MESDC2 antibodies are IgG-class immunoglobulins produced in rabbits using recombinant fusion proteins containing amino acid sequences (e.g., residues 1–234 of human MESDC2) as immunogens . These antibodies target MESDC2, a 26 kDa protein localized in the endoplasmic reticulum . Key features include:
MESDC2 antibodies are validated for:
Western Blot: Detects endogenous MESDC2 in HEK-293, HeLa, NIH/3T3, and SGC-7901 cell lines at 1:500–1:2000 dilutions .
Immunohistochemistry: Identifies MESDC2 in human placenta and stomach tissues at 1:500–1:2000 dilutions .
MESDC2 is implicated in:
Osteogenesis Imperfecta: Mutations in MESDC2 are linked to osteogenesis imperfecta type 20, a brittle bone disorder .
Protein Folding: Facilitates proper folding of low-density lipoprotein receptor-related proteins .
Metabolic Regulation: Involved in lipid metabolism pathways .
Osteogenesis Imperfecta: MESDC2 variants disrupt collagen maturation, contributing to bone fragility .
Cancer: Overexpression observed in A-431 (epidermoid carcinoma) and HepG2 (hepatocellular carcinoma) cell lines .
Sensitivity: Detects MESDC2 at low concentrations in WB and IHC .
Specificity: No cross-reactivity reported with non-target proteins .
MESDC2 (Mesoderm Development Candidate 2, also known as Boca in Drosophila) is a 22-26 kDa protein essential for embryonic development, particularly in the formation of primitive streak and mesoderm during embryogenesis . Its primary function is within the endoplasmic reticulum (ER), where it serves as a specialized chaperone for Wnt co-receptors LRP5 and LRP6 . By facilitating proper folding and trafficking of these receptors to the cell surface, MESDC2 plays a crucial role in cellular Wnt responsiveness . The protein contains an ER retention motif in its C-terminal region that localizes it to the ER lumen .
MESDC2 is involved in several key pathways:
Wnt signaling pathway regulation through LRP5/6 processing
Developmental processes requiring proper mesoderm formation
Potential involvement in disease states when dysregulated, including osteogenesis imperfecta and certain types of epilepsy
MESDC2 antibodies have been validated for multiple research applications:
These applications allow researchers to study MESDC2 expression, localization, and interactions in various experimental contexts .
MESDC2 antibodies require specific storage conditions to maintain their activity and specificity:
Lyophilized antibodies: Store at -20°C to -70°C upon receipt
Reconstituted antibodies: Store at 2-8°C for short-term (1 month) or -20°C to -70°C for long-term (6 months) under sterile conditions
Antibodies in storage buffer (often PBS with sodium azide and glycerol): Store at -20°C
To maximize shelf life (typically 12 months from date of receipt):
Avoid repeated freeze-thaw cycles by aliquoting larger volumes
Use manual defrost freezers rather than auto-defrost types
Validating antibody specificity is critical for reliable experimental results. For MESDC2 antibodies, consider these approaches:
Western Blot Validation:
Compare detected band sizes with predicted molecular weight (25-26 kDa)
Test multiple cell/tissue types known to express MESDC2 (e.g., brain tissue, Jurkat cells, HeLa cells)
Include negative controls lacking MESDC2 expression
Advanced Validation Approaches:
CRISPR/Cas9 knockout validation: Generate MESDC2 knockout cells to confirm antibody specificity through loss of signal
Overexpression validation: Transfect cells with MESDC2 expression constructs and confirm increased detection
Blocking experiments: Pre-incubate antibody with recombinant MESDC2 protein before application to demonstrate specific binding
A comprehensive validation should include at least two independent methods, particularly when using the antibody in new experimental contexts or sample types .
Successful Western blotting for MESDC2 requires attention to several technical parameters:
Sample Preparation and Gel Conditions:
Reducing conditions are recommended based on validated protocols
Both tissue lysates and cell line samples can be effective (validated examples include mouse brain tissue, Jurkat cells, HeLa cells, and embryonic stem cell lines)
Antibody Dilutions and Detection:
Primary antibody dilutions typically range from 1:500-1:2000 depending on manufacturer
Secondary antibody selection should match the host species of primary antibody
HRP-conjugated secondary antibodies work well with standard ECL detection systems
Expected Results:
Minor variation in molecular weight (26-28 kDa) may be observed depending on post-translational modifications
Selection criteria for MESDC2 antibodies should include:
Antibody Format and Species Considerations:
Host species: Rabbit and goat antibodies are commonly available
Clonality: Both monoclonal (e.g., C22F5 clone) and polyclonal options exist
Species reactivity: Confirm cross-reactivity with your model system (human, mouse, rat, etc.)
