MDK Antibody

Shipped with Ice Packs
In Stock

Product Specs

Buffer
PBS with 0.1% Sodium Azide, 50% Glycerol, pH 7.3. -20°C. Avoid freeze-thaw cycles.
Lead Time
Typically, we can ship products within 1-3 business days of receiving your order. Delivery times may vary depending on the purchase method or location. Please consult your local distributor for specific delivery timeframes.
Synonyms
Amphiregulin associated protein antibody; Amphiregulin-associated protein antibody; ARAP antibody; FLJ27379 antibody; Mdk antibody; Midgestation and kidney protein antibody; Midkine antibody; MK 1 antibody; MK antibody; MK_HUMAN antibody; MK1 antibody; NEGF 2 antibody; NEGF2 antibody; Neurite growth promoting factor 2 antibody; Neurite outgrowth promoting protein antibody; Neurite outgrowth-promoting factor 2 antibody; Neurite outgrowth-promoting protein antibody; Retinoic acid inducible factor antibody
Target Names
MDK
Uniprot No.

Target Background

Function
Midkine (MDK) is a secreted protein that functions as a cytokine and growth factor, mediating its signal through cell-surface proteoglycan and non-proteoglycan receptors. MDK binds to cell-surface proteoglycan receptors through their chondroitin sulfate (CS) groups, thereby regulating a wide range of cellular processes including inflammatory response, cell proliferation, cell adhesion, cell growth, cell survival, tissue regeneration, cell differentiation, and cell migration. MDK plays a significant role in inflammatory processes by exhibiting dual activities:

1. **Mediating neutrophil and macrophage recruitment:** MDK directly recruits neutrophils and macrophages to sites of inflammation, cooperating with integrin β2 (ITGB2) via low-density lipoprotein receptor-related protein 1 (LRP1), and by inducing chemokine expression. This inflammatory response can be accompanied by epithelial cell survival and smooth muscle cell migration after renal and vessel damage, respectively.

2. **Modulating immune cell differentiation and T cell expansion:** MDK suppresses the development of tolerogenic dendritic cells, thereby inhibiting the differentiation of regulatory T cells and promoting T cell expansion via nuclear factor of activated T cells (NFAT) signaling and Th1 cell differentiation.

MDK promotes tissue regeneration following injury or trauma. After heart damage, MDK negatively regulates the recruitment of inflammatory cells and mediates cell survival through activation of anti-apoptotic signaling pathways via mitogen-activated protein kinases (MAPKs) and Akt pathways, ultimately stimulating angiogenesis. MDK facilitates liver regeneration, bone repair by recruiting macrophages to the site of trauma, and cartilage development by promoting chondrocyte differentiation.

MDK plays a crucial role in the brain by promoting neural precursor cell survival and growth through interaction with heparan sulfate proteoglycans. MDK binds to protein tyrosine phosphatase receptor type Z1 (PTPRZ1), promoting neuronal migration and embryonic neuron survival. MDK binds to syndecan 3 (SDC3) or glypican 2 (GPC2), mediating neurite outgrowth and cell adhesion. MDK binding to chondroitin sulfate E and heparin inhibits neuronal cell adhesion induced by GPC2. MDK binds to chondroitin sulfate proteoglycan 5 (CSPG5) and promotes the elongation of oligodendroglial precursor-like cells. MDK also binds to the integrin α6:β1 complex, which mediates MDK-induced neurite outgrowth. MDK binds to LRP1 and promotes neuronal survival. MDK binds to the integrin α4:β1 complex, mediating MDK-induced osteoblast cell migration via paxillin (PXN) phosphorylation.

MDK binds to anaplastic lymphoma kinase (ALK) which induces ALK activation and subsequent phosphorylation of the insulin receptor substrate (IRS1), followed by the activation of mitogen-activated protein kinase (MAPK) and phosphatidylinositol 3-kinase (PI3-kinase), and the induction of cell proliferation. MDK promotes epithelial to mesenchymal transition through interaction with NOTCH2.

During arteriogenesis, MDK plays a role in vascular endothelial cell proliferation by inducing vascular endothelial growth factor A (VEGFA) expression and release, which in turn induces nitric oxide synthase expression. MDK activates vasodilation through nitric oxide synthase activation. MDK negatively regulates bone formation in response to mechanical load by inhibiting Wnt/β-catenin signaling in osteoblasts.

