LMO2 Antibody

Shipped with Ice Packs
In Stock

Description

Definition and Mechanism of Action

LMO2 is a nuclear protein that functions as a scaffold in transcriptional complexes, interacting with key regulators like SCL/TAL1, GATA-1, and LDB1 to drive hematopoietic stem cell development and angiogenesis . Its dysregulation contributes to leukemogenesis, particularly in T-cell acute lymphoblastic leukemia (T-ALL) and B-cell lymphomas .

The LMO2 antibody is designed to bind specifically to the LMO2 protein, enabling its detection via:

  • Immunohistochemistry (IHC): Identifies nuclear localization in tumor cells.

  • Flow Cytometry: Detects intracellular LMO2 in hematopoietic precursors and malignant cells .

  • Western Blotting: Validates protein expression in cell lines and tissues .

Key Antibody Variants and Their Applications

Several LMO2 antibodies are clinically validated, differing in host species, epitope specificity, and diagnostic utility:

Antibody CloneHost SpeciesReactivityPrimary UseSource
SP51RabbitNuclear (paraffin)IHC for B-cell lymphomas, T-ALL
RBT-LM02RabbitNuclear (paraffin)IHC for germinal center B-cell markers
AF2726GoatNuclear (flow cytometry)Flow cytometry, intracellular staining

SP51 is widely used for its crisp nuclear staining in germinal center B-cells and lymphomas, while AF2726 enables quantitative analysis in flow cytometry .

Clinical Applications in Hematopathology

LMO2 antibodies are pivotal in diagnosing and subclassifying hematolymphoid malignancies:

B-Cell Lymphomas

LMO2 expression correlates with germinal center (GC) origin, aiding in distinguishing GC-derived lymphomas (e.g., follicular lymphoma, DLBCL) from non-GC types :

Lymphoma SubtypeLMO2 PositivityPrognostic Significance
DLBCL (GC-like)12/13 casesFavorable prognosis
Follicular Lymphoma42/74 casesDiagnostic adjunct
Mantle Cell Lymphoma6/42 casesRare expression

DLBCL patients with LMO2-positive tumors exhibit improved 5-year progression-free survival (55% vs. 23% in negative cases) .

T-Cell Acute Lymphoblastic Leukemia (T-ALL)

LMO2 is consistently expressed in T-ALL (14/14 cases), serving as a diagnostic marker alongside CD3 and TdT .

Acute Myeloid Leukemia (AML)

LMO2 is detected in 22/24 AML cases, highlighting its role in myeloid leukemia .

Expression Patterns in Normal and Neoplastic Tissues

LMO2 exhibits tissue-specific expression, critical for distinguishing benign from malignant conditions:

Tissue/Cell TypeLMO2 ExpressionLocalizationClinical Relevance
Germinal Center B-cellsStrong nuclear stainingNucleusGC-derived lymphoma diagnosis
Endothelial CellsModerate nuclear stainingNucleusAngiogenesis studies
Hematopoietic PrecursorsHigh nuclear stainingNucleusStem cell biology research
Prostate CarcinomaCytoplasmic stainingCytoplasmLimited diagnostic utility

LMO2 is absent in non-hematolymphoid tissues except endothelial cells and certain carcinomas, where cytoplasmic staining may occur .

Validation and Specificity

LMO2 antibodies are rigorously validated for specificity:

  • SP51: Detects nuclear LMO2 in paraffin-embedded tissues without cross-reactivity to non-GC B-cells .

  • AF2726: Validated via flow cytometry in K562 leukemia cells and human PBMCs, with minimal non-specific binding .

  • RBT-LM02: Used in IHC panels to exclude follicular lymphoma mimics (e.g., nodal marginal zone lymphoma) .

Challenges and Limitations

  • Heterogeneous Expression: LMO2 staining intensity may vary within tumor subtypes (e.g., DLBCL ABC-like vs. GCB-like) .

  • Cross-Reactivity in Carcinomas: Cytoplasmic LMO2 in epithelial tumors requires careful interpretation to avoid misdiagnosis .