Epitope and Recognition Region:
Consider the specific region recognized (e.g., human MESDC2 Ala34-Leu234)
For functional studies, antibodies recognizing the structured central domain may be preferable
Application Compatibility:
Validate that the antibody has been tested for your specific application
Review scientific data provided by manufacturers showing application-specific results
Consider antibody performance in multiple applications if your research requires various techniques
Technical Documentation:
Prefer antibodies with extensive validation data
Look for peer-reviewed publications citing the specific antibody catalog number
MESDC2's critical role in Wnt signaling makes it an important target for pathway studies:
Co-Immunoprecipitation Approaches:
MESDC2 antibodies can be used to pull down protein complexes containing LRP5/6
Analysis of associated proteins can reveal interaction dynamics in the ER
Trafficking and Localization Studies:
Use fluorescently labeled MESDC2 antibodies to track co-localization with LRP5/6 through secretory pathways
Compare wild-type cells with those expressing mutant LRP5/6 unable to interact with MESDC2
Functional Analyses:
Study the impact of MESDC2 knockdown/knockout on LRP5/6 surface expression
Correlate changes in MESDC2 expression with alterations in Wnt pathway activation
Investigate how MESDC2 disruption affects cellular response to Wnt ligands
The interaction between MESDC2 and LRP5/6 is particularly interesting in disease contexts where Wnt signaling is dysregulated, such as in bone formation disorders linked to LRP5 mutations .
CRISPR/Cas9 provides a powerful approach for antibody validation through genetic knockout:
Experimental Design:
Design multiple sgRNAs targeting conserved exons of the MESDC2 gene
Include control sgRNAs targeting non-human sequences
Consider generating both complete knockout and heterozygous cell populations for gradient validation
Technical Considerations:
Use lentiviral delivery systems for efficient sgRNA/Cas9 transduction into target cells
Select cell lines that naturally express detectable levels of MESDC2 (e.g., Jurkat, HeLa)
Confirm knockout efficiency at genomic level through sequencing and at protein level via Western blot
Validation Analysis:
Compare antibody signal between wild-type and knockout cells across multiple applications
Quantify signal reduction in heterozygous cells to assess antibody sensitivity
Document any residual binding that might indicate cross-reactivity with other proteins
This approach has been successfully employed in target deconvolution studies for therapeutic antibodies, demonstrating its robustness for specificity validation .
When encountering challenges with MESDC2 antibodies, consider these application-specific troubleshooting strategies:
Western Blot Issues:
Immunohistochemistry Challenges:
ELISA Optimization:
For sandwich ELISA, ensure capture and detection antibodies recognize different epitopes
Carefully calibrate standard curves using recombinant MESDC2 protein
Validate sample diluent compatibility with your specific sample types
Recent research has expanded our understanding of MESDC2's involvement in disease processes:
Bone Development Disorders:
MESDC2 antibodies are being used to study its role in proper LRP5 function, particularly in cases of osteogenesis imperfecta and high bone mass phenotypes
Immunohistochemistry with MESDC2 antibodies can reveal altered expression patterns in bone tissue samples
Cancer Research Applications:
MESDC2 has been identified in studies related to germ cell tumors, specifically infantile sacrococcygeal teratoma, where chromosomal translocation can disrupt MESDC2
Antibodies are useful for analyzing MESDC2 expression changes in tumor versus normal tissues
Developmental Biology:
MESDC2 antibodies facilitate studying embryonic development, particularly mesoderm formation
IHC applications in developmental studies benefit from well-validated antibodies that work in fixed embryonic tissues
As research progresses, new roles for MESDC2 in disease mechanisms continue to emerge, expanding the utility of these antibodies .
