LMNA Antibody, HRP Conjugated is a polyclonal or monoclonal antibody specifically targeting lamin A/C proteins (encoded by the LMNA gene) and conjugated to horseradish peroxidase (HRP) for enhanced detection in immunoassays. This compound is widely used in molecular biology to identify and quantify lamin A/C isoforms in samples such as cell lysates or tissue sections . Lamin A/C proteins are critical components of the nuclear lamina, providing structural support to the nucleus and regulating chromatin organization, gene expression, and cellular differentiation .
A 2022 study using LMNA antibodies (including HRP-conjugated variants) revealed that the heterozygous p.S143P LMNA mutation increases lamin A/C turnover. Key findings include:
Enhanced degradation: Mutant lamin A/C proteins showed higher ubiquitination (K48-linked) and susceptibility to proteasomal degradation .
Impaired proteasome activity: Cells expressing mutant lamin A exhibited 50% reduced chymotrypsin-like protease activity compared to wild-type controls .
Autophagy-UPS crosstalk: Treatment with 4-PBA (a chemical chaperone) restored proteasome function and reduced lamin A/C aggregates in mutant cells .
A 2021 hiPSC-derived cardiomyocyte study demonstrated that pathogenic LMNA variants (e.g., T10I, R541C) disrupt lamina-chromatin interactions:
Peripheral chromatin displacement: Mutant cells lost interactions with LAMIN B1-enriched regions, leading to aberrant expression of non-myocyte genes (e.g., hepatocyte-/adipocyte-specific pathways) .
Nuclear morphology defects: Over 60% of mutant cardiomyocytes exhibited dysmorphic nuclei, correlating with disrupted chromatin organization .
Bioss antibody: Detects a 74 kDa band corresponding to lamin A/C in mouse and rat tissues .
Abcam antibody: Validated in LMNA knockout HAP1 cells, showing complete loss of signal in mutant lysates (40 µg load) .
Abcam’s HRP-conjugated antibody (ab193904) localizes lamin A/C to the nuclear envelope in human neuroblastoma (SH-SY5Y) cells .
HRP-conjugated LMNA antibodies enable high-sensitivity detection of lamin A/C in disease models, particularly laminopathies like dilated cardiomyopathy. Key insights include:
Lamins are integral components of the nuclear lamina, a fibrous network lining the nucleoplasmic face of the inner nuclear membrane. This structure is believed to provide a structural framework for the nuclear envelope and may also interact with chromatin. Lamin A and C are present in roughly equal quantities within the mammalian nuclear lamina. These proteins are recruited by DNA repair proteins XRCC4 and IFFO1 to sites of DNA double-strand breaks (DSBs) to prevent chromosomal translocations by immobilizing the broken DNA ends. Lamins play a crucial role in nuclear assembly, chromatin organization, nuclear membrane dynamics, and telomere maintenance. They are essential for the normal development of the peripheral nervous system and skeletal muscle, as well as muscle satellite cell proliferation. Furthermore, they are required for osteoblastogenesis and bone formation, preventing fat infiltration of muscle and bone marrow, thereby contributing to skeletal muscle and bone mass and strength. They are also vital for cardiac homeostasis. Conversely, prelamin-A/C can accelerate smooth muscle cell senescence, disrupting mitosis, inducing DNA damage in vascular smooth muscle cells (VSMCs), and ultimately leading to mitotic failure, genomic instability, and premature senescence.
The following studies highlight key aspects of lamin A/C function and its implications in various biological processes and disease states:
LMNA proteins (Lamin A and Lamin C) are intermediate filament proteins that form a filamentous meshwork constituting major components of the nuclear lamina. This fibrous layer lies on the nucleoplasmic side of the inner nuclear membrane and plays crucial roles in nuclear assembly, chromatin organization, nuclear membrane integrity, and telomere dynamics . These proteins provide structural framework for the nuclear envelope, bridging between the nuclear membrane and chromatin. Their importance extends to multiple cellular processes including cell division, differentiation, and DNA damage response. Mutations in LMNA are associated with diverse human diseases collectively termed laminopathies .
Researchers should be aware of the characteristic molecular weight patterns when detecting LMNA proteins:
| Protein Isoform | Calculated MW | Observed MW | Notes |
|---|---|---|---|
| Lamin A | 74 kDa | 70-75 kDa | Primary isoform, processed from prelamin A |
| Lamin C | 65-67 kDa | 65 kDa | Alternative splice variant lacking C-terminal processing |
The discrepancy between calculated and observed molecular weights is often attributed to post-translational modifications and protein processing events . Multiple bands may be observed depending on the specific antibody clone and the sample preparation conditions.