  • Technical Requirements: Optimal staining depends on fixation protocols and antibody dilution (1:500–1:2000 for SP51) .

Future Directions

Emerging research focuses on therapeutic targeting of LMO2:

  • Intracellular Antibodies: VH576 (iDAb LMO2) disrupts LMO2’s protein interactions, inhibiting T-ALL growth .

  • Small Molecule Inhibitors: Screening identified compounds binding to LMO2’s interaction interface, offering potential for targeted therapies .

Product Specs

Buffer
Preservative: 0.03% Proclin 300
Constituents: 50% Glycerol, 0.01M PBS, pH 7.4
Form
Liquid
Lead Time
Typically, we can ship the products within 1-3 business days after receiving your orders. Delivery times may vary depending on the purchase method or location. For specific delivery time information, please consult your local distributors.
Synonyms
Cysteine rich protein TTG 2 antibody; Cysteine rich protein TTG2 antibody; Cysteine-rich protein TTG-2 antibody; LIM domain only 2 (rhombotin like 1) antibody; LIM domain only 2 antibody; LIM domain only protein 2 antibody; LMO 2 antibody; LMO-2 antibody; lmo2 antibody; RBTN 2 antibody; RBTN L1 antibody; RBTN2 antibody; RBTN2_HUMAN antibody; RBTNL 1 antibody; RBTNL1 antibody; RHOM 2 antibody; RHOM2 antibody; Rhombotin 2 antibody; Rhombotin like 1 antibody; Rhombotin-2 antibody; Rhombotin2 antibody; T cell translocation gene 2 antibody; T cell translocation protein 2 antibody; T-cell translocation protein 2 antibody; TTG 2 antibody; TTG2 antibody
Target Names
LMO2
Uniprot No.