MDK also plays a role in hippocampal development, working memory, auditory response, early fetal adrenal gland development, and the female reproductive system.
Gene References Into Functions
  1. Studied levels of mucin 16 (CA125), adenosine deaminase, and midkine as tumor markers in non-small cell lung cancer-associated malignant pleural effusion. PMID: 29797475
  2. Demonstrated that MK can potentially serve as a surrogate biomarker for predicting distant tumor cell metastases when thyroglobulin is not suitable due to thyroglobulin antibody positivity. PMID: 28240744
  3. Found that midkine expression is not significantly linked to metastatic disease in pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma. PMID: 29355490
  4. High midkine expression was associated with invasion and metastasis in hepatocellular carcinoma. PMID: 29936723
  5. This study revealed a significant association between increased serum MK levels and risk factors of atherosclerosis, such as hypertension and increased total and LDL cholesterol. PMID: 29984722
  6. Midkine can be considered as both a differentiating factor and a molecular-targeted therapy in odontogenic lesions. PMID: 29383694
  7. Positive expression of MK predicted poor prognosis in patients with resectable combined hepatocellular cholangiocarcinoma. PMID: 29486735
  8. The data of this study demonstrated that the serum MK concentration in patients with autism spectrum disorder is significantly higher than healthy controls. PMID: 29164967
  9. MDK promoted gemcitabine resistance of biliary tract cancer through inducing epithelial to mesenchymal transition via upregulating Notch1. PMID: 29344648
  10. These results demonstrate that analysis of immunohistochemical expression patterns of MK and NANOG in pretreatment biopsy specimens can provide a more definitive prognosis prediction for each oral squamous cell carcinoma (OSCC) patient, which can help clinicians develop a more precise individual treatment modality. PMID: 29113102
  11. Elevated plasma midkine and pleiotrophin levels in systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE) patients suggest their involvement in this disease. PMID: 27903979
  12. Urinary midkine may be an effective biological marker for early diagnosis of acute kidney injury. PMID: 27530994
  13. Suppression of midkine gene promoted the antitumoral effect of cisplatin on human gastric cell line AGS in vitro and in vivo via the Notch signaling pathway. PMID: 28656262
  14. Results revealed that ectopic overexpression of midkine in HCC cell lines with IGF-1R inhibition markedly rescued inhibition of HCC cell proliferation, migration, and invasion. These data imply that inhibition of IGF-1R suppresses HCC growth and invasion via down-regulating midkine expression. PMID: 27813495
  15. Midkine is involved in bowel inflammation in ulcerative colitis and lymph node metastasis in colorectal cancer, rendering midkine an attractive target for their treatment. PMID: 27692729
  16. According to our results, serum MK has greater diagnostic value in diagnosing cancer; however, more reliable studies in larger cohorts should be conducted to evaluate the diagnostic accuracy of serum MK. PMID: 28686647
  17. Data suggest that mature kallikrein 9 (KLK9) is a glycosylated chymotrypsin-like enzyme with a strong preference for tyrosine over phenylalanine at the P1 cleavage position; substrate specificity of KLK9 appears to extend to KLK10 and midkine; enzyme activity is enhanced by Mg2+ and Ca2+ but is reversibly attenuated by Zn2+; KLK9 is inhibited in vitro by many naturally occurring or synthetic protease inhibitors. PMID: 28559305
  18. This paper shows that measurement of serum levels of MK is helpful in confirming the diagnosis of Henoch-Schönlein purpura and predicting related nephritis in Chinese children. PMID: 27497193
  19. Midkine may be a good inflammatory marker in renal transplant recipients, as in other inflammatory diseases. Moreover, it seems that it is not affected by factors other than inflammation during the post-transplantation period. PMID: 27470002
  20. High MK expression is an independent adverse prognostic factor in childhood acute lymphoblastic leukemia (ALL). Its level may be incorporated into an improved risk classification system for ALL and suggests the need for alternative treatment regimens. PMID: 26352402
  21. Study shows that overexpression of serum MK levels in patients with head and neck squamous cell carcinoma are associated with poor prognosis. PMID: 26798989
  22. MK was significantly elevated in vitamin D deficiency and associated with anti-Saccharomyces cerevisiae antibodies positivity, which was significantly increased in vitamin D deficiency. PMID: 26566633
  23. MDK plays an important role in non-small cell lung cancer progression and prognosis and may act as a convincing prognostic indicator for non-small cell lung cancer patients. PMID: 26656665
