Here’s a structured collection of FAQs for researchers working with CEL-1 (C-type lectin-like molecule-1) antibodies, organized by complexity and grounded in methodological rigor:
Flow cytometry validation: Compare CEL-1 expression across AML cell lines (e.g., HL-60), healthy donor myeloid cells, and non-myeloid controls. Use isotype-matched controls to rule out nonspecific binding .
Competitive blocking: Pre-incubate antibodies with recombinant CEL-1 extracellular domain to confirm binding specificity .
Cross-reactivity screening: Test antibody reactivity against related C-type lectin family members (e.g., CD33) using transfected HEK293 cells .
Stratify samples by FAB classification and genetic markers (e.g., FLT3-ITD status).
Quantify heterogeneity using single-cell CITE-seq to distinguish blast vs. leukemic stem cell expression .
Correlate surface density (antibody binding capacity) with transcript levels via parallel scRNA-seq .
Example finding: CD34+/CD38− leukemic stem cells show 3-fold lower CEL-1 surface density than blasts despite comparable mRNA levels .
Patient stratification: Select samples with ≥20% CEL-1+ blasts via flow cytometry .
Effector cells: Use NK-92MI cells (CD16+) at 10:1 E:T ratio for ADCC assays .
Endpoint selection:
Structural modeling: Use AlphaFold2 to predict paratope-epitope interactions .
Library screening: Apply neural network-based frameworks (e.g., DeepAb) to assess off-target risks against human proteome .
Experimental validation: Perform phage display counter-selection against CD33 and CD123 .
Dimensionality reduction: Run UMAP on flow cytometry data (CEL-1, PD-L1, TIM-3)
Cluster validation: Apply SPADE analysis to identify rare double-positive populations
Functional correlation: Measure IFN-γ secretion in sorted subsets via ELISpot
Key finding: CEL-1+PD-L1+ AML cells show 5.8-fold higher T-cell suppression vs. single-positive subsets .