC-conjugated LIMS1 antibodies show promising applications in clinical research:

  • Biomarker development: The identification of LIMS1 autoantibodies in pathologic myopia suggests potential diagnostic applications for detecting and monitoring disease progression

  • Mechanistic studies: These tools enable investigation of cytoskeletal and junction disruptions in RPE cells that may contribute to blood-retinal barrier breakdown in various retinal diseases

  • Therapeutic target identification: Understanding LIMS1's role in maintaining cellular junctions could lead to novel treatments aimed at preserving barrier function

  • Autoimmune disease research: The involvement of LIMS1 in both pathologic myopia and kidney allograft rejection suggests broader implications in autoimmune pathologies

  • Drug screening applications: FITC-conjugated LIMS1 antibodies can facilitate high-content screening of compounds that may stabilize LIMS1-dependent cellular junctions

Quick Inquiry

Personal Email Detected
Please use an institutional or corporate email address for inquiries. Personal email accounts ( such as Gmail, Yahoo, and Outlook) are not accepted. *
© Copyright 2025 TheBiotek. All Rights Reserved.