LSS Antibody (Product ID: 13715-1-AP) is a rabbit-derived polyclonal antibody that binds to Lanosterol Synthase (LSS), also known as Oxidosqualene Cyclase (OSC). This enzyme catalyzes the cyclization of (S)-2,3-oxidosqualene into lanosterol, a pivotal step in forming the sterol nucleus required for cholesterol synthesis .
The LSS Antibody is validated for multiple experimental techniques, with optimized dilution ratios and protocols :
| Application | Dilution/Usage | Detected Samples |
|---|---|---|
| Western Blot (WB) | 1:1,000–1:5,000 | HT-1376, PC-3, HeLa, HepG2 cells |
| Immunohistochemistry | 1:20–1:200 (TE buffer pH 9.0 retrieval) | Human liver, mouse testis tissue |
| Immunofluorescence | 1:20–1:200 | HepG2 cells |
| Immunoprecipitation | 0.5–4.0 µg per 1–3 mg lysate | HepG2 cells |
The LSS Antibody has been instrumental in studies investigating cholesterol metabolism and disease mechanisms:
Astrocytic ApoE and Cholesterol Metabolism
LSS Deficiency and Disease Models
Antiviral Mechanisms
Pathway Role: LSS sits at a branch point in the mevalonate pathway, directing flux toward cholesterol or nonsterol metabolites .
Therapeutic Targeting: Inhibition of LSS is explored in cancer research (e.g., colorectal cancer via Notch signaling suppression) .
The antibody’s specificity is confirmed by:
Lanosterol Synthase (LSS) is a key enzyme in the cholesterol biosynthesis pathway encoded by the LSS gene. In humans, the canonical LSS protein has 732 amino acid residues and a mass of 83.3 kDa . LSS belongs to the Terpene cyclase/mutase protein family and is also known as CTRCT44, HYPT14, OSC, 2,3-epoxysqualene-lanosterol cyclase, and APMR4 .
LSS antibodies are important research tools because they:
Enable detection and quantification of LSS expression across different tissue types
Support investigation of cholesterol biosynthesis dysregulation in disease states
Allow for monitoring LSS localization and interactions with other proteins
Provide insights into alternative splicing events that generate the 3 different reported isoforms
LSS antibodies have multiple research applications:
LSS is primarily localized in the endoplasmic reticulum (ER) . This subcellular localization has important implications for antibody selection and experimental design:
For immunofluorescence studies, co-staining with ER markers (such as calnexin or PDI) is recommended to confirm proper localization
Membrane permeabilization protocols must effectively target the ER membrane for optimal antibody access
When studying potential non-canonical localizations of LSS, careful validation with multiple antibodies is essential to confirm unexpected findings
For live cell imaging applications, consider the limitations of antibody penetration across the ER membrane
Rigorous validation is essential before using an LSS antibody for critical experiments. The European Monoclonal Antibody Network recommends a stepwise validation approach :
Positive and negative controls:
Epitope considerations:
Cross-reactivity testing:
Technical validation:
When working with alternatively spliced LSS isoforms, polyclonal antibodies that recognize multiple epitopes may detect all isoforms, while monoclonals might miss certain variants depending on the epitope location .
