LYP1 Antibody

Shipped with Ice Packs
In Stock

Description

LyP-1 and p32 Interaction

LyP-1 binds to cell-surface p32, a protein aberrantly expressed in pathological cells. Structural studies reveal critical residues (Asn3, Lys4, Arg5, Arg7) essential for binding . This interaction enables LyP-1 to home to hypoxic tumor regions, atherosclerotic plaques, and fibrotic tissues .

Key StudyFindingsCitation
Alanine scanning of LyP-1Identified Asn3, Lys4, Arg5, and Arg7 as critical for p32 binding.
Molecular docking analysisConfirmed electrostatic interactions dominate LyP-1/p32 binding.
p32 localization in fibrotic lungsp32 expression observed in fibrotic lesions but not colocalized with LyP-1.

LyP-1-Based Diagnostic Applications

LyP-1 has been conjugated to imaging agents for targeted detection:

  • Fluorescent probes: FITC-LyP-1 localized to atherosclerotic plaques (60% of plaque cells positive) and fibrotic lung lesions in bleomycin-induced models .

  • PET/CT tracers: [18F]FBA-LyP-1 showed 4–6× higher uptake in atherosclerotic aortas vs. controls .

  • Nanoparticles: LyP-1-coated iron oxide nanoparticles accumulated in plaque interiors .

Therapeutic Mechanisms

LyP-1 exhibits intrinsic antitumor and immunomodulatory properties:

  • Proapoptotic activity: Induced apoptosis in MDA-MB-435 breast cancer cells (IC50 ≈66 µM) .

  • Immune modulation: Reduced myeloid-derived suppressor cells (MDSCs) and promoted M1 macrophage polarization in 4T1 tumors when combined with radiotherapy .

  • Drug delivery: Enhanced tumor penetration via CendR motif (C-terminal KRTR) for nuclear internalization .

Antibodies in LyP-1 Research

Antibodies targeting p32 (e.g., rabbit anti-p32/gC1qR, Abcam #ab101267) are used to study LyP-1 mechanisms:

  • Western blot/immunocytochemistry: Detected p32 expression in tumor cells and atherosclerotic macrophages .

  • Co-staining experiments: LyP-1 did not colocalize with CD45+ immune cells or α-SMA+ smooth muscle cells in fibrotic lungs .

Challenges and Future Directions

  • Target specificity: LyP-1 binds collagen I in fibrotic lungs, complicating differentiation from malignancies .

  • Clinical translation: Requires optimization of stability and pharmacokinetics .

  • Combination therapies: Synergy with radiotherapy and checkpoint inhibitors shows promise .

Product Specs

Buffer
Preservative: 0.03% ProClin 300; Constituents: 50% Glycerol, 0.01M Phosphate Buffered Saline (PBS), pH 7.4
Form
Liquid
Lead Time
14-16 week lead time (made-to-order)
Synonyms
LYP1 antibody; YNL268W antibody; N0790 antibody; Lysine-specific permease antibody
Target Names
LYP1
Uniprot No.

Target Background

Function
High-affinity lysine permease.
Database Links

KEGG: sce:YNL268W

STRING: 4932.YNL268W

Protein Families
Amino acid-polyamine-organocation (APC) superfamily, YAT (TC 2.A.3.10) family
Subcellular Location
Membrane; Multi-pass membrane protein.

Q&A

What is LyP-1 and how was it identified?

LyP-1 is a peptide selected from a phage-displayed peptide library that specifically binds to tumor and endothelial cells of tumor lymphatics in certain tumors. It was originally identified as a tumor-homing peptide that recognizes tumor cells, tumor lymphatics, and tumor-associated macrophages . Unlike many targeting peptides, LyP-1 shows remarkable specificity for certain tumor types and penetrates into hypoxic areas within tumors, making it particularly valuable for targeted therapy development .

What is the receptor for LyP-1 and where is it expressed?

The cell surface p32 protein has been identified as the receptor that mediates the tumor homing of LyP-1 . This receptor is overexpressed in atherosclerotic plaques as well as in tumors . Importantly, p32 shows differential localization in diseased versus normal tissues - it is expressed on the cell surface in plaques and tumors but remains intracellular in normal tissues. Immunostaining analysis of nonpermeabilized plaque sections and FACS quantification confirm p32 expression at the cell surface in diseased tissue, whereas normal tissues like liver and spleen showed no significant staining before permeabilization but were positive after permeabilization .

How does LyP-1 enter target cells?

LyP-1 shows a propensity to become internalized by cells that express its receptor. Cells that bind the LyP-1 peptide transport it across the cell membrane into the cytoplasm and the nucleus . In this regard, LyP-1 resembles cell-penetrating peptides like the Tat peptide, but with an important difference - LyP-1 penetration is cell type-specific, allowing for targeted delivery to specific cells expressing the p32 receptor .