Target Background

Function
LMO2 acts in conjunction with TAL1/SCL to regulate red blood cell development. It also collaborates with LDB1 to maintain erythroid precursors in an immature state.
Gene References Into Functions
  1. This study revealed a novel interaction between LMO2 and the Wnt signaling pathway during tumorigenesis, suggesting that LMO2 might act as a tumor suppressor in certain solid tumors. PMID: 27779255
  2. LMO2 predominantly localizes to the cytoplasm in breast cancer cells. Its interaction with cofilin1 modulates actin cytoskeleton dynamics, promoting tumor cell invasion and metastasis. PMID: 27880729
  3. These data indicate that Lhx2 can inhibit proliferation of T-ALL-derived cells through both LMO2-dependent and -independent mechanisms. We propose Lhx2 as a potential new therapeutic target for anti-T-ALL drug development. PMID: 29278703
  4. Stromal LMO2 may be responsible for the zonal characteristics of Prostate cancer. PMID: 27028859
  5. The transcription factor LMO2 regulates endothelial proliferation and angiogenesis in vitro. PMID: 27792641
  6. This article demonstrates a novel and unexpected function of the LMO2 oncogenic transcription factor in controlling DNA replication, discovered through an unbiased proteome-wide screen for LMO2-interacting partners. PMID: 26764384
  7. Findings suggest that LMO2 loss may be a reliable predictor for the presence of MYC translocation in large B-cell lymphoma. PMID: 28288039
  8. FOXP3 binds to LMO2 in vitro, leading to decreased interaction between LMO2 and TAL1, providing a molecular mechanism for FOXP3-mediated transcriptional modulation in T-ALL. PMID: 26686090
  9. Recurrent activating intronic mutations of LMO2, a prominent oncogene in T-cell acute lymphoblastic leukemia (T-ALL), have been identified. Heterozygous mutations were found in PF-382 and DU.528 T-ALL cell lines, as well as in 3.7% of pediatric (6 of 160) and 5.5% of adult (9 of 163) T-ALL patient samples. PMID: 28270453
  10. Data indicate a novel functional mechanism of LMO2 in facilitating the delivery of actin monomers to the branched microfilament, enhancing lamellipodia/filopodia formation in basal-type breast cancer cells. PMID: 28170369
  11. This research demonstrates previously unrecognized mechanisms by which LMO2 alters human T-cell development in vivo; these mechanisms correlate with human T-ALL leukemogenesis. PMID: 27302866
  12. This study revealed a novel function of LMO2 in the regulatory hierarchy of the UBA6-USE1-FAT10ylation pathway by targeting the E1 enzyme UBA6. PMID: 27569286
  13. LMO2 is a useful marker for immunophenotypic assessment of thymic neoplasms. PMID: 26796495
  14. LMO2 was associated with increased levels of cytosolic p27(Kip1) protein. PMID: 26383528
  15. Suppression of MIR223 expression, compared with controls, is associated with lack of differentiation and adverse cytogenetic profile, but unrelated to LMO2 protein expression or overall survival. PMID: 25710580
  16. Alanine scanning mutagenesis of the LIM interaction domain of LDB1 identified a discrete motif, R(320)LITR, required for LMO2 binding. PMID: 26598604
  17. LMO2 expression was elevated in GBM tissues and inversely correlated with prognosis of GBM patients. Taken together, these findings describe novel dual roles of LMO2 in inducing tumorigenesis and angiogenesis. PMID: 25721045
  18. Diagnostic Utility of the Germinal Center-associated Markers GCET1, HGAL, and LMO2 in Hematolymphoid Neoplasms. PMID: 25203428
  19. Data show that the Lim domain only 2 (LMO2) regulatory element (element-25) region comprises transcription factor GATA2-binding myeloid enhancer and RUNX protein-binding T-cell repressor. PMID: 26161748
  20. Cryptic chromosomal rearrangements in the LMO2 gene were associated with T-cell acute lymphoblastic leukemia. PMID: 25682596
  21. Results suggest that E47 has diverse effects in T-ALL, but functional deficiency of E47 is not a universal feature of Lmo2-induced T-ALL. PMID: 25499232
  22. HHEX is a direct transcriptional target of LMO2, consistent with its concordant gene expression. PMID: 24465765
  23. LMO2 is expressed in a subset of acute myeloid leukaemia patients and is associated with normal karyotype, which is different from T lymphoblastic lymphoma/leukaemia, where specific translocation (11p13) mediates protein expression. PMID: 24330148
  24. GATA2 and Lmo2 cooperatively regulate VEGF-induced angiogenesis and lymphangiogenesis via NRP2. PMID: 23892628
  25. In t(8;21) leukemia cells, LMO2 functions as a component of the stable AML1-ETO-containing transcription factor complex (AETFC). The AETFC components cooperatively regulate gene expression and contribute to leukemogenesis. PMID: 23812588
  26. A regulatory hierarchy of HOX control of LMO2 in normal development. PMID: 23708655
  27. Staining for LMO2 in addition to CD10 and BCL6 facilitates the detection of a germinal center phenotype in follicular lymphoma. PMID: 23897248
  28. HGAL and LMO2 may be useful adjuncts in the identification of follicular lymphoma of the nongastric gastrointestinal tract. PMID: 22914613
  29. LMO2 expression is a distinctive feature of germinal center diffuse large B cell lymphomas. PMID: 22776842
  30. Transcriptional regulators collaborate to establish or maintain primitive stem cell-like signatures in leukemic cells. PMID: 23327922
  31. The new anti-LMO2 antibody can be reliably applied to routine sections, contributing to the differential diagnosis of several lymphoma subtypes, subtyping of DLBCLs and potential development of innovative therapies. PMID: 22394247
  32. Germline genetic variation in LMO2 was associated with diffuse large B-cell lymphoma prognosis and provided slightly stronger predictive ability compared to LMO2 immunohistochemistry status. PMID: 22066713
  33. Evidence suggests that the H3K9-me1/2 demethylase KDM3B might play a role in leukemogenesis through activation of lmo2 via interdependent actions with the histone acetyltransferase complex containing CBP. PMID: 22615488
  34. Overexpression of LMO2 in diffuse large B-cell (DLBCL) cell lines results in centrosome amplification. PMID: 22517897
  35. B-cell acute lymphoblastic leukemia cases expressed variable levels of LMO2 depending on immunophenotypical and cytogenetic features. PMID: 21459790
  36. Studies suggest that the expression of LMO2 protein in lymphoma tissue biopsies predicts survival in patients with RA who have developed DLBCL. PMID: 21375434
  37. Data suggest that both HGAL and LMO2 are directly regulated by the transcription repressor PRDM1—overexpression of PRDM1 down-regulates HGAL and LMO2; PRDM1 directly binds to promoters of both HGAL and LMO2 and represses genetic transcription. PMID: 21722313
  38. The measurement of a single gene expressed by tumor cells (LMO2) and a single gene expressed by the immune microenvironment (TNFRSF9) powerfully predicts overall survival in patients with diffuse large B-cell lymphoma. PMID: 21670469
  39. LMO2 is a sensitive and specific marker for detecting follicular lymphoma in nodal and extranodal sites. PMID: 21502424
  40. Both Lmo2 and Bcl-2 are required for the action of E2A-HLF in leukemogenesis. PMID: 21072044
  41. The first structural model of the DNA-binding complex containing LMO2, LDB1, SCL/TAL1, and GATA-1. PMID: 21076045
  42. Multiple-wavelength anomalous dispersion (MAD) data have been collected at the zinc X-ray absorption edge to a resolution of 2.8 Å and the data were used to solve the structure of the LMO2:Ldb1-LIM-interaction domain complex. PMID: 21045296
  43. LMO2 likely promotes angiogenesis through up-regulation of bFGF expression, which in turn influences the progression of infantile haemangiomas. PMID: 20955387
  44. As LMO2 regulates hematopoiesis, its dysregulation can lead to leukemogenesis. PMID: 21059912
  45. Overexpression of either KLF1 or LMO2 partially rescued the defect in erythropoiesis caused by c-myb silencing, while only KLF1 was also able to repress the megakaryocyte differentiation enhanced in Myb-silenced CD34+ cells. PMID: 20686118
  46. Ectopically expressed LMO2 impaired the function of DeltaEF1 at both transcriptional and protein levels, identifying DeltaEF1 as a novel pathogenic target of LMO2 in T-cell leukemia. PMID: 20731704
  47. A self-sustaining triad of LMO2/ERG/FLI1 stabilizes the expression of important mediators of the leukaemic phenotype such as HHEX/PRH. PMID: 20676125
  48. We report that LMO2 protein is expressed in a significant proportion of B-ALL and AML, and the staining of LMO2 protein does not predict survival in acute leukemia. PMID: 20557670
  49. E2A-HLF promotes cell survival of t(17;19)- acute lymphoblastic leukemia cells by aberrantly up-regulating LMO2 expression. PMID: 20519628
  50. Our results demonstrate that HGAL and LMO2 are sensitive markers for follicular lymphoma diagnosis. PMID: 20697248

