MEIKIN (Meiosis-specific kinetochore protein) is a conserved regulator essential for proper kinetochore function during meiosis I. It ensures mono-orientation of sister kinetochores (where sister chromatids attach to spindle fibers from the same pole) and protects centromeric cohesin from premature cleavage . This protein is expressed exclusively in germ cells (testis and ovary) and is absent in somatic tissues .
Prevents premature cleavage of cohesin at centromeres, preserving sister chromatid cohesion until anaphase I .
Collaborates with PLK1 (Polo-like kinase 1) to regulate spindle attachment and chromosome alignment .
MEIKIN antibodies are primarily used to study meiosis mechanisms, particularly in model organisms like mice and fission yeast.
The table below lists commercially available MEIKIN antibodies, their providers, and applications:
| Provider | Catalog Number | Clonality | Applications | Host Species |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Invitrogen Antibodies | PA5-144240 | Polyclonal | ELISA, IHC-P | Rabbit |
| Cusabio Biotech Co., Ltd | CSB-PA20649A0Rb | Polyclonal | ELISA, IHC | Rabbit |
| Abbexa | abx301782 | Polyclonal | IHC | Rabbit |
| antibodies-online | ABIN5867514 | Polyclonal | ELISA, IHC | Rabbit |
Localization Dynamics: MEIKIN appears at centromeres during pachytene stage, peaks at diplotene, and disappears by anaphase I. This contrasts with constitutive kinetochore proteins like CENP-C, which persist through meiosis I and II .
Knockout Phenotypes: Meikin−/− oocytes exhibit premature sister chromatid separation and disrupted metaphase II alignment due to loss of centromeric cohesin protection .
Evolutionary Conservation: MEIKIN homologs exist in vertebrates, with functional studies in mice and fission yeast confirming its universal role in meiosis I .
Investigating MEIKIN’s interaction with shugoshin-cohesin protection pathways.
Developing conditional knockout models to study tissue-specific roles.
Exploring therapeutic potential in fertility disorders linked to meiotic errors.
MEIKIN (Meiosis-specific kinetochore protein) functions as a key regulator of kinetochore function specifically during meiosis I. It serves two critical functions: enabling mono-orientation of kinetochores on sister chromosomes and protecting centromeric cohesin from separase-mediated cleavage. MEIKIN facilitates kinetochore mono-orientation during meiosis I when kinetochores on sister chromosomes face the same direction and are captured by spindle fibers from the same pole. Additionally, it prevents cleavage of cohesin at centromeres during meiosis I, possibly by regulating the shugoshin-dependent protection pathway. MEIKIN acts in collaboration with PLK1 and is required for PLK1 enrichment to kinetochores. Notably, MEIKIN is not required during meiosis II or mitosis, making it specific to meiosis I processes .
Based on current research resources, rabbit polyclonal antibodies against MEIKIN are commercially available. For example, ab234661 is a rabbit polyclonal antibody raised against a recombinant fragment protein within Human MEIKIN amino acids 1-100. When selecting MEIKIN antibodies, researchers should evaluate several factors including the host species, antibody type (polyclonal vs monoclonal), the specific immunogen used, and validated applications for which the antibody has been tested .
Selection of an appropriate MEIKIN antibody should follow the principles outlined in comprehensive antibody validation studies. First, determine your experimental application (Western blot, immunohistochemistry, immunoprecipitation). Then, evaluate available antibodies based on their validation data for your specific application. Consider whether the antibody has been tested on knockout and wildtype controls, as this standardized experimental protocol provides the strongest evidence of specificity . For MEIKIN antibodies specifically, check whether they have been validated in reproductive tissues where MEIKIN is naturally expressed. Finally, review published literature where MEIKIN antibodies have been successfully employed to assess their performance in contexts similar to your planned experiments .
When working with MEIKIN antibodies, particularly for immunohistochemistry, several controls are essential:
Positive tissue controls: Tissues known to express MEIKIN, such as human placenta
Negative tissue controls: Tissues that don't express MEIKIN
Primary antibody omission: To detect non-specific binding of secondary antibody
Isotype control: An irrelevant antibody of the same isotype and concentration
Concentration gradient: Testing different dilutions (e.g., 1/100 for ab234661 in IHC-P)
Ideally, a MEIKIN-knockout or MEIKIN-depleted sample as the most stringent specificity control
These controls help ensure that observed signals are specific to MEIKIN and not due to technical artifacts or cross-reactivity.