  24. The concentration of MDK in amniotic fluid declined with gestational age. MDK concentrations in amniotic fluid were far higher than in maternal plasma. PMID: 27089523
  25. The Circulating Levels of Selenium, Zinc, Midkine, Some Inflammatory Cytokines, and Angiogenic Factors in Mitral Chordae Tendineae Rupture. PMID: 25787827
  26. Overexpression of midkine protein serves as an unfavorable prognostic biomarker in breast cancer patients. PMID: 26159850
  27. Our results suggest that midkine expression could be a clinically useful marker in predicting the presence of multiple lymph node metastases in BRAFV600E papillary thyroid carcinoma. PMID: 26297257
  28. PLSCR1 positively regulates hepatic carcinoma cell proliferation and migration through interacting with midkine. PMID: 26642712
  29. Use hybrid-type modified chitosan derivative nanoparticles to deliver midkine-siRNA to HepG2 cells. PMID: 25655295
  30. Data shows the possibility that Staphylococcus aureus modulates and corrupts host airway defense lines such as MK by fragmentation in both immuno-competent and -suppressed patient groups. PMID: 24043271
  31. SP1 directly up-regulated the expression of midkine (MDK), and the SP1-MDK axis cooperated in glioma tumorigenesis. PMID: 25428991
  32. Results from targeted sequencing in patients with acute lymphoblastic leukemia identified KMT2D and KIF1B as novel putative driver genes and a putative regulatory non-coding variant that coincided with overexpression of the growth factor MDK. PMID: 25355294
  33. MK expression in glioma was higher than in paratumor tissues. Overexpression was associated with the WHO grade, low Karnofsky score, time to recurrence, and poor survival. Co-expression of pleiotrophin and MK had a worse prognosis than either alone. PMID: 25001988
  34. Midkine is as good as or even better than thyroglobulin to screen patients with thyroid nodules for differentiated thyroid cancer before surgery and to predict whether metastases exist. PMID: 25817231
  35. MK was expressed in adipocytes and regulated by inflammatory modulators. A significant increase in MK levels was observed in adipose tissue of obese ob/ob mice as well as in serum of overweight/obese subjects when compared with their respective controls. PMID: 24516630
  36. High expression levels of Midkine in gastric cardiac adenocarcinoma tissues may indicate a differentiation stage that is characteristic of malignancy, a late clinical stage, and a poor prognosis. PMID: 25017879
  37. Midkine protein level is significantly higher in papillary thyroid cancer than in multi-nodular goiter patients. PMID: 25283079
  38. High levels of midkine in severe peripheral artery disease patients introduce this cytokine as a possible novel effector in the advanced atherosclerotic process. PMID: 25056169
  39. Frequently expressed in pancreatic cancer and associated with perineural invasion. PMID: 24659893
  40. Study presents novel MK functions and new upstream signaling effectors that induce its expression to promote pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma (PDAC). PMID: 24567526
  41. Midkine is specifically expressed in papillary thyroid cancer tissues and is associated with clinicopathological features and BRAF mutation. PMID: 24272599
  42. MK might play an important role in the progression of head and neck squamous cell carcinoma (HNSCC) and may be a useful prognostic factor. PMID: 24164595
  43. PKCdelta/midkine axis mediates hypoxic proliferation and differentiation of lung epithelial cells. PMID: 24500281
  44. Circulating Midkine is significantly higher in malignant and non-malignant colorectal diseases than in apparently healthy individuals with more pronounced elevation in colorectal cancer than in non-malignant conditions. PMID: 23899719
  45. Serum MDK level was significantly decreased in patients with hepatocellular carcinomas after curative resection and re-elevated when tumor relapse occurred. PMID: 23719264
  46. High MK expression was found in cystic fibrosis lung tissue compared with control samples, involving epithelia of the large and small airways, alveoli, and cells of the submucosa (i.e., neutrophils and mast cells). PMID: 23815177
  47. This study shows that airway epithelial cells of large airways and alveoli have a constitutive production of MK that is part of the bactericidal activity present in the air surface liquid, at least in vitro, and may thus be an important part of this arm of airway host defense. PMID: 23391998
  48. The MDK signal peptide contains both subdominant and cryptic CD4+ T cell epitopes. PMID: 23553629
  49. Midkine is differently expressed in tumors arising from colonic and rectal mucosa, where it may play diverse roles in carcinogenesis. PMID: 22562257
  50. MDK upregulation in castration-resistant prostate cancer is associated with neuroendocrine differentiation (shown by its relation to chromogranin A (CGA) and tubulin beta 3 class III (TUBB3)). PMID: 23129424