Show More

Hide All

Database Links

HGNC: 6642

OMIM: 180385

KEGG: hsa:4005

STRING: 9606.ENSP00000257818

UniGene: Hs.34560

Involvement In Disease
A chromosomal aberration involving LMO2 may be a cause of a form of T-cell acute lymphoblastic leukemia (T-ALL). Translocation t(11,14)(p13;q11) with TCRD.
Subcellular Location
Nucleus.

Q&A

What is LMO2 and what is its biological significance?

LMO2 (LIM domain only 2) is a cysteine-rich, two LIM-domain protein that plays a crucial role in hematopoietic development. The protein is highly conserved and has a central role in erythropoiesis . LMO2 functions primarily by facilitating the formation of multipartite DNA-binding complexes that regulate gene expression .

In normal tissues, LMO2 protein is expressed as a nuclear marker in germinal-center (GC) B cells, GC-derived B-cell lines, erythroid and myeloid precursors, and megakaryocytes . The LMO2 gene is located on chromosome 11p13, approximately 25 kb downstream from the T-cell translocation cluster, where several T-cell acute lymphoblastic leukemia-specific translocations occur .

LMO2 has emerged as one of the strongest predictors of superior outcome in DLBCL patients, making it an important biomarker in lymphoma research and diagnostics .

