KEGG: ath:ArthMp025
STRING: 3702.ATMG00280.1
Include redox-state controls:
Validate with diagonal electrophoresis to separate oxidized vs. reduced forms
Epitope accessibility test: Compare native vs. denatured samples
Method correlation analysis (Table 2):
Table 2: Inter-method comparison
| Sample | ELISA (ng/μg) | WB (densitometry) | R² |
|---|---|---|---|
| Leaf | 2.3 ± 0.4 | 2.1 ± 0.3 | 0.89 |
| Root | 1.1 ± 0.2 | 3.4 ± 0.6 | 0.32 |
Interpretation: Post-translational modifications in root samples may affect antibody recognition
Epitope mapping: Use ABodyBuilder2 with RosettaFold-predicted structure
MD simulations: 100ns runs in CHARMM36m to assess binding entropy changes
ΔΔG calculation: Compare wild-type vs. mutant binding energies (Table 3)
Table 3: Mutant binding analysis
| Mutation | ΔΔG (kcal/mol) | Contact Residues Lost |
|---|---|---|
| R34A | +2.3 | D12, E89 |
| K101M | +0.7 | S45 |
Create three distinct lines:
Validate with multi-platform sequencing:
Nanopore for structural variations
Illumina SNP confirmation