HRP-conjugated MC4R antibodies enable precise localization and quantification of MC4R in diverse experimental models:
ELISA: Used to quantify MC4R surface expression in HEK293 cells transfected with wild-type or mutant receptors (e.g., V103I, Q307Ter) . Mutations reducing cell membrane localization correlate with impaired agonist-induced internalization .
Radiolabeled Ligand Assays: Validated against HRP-conjugated antibodies to confirm MC4R expression levels in signaling studies .
β-Arrestin Recruitment: HRP-based detection aids in evaluating β-arrestin-biased signaling in MC4R mutants (e.g., V103I increases β-arrestin recruitment and ERK1/2 phosphorylation) .
cAMP Production: Antibodies help correlate receptor surface expression with Gαs-mediated cAMP responses, critical for identifying loss-of-function mutations linked to obesity .
IHC and Confocal Microscopy: HRP-conjugated antibodies confirm MC4R retention on the cell membrane (e.g., V103I mutants) versus cytoplasmic translocation in wild-type receptors .
HRP-conjugated MC4R antibodies have advanced understanding of MC4R’s role in metabolic disorders:
β-Arrestin-Biased Mutants: Variants like V103I show enhanced β-arrestin recruitment and sustained ERK1/2 activation, associated with reduced obesity risk .
Constitutive Activity: N-terminal mutations (e.g., R18C) impair basal MC4R activity, highlighting the N-terminus’s role as an intramolecular agonist .
Loss-of-Function (LoF) Mutants: Truncations (e.g., Q307Ter) cause intracellular retention and abolished cAMP signaling, whereas L328Ter retains normal function .
Surface Expression Defects: Over 70% of MC4R mutations reduce membrane localization, detectable via HRP-based ELISA .
Biased Agonism: HRP-conjugated antibodies help identify β-arrestin-biased MC4R ligands as potential anti-obesity therapeutics .
MC4R Antibody, HRP conjugated is primarily utilized in Enzyme-Linked Immunosorbent Assay (ELISA) and immunohistochemistry on frozen sections (IHC-F) . The HRP conjugation eliminates the need for secondary antibody incubation, streamlining experimental workflows and potentially reducing background signal. The recommended dilution ranges are 1:500-1000 for ELISA applications and 1:100-500 for IHC-F . This reagent is particularly valuable for detecting MC4R expression patterns in brain tissue, where this receptor is predominantly expressed.
The MC4R Antibody, HRP conjugated products available typically demonstrate reactivity with human, mouse, and rat samples . This cross-species reactivity is advantageous for comparative studies and translational research. When working with samples from other species, validation experiments should be conducted to confirm binding specificity, as sequence homology and epitope conservation may vary across species.
For optimal preservation of activity, MC4R Antibody, HRP conjugated should be stored at -20°C . The antibody is typically provided in an aqueous buffered solution containing 0.01M TBS (pH 7.4) with 1% BSA, 0.03% Proclin300, and 50% Glycerol . To minimize activity loss from repeated freeze-thaw cycles, it is strongly recommended to aliquot the antibody into multiple smaller volumes before freezing . When handling, keep the antibody on ice and return to storage promptly after use to prevent degradation of the HRP enzyme.
When using MC4R Antibody, HRP conjugated for Western blotting, several protocol modifications optimize detection sensitivity:
Sample preparation: MC4R is a membrane-bound G protein-coupled receptor, requiring careful extraction protocols. Brain tissue samples should be lysed in ice-cold radioimmunoprecipitation assay (RIPA) buffer containing protease inhibitors .
Protein loading: Load 30-50 μg total protein per lane for optimal detection .
Blocking: Use 5% non-fat dry milk or 3% BSA in TBS-T for blocking membranes.
Primary antibody incubation: Since the antibody is HRP-conjugated, dilute to 1:500-1:1000 in blocking buffer and incubate overnight at 4°C.
Washing: Perform stringent washing (4-5 times with TBS-T) to remove unbound antibody.
Detection: Proceed directly to enhanced chemiluminescence (ECL) detection without secondary antibody incubation.
Controls: Include positive controls (tissue with known MC4R expression) and negative controls (MC4R knockout samples if available).
This protocol modification accounts for the direct detection capability of the HRP-conjugated antibody while addressing the technical challenges of detecting a seven-transmembrane receptor.