How can LyP-1 be used for tumor imaging?

Fluorescein-conjugated LyP-1 strongly accumulates in breast cancer xenografts after intravenous injection, with sufficient efficacy and specificity to allow visualization of orthotopic tumors in intact mice based on fluorescence . This remarkable tumor-homing efficiency makes LyP-1 potentially useful for tumor detection in clinical settings. For quantitative imaging, [18F]FBA-conjugated LyP-1 has been used in PET imaging studies, showing a four- to sixfold increase in peak PET activity in diseased tissues compared to controls .

How effective is LyP-1 for nanoparticle delivery to target tissues?

LyP-1 has demonstrated the capacity to deliver intravenously injected nanoparticles to disease sites. In atherosclerosis studies, LyP-1–coated superparamagnetic iron oxide nanoparticles showed abundant accumulation in the plaque interior, while other targeting peptides like CREKA remained mainly at the surface of the plaques . This ability to penetrate deeply into target tissues differentiates LyP-1 from other targeting peptides and allows for more comprehensive drug delivery throughout diseased tissue.

What experimental models have been validated for LyP-1 research?

LyP-1 has been extensively studied in:

  • MDA-MB-435 breast cancer xenografts in mice

  • MDA-MB-435/VEGF-C tumor models

  • Apolipoprotein E (ApoE)-null mice maintained on a high-fat diet to induce atherosclerosis

The peptide shows specific accumulation in these models with minimal binding to normal tissues, making them reliable systems for LyP-1-mediated targeting studies .

How does LyP-1 inhibit tumor growth?

LyP-1 demonstrates a direct proapoptotic/cytotoxic effect on tumor cells that bind and internalize the peptide. When administered systemically, LyP-1 causes tumor cell apoptosis as evidenced by numerous TUNEL-positive cells in treated tumors . This effect is specific for the tumor tissue, as other tissues did not contain significant numbers of TUNEL-positive cells. The mechanism appears to involve targeting stressed cells, as LyP-1 colocalizes with tissue hypoxia markers in vivo, and serum starvation enhances LyP-1 binding and internalization by cultured tumor cells in vitro .

What effect does LyP-1 have on tumor lymphatics?

Treatment with LyP-1 dramatically reduces the expression of lymphatic endothelial markers in treated tumors, suggesting that LyP-1 is also cytotoxic/proapoptotic for lymphatic endothelial cells in tumors . Given the demonstrated role of tumor lymphatics in metastasis, destroying tumor lymphatics with LyP-1 may be particularly effective in curtailing lymphatic spread of tumors. This is significant because lymphatics appear to be the first target of LyP-1 in tumors, making the antitumor effect particularly pronounced on tumor cells within and close to the lymphatics .

What is the relationship between LyP-1 and hypoxia in tumors?

LyP-1 and its variant LyP-1b preferentially localize in hypoxic areas within tumors . This relationship with hypoxia is further supported by in vitro observations where serum starvation enhanced LyP-1 binding and internalization. The proapoptotic effect of LyP-1 seems to be directed against tumor cells that are under stress, making it potentially effective against therapy-resistant hypoxic tumor regions that are often difficult to target with conventional treatments .

How can LyP-1 be optimized for different targeting applications?

For optimizing LyP-1 for various targeting applications, researchers should consider:

  • Conjugation chemistry: Different payload attachment methods may affect targeting efficiency.

  • Structural modifications: Changes to the cyclic structure or amino acid composition may enhance stability or targeting.

  • Dosing regimen: In treatment studies, biweekly i.v. injections of LyP-1 peptide showed significant tumor growth inhibition (~50% reduction in tumor volume), but increasing the dose did not improve efficacy, suggesting optimal dosing requires careful calibration .

  • Payload selection: Different payloads (fluorescent dyes, nanoparticles, therapeutic agents) may require specific modifications to maintain targeting efficacy.

How does LyP-1 distribution differ between tumor and atherosclerotic plaque targeting?

In tumors, LyP-1 shows strong colocalization with lymphatic markers like podoplanin and LYVE-1, as well as targeting tumor cells in hypoxic regions . In atherosclerotic plaques, LyP-1 accumulates in the plaque interior, predominantly in macrophages, with more than 60% of cells released from plaques showing positive LyP-1 fluorescence . LyP-1 also targets podoplanin-positive areas within plaques, though these areas don't colocalize with blood vessel endothelia or macrophages. The penetration ability of LyP-1 contrasts with other plaque-homing peptides like CREKA, which mainly accumulate at the surface of plaques .

What are the limitations of LyP-1 in targeting specific tumor types?