What are the validated applications for LMO2 antibodies?

LMO2 antibodies have been validated for multiple research applications:

  • Flow Cytometry: LMO2 antibodies have been successfully used to detect LMO2 expression in various cell types including K562 chronic myelogenous leukemia cell line and human peripheral blood mononuclear cells (PBMCs) .

  • Western Blotting: LMO2 antibodies can detect LMO2 protein in cell lysates, with the protein having a predicted molecular weight of approximately 18.4 kDa .

  • Immunocytochemistry (ICC): LMO2 antibodies have been used to detect nuclear localization of LMO2 in fixed cells .

  • Immunohistochemistry (IHC): For detection of LMO2 in formalin-fixed, paraffin-embedded tissues such as lymphoma samples .

  • Peptide ELISA: Some LMO2 antibodies have been validated for this application .

  • BRET (Bioluminescence Resonance Energy Transfer): Used in cell-based screening methods for identifying compounds that target LMO2 .

How should I optimize sample preparation for LMO2 detection?

For optimal LMO2 detection, sample preparation depends on the application and cellular localization of LMO2:

Flow Cytometry:

  • Fix cells with appropriate fixatives (e.g., using FoxP3 Fixation & Permeabilization Buffer)

  • Permeabilize cells thoroughly as LMO2 is primarily nuclear

  • Block nonspecific binding sites

  • Incubate with primary LMO2 antibody followed by fluorophore-conjugated secondary antibody

Immunocytochemistry:

  • Use immersion fixation for suspension cells like K562

  • Apply LMO2 antibody at optimal concentration (e.g., 10 μg/mL)

  • Incubate for sufficient time (e.g., 3 hours at room temperature)

  • Counterstain with DAPI to visualize nuclei

  • Specific staining should be localized to nuclei

Western Blotting:

  • Prepare nuclear extracts for optimal results since LMO2 is a nuclear protein

  • Use appropriate lysis buffers that preserve protein integrity

  • Include protease inhibitors to prevent degradation

How do I select the appropriate LMO2 antibody for my experiments?

When selecting an LMO2 antibody, consider these factors:

  • Antibody Type: Both monoclonal (e.g., clone 4D8) and polyclonal antibodies (e.g., goat anti-human LMO2) are available. Monoclonals offer higher specificity, while polyclonals may provide stronger signals .

  • Species Reactivity: Verify reactivity with your species of interest. Many commercial LMO2 antibodies are validated for human samples .

  • Epitope Recognition: Consider which region of LMO2 the antibody recognizes. Some antibodies target the full-length protein (amino acids 1-158), while others may target specific domains .

  • Validated Applications: Ensure the antibody has been validated for your specific application (Western blot, flow cytometry, IHC, etc.) .

  • Performance Data: Review scientific data showing antibody performance in applications similar to yours, such as flow cytometry histograms or immunofluorescence images .

What controls should I include when using LMO2 antibodies?

Proper controls are essential for reliable LMO2 antibody experiments:

  • Positive Controls:

    • Cell lines with known LMO2 expression such as K562 chronic myelogenous leukemia cell line, GCB-like DLBCL cell lines (SU-DHL4, OCI-LY19), or Burkitt lymphoma cell lines (Raji)

    • Normal tissues with known LMO2 expression (germinal center B cells, erythroid precursors)

  • Negative Controls:

    • Cell lines with low/no LMO2 expression such as ABC-like DLBCL cell lines (OCI-LY3, OCI-LY10) or HeLa cells

    • Non-lymphoid tissues (except endothelial cells which may express LMO2)

    • Isotype control antibodies (e.g., catalog # AB-108-C) to identify nonspecific binding

  • Secondary Antibody Controls:

    • Samples treated with secondary antibody only to assess background

How can I investigate LMO2 protein interactions in hematopoietic cells?