Show More

Hide All

Database Links

HGNC: 6972

OMIM: 162096

KEGG: hsa:4192

STRING: 9606.ENSP00000352852

UniGene: Hs.82045

Protein Families
Pleiotrophin family
Subcellular Location
Secreted.
Tissue Specificity
Expressed in various tumor cell lines. In insulinoma tissue predominantly expressed in precancerous lesions.

Q&A

What is MDK protein and why is it significant in research?

Midkine (MDK) is a secreted heparin-binding growth factor originally identified as a retinoic acid-responsive gene during embryogenesis. It has emerged as a multifunctional protein with significant research importance for several reasons:

  • Development and tissue homeostasis: Highly expressed during mid-gestation with critical roles in development, reproduction, and repair processes

  • Disease association: Abnormally elevated in various human malignancies, inflammatory conditions, and neurodegenerative diseases

  • Cancer progression: Acts as a mediator for critical cancer hallmarks including cell growth, survival, metastasis, migration, and angiogenesis

  • Biomarker potential: Shows promise as a diagnostic serum biomarker, particularly in hepatocellular carcinoma with superior performance compared to alpha-fetoprotein (AFP)

  • Therapeutic target: Emerging as a potential target for treating various cancers and inflammatory conditions

MDK functions through binding to cell-surface proteoglycan receptors via their chondroitin sulfate groups, activating multiple signaling pathways that regulate cellular behaviors .

How should I select the most appropriate MDK antibody for my specific application?

Selecting the appropriate MDK antibody requires careful consideration of several factors:

  • Application compatibility:

    • Verify antibody validation for your specific application (WB, IHC, IP, IF/ICC, ELISA)

    • Review manufacturer validation images and protocols

    • Consider antibodies specifically validated using standardized protocols with both wild-type and knockout samples

  • Technical specifications:

    • Clonality: Polyclonal antibodies may provide broader epitope recognition; monoclonal or recombinant antibodies offer higher specificity

    • Host species: Select based on compatibility with your secondary detection system

    • Epitope region: Consider N-terminal vs C-terminal targeting based on your research focus

    • Format: Unconjugated vs conjugated (biotin, fluorophores) based on detection method

  • Species reactivity:

    • Ensure reactivity with your experimental species (human MDK shares 87% and 89% amino acid sequence identity with mouse and rat MDK, respectively)

    • Check cross-reactivity data if working with non-human samples

  • Supporting validation data:

    Antibody Selection ParametersConsiderations
    Validation methodsLook for antibodies validated using knockout controls
    Specificity demonstrationSingle band at ~16 kDa for WB applications
    Reactivity confirmationValidated in your species of interest
    Application-specific dataExamine validation images for your specific application

For optimal results, consider antibodies like those characterized in recent studies specifically evaluating commercial MDK antibody performance using standardized protocols .

What controls should be included when using MDK antibodies?

Implementing appropriate controls is critical for obtaining reliable results with MDK antibodies:

  • Positive controls:

    • Cell lines with documented MDK expression (SH-SY5Y, U20S for human MDK)

    • Recombinant MDK protein (purified or overexpressed)

    • Tissue samples known to express MDK

  • Negative controls:

    • MDK knockout or knockdown samples (siRNA, shRNA)

    • Cell lines with minimal MDK expression

    • Primary antibody omission controls

    • Isotype control antibodies

  • Application-specific controls:

    • For Western blot:

      • Loading controls (β-actin, GAPDH)

      • Molecular weight marker (MDK expected at ~16 kDa)

      • Both cell lysates and concentrated culture media (MDK is secreted)

    • For IHC/ICC:

      • Known positive and negative tissues

      • Antigen blocking peptide controls when available

      • Secondary antibody-only controls

  • Characterization controls:

    • Testing multiple antibodies targeting different epitopes

    • Comparative analysis across different applications

    • Validating results with complementary techniques (e.g., ELISA, mass spectrometry)

A robust validation strategy should include comparing wild-type and knockout/knockdown samples using standardized protocols as demonstrated in recent MDK antibody validation studies .

What are the optimal methods for detecting secreted MDK in cell culture experiments?

Since MDK is a secreted protein, detecting it in cell culture experiments requires specific methodological considerations:

  • Sample preparation for conditioned media:

    • Serum starvation: Starve cells for 18-24 hours in serum-free medium to reduce background and enhance detection of secreted MDK

    • Sequential centrifugation: Centrifuge media at 500 × g (10 min) to remove cells, followed by 4500 × g (10 min) to eliminate smaller contaminants

    • Concentration: Use Amicon Ultra-15 Centrifugal Filter Units to concentrate secreted proteins from media (e.g., concentrate 20 ml to 500 μl)

  • Western blot optimization:

    • Sample loading: Load concentrated media alongside cellular lysates

    • Electrophoresis conditions: Use 5-20% SDS-PAGE gels for optimal resolution of the 16 kDa MDK protein

    • Transfer parameters: 150 mA for 50-90 minutes to nitrocellulose membrane

    • Blocking: 5% non-fat milk/TBS for 1.5 hours at room temperature

    • Antibody dilutions: Follow manufacturer recommendations (e.g., 0.5 μg/mL for RP1051)

  • Alternative detection methods:

    • ELISA: For quantitative measurement of secreted MDK

    • Immunofluorescence: To detect cell-associated MDK before secretion

    • Dot blot: For rapid screening of multiple samples

  • Controls and standards:

    • Include recombinant MDK protein as positive control

    • Compare wild-type and MDK knockout cell media

    • Normalize to cell number or total protein concentration

This approach has successfully detected MDK secretion in various cell culture systems, including HAP1 cells and cancer cell lines like SH-SY5Y and U20S .