While LyP-1 shows strong targeting to certain tumors like MDA-MB-435 breast cancer xenografts, its effectiveness may vary across different tumor types. For instance, melanoma cells that do not bind LyP-1 were unaffected by its cytotoxic effects . This targeting specificity likely depends on the expression levels and accessibility of p32 on the cell surface in different tumor types. Researchers should validate p32 expression and LyP-1 binding in their specific tumor models before proceeding with targeting applications.

How should researchers validate LyP-1 targeting efficacy in new models?

A comprehensive validation approach should include:

  • Expression analysis of p32 receptor:

    • Immunohistochemistry with and without permeabilization to confirm surface expression

    • Flow cytometry on cells isolated from target tissues

    • Western blot for total p32 expression levels

  • Binding and uptake studies:

    • In vitro binding assays with fluorescein-labeled LyP-1

    • Ex vivo analysis of peptide binding to primary cells released from target tissues

    • Flow cytometric quantification of LyP-1 uptake in specific cell populations (e.g., CD11b+ macrophages)

  • In vivo distribution analysis:

    • Whole-animal fluorescence imaging at multiple timepoints

    • Tissue sectioning and colocalization with relevant markers

    • Quantification of peptide accumulation in target vs. non-target tissues

What protocols are effective for conjugating LyP-1 to different payloads?

Effective conjugation strategies depend on the payload type:

  • For fluorescent dyes:
    Direct conjugation of fluorescein to LyP-1 has been successfully used for imaging studies .

  • For nanoparticles:
    LyP-1 can be coated onto superparamagnetic iron oxide nanoparticles for targeted delivery to plaques .

  • For PET imaging agents:
    4-[18F]fluorobenzoic acid ([18F]FBA) conjugation to LyP-1 has shown effective targeting in PET imaging studies .

Each conjugation strategy should be validated to ensure that LyP-1 maintains its targeting ability after modification.

How can researchers analyze the therapeutic efficacy of LyP-1-mediated targeting?

Analysis of LyP-1 therapeutic efficacy should include:

  • Tumor growth measurements:

    • Regular tumor volume measurements (length × width² × 0.52)

    • Statistical analysis (e.g., Student's t-test) to determine significance

  • Apoptosis assessment:

    • TUNEL staining of treated tissues

    • Quantification of apoptotic cells in target vs. non-target tissues

  • Lymphatic vessel evaluation:

    • Antibody staining against lymphatic markers (podoplanin, LYVE-1)

    • Quantification of lymphatic vessel density

  • Efficacy in hypoxic regions:

    • Co-staining with hypoxia markers

    • Analysis of therapeutic effects in relation to tissue oxygenation

How might LyP-1 be combined with other targeting strategies for enhanced efficacy?

LyP-1 targets hypoxic tumor regions and tumor lymphatics, which are often resistant to conventional therapies. Combining LyP-1-based targeting with strategies that target blood vessels (like RGD peptides) could provide complementary coverage of different tumor compartments. In one study, increasing the dose of LyP-1 peptide did not improve efficacy beyond a certain point , suggesting that combination approaches might be necessary for complete tumor control. Researchers might explore dual-targeting nanoparticles or sequential administration protocols to maximize therapeutic coverage.

What potential exists for using LyP-1 in immunotherapy approaches?

Given LyP-1's ability to target tumor-associated macrophages in both tumors and plaques , there is potential for using LyP-1 to deliver immunomodulatory agents to reshape the tumor microenvironment. LyP-1 could potentially deliver:

  • Macrophage repolarizing agents (to shift from M2 to M1 phenotype)

  • Immune checkpoint inhibitors specifically to the tumor microenvironment

  • Cytokines or other immune stimulants to enhance local anti-tumor responses

The ability of LyP-1 to penetrate deeply into tissues may provide advantages over antibody-based approaches that often show limited penetration into solid tumors.

What are the translational considerations for moving LyP-1 targeting into clinical applications?

Key translational considerations include:

  • Safety and toxicity profiling:

    • While studies show minimal binding to normal tissues, comprehensive toxicology studies would be needed

    • Evaluation of potential immunogenicity of repeated peptide administration

  • Scalable manufacturing:

    • Optimization of peptide synthesis and purification methods

    • Stability studies under various storage conditions

  • Pharmacokinetic optimization:

    • Modifications to enhance half-life without compromising targeting

    • Evaluation of different administration routes and schedules

  • Clinical imaging compatibility:

    • Development of GMP-grade imaging conjugates

    • Validation in larger animal models prior to human studies

Quick Inquiry

Personal Email Detected
Please use an institutional or corporate email address for inquiries. Personal email accounts ( such as Gmail, Yahoo, and Outlook) are not accepted. *
© Copyright 2025 TheBiotek. All Rights Reserved.