MET (Ab-1313) Antibody is a rabbit polyclonal antibody that specifically recognizes endogenous levels of total MET protein (also known as hepatocyte growth factor receptor or c-Met). It was developed using a synthesized peptide derived from the internal region of human MET . The antibody targets MET, a receptor tyrosine kinase that transduces signals from the extracellular matrix into the cytoplasm by binding to hepatocyte growth factor (HGF). MET regulates critical physiological processes including cell proliferation, scattering, morphogenesis, and survival .
The primary validated applications for MET (Ab-1313) Antibody include:
| Application | Recommended Dilution | Validated Species |
|---|---|---|
| Western Blot (WB) | 1:500-1:3000 | Human, Mouse, Rat |
| ELISA | As per protocol | Human |
Experimental validation has been demonstrated in human cell lines including JK cells and K562 cells . When performing Western blot analysis, the antibody successfully detects endogenous levels of MET protein at the expected molecular weight .
For optimal activity preservation:
Store at -20°C in the provided buffer (rabbit IgG in phosphate buffered saline without Mg²⁺ and Ca²⁺, pH 7.4, containing 150mM NaCl, 0.02% sodium azide and 50% glycerol)
Avoid repeated freeze-thaw cycles by making single-use aliquots
Allow the antibody to reach room temperature before opening
Centrifuge the vial briefly before use to collect all material at the bottom
Working dilutions should be prepared fresh and used within 24 hours
When designing Western blot experiments with MET (Ab-1313) Antibody:
Sample preparation: Prepare cell or tissue lysates using standard protocols with protease inhibitors
Protein loading: Load 20-50 μg of total protein per lane
Electrophoresis conditions: Use 8-10% SDS-PAGE gels (MET is approximately 145 kDa)
Transfer conditions: Transfer to PVDF or nitrocellulose membranes
Blocking: Block with 5% non-fat milk or BSA in TBST for 1 hour at room temperature
Primary antibody incubation: Dilute MET (Ab-1313) Antibody at 1:500-1:3000 in blocking buffer and incubate overnight at 4°C
Secondary antibody: Use anti-rabbit IgG conjugated to HRP at 1:5000-1:10000
Detection: Use enhanced chemiluminescence (ECL) detection reagents
Expected results: A specific band at approximately 145 kDa corresponding to MET protein, as validated in JK cells and K562 cells .
To validate antibody specificity:
Peptide competition assay: Pre-incubate the antibody with excess synthesized peptide immunogen before applying to Western blot or other applications. This should abolish specific binding, as demonstrated in published results
Positive and negative controls:
Positive controls: Cell lines known to express MET (such as JK cells and K562 cells)
Negative controls: Cell lines with low or no MET expression, or MET knockout cell lines
siRNA knockdown: Compare antibody signal between wild-type cells and cells treated with MET-specific siRNA
Multiple detection methods: Confirm results using alternative techniques (e.g., IF, IHC) or a different antibody against MET
MET (Ab-1313) Antibody can be employed in several advanced applications for MET signaling research:
Signaling cascade analysis: Monitor total MET levels while studying downstream signaling effects through RAS-ERK, PI3K-AKT, and PLCγ-PKC pathways in response to HGF stimulation or drug treatments
Correlation with phosphorylation states: Use in conjunction with phospho-specific MET antibodies to establish the relationship between total MET levels and activation status
Protein-protein interaction studies: Use in co-immunoprecipitation experiments to examine MET interactions with downstream effectors like PI3K subunit PIK3R1, PLCG1, SRC, GRB2, STAT3, or the adapter GAB1
MET degradation and trafficking studies: Monitor changes in total MET levels during receptor internalization, recycling, and degradation experiments
Example research workflow:
Serum-starve cells overnight
Treat with HGF (20-50 ng/mL) for various time points (0, 5, 15, 30, 60 min)
Lyse cells and perform Western blot for total MET using MET (Ab-1313) Antibody
Strip and reprobe for phospho-MET and downstream signaling molecules
For live cell binding assays with MET (Ab-1313) Antibody:
Protocol design:
Seed cells at 1×10⁶ cells per well in appropriate medium
Allow cells to reach 80-90% confluence after 24 hours
Change medium to pre-warmed DMEM (pH 7.4 at 37°C) 1 hour prior to binding experiment
For blocking experiments, add 50X excess of unlabeled antibody 20 minutes before adding labeled antibody
Add labeled antibody (can be fluorescently labeled or radiolabeled)
Incubate at 37°C with CO₂ for 1 hour
Wash cells with ice-cold buffer multiple times
For extraction, add lysis buffer (1% SDS, 10mM sodium borate)
Controls and variables to consider:
Positive control: MET-overexpressing cells
Negative control: MET knockout cells
Competition assay with unlabeled antibody
Temperature dependency (4°C vs. 37°C)
Time course analysis (15, 30, 60, 120 min)
When comparing MET (Ab-1313) Antibody (a conventional antibody) with biparatopic MET antibodies:
Mechanistic differences:
Functional comparison:
Research applications:
MET (Ab-1313): Optimal for monitoring total MET levels in signaling studies, protein expression analysis, and as a control in therapeutic studies
Biparatopic antibodies: Better suited for studies focused on MET trafficking, degradation, and therapeutic intervention
Research has shown that biparatopic antibodies induce very transient downstream signaling and fail to activate MET-dependent biological responses, in contrast to conventional antibodies that may have variable effects on signaling .
| Challenge | Possible Causes | Solutions |
|---|---|---|
| Weak or no signal in Western blot | Insufficient protein, antibody concentration too low, poor transfer | Increase protein loading (40-60 μg), optimize antibody dilution (start at 1:500), ensure complete transfer |
| High background | Insufficient blocking, antibody concentration too high, inadequate washing | Increase blocking time (2-3 hrs), optimize antibody dilution (try 1:1000-1:3000), increase washing steps (5× 5 min) |
| Multiple bands | Cross-reactivity, protein degradation, post-translational modifications | Use fresh samples with protease inhibitors, validate with peptide competition, optimize SDS-PAGE conditions |
| Inconsistent results | Antibody degradation, variable sample preparation | Use single-use aliquots, standardize lysate preparation, include positive controls |
For method-specific optimization:
Ensure complete denaturation of samples for MET detection (heat at 95°C for 5 min in sample buffer)
For detecting membrane-associated MET, consider using specialized lysis buffers