How can I optimize MDK antibody performance for immunohistochemistry applications?

Optimizing MDK antibody performance for immunohistochemistry requires careful attention to several parameters:

  • Sample preparation:

    • Fixation: Standard formalin fixation is typically suitable for MDK detection

    • Sectioning: 4-5 μm sections for optimal staining

    • Antigen retrieval: Critical for exposing epitopes; test both heat-mediated (citrate or EDTA buffer) and enzymatic methods

  • Antibody parameters:

    • Dilution optimization: Start with manufacturer recommendations (e.g., 1:50-1:200 for A01823-1) and optimize with a dilution series

    • Incubation conditions: Typically overnight at 4°C for maximum sensitivity

    • Detection systems: Polymer-based detection systems often provide better signal-to-noise ratio

  • Protocol refinement:

    ParameterRecommendation
    Blocking5-10% normal serum from secondary antibody host species
    Primary antibodyDilute in blocking buffer with 0.1% Triton X-100
    WashingMultiple PBS-T washes (3-5 minutes each)
    CounterstainHematoxylin for nuclear visualization
    MountingUse appropriate mounting media for long-term preservation
  • Validation strategies:

    • Test multiple antibodies targeting different MDK epitopes

    • Include known positive controls (MDK is expressed in various cancer tissues)

    • Implement technical negative controls (primary antibody omission, isotype control)

    • Consider dual staining with other markers to establish cellular context

  • Interpretation considerations:

    • Evaluate both staining intensity and distribution pattern

    • Document subcellular localization (cytoplasmic, membranous, secreted)

    • Quantify using appropriate scoring systems if conducting comparative studies

Following these optimization steps will help achieve reliable and specific MDK detection in tissue samples for diagnostic and research applications .

What are the challenges in detecting different MDK isoforms, and how can they be addressed?

Detecting different MDK isoforms presents several technical challenges that require specific strategies:

  • Understanding MDK isoform complexity:

    • Full-length MDK has a calculated molecular weight of 15.6 kDa

    • Two reported isoforms exist with potentially different biological activities

    • Post-translational modifications may create additional functional variants

  • Antibody selection for isoform detection:

    • Epitope location is critical - select antibodies targeting regions present in all isoforms for pan-MDK detection or isoform-specific regions for selective detection

    • Consider using multiple antibodies targeting different epitopes in parallel experiments

    • Review immunogen information carefully (e.g., RP1051 targets human MDK position V21-D143)

  • Experimental approaches for isoform discrimination:

    • Western blot optimization:

      • Use gradient gels (4-20%) for better separation of closely sized isoforms

      • Extend running time to improve resolution

      • Consider 2D gel electrophoresis to separate isoforms by both size and charge

    • Mass spectrometry:

      • Implement immunoprecipitation followed by mass spectrometry (IP-MS)

      • Use targeted proteomics approaches for specific isoform quantification

    • PCR-based methods:

      • Design primers spanning isoform-specific junctions

      • Employ qRT-PCR with isoform-specific probes

  • Validation strategies:

    • Use recombinant isoform proteins as positive controls

    • Generate isoform-specific knockdown/knockout models

    • Perform competitive binding assays with isoform-specific peptides

These approaches allow researchers to distinguish between MDK isoforms and understand their potentially distinct roles in normal physiology and disease states.

How can I troubleshoot weak or non-specific MDK antibody signals?

Troubleshooting weak or non-specific MDK antibody signals requires systematic evaluation of several experimental parameters:

  • Addressing weak signal issues:

    • Sample preparation:

      • For secreted MDK: Ensure proper concentration of conditioned media (20 ml to 500 μl recommended)

      • For cellular MDK: Optimize protein extraction with appropriate lysis buffers

      • Include protease inhibitors to prevent degradation

    • Antibody conditions:

      • Increase antibody concentration (start with manufacturer recommendations, e.g., 0.1-0.5 μg/ml for RP1051 or 1:500-1:1,000 for A01823-1)

      • Extend incubation time (overnight at 4°C preferred)

      • Try different antibody clones targeting different MDK epitopes

    • Detection enhancement:

      • Use more sensitive detection systems (enhanced chemiluminescence, amplification systems)

      • Optimize exposure time for Western blots

      • For IHC/ICC, employ signal amplification methods (TSA, polymer systems)

  • Resolving non-specific signal problems:

    • Blocking optimization:

      • Increase blocking time (1.5-2 hours)

      • Test different blocking agents (5% milk, 3-5% BSA, commercial blockers)

      • Add 0.1-0.3% Triton X-100 to reduce non-specific binding

    • Washing improvements:

      • Increase number and duration of washes

      • Add 0.1% Tween-20 to wash buffers

      • Consider gentle agitation during washing steps

    • Antibody specificity:

      • Verify using MDK knockout/knockdown controls

      • Pre-adsorb antibody with immunizing peptide when available

      • Reduce secondary antibody concentration

  • Technical considerations:

    IssuePotential Solution
    Multiple bandsVerify molecular weight (MDK expected at ~16 kDa)
    High backgroundDilute antibodies further, increase blocking, improve washing
    No signalConfirm MDK expression in your sample, try different antibody
    Variable resultsStandardize protocols, use same antibody lot numbers
  • Control experiments:

    • Include appropriate positive controls (known MDK-expressing cells/tissues)

    • Implement proper negative controls (antibody omission, isotype controls)

    • Consider alternative detection methods to confirm results

Systematic troubleshooting using these approaches can help achieve specific and reproducible MDK detection .

How should MDK antibodies be stored and handled to maintain optimal performance?

Proper storage and handling of MDK antibodies is essential for maintaining their performance and extending their usable lifespan:

  • Storage conditions by antibody format:

    • Lyophilized antibodies (e.g., RP1051):

      • Store at -20°C for one year from date of receipt

      • After reconstitution, store at 4°C for up to one month or aliquot and freeze at -20°C for six months

      • Avoid repeated freeze-thaw cycles (limit to 3-5 cycles maximum)

    • Liquid antibodies (e.g., A01823-1):

      • Store at -20°C for one year

      • For frequent use, store at 4°C for up to one month

      • Prepare small working aliquots to prevent freeze-thaw degradation

  • Reconstitution of lyophilized antibodies:

    • Use sterile technique and the recommended diluent (typically distilled water or PBS)

    • Allow complete dissolution before use (e.g., adding 0.2 ml of distilled water to RP1051 yields 500 μg/ml)

    • Mix gently by inversion, avoid vigorous shaking which can denature antibodies

  • Working solution preparation:

    • Prepare fresh working dilutions on the day of experiment

    • Dilute in recommended buffer (typically PBS with 0.1-1% BSA)

    • Keep on ice during use to preserve activity

  • Preservation considerations:

    • Some antibodies contain preservatives (e.g., A01823-1 contains 0.02% sodium azide and 50% glycerol)

    • Note that sodium azide inhibits HRP; wash thoroughly when using HRP-based detection systems

    • Carrier proteins (BSA) and cryoprotectants (glycerol) help maintain antibody stability

  • Quality monitoring:

    • Include positive controls in experiments to verify antibody performance over time

    • Document lot numbers and performance to identify potential variations

    • Consider validation experiments if long-term storage exceeds manufacturer recommendations

Following these storage and handling guidelines will help maintain antibody specificity and sensitivity for optimal experimental results .

How can MDK antibodies be used to investigate cancer biomarker potential?

MDK antibodies play a critical role in investigating MDK's potential as a cancer biomarker through multiple research approaches:

  • Serum biomarker validation:

    • ELISA-based detection of MDK in patient serum samples

    • Comparative analysis with established biomarkers (e.g., MDK showed superior diagnostic performance compared to AFP in hepatocellular carcinoma with 86.9% vs. 51.9% sensitivity)

    • Stratification by disease stage (MDK maintains high sensitivity even in early-stage cancers)

    • Longitudinal monitoring to assess treatment response (serum MDK decreases after curative resection and re-elevates upon tumor relapse)

  • Tissue expression profiling:

    • Immunohistochemical analysis of MDK expression in tumor tissues vs. normal tissues

    • Correlation with clinicopathological features and patient outcomes

    • Tissue microarray studies for high-throughput analysis across multiple cancer types

    • Dual staining with other markers to establish cellular context

  • Molecular characterization:

    • Western blot analysis of MDK expression in patient-derived samples

    • Immunoprecipitation followed by mass spectrometry to identify MDK binding partners

    • Analysis of post-translational modifications that may affect biomarker potential

  • Functional validation:

    • Correlation of MDK levels with cancer hallmarks (proliferation, migration, angiogenesis)

    • Investigation of MDK's role in therapeutic resistance

    • Analysis of MDK-dependent signaling pathways in different cancer contexts

  • Translational research approaches:

    ApplicationMethodology
    Early detectionMDK detection in minimally invasive samples (serum, urine)
    Treatment responsePre- and post-treatment MDK level comparison
    Recurrence monitoringLongitudinal MDK measurement during follow-up
    Therapeutic targetingAnti-MDK antibody therapy development

These research applications collectively strengthen the evidence for MDK as a valuable cancer biomarker, particularly in contexts where traditional biomarkers show limitations, such as AFP-negative hepatocellular carcinomas .