Based on experimental validation data, HRP-conjugated LMNA antibodies show cross-reactivity with multiple species:
| Antibody Example | Verified Reactivity | Predicted Reactivity |
|---|---|---|
| JOL2 Clone (ab196636) | Human, African green monkey | - |
| EPR4068 Clone | Human | Other primates |
| Polyclonal E-AB-31899 | Human, Mouse, Rat | - |
Researchers should select antibodies specifically validated for their target species to ensure reliable results .
Determining optimal antibody concentration requires consideration of several factors:
Always start with the manufacturer's recommended dilution range (e.g., 1:200-1:16000 for WB)
Perform a dilution series to identify the optimal signal-to-noise ratio
Consider sample type - cell lines typically require different concentrations than tissue sections
For Western blots, optimize protein loading (20-40 μg recommended) alongside antibody dilution
Extended incubation at 4°C with more dilute antibody often yields better results than shorter incubations with concentrated antibody
Optimizing Western blot protocols for LMNA detection requires attention to several critical parameters:
| Parameter | Optimized Condition | Rationale |
|---|---|---|
| Lysis Buffer | Contains nuclear extraction components | Ensures efficient extraction of nuclear envelope proteins |
| Protein Loading | 20-40 μg total protein | Demonstrated optimal for LMNA detection in HAP1, HeLa, HepG2 cells |
| Gel Percentage | 10-12% | Provides optimal resolution between Lamin A (~74 kDa) and Lamin C (~65 kDa) |
| Membrane Blocking | 3% milk in TBS-T (0.1% Tween) | Reduces background while maintaining specific binding |
| Antibody Incubation | Overnight at 4°C | Improves signal-to-noise ratio |
| Detection System | ECL with 150s exposure | Provides adequate sensitivity without overexposure |
For particularly challenging samples, researchers have successfully employed reducing conditions and extended blocking times (1-2 hours) to minimize background and maximize specific signal .
Implementing proper controls is essential for reliable interpretation of LMNA antibody results:
Positive Controls: Include cell lysates with known LMNA expression (HeLa, HepG2, or 3T3 cells), which have been established as reliable positive controls
Negative Controls: LMNA knockout cell lines (e.g., LMNA knockout HAP1 cells) provide definitive negative controls. Western blot analysis showed complete absence of signal in these samples, confirming antibody specificity
Loading Controls: Use established housekeeping proteins like GAPDH or total protein staining methods. In published validations, Alexa Fluor 680 Anti-GAPDH antibody was successfully used at 1:1000 dilution alongside HRP-conjugated LMNA antibodies
Isotype Controls: Particularly important for immunohistochemistry and immunofluorescence applications
Peptide Competition: For antibodies raised against specific peptide epitopes, peptide blocking controls can confirm binding specificity
Distinguishing between Lamin A and Lamin C isoforms requires specialized approaches:
Gel Resolution: Use higher percentage (10-12%) SDS-PAGE gels to maximize separation between the 74 kDa Lamin A and 65 kDa Lamin C bands
Isoform-Specific Antibodies: Some antibodies preferentially recognize specific isoforms; review epitope information before selecting
Quantitative Analysis: Use densitometry to determine the ratio of Lamin A:Lamin C, which may have biological significance. Research has shown that altered ratios of normal:mutant protein correlate with disease severity in some LMNA-associated conditions
Western Blot Optimization: Extended run times and careful sample preparation can improve band separation
Knockout Validation: Use samples from LMNA knockout models as negative controls to confirm band identity
Multiple experimental parameters can affect detection sensitivity:
Sample Preparation: Nuclear proteins require effective extraction methods; inefficient lysis can reduce signal intensity
Protein Degradation: LMNA proteins may be subject to proteolytic degradation during sample preparation; use fresh samples and appropriate protease inhibitors
Transfer Efficiency: Larger proteins like Lamin A (74 kDa) may require extended transfer times or specialized buffers
Blocking Conditions: Excessive blocking can mask epitopes; 3% milk in TBS-T has been successfully used
Antibody Affinity: Different clones exhibit varying affinities; ab196636 (JOL2) demonstrated high specificity at 1:200 dilution
Signal Development: ECL substrate selection impacts sensitivity; exposure times of approximately 150 seconds have been effective for LMNA detection
Research on LMNA mutations provides important considerations for antibody-based detection:
Most LMNA antibodies target epitopes that remain intact in common LMNA mutations, allowing detection of both wild-type and mutant proteins
Quantitative studies revealed that some mutations (e.g., LMNA-p.Arg216Cys) result in differential expression levels, with the ratio of mutated to wild-type protein being approximately 30:70 in cases with favorable prognosis
Protein expression studies suggested severe disease outcomes correlate with higher expression of mutated protein
Western blot analysis may reveal altered migration patterns for certain LMNA mutants due to conformational changes
Researchers should consider that mutation status may affect subcellular localization, potentially altering staining patterns in immunohistochemistry or immunofluorescence applications