Investigating MESDC2's chaperone function requires specialized experimental approaches:
ER Localization and Trafficking Studies:
Use subcellular fractionation followed by Western blotting with MESDC2 antibodies to confirm ER localization
Consider dual-labeling approaches using MESDC2 antibodies alongside ER markers
Track LRP5/6 receptor progression through secretory pathways in relation to MESDC2 distribution
Protein Folding Analysis:
Design experiments that probe how MESDC2 affects LRP5/6 folding state
Compare wild-type cells with MESDC2-depleted cells for changes in LRP5/6 misfolding/aggregation
Consider proteostasis assays that measure unfolded protein response activation
Interaction Domain Mapping:
Use truncated or mutated versions of MESDC2 in combination with co-IP using MESDC2 antibodies
Identify critical regions required for chaperone function through rescue experiments in MESDC2-deficient cells
These approaches can provide mechanistic insights into MESDC2's essential role in protein quality control within the secretory pathway .
Multiplexed detection involving MESDC2 requires careful planning:
Antibody Panel Design:
Consider host species compatibility to avoid cross-reactivity between secondary antibodies
MESDC2 antibodies are available in multiple host species (rabbit, goat) allowing flexible panel design
Include organelle markers to study subcellular localization (e.g., ER markers to confirm MESDC2 localization)
Signal Optimization:
Carefully titrate each antibody in the panel individually before combining
For MESDC2 detection, concentrations around 10 μg/mL have shown good results for fluorescent IHC
Use appropriate fluorophores based on expected expression levels (brighter fluorophores for lower-expressed targets)
Technical Considerations:
Sequential staining protocols may be necessary if antibodies have incompatible requirements
Consider tyramide signal amplification for enhancing MESDC2 detection if expression is low
DAPI counterstaining works well with MESDC2 detection as demonstrated in validated protocols
Validated protocols have successfully used NorthernLights™ 557-conjugated secondary antibodies for MESDC2 detection in multiplex settings .
Recent advances in therapeutic antibody development have influenced MESDC2 research methodologies:
Target Deconvolution Technologies:
CRISPR/Cas9 screening approaches have revolutionized antibody target identification, including for potential MESDC2-targeting antibodies
These methods allow rapid identification of both direct targets and functional dependencies, which has expanded our understanding of MESDC2's interaction network
Emerging Role in Antibody Discovery:
MESDC2 has been identified in screens for novel therapeutic targets, particularly in contexts where Wnt signaling is dysregulated
High-throughput antibody discovery platforms now incorporate MESDC2 as a potential target of interest
Validation Methodologies:
Advanced validation approaches developed for therapeutic antibodies are now being applied to research antibodies against MESDC2
This includes rigorous specificity testing through genetic knockout, overexpression, and epitope mapping
These developments have elevated the standards for MESDC2 antibody validation and expanded their research applications .
Innovative approaches for studying MESDC2 interactions include:
Proximity Labeling Techniques:
BioID or APEX2 fusion proteins with MESDC2 can identify transient interaction partners in living cells
These approaches complement traditional co-IP methods using MESDC2 antibodies
Allow identification of the broader MESDC2 interactome beyond known LRP5/6 interactions
Advanced Imaging Approaches:
Super-resolution microscopy combined with MESDC2 antibodies enables detailed visualization of subcellular localization
Live-cell imaging using split-fluorescent protein systems can track MESDC2-client interactions in real-time
These techniques provide spatial and temporal dimensions to interaction studies
Computational Prediction:
Machine learning approaches are beginning to predict antibody-antigen binding, which may eventually improve MESDC2 antibody design
Library-on-library approaches can identify specific interacting pairs between MESDC2 and potential binding partners
These methodologies represent the cutting edge of protein interaction research and are increasingly being applied to MESDC2 studies .
Despite significant advances, several challenges remain in MESDC2 antibody research:
Technical Limitations:
Variable performance across different applications and sample types
Limited availability of antibodies targeting specific functional domains
Need for more extensively validated antibodies for challenging applications like ChIP or in vivo imaging
Biological Complexities:
MESDC2's function within multi-protein complexes complicates interpretation of antibody-based detection
Potential epitope masking when MESDC2 is bound to client proteins
Difficulty distinguishing between free and client-bound populations of MESDC2
Future Research Needs:
Development of conformation-specific antibodies that distinguish different functional states of MESDC2
Creation of more extensive validation datasets across diverse experimental systems
Standardization of validation protocols to enable better comparison between different antibody products
Addressing these challenges will require collaborative efforts between academic researchers, antibody manufacturers, and technology developers .