What are the methodological considerations when studying MDK's role in neurological diseases?

Studying MDK's role in neurological diseases requires specific methodological considerations due to the unique challenges of the central nervous system (CNS):

  • Sample preparation from neural tissues:

    • Brain tissue processing: Consider region-specific analysis as MDK accumulates in amyloid plaques in Alzheimer's Disease

    • CSF collection and handling: Requires careful preservation to maintain protein integrity

    • Blood-brain barrier considerations: Analysis of MDK transport/penetration across the BBB

  • Antibody selection for CNS applications:

    • Choose antibodies validated for neural tissues and CNS-specific applications

    • Consider antibodies that can detect MDK in amyloid plaques or other disease-specific structures

    • Verify species cross-reactivity for animal model studies of neurological diseases

  • Experimental design for neurological contexts:

    • Immunohistochemistry optimization:

      • Antigen retrieval methods specific for fixed brain tissue

      • Background reduction techniques for CNS autofluorescence

      • Co-localization studies with neuronal, glial, and pathological markers

    • Ex vivo and in vitro models:

      • Primary neural cell cultures (neurons, astrocytes, microglia, oligodendrocytes)

      • Brain organoids for 3D modeling of MDK function

      • Slice cultures for preserving neural circuit architecture

  • Functional assessment approaches:

    • Neuro-immune interaction studies:

      • Analysis of MDK's effects on neuroinflammatory processes

      • Investigation of MDK-mediated communication between CNS-resident and infiltrating immune cells

      • Assessment of microglial and astrocytic responses to MDK

    • Neurodegenerative disease models:

      • MDK accumulation patterns in relation to disease progression

      • Effects of MDK modulation on neuronal survival and function

      • Correlation with cognitive or behavioral outcomes in animal models

  • Translational relevance:

    • Biomarker potential in CSF or plasma for neurological diseases

    • Therapeutic targeting strategies considering BBB penetration

    • Longitudinal studies correlating MDK levels with disease progression

These methodological considerations help researchers accurately assess MDK's roles in neurological conditions and its potential as a therapeutic target for CNS disorders .

How can MDK antibodies contribute to understanding signaling pathway interactions?

MDK antibodies are valuable tools for elucidating the complex signaling pathway interactions mediated by this growth factor:

  • Receptor identification and characterization:

    • Immunoprecipitation to isolate MDK-receptor complexes

    • Western blot analysis of known MDK receptors (PTPζ, LRP1, ALK, and syndecans)

    • Co-immunoprecipitation studies to map the molecular complex formation

    • Proximity ligation assays to visualize MDK-receptor interactions in situ

  • Downstream signaling pathway analysis:

    • Western blot analysis of phosphorylated signaling proteins following MDK stimulation

    • Immunofluorescence to track subcellular localization changes of signaling molecules

    • Time-course experiments to determine signaling kinetics

    • Inhibitor studies to dissect pathway dependencies

  • Neutralization experiments:

    • Using anti-MDK antibodies as blocking agents to prevent receptor binding

    • Comparing effects of different epitope-targeting antibodies

    • Dose-response studies to determine threshold concentrations for signaling activation

    • Combination with genetic approaches (siRNA, CRISPR) for validation

  • Context-dependent signaling:

    • Comparative analysis across different cell types and tissues

    • Investigation of signaling differences between normal and disease states

    • Analysis of microenvironmental factors affecting MDK signaling

    • Cross-talk studies with other growth factor pathways

  • Functional outcomes of pathway modulation:

    Signaling OutcomeAssessment Method
    ProliferationCell counting, EdU incorporation, Ki-67 staining
    SurvivalApoptosis assays, caspase activation measurement
    MigrationWound healing, transwell migration assays
    AngiogenesisTube formation assays, in vivo vascular imaging
    Therapeutic resistanceDrug sensitivity assays with/without MDK blockade

These approaches collectively help map the complex signaling networks influenced by MDK in both physiological and pathological contexts, providing insights into potential therapeutic intervention points .

What new technologies are emerging for more sensitive and specific MDK detection?