Optimizing Western blot protocols for LSS detection requires consideration of several factors:
Sample preparation:
Gel selection and transfer:
Blocking and antibody incubation:
5% non-fat milk in TBST is typically effective for LSS antibodies
BSA-based blocking may be preferable for phospho-specific antibodies
Optimize primary antibody concentration (typically 1:500-1:2000)
Incubate at 4°C overnight for best results
Detection and analysis:
Use appropriate HRP-conjugated secondary antibodies
For quantitative analysis, include loading controls (β-actin, GAPDH)
Validate signal linearity across a range of protein concentrations
Troubleshooting:
For weak signals, increase antibody concentration or extend incubation
For high background, increase washing steps or reduce antibody concentration
For optimal IHC/ICC results with LSS antibodies:
Fixation and antigen retrieval:
Use 4% paraformaldehyde or formalin fixation
For paraffin sections, heat-mediated antigen retrieval in citrate buffer (pH 6.0) is typically effective
For frozen sections, acetone fixation for 10 minutes at -20°C often works well
Blocking and permeabilization:
Antibody incubation:
Optimize antibody dilution (typically 1:100-1:500)
Incubate primary antibody overnight at 4°C or 1-2 hours at room temperature
Use fluorophore or enzyme-conjugated secondary antibodies based on detection method
Controls and validation:
When facing conflicting results with different LSS antibodies:
Epitope mapping:
Validation approach:
Use genetic models (knockdown/knockout) to verify specificity
Perform immunoprecipitation followed by mass spectrometry
Compare results with orthogonal methods (qPCR, activity assays)
Technical considerations:
Assess if conflicting results are technique-dependent
Review buffer compositions and experimental conditions
Consider the possibility of non-specific binding or cross-reactivity
Resolution strategies:
Use multiple antibodies targeting different epitopes
Employ complementary techniques to validate findings
Consult literature for reports of similar discrepancies
Several approaches can be used for quantitative analysis of LSS:
Western blot densitometry:
Create standard curves using recombinant LSS protein
Ensure linear detection range by testing multiple exposures
Normalize to appropriate loading controls
ELISA-based quantification:
Flow cytometry:
Perform proper compensation when using multiple fluorophores
Use fluorescence minus one (FMO) controls
Calculate median fluorescence intensity (MFI) for population analysis
Image-based quantification:
Use software like ImageJ for immunofluorescence quantification
Establish consistent acquisition parameters
Set appropriate thresholds and perform background correction
Spatial analysis in tissues:
Quantify cell-type specific expression using multiplexed IHC
Measure subcellular distribution patterns
Compare expression levels across different tissue regions
Deep learning is revolutionizing antibody research through several mechanisms:
In-silico antibody generation:
Deep learning models can generate libraries of highly human antibody variable regions with desirable developability attributes
Models like Generative Adversarial Networks (GANs) and Wasserstein GAN with Gradient Penalty can produce novel antibody sequences
These approaches generate antibodies with high expression, monomer content, and thermal stability along with low hydrophobicity
Epitope prediction and optimization:
Computational models predict optimal epitopes for targeting LSS
Machine learning algorithms enhance antibody affinity and specificity
In-silico screening reduces experimental validation requirements
Performance prediction:
Models predict antibody performance in specific applications
Algorithms identify potential cross-reactivity issues
Computational approaches optimize antibody-antigen interactions
The ability to computationally generate developable human antibody libraries represents a significant advancement that may accelerate in-silico discovery of antibody-based biotherapeutics targeting proteins like LSS .
LSS antibodies are valuable tools for investigating cholesterol biosynthesis disorders:
Disease mechanisms:
Detect alterations in LSS expression or localization in pathological states
Study LSS interactions with other cholesterol biosynthesis enzymes
Identify post-translational modifications affecting LSS function
Diagnostic applications:
Develop immunoassays for measuring LSS levels in patient samples
Create tissue-based diagnostic tests using IHC
Develop multiplexed assays to analyze multiple pathway components
Therapeutic monitoring:
Assess pharmacological modulation of LSS activity
Monitor changes in LSS expression during treatment
Evaluate the effects of novel cholesterol-lowering compounds
Research applications:
Study LSS in cellular and animal models of cholesterol disorders
Investigate tissue-specific regulation of cholesterol biosynthesis
Explore non-canonical functions of LSS beyond cholesterol synthesis
Optimizing multiplex immunoassays with LSS antibodies requires:
Antibody selection:
Panel design:
Technical optimization:
Test antibodies individually before combining