HRP-conjugated LMNA antibodies offer powerful approaches for investigating nuclear envelope structure and function:
Western Blot Analysis: Quantify changes in LMNA expression levels during cellular processes like differentiation, senescence, or disease progression
Immunohistochemistry: Examine nuclear morphology changes in tissue sections, which has been validated for human colon and uterus samples
Protein-Protein Interaction Studies: Investigate LMNA interactions with other nuclear envelope components and chromatin
Cell Cycle Analysis: Monitor nuclear envelope breakdown and reformation during mitosis, leveraging LMNA's role in nuclear structure maintenance
Disease Modeling: Compare LMNA expression and localization between normal and diseased tissues or cells to understand pathological mechanisms
LMNA antibodies have been instrumental in advancing our understanding of laminopathies:
Clinical studies using LMNA antibodies demonstrated that different missense mutations (LMNA-p.Arg216Cys, LMNA-p.Arg471Cys, and LMNA-p.Arg471His) produce distinct patterns of protein expression and incorporation into the nuclear envelope
Quantitative analysis showed correlation between the ratio of mutated to wild-type protein and disease severity, with favorable prognosis associated with lower mutant protein expression (30:70 ratio)
These findings suggest that some LMNA mutations may be associated with favorable prognosis and low risk of sudden death, contrary to previous assumptions that all LMNA mutations confer severe outcomes
Protein expression studies using LMNA antibodies provide criteria for risk assessment and clinical management of LMNA mutation carriers
Immunohistochemical analysis can reveal tissue-specific effects of LMNA mutations, helping explain the diverse clinical manifestations of laminopathies
LMNA proteins provide a framework that influences chromatin architecture and gene expression:
Co-immunoprecipitation: HRP-conjugated LMNA antibodies can be used to pull down LMNA-interacting chromatin components
Chromatin Fractionation: Analyze LMNA distribution between soluble and chromatin-bound fractions
Imaging Studies: Combine LMNA antibodies with chromatin markers to visualize spatial relationships
Gene Expression Analysis: Correlate changes in LMNA localization or expression with transcriptional alterations
Disease Models: Compare chromatin organization in cells expressing wild-type versus mutant LMNA to understand pathological mechanisms
LMNA proteins "play an important role in nuclear assembly, chromatin organization, nuclear membrane and telomere dynamics," making them critical targets for understanding genome regulation .
HRP-conjugated LMNA antibodies facilitate investigation of age-related nuclear changes:
Senescence Markers: Nuclear architecture abnormalities detected by LMNA antibodies serve as indicators of cellular senescence
Progeria Research: LMNA is mutated in Hutchinson-Gilford Progeria Syndrome (HGPS), making LMNA antibodies essential tools for studying premature aging
Post-translational Modifications: Aging-associated changes in LMNA modification states can be analyzed using specific antibodies
Tissue-Specific Effects: Compare LMNA expression patterns across tissues with different aging rates
Intervention Studies: Monitor nuclear envelope restoration in experimental anti-aging interventions
LMNA expression and localization changes are increasingly recognized as relevant to cancer biology:
Biomarker Development: Altered LMNA expression patterns may serve as diagnostic or prognostic indicators in certain cancers
Nuclear Architecture: Investigate cancer-associated changes in nuclear morphology using LMNA as a structural marker
Metastatic Potential: Correlate LMNA expression with cellular deformability and migration capacity
Therapy Response: Monitor changes in nuclear envelope integrity during cancer treatment
Mechanistic Studies: Explore how LMNA-mediated genome organization influences oncogene expression
Multiple bands in LMNA Western blots can arise from several factors:
Isoform Detection: LMNA antibodies typically detect both Lamin A (~74 kDa) and Lamin C (~65 kDa), resulting in two primary bands
Post-translational Modifications: Phosphorylation, SUMOylation, and other modifications can alter migration patterns
Protein Processing: Prelamin A undergoes multiple processing steps before maturing to Lamin A
Degradation Products: Proteolytic fragments may be detected, particularly in improperly handled samples
Alternative Splice Variants: Beyond the main Lamin A and C isoforms, minor splice variants may be present
As stated in the product documentation: "If a protein in a sample has different modified forms at the same time, multiple bands may be detected on the membrane" .
Discrepancies between theoretical and observed molecular weights are common with LMNA proteins:
Post-translational Modifications: Phosphorylation, acetylation, and other modifications affect mobility
Protein Processing: Prelamin A undergoes C-terminal processing, affecting its migration pattern
Conformational Effects: Protein folding and SDS binding can influence apparent molecular weight
Gel Percentage: Different acrylamide percentages alter migration patterns
Running Conditions: Buffer composition and voltage affect protein mobility
According to technical documentation: "The mobility is affected by many factors, which may cause the observed band size to be inconsistent with the expected size" . For LMNA, validated observations show bands at 70-75 kDa for Lamin A and 65 kDa for Lamin C .