LMO2 functions within multiprotein complexes, making the study of its interactions critical:

  • Co-immunoprecipitation:

    • Use anti-LMO2 antibodies to pull down LMO2 and its interacting partners

    • Analyze precipitated proteins by mass spectrometry or Western blot

    • Look for known partners such as LDB1, E2A, HEB, Lyl1, ETO2, and SP1

  • BRET Assays:

    • Implement bioluminescence resonance energy transfer to monitor protein-protein interactions in live cells

    • This technique has been successfully used to characterize LMO2 interactions and screen for small molecule inhibitors

    • For example, BRET donor saturation assays can quantify interaction strength through BRET max and BRET 50 values

  • Comparative Analysis:

    • Different cell contexts may have different LMO2 complexes

    • In DLBCL, the LMO2 complex contains traditional partners like LDB1, E2A, HEB, Lyl1, ETO2, and SP1, but notably lacks TAL1 or GATA proteins typically found in erythroid cells

  • Mutation Analysis:

    • Introduce mutations in LMO2 (especially around the hinge region) to study their impact on protein interactions

    • Mutations can affect binding affinity as demonstrated by changes in BRET max and BRET 50 values

What approaches can I use to study LMO2's role in gene regulation?

To investigate LMO2's function in transcriptional regulation:

  • ChIP-seq (Chromatin Immunoprecipitation followed by Sequencing):

    • Use LMO2 antibodies to identify genomic loci bound by LMO2

    • Cross-reference with gene expression data to identify direct targets

  • Transcriptome Analysis:

    • Compare gene expression profiles after LMO2 manipulation (overexpression, knockdown)

    • Studies show LMO2 regulates genes implicated in kinetochore function, chromosome assembly, and mitosis

    • RNA-seq can identify differentially expressed genes as shown in studies of Flk-1+ cells

  • Gene Ontology Analysis:

    • Perform enrichment analysis on identified gene sets

    • For example, cluster analysis of differentially expressed genes can reveal biological processes regulated by LMO2

  • Hierarchical Cluster Analysis:

    • Use hierarchical clustering to analyze LMO2 expression in relation to other markers

    • In DLBCL, LMO2 expression clusters with other GC-associated proteins (HGAL, BCL6, CD10) and differs from non-GC proteins (MUM1/IRF4, BCL2)

How do I troubleshoot inconsistencies between LMO2 mRNA and protein expression?

Discrepancies between mRNA and protein levels can occur for several reasons:

  • Verification Methods:

    • Use multiple techniques to validate expression

    • Compare quantitative real-time RT-PCR for mRNA with immunoblot analysis for protein expression

    • Include multiple cell lines as comparative controls

  • Data Interpretation:

    • In most GC-derived cell lines (SU-DHL4, OCI-LY19, Raji), high LMO2 mRNA correlates with high protein expression

    • In contrast, some cell lines may show discrepancies that could reflect post-transcriptional regulation

  • Technical Considerations:

    • Ensure antibody specificity through appropriate controls

    • Use nuclear extracts rather than whole cell lysates for Western blotting

    • Include loading controls (e.g., beta-actin) to normalize protein levels

  • Biological Explanations:

    • Consider posttranscriptional regulation mechanisms

    • Investigate protein stability and turnover rates

    • Examine the role of microRNAs in regulating LMO2 translation

How can I design experiments to investigate LMO2's role in centrosome amplification?

Based on LMO2's reported role in centrosome amplification in DLBCL cell lines :

  • Overexpression Studies:

    • Transfect DLBCL cell lines with LMO2 expression vectors

    • Quantify centrosome numbers using immunofluorescence with centrosome markers (γ-tubulin, pericentrin)

    • Compare centrosome counts in LMO2-overexpressing versus control cells

  • Knockdown/Knockout Experiments:

    • Use siRNA, shRNA, or CRISPR-Cas9 to reduce or eliminate LMO2 expression

    • Assess impact on centrosome number and mitotic abnormalities

    • Monitor cell cycle progression and genomic stability

  • Mechanistic Investigation:

    • Identify LMO2-regulated genes involved in centrosome duplication or mitotic control

    • Perform ChIP to confirm direct regulation of these genes

    • Study interactions between LMO2 and proteins involved in centrosome regulation

  • Functional Consequences:

    • Examine correlation between LMO2 expression, centrosome amplification, and chromosomal instability

    • Assess impact on cell proliferation, apoptosis, and drug resistance

How can I use LMO2 antibodies in drug discovery applications?