Confirm lack of cross-reactivity between detection systems
Optimize signal-to-noise ratio for each antibody
Controls and validation:
Include single-stain controls
Use spectral unmixing for fluorescent multiplex assays
Validate results with orthogonal methods
Analysis approaches:
Employ colocalization analysis for spatial relationships
Quantify relative expression levels across markers
Perform correlation analysis between pathway components
Non-specific binding is a common issue that can be addressed through several approaches:
Optimization strategies:
Increase blocking concentration (5-10% normal serum)
Add 0.1-0.5% non-ionic detergent to reduce hydrophobic interactions
Include 0.1-0.3% BSA in antibody diluent
Optimize antibody concentration using titration experiments
Technical improvements:
Extend washing steps (number and duration)
Pre-adsorb antibody with tissue powder or cells lacking LSS
Filter antibody solution before use (0.22 μm)
Use more stringent washing buffers (higher salt concentration)
Control experiments:
Include isotype controls to identify Fc-mediated binding
Use peptide competition assays
Perform staining on tissues known to lack LSS expression
Alternative approaches:
Try a different LSS antibody targeting another epitope
Use more specific detection methods (e.g., tyramide signal amplification)
Consider directly conjugated primary antibodies to eliminate secondary antibody issues
For challenging samples with low LSS expression or high background:
Signal enhancement methods:
Implement heat-mediated antigen retrieval (citrate buffer pH 6.0)
Use signal amplification systems (avidin-biotin, tyramide)
Extend primary antibody incubation time (overnight at 4°C)
Try different detection systems (chromogenic vs. fluorescent)
Sample preparation improvements:
Optimize fixation conditions (duration, temperature)
Test different permeabilization methods for ER access
Reduce autofluorescence using sodium borohydride or Sudan Black
Use antigen retrieval methods appropriate for ER proteins
Advanced detection approaches:
Consider proximity ligation assay (PLA) for enhanced specificity
Use highly sensitive detection systems like QDs or organic dyes
Implement spectral imaging to separate signal from autofluorescence
Technical considerations:
Optimize microscope settings (exposure, gain, offset)
Use deconvolution or confocal microscopy for improved resolution
Consider tissue clearing techniques for thick samples
Ensuring reproducibility requires systematic approach:
Antibody management:
Use the same antibody clone and lot when possible
Maintain detailed records of antibody sources and lot numbers
Aliquot antibodies to avoid freeze-thaw cycles
Store according to manufacturer recommendations
Protocol standardization:
Develop detailed standard operating procedures (SOPs)
Maintain consistent reagent sources and preparation methods
Use automated systems where possible
Standardize timing of critical steps
Quality control measures:
Include consistent positive and negative controls
Use internal reference standards
Implement quantitative acceptance criteria
Perform periodic validation experiments
Data management:
Maintain comprehensive records of experimental conditions
Document any deviations from standard protocols
Implement blinding procedures for analysis
Use consistent image acquisition and analysis parameters
Recent antibody engineering advances offer several benefits:
Format modifications:
Affinity enhancements:
Directed evolution techniques increase binding affinity
Computational design optimizes complementarity-determining regions (CDRs)
Structure-guided engineering improves antigen recognition
Stability improvements:
Engineering disulfide bonds enhances thermal stability
Reducing hydrophobic patches minimizes aggregation
Optimizing framework regions improves folding efficiency
Functional modifications:
Adding site-specific conjugation sites for controlled labeling
Modifying Fc regions to alter effector functions
Developing bispecific formats for simultaneous targeting
The LS (Met428Leu and Asn434Ser) mutation in the Fc region has been shown to improve pharmacokinetic profiles by enhancing binding affinity to the neonatal Fc receptor, which could benefit LSS antibodies used in in vivo applications .
LSS antibodies are finding new applications:
Advanced imaging techniques:
Super-resolution microscopy for nanoscale localization
Intravital imaging to study LSS dynamics in live animals
Correlative light and electron microscopy (CLEM) for ultrastructural analysis
Single-cell analyses:
Mass cytometry (CyTOF) for high-dimensional single-cell profiling
Imaging mass cytometry for spatial proteomics
Single-cell western blotting for heterogeneity assessment
Functional studies:
Antibody-mediated protein knockdown techniques
Intrabody approaches to study protein function
Proximity-dependent labeling to identify interacting partners
Clinical applications:
Development of companion diagnostics
Therapies targeting LSS in cholesterol-related disorders
Biomarker discovery and validation
These emerging applications expand the utility of LSS antibodies beyond traditional protein detection into functional studies and potential therapeutic applications.