Validating antibody specificity is crucial for reliable MC4R detection. A comprehensive validation approach includes:
Positive and negative controls:
Test against samples with known MC4R expression levels (e.g., hypothalamic tissue vs. non-expressing tissues)
If available, use MC4R knockout samples as negative controls
Peptide competition assay:
Orthogonal methods:
Confirm expression patterns using alternative detection methods like RT-PCR
Compare results with other validated MC4R antibodies
Signal localization:
Cross-reactivity assessment:
Test against other melanocortin receptor subtypes (MC1R, MC2R, MC3R, MC5R) to confirm specificity
This multi-faceted validation approach ensures that experimental findings accurately reflect MC4R biology rather than non-specific interactions.
MC4R Antibody, HRP conjugated provides valuable insights into receptor trafficking abnormalities associated with obesity-causing MC4R variants. A comprehensive experimental approach includes:
Cell surface biotinylation assay:
Stimulation response analysis:
Confocal microscopy with dual labeling:
Use MC4R Antibody along with markers for intracellular compartments (ER, Golgi)
Determine where mutant receptors are retained within the cell
Western blot quantification:
Compare total MC4R expression (whole cell lysates) versus membrane fraction
Calculate the surface/total ratio as a measure of trafficking efficiency
Research has demonstrated that obesity-associated MC4R variants (e.g., S85G, Y268H) show impaired membrane localization despite normal total protein expression, suggesting intracellular retention as a key pathogenic mechanism .
MC4R variants can lead to obesity through multiple mechanisms. A comprehensive functional assessment protocol leveraging MC4R Antibody, HRP conjugated includes:
Signal transduction analysis:
cAMP accumulation assay:
Protein-protein interaction assessment:
Immunoprecipitate MC4R using the HRP-conjugated antibody
Identify binding partners by mass spectrometry
Compare interaction profiles between wild-type and mutant receptors
Comparison with nanobody activation:
These methods allow researchers to determine if MC4R variants affect ligand binding, receptor activation, membrane localization, or downstream signaling, providing mechanistic insights into obesity pathogenesis.
Working with MC4R Antibody, HRP conjugated can present several technical challenges. Here are common issues and their solutions:
High background in immunohistochemistry:
Weak or absent signal:
Non-specific bands in Western blot:
Optimize blocking conditions (5% non-fat dry milk vs. 3% BSA)
Increase washing stringency (0.1% SDS in TBST)
Pre-adsorb antibody with non-specific proteins
Use gradient gels to better resolve proteins of similar molecular weight
Inconsistent results:
These troubleshooting approaches address the specific challenges associated with detecting a membrane-bound G protein-coupled receptor while leveraging the advantages of HRP conjugation.
Dual labeling experiments provide valuable insights into MC4R colocalization with other proteins. Optimization strategies include:
Sequential detection approach:
Complete MC4R detection with HRP-conjugated antibody first
Quench HRP activity thoroughly (3% H₂O₂, 10 minutes)
Block again before applying the second primary antibody
Use alkaline phosphatase (AP) conjugated secondary antibody with different substrate
Tyramide signal amplification (TSA):
Use MC4R Antibody, HRP conjugated at low concentration (1:1000)
Apply fluorophore-conjugated tyramide substrate
HRP catalyzes tyramide deposition, creating covalent binding to nearby proteins
Inactivate HRP completely before second antibody application
This approach provides signal amplification and permanent labeling
Spectral separation optimization:
For DAB (brown) visualization of HRP, pair with:
Vector VIP (purple)
Vector SG (blue-gray)
AEC (red)
Choose complementary colors for clear visual distinction
Controls for specificity:
Single-labeling controls to verify staining patterns
Species-specific secondary antibody controls
Absorption controls with immunizing peptides
This approach enables researchers to study MC4R colocalization with signaling partners, trafficking machinery, or other receptors with minimal cross-reactivity.