Optimizing immunohistochemistry for MEIKIN detection requires systematic adjustment of several parameters:
Document all optimization steps systematically, and maintain protocol consistency for all subsequent experiments.
A comprehensive validation protocol for MEIKIN antibodies should include:
Knockout validation: Testing on MEIKIN-knockout cells/tissues compared to wildtype controls
Epitope competition: Pre-incubating antibody with immunizing peptide to block specific binding
Signal correlation: Correlating protein levels detected by antibody with mRNA expression
Orthogonal detection: Comparing results with alternative detection methods
Independent antibodies: Testing multiple antibodies targeting different MEIKIN epitopes
Cross-reactivity assessment: Testing on tissues from other species or related proteins
This standardized approach, similar to that used for Midkine antibodies , provides robust evidence of antibody specificity and reliability.
Systematic troubleshooting based on standardized validation approaches can resolve most common issues encountered with antibody-based detection methods.
Computational modeling offers powerful approaches to enhance MEIKIN antibody specificity and performance:
Epitope prediction to identify unique MEIKIN regions unlikely to cross-react with similar proteins
Antibody sequence optimization to increase affinity for specific MEIKIN epitopes
Energy function modeling of antibody-antigen interactions to enhance binding properties
Design of antibodies that distinguish between different conformational states of MEIKIN
Development of antibodies specific to post-translational modifications
As demonstrated in recent antibody design research, biophysics-informed modeling combined with experimental data can generate antibodies with custom specificity profiles . These computational approaches can be validated through experimental techniques like phage display, creating an iterative design process that progressively improves antibody specificity and performance.
When faced with discrepant results from different MEIKIN antibodies, a systematic investigation should include:
Comparing immunogens used to generate each antibody (they may recognize different epitopes)
Assessing each antibody's validation data for your specific application
Determining if antibodies recognize different isoforms or post-translationally modified versions
Evaluating experimental conditions that might favor one antibody over another
Testing antibodies side-by-side using identical positive and negative controls
Employing orthogonal methods to confirm findings (mass spectrometry, genetic approaches)
As highlighted in antibody characterization studies, performance can vary significantly between antibodies, and some commercial antibodies may underperform or provide misleading results, emphasizing the importance of rigorous validation .
MEIKIN antibodies can be modified for various specialized applications:
Fluorophore conjugation for live-cell imaging of MEIKIN dynamics during meiosis
Development of TCR-like antibodies based on the framework used for other immune applications
Creation of bispecific antibodies to study MEIKIN interactions with binding partners like PLK1
Adaptation for super-resolution microscopy through optimized labeling strategies
Engineering of antibody fragments for improved tissue penetration
Development of intrabodies to manipulate MEIKIN function within living cells
These modifications could enable more precise investigation of MEIKIN's role in meiotic processes, potentially revealing new functional insights.
Advanced techniques for studying MEIKIN interactions include:
Co-immunoprecipitation using MEIKIN antibodies followed by mass spectrometry
Proximity ligation assay (PLA) to visualize interactions between MEIKIN and potential partners
FRET/FLIM imaging using fluorescently-tagged MEIKIN antibody fragments
Pull-down assays combined with Western blotting to confirm specific interactions
ChIP-seq to identify MEIKIN-associated DNA regions at kinetochores
These approaches can reveal MEIKIN's interaction network and help elucidate its mechanism of action in regulating kinetochore function during meiosis I.
Cutting-edge approaches for studying MEIKIN in meiosis combine traditional antibody methods with advanced molecular techniques:
Live-cell imaging using fluorescently-tagged MEIKIN antibody fragments
Super-resolution microscopy to visualize MEIKIN at kinetochores with nanometer precision
Single-molecule tracking to follow individual MEIKIN molecules during meiotic progression
Proximity labeling techniques (BioID, APEX) to identify transient MEIKIN interaction partners
CRISPR-engineered cell lines expressing tagged MEIKIN for antibody-based detection
Antibody-dependent cytotoxicity assays using techniques similar to those described for other target proteins
These approaches provide unprecedented insights into how MEIKIN coordinates kinetochore orientation and cohesin protection during meiosis I, potentially revealing new regulatory mechanisms.