Optimizing signal-to-noise ratio requires systematic approach:
| Strategy | Implementation | Expected Outcome |
|---|---|---|
| Antibody Titration | Test dilution series (1:200-1:16000) | Identify optimal concentration with minimal background |
| Blocking Optimization | 3% milk in TBS-T (0.1% Tween) | Reduce non-specific binding |
| Incubation Conditions | Overnight at 4°C | Improve specific binding, reduce background |
| Wash Protocol | Multiple washes with TBS-T | Remove unbound antibody |
| Substrate Selection | Enhanced chemiluminescence (ECL) | Balance sensitivity with background |
| Exposure Optimization | Begin with 150s exposure | Adjust based on signal intensity |
Research labs have successfully implemented these approaches with LMNA antibodies to achieve clean, specific signal detection .
Comprehensive specificity validation includes multiple approaches:
Knockout Controls: Use LMNA knockout samples as definitive negative controls. Testing showed complete signal loss in LMNA knockout HAP1 cell lysates
Competing Peptides: Pre-incubate antibody with immunizing peptide to block specific binding
Multiple Antibodies: Compare results using different antibody clones targeting distinct epitopes
Recombinant Protein Controls: Use purified LMNA protein as positive control
Cross-Species Testing: Carefully validate antibody performance when working with non-validated species
Tissue-Specific Validation: For each new tissue type, verify expression pattern matches expected nuclear envelope localization
Accurate quantification of LMNA expression requires attention to several methodological considerations:
Loading Normalization: Use consistent total protein loading (20-40 μg) and reliable loading controls like GAPDH
Isoform Ratio Analysis: Quantify Lamin A and Lamin C bands separately to detect changes in their relative expression
Linear Detection Range: Ensure signal falls within linear range of detection method
Biological Replicates: Include multiple independent samples to account for biological variability
Statistical Analysis: Apply appropriate statistical tests when comparing expression levels across conditions
Wild-type/Mutant Ratio: In mutation studies, quantify the ratio of wild-type to mutant protein, which may correlate with disease severity
Clinical research reveals important correlations between protein expression patterns and disease outcomes:
In LMNA-p.Arg216Cys carriers with favorable prognosis, the ratio of mutated to wild-type protein was only 30:70
More severe disease expression in LMNA-p.Arg471Cys and LMNA-p.Arg471His carriers correlated with higher mutant protein expression
These findings contradict the general belief that all LMNA mutations are associated with severe prognosis
Quantitative protein expression analysis using LMNA antibodies may serve as a prognostic tool for risk stratification in laminopathy patients
The specific mutation location within the LMNA protein appears to influence both expression level and clinical outcome
LMNA antibodies provide valuable tools for studying nuclear architecture:
LMNA proteins form a framework at the nuclear periphery that interacts with chromatin
These interactions influence chromatin organization, gene accessibility, and expression patterns
HRP-conjugated LMNA antibodies can be used in chromatin immunoprecipitation studies to identify LMNA-associated DNA regions
Combining LMNA antibodies with chromatin markers in imaging studies reveals spatial relationships between the nuclear lamina and specific genome regions
Changes in these interactions may contribute to disease mechanisms in laminopathies, aging, and cancer
LMNA antibodies are increasingly employed in developmental biology studies:
LMNA expression changes during cellular differentiation, making it a valuable marker for monitoring stem cell maturation
Nuclear architecture reorganization during lineage commitment can be tracked using LMNA antibodies
The relationship between LMNA expression, nuclear mechanics, and cell fate decisions is an active research area
LMNA mutations may affect stem cell function and tissue regeneration capacity, which can be studied using appropriate antibodies
Comparing LMNA expression and localization between induced pluripotent stem cells (iPSCs) and their differentiated derivatives provides insights into nuclear reprogramming mechanisms
Effective multiplexing strategies for LMNA antibodies include:
Antibody Selection: Choose LMNA antibodies raised in different host species than other target antibodies
Fluorophore Pairing: For fluorescent applications, select spectrally distinct fluorophores with minimal overlap
Sequential Detection: For HRP-conjugated antibodies, consider sequential detection with stripping between rounds
Epitope Accessibility: Ensure primary antibody combinations don't interfere with each other's epitopes
Controls: Include appropriate single-stain controls to verify specificity in the multiplexed context
Cross-species applications require careful methodological consideration:
Epitope Conservation: Review sequence homology at the antibody epitope region before selecting antibodies for non-human studies
Validated Reactivity: HRP-conjugated LMNA antibodies have been verified for human, mouse, rat, and African green monkey samples
Isoform Differences: Expression patterns and molecular weights of LMNA isoforms may vary across species
Controls: Include species-appropriate positive controls (e.g., 3T3 cells for mouse studies)
Optimization: Antibody concentration and incubation conditions may require adjustment for different species