The MC4R is a membrane-bound G-protein coupled receptor (GPCR) primarily expressed in the hypothalamus, where it regulates food intake, energy expenditure, and body weight . It binds endogenous ligands like α-melanocyte-stimulating hormone (α-MSH) and agouti-related peptide (AgRP), activating downstream signaling pathways such as adenylyl cyclase and β-arrestin recruitment . Mutations in MC4R are the most common monogenic cause of obesity, with variants disrupting receptor trafficking or signaling .
MC4R antibodies are designed to target specific epitopes for research and therapeutic applications. Key features include:
| Antibody Type | Epitope Target | Applications | Species Reactivity |
|---|---|---|---|
| AMR-024 | Extracellular domain | Immunohistochemistry, immunocytochemistry | Human, mouse, rat |
| pN162 | Orthosteric pocket | Structural studies, nanobody-based therapies | Human |
| Generic anti-MC4R | Intracellular or extracellular regions | Western blot, ELISA | Human, rodent |
The AMR-024 antibody (Alomone Labs) recognizes an extracellular epitope, enabling detection in live cells , while pN162 is a nanobody agonist used in cryo-EM structural studies of MC4R .
MC4R antibodies are utilized in:
Immunohistochemistry: Detecting receptor expression in brain regions like the hypothalamus and hippocampus .
Cell Surface Staining: Validating receptor localization in live cells (e.g., GH3 pituitary cells) .
Structural Biology: Mapping ligand-receptor interactions via cryo-EM (e.g., pN162-bound MC4R) .
Signaling Assays: Measuring β-arrestin recruitment or cAMP production in response to agonists .
A 2021 study demonstrated that pharmacological chaperones rescue misfolded MC4R mutants (e.g., R165W) in humanized mouse models, restoring receptor trafficking and anorexigenic responses .
Gain-of-function MC4R variants (e.g., V103I) exhibit biased signaling toward β-arrestin recruitment, correlating with lower BMI and reduced cardiometabolic risk in humans .
Cryo-EM structures of MC4R-pN162 complexes reveal deep orthosteric pocket binding, informing the design of nanobody agonists for obesity treatment .
MC4R antibodies are pivotal in:
Drug Discovery: High-throughput screening for agonists (e.g., setmelanotide) .
Diagnostic Biomarkers: Detecting receptor expression in obesity-related tissues .
Personalized Medicine: Stratifying patients with MC4R mutations for targeted therapies .
MC4R (melanocortin 4 receptor) is a G-protein coupled receptor encoded by the MC4R gene in humans. It functions as a key switch in the leptin-melanocortin molecular axis controlling hunger and satiety. This 332 amino acid protein (36.9 kDa) is also known as BMIQ20, melanocortin receptor 4, and MC4-R . MC4R has become an important research target because of its central role in energy homeostasis and weight regulation. Understanding its signaling pathways, activation mechanisms, and variants has implications for metabolic disorders, obesity research, and potential therapeutic development .
MC4R antibodies are available for multiple species, which is important for comparative studies and animal model research. Most commonly available antibodies target human MC4R, but antibodies reactive to other species variants are also produced, including those for canine, porcine, monkey, mouse, and rat MC4R . When selecting an antibody for cross-species research, it's essential to verify the species reactivity information provided by the manufacturer and consider sequence homology between species at the target epitope .
MC4R antibodies are utilized in numerous research applications:
Western Blotting (WB): For detection and quantification of MC4R protein in tissue/cell lysates
Enzyme-Linked Immunosorbent Assay (ELISA): For quantitative measurement of MC4R
Immunohistochemistry (IHC): For visualizing MC4R distribution in tissue sections
Immunofluorescence (IF): For cellular localization studies
Immunocytochemistry (ICC): For detection in cultured cells
Each application requires specific antibody characteristics and validation. For example, antibodies used for Western blotting should be validated for specificity by showing appropriate molecular weight bands, while those for immunohistochemistry need to demonstrate specific tissue staining patterns consistent with known MC4R expression.
Verifying antibody specificity is crucial for reliable research outcomes. For MC4R antibodies, consider these validation strategies:
Testing on cells transfected with FLAG-tagged MC4R constructs versus untransfected controls
Using ELISA to assess cell surface localization with anti-FLAG (M2) antibody detection
Performing blocking experiments with the immunizing peptide
Testing reactivity in MC4R knockout tissues/cells (negative control)
Checking for cross-reactivity with other melanocortin receptor family members
Verifying expected molecular weight (approximately 37 kDa) in Western blots
Researchers should also review published literature where specific antibodies have been previously validated, as this can provide valuable information on performance and reliability across different experimental conditions.
Cell surface expression of MC4R is critical for proper receptor function and can be altered by mutations or experimental conditions. To assess MC4R cell surface localization:
Use ELISA with epitope-tagged MC4R (e.g., FLAG tag) and surface-specific antibody detection:
Transfect cells with FLAG-tagged MC4R constructs
Fix cells with 3.7% paraformaldehyde (15 min, room temperature)
Block with 3% non-fat dry milk in 50 mM Tris-PBS pH 7.4
Incubate with anti-FLAG (M2) antibody (1:1000 dilution, overnight at 4°C)
Detect with HRP-conjugated secondary antibody (e.g., goat anti-mouse IgG)
Alternative approaches include:
Flow cytometry with non-permeabilized cells
Confocal microscopy using immunofluorescence to distinguish membrane from intracellular staining
Biotinylation of cell surface proteins followed by streptavidin pulldown and Western blotting
The selection of method depends on the specific research question, available equipment, and required sensitivity.
MC4R antibodies offer distinct advantages and limitations compared to other research tools:
Understanding these differences helps researchers select the most appropriate tools for specific experimental questions about MC4R biology.
MC4R variants/mutations can have significant implications for receptor function. To investigate their consequences using antibodies:
Compare cell surface expression levels between wild-type and variant MC4R:
Transfect cells with wild-type and variant MC4R constructs
Use cell surface ELISA or flow cytometry with MC4R antibodies
Quantify differences in surface expression
Assess intracellular retention/misfolding:
Perform dual immunofluorescence with surface (non-permeabilized) and total (permeabilized) staining
Calculate surface-to-total ratio as an indicator of trafficking efficiency
Combine with functional assays to correlate expression with activity:
This approach allows for semi-quantitative classification of variants as complete loss-of-function, partial loss-of-function, or wild-type-like, providing insights into the molecular mechanisms underlying MC4R-associated disorders.
Researchers often encounter conflicting results when using different MC4R antibodies. To resolve these contradictions:
Compare epitope specificity:
Evaluate antibody validation evidence:
Review published literature for each antibody
Check manufacturer's validation data
Perform your own validation experiments (knockout controls, peptide competition)
Implement multiple detection methods:
Use at least two antibodies targeting different epitopes
Complement antibody-based detection with other approaches (mRNA expression, reporter systems)
Confirm with functional assays when possible
Consider protein conformation and post-translational modifications:
Some antibodies may preferentially recognize specific conformational states
Post-translational modifications may mask epitopes in certain cellular contexts
This systematic approach helps identify reliable antibodies and explains discrepancies between different experimental results.
For comprehensive MC4R characterization, integrating structural data from antibody studies with functional assessments is essential:
Correlation of surface expression with signaling capacity:
Monitoring conformational changes:
Data integration approach:
Plot surface expression versus functional activity for different MC4R variants
Classify variants based on combined datasets (trafficking defects, signaling defects, or both)
Use statistical approaches to normalize data across experimental systems
This integrated approach provides mechanistic insights into how structural alterations (detected by antibodies) translate to functional consequences in MC4R signaling pathways.