LMO2 antibodies can facilitate drug discovery through several approaches:

  • Antibody-Derived (Abd) Technology:

    • Use intracellular antibodies (iDAbs) against LMO2 as starting points for small molecule development

    • Employ cell-based screening methods using BRET to identify compounds that disrupt LMO2 interactions

    • Dematured iDAbs with decreased affinity can be optimal for competition-based screening assays

  • High-Throughput Screening:

    • Develop BRET-based competition assays where compounds compete with iDAbs for binding to LMO2

    • Measure dose-response curves to determine compound potency (IC50 values)

    • Conduct structure-activity relationship (SAR) studies of hit compounds

  • Target Validation:

    • Use anti-LMO2 intracellular antibodies to interfere with protein-protein interactions

    • Validate cellular phenotypes as a benchmark for small molecule effects

    • Focus particularly on transcription factor complexes that are traditionally considered "undruggable"

  • Compound Optimization:

    • Synthesize analogs of hit compounds for SAR studies

    • Test analogs in dose-response BRET assays to verify binding to LMO2 and determine cellular potency

    • Use the most potent inhibitors as templates for further optimization

CompoundStructure TypeRelative PotencyEffect on LMO2-iDAb Interaction
Abd-L9Five-membered ringHighStrong inhibition
Abd-L10Five-membered ringModerateModerate inhibition
Abd-L12Five-membered ringModerateModerate inhibition
Abd-L5Five-membered ringLowNo inhibition
Abd-L8Five-membered ringLowNo inhibition
Abd-L11Five-membered ringLowNo inhibition

Table 1: Representative data for SAR study of LMO2 inhibitor analogs based on BRET competition assays

What are the best practices for validating LMO2 antibody specificity?

Thorough validation is critical for reliable research results:

  • Multiple Antibody Comparison:

    • Use different antibodies targeting distinct epitopes of LMO2

    • Compare staining patterns and expression levels

  • Genetic Validation:

    • Test antibodies in LMO2 knockout or knockdown models

    • Compare with wildtype cells as demonstrated in studies using WT and Lmo2−/− cells

  • Recombinant Protein Controls:

    • Use purified recombinant LMO2 (e.g., E. coli-derived recombinant human LMO2, Ser2-Ile158) as positive controls

    • Perform peptide competition assays to confirm specificity

  • Cross-Reactivity Assessment:

    • Test antibodies on tissues/cells known to be negative for LMO2

    • Check for cross-reactivity with related proteins (other LMO family members)

  • Method-Specific Validation:

    • For Western blot: confirm band size (~18.4 kDa for LMO2)

    • For IHC/ICC: verify expected subcellular localization (nuclear)

    • For flow cytometry: compare with isotype controls

How should I analyze LMO2 expression data in the context of lymphoma classification?

LMO2 is an important marker in lymphoma research and classification:

  • Multiparameter Analysis:

    • Analyze LMO2 expression alongside other GC-associated markers (HGAL, BCL6, CD10)

    • Compare with non-GC markers (MUM1/IRF4, BCL2)

  • Hierarchical Clustering:

    • Perform hierarchical cluster analysis of immunohistologic data

    • Use this to determine if a DLBCL sample aligns with GC or non-GC subtypes

  • Survival Analysis:

    • Incorporate LMO2 expression into multivariate analyses for predicting survival

    • Construct immunohistologic algorithms for clinical application

  • Standardization:

    • Define clear cutoffs for positive versus negative LMO2 expression

    • Validate scoring systems across different laboratories

  • Integration with Molecular Data:

    • Correlate LMO2 protein expression with gene expression profiling data

    • Consider chromosomal abnormalities affecting the LMO2 locus

Quick Inquiry

Personal Email Detected
Please use an institutional or corporate email address for inquiries. Personal email accounts ( such as Gmail, Yahoo, and Outlook) are not accepted. *
© Copyright 2025 TheBiotek. All Rights Reserved.