Emerging technologies are enhancing MDK detection sensitivity and specificity:

  • Advanced immunoassay platforms:

    • Single-molecule array (Simoa) technology for ultra-sensitive detection

    • Proximity extension assays combining antibody specificity with nucleic acid amplification

    • Aptamer-based detection systems as alternatives to traditional antibodies

    • Microfluidic immunoassays for minimal sample requirements

  • Mass spectrometry innovations:

    • Targeted proteomics using selected/multiple reaction monitoring (SRM/MRM)

    • SWATH-MS for comprehensive MDK isoform quantification

    • Immunocapture combined with mass spectrometry for enhanced sensitivity

    • Ion mobility mass spectrometry for improved separation of MDK variants

  • Imaging advancements:

    • Super-resolution microscopy for nanoscale localization

    • Multiplexed immunofluorescence for simultaneous detection of MDK and interacting partners

    • In vivo imaging using labeled MDK antibodies

    • Spatial transcriptomics combined with protein detection

  • Nucleic acid-based approaches:

    • Digital PCR for absolute quantification of MDK transcripts

    • RNA-protein correlation studies using spatial transcriptomics

    • CRISPR-based reporters for live-cell MDK monitoring

    • Biosensors responding to MDK binding events

  • Computational and AI-assisted methods:

    • Machine learning algorithms for identifying MDK expression patterns

    • Integrative multi-omics approaches correlating MDK protein with other biomolecules

    • Network analysis tools for mapping MDK signaling pathways

    • Predictive modeling of MDK function in disease contexts

These technological advances will enable more comprehensive characterization of MDK biology and facilitate its development as a biomarker and therapeutic target .

How are MDK antibodies being developed as potential therapeutic agents?

MDK antibodies are being developed as potential therapeutic agents through several innovative approaches:

  • Neutralizing antibody development:

    • Generation of high-affinity antibodies targeting functional epitopes

    • Humanization of promising murine antibodies for clinical application

    • Affinity maturation to enhance binding specificity and neutralizing potency

    • Development of antibodies targeting specific MDK isoforms or modified forms

  • Antibody engineering strategies:

    • Fragment-based approaches (Fab, scFv) for improved tissue penetration

    • Bispecific antibodies linking MDK recognition with immune cell recruitment

    • Antibody-drug conjugates targeting MDK-expressing cells

    • pH-sensitive antibodies for improved tumor targeting

  • Combination therapy approaches:

    • MDK-neutralizing antibodies with conventional chemotherapy

    • Anti-MDK antibodies with immune checkpoint inhibitors

    • Sequential therapy using MDK antibodies to overcome resistance mechanisms

    • Rational combinations based on MDK's role in specific signaling pathways

  • Delivery optimization:

    • Blood-brain barrier penetrating antibody variants for neurological applications

    • Nanoparticle-conjugated antibodies for enhanced delivery

    • Targeted delivery to specific tissues with high MDK expression

    • Long-acting formulations for sustained MDK inhibition

  • Clinical development considerations:

    Development StageKey Focus
    PreclinicalTarget validation in disease-relevant models
    Early clinicalSafety, pharmacokinetics, dosing optimization
    Biomarker strategyIdentifying patients most likely to benefit
    Combination studiesSynergistic therapeutic partnerships

The therapeutic potential of anti-MDK antibodies is particularly promising in contexts where MDK promotes disease progression, such as cancer, inflammatory conditions, and certain neurological disorders .

What are the most promising future research directions for MDK antibody applications?

The most promising future research directions for MDK antibody applications span several exciting areas:

  • Advanced diagnostic applications:

    • Liquid biopsy development for early cancer detection using ultra-sensitive MDK assays

    • Point-of-care diagnostic platforms for rapid MDK quantification

    • Multiplexed panels combining MDK with other biomarkers for improved specificity

    • AI-assisted image analysis for MDK immunohistochemistry interpretation

  • Precision medicine approaches:

    • Stratification of patients based on MDK expression profiles

    • Predictive biomarker development for anti-MDK therapy response

    • Pharmacodynamic monitoring using MDK antibodies during treatment

    • Companion diagnostics paired with emerging MDK-targeted therapies

  • Novel therapeutic strategies:

    • Intracellular antibody (intrabody) delivery targeting MDK production

    • Combination immunotherapy approaches leveraging MDK's immune modulatory effects

    • Dual-targeting strategies addressing MDK alongside its receptors

    • Cell-based therapies with engineered anti-MDK activity

  • Fundamental biology investigations:

    • Single-cell analysis of MDK signaling heterogeneity

    • Structural biology studies of MDK-antibody complexes

    • Systems biology approaches to map comprehensive MDK interaction networks

    • Evolutionary studies of MDK function across species

  • Translational research opportunities:

    • Biobank studies correlating MDK levels with long-term clinical outcomes

    • Patient-derived models for personalized MDK-targeted therapy testing

    • Therapeutic window definition for anti-MDK interventions

    • Repurposing existing drugs as MDK pathway modulators

These research directions promise to advance both our fundamental understanding of MDK biology and its clinical applications across multiple disease contexts, particularly in cancer, inflammatory conditions, and neurodegenerative diseases where MDK plays significant roles .

Quick Inquiry

Personal Email Detected
Please use an institutional or corporate email address for inquiries. Personal email accounts ( such as Gmail, Yahoo, and Outlook) are not accepted. *
© Copyright 2025 TheBiotek. All Rights Reserved.