MC4R has emerging roles in synaptic plasticity beyond its established function in energy homeostasis. An experimental approach to investigate this using MC4R Antibody, HRP conjugated includes:
Immunohistochemical analysis of receptor distribution:
Perform dual-labeling with MC4R Antibody and markers for:
Excitatory synapses (PSD-95, vGlut1)
Inhibitory synapses (Gephyrin, vGAT)
Specific neuronal populations (TH, ChAT, 5-HT)
Map MC4R distribution relative to synaptic structures
Biochemical analysis of postsynaptic complexes:
Analysis of activity-dependent regulation:
Compare MC4R levels in synaptic fractions across conditions:
Basal state
After pharmacological stimulation (α-MSH)
After physiological challenges (fasting/feeding)
Quantify changes in synaptic localization
Correlation with glutamate receptor subunits:
Research has shown that MC4R deficiency causes dysregulation of postsynaptic excitatory neurotransmission , suggesting important interactions between melanocortin signaling and glutamatergic transmission in regions like the paraventricular hypothalamus.
Understanding MC4R internalization dynamics is crucial for comprehending receptor desensitization and resensitization. A methodological approach using MC4R Antibody, HRP conjugated includes:
Time-course analysis of receptor internalization:
Label surface MC4R with cleavable biotin
Stimulate with α-MSH for various durations (5, 15, 30, 60 minutes)
Cleave remaining surface biotin
Quantify internalized (protected) biotin-labeled MC4R using the HRP-conjugated antibody
Plot internalization rate curves
Recycling assay:
Label surface MC4R with biotin
Induce internalization with α-MSH
Allow varying recovery periods
Quantify receptor recycling to the plasma membrane
Compare recycling kinetics between wild-type and mutant receptors
Colocalization with endocytic markers:
Dual-label cells with MC4R Antibody and markers for:
Early endosomes (EEA1)
Recycling endosomes (Rab11)
Late endosomes/lysosomes (LAMP1)
Track receptor trafficking through the endocytic pathway
Determine the fate of internalized receptors
Effect of β-arrestin recruitment:
Analyze β-arrestin binding to MC4R following stimulation
Compare wild-type and mutant receptors for differences in arrestin recruitment
Correlate with internalization rates
This methodological approach provides insights into how receptor dynamics influence MC4R signaling duration and intensity, which may be altered in pathological conditions involving the melanocortin system.
MC4R is a promising target for obesity treatment, and MC4R Antibody, HRP conjugated can facilitate therapeutic development through:
Target engagement assessment:
Develop competitive binding assays between therapeutic candidates and the antibody
Determine if candidates and antibody recognize overlapping epitopes
Map binding domains through competition analysis
Conformational change detection:
Receptor trafficking analysis:
Monitor how therapeutics affect:
Surface expression levels
Internalization rates
Recycling efficiency
Compare effects between wild-type and mutant receptors
Downstream signaling assessment:
Analyze how therapeutics influence MC4R coupling to:
G protein-dependent pathways (cAMP/PKA)
G protein-independent pathways (β-arrestin/ERK)
Compare signaling profiles of different therapeutic modalities
Recent approaches using nanobodies targeting MC4R have shown promise, with agents like pN162 demonstrating potent full agonist activity (EC₅₀ ≈ 0.7 nM) and specificity for MC4R over other melanocortin receptor subtypes .
GPCRs like MC4R can form functional heterodimers with other receptors, potentially modifying signaling properties. Approaches to study MC4R heterodimers include:
Co-immunoprecipitation analysis:
Immunoprecipitate MC4R using the HRP-conjugated antibody
Probe for co-precipitated receptors of interest
Compare heterodimer formation in different tissues/conditions
Include appropriate controls for non-specific binding
Proximity ligation assay (PLA):
Use MC4R Antibody alongside antibodies against potential partners
Apply secondary antibodies with complementary oligonucleotides
If proteins are in close proximity (<40 nm), ligation produces a circular DNA
Amplify signal through rolling circle amplification
Quantify fluorescent signals as measure of protein proximity
Bioluminescence/Förster resonance energy transfer (BRET/FRET):
Create fusion constructs of MC4R and potential partners
Measure energy transfer as indicator of protein-protein interaction
Compare interaction efficiency between wild-type and mutant receptors
Assess how ligands affect heterodimer formation
Functional consequences analysis:
Compare signaling properties of:
MC4R alone
Potential partner alone
Co-expressed receptors
Assess alterations in ligand potency, efficacy, or biased signaling
Determine if heterodimers have unique pharmacological profiles
This methodological framework enables researchers to explore how MC4R interactions with other receptors might influence its function in both physiological and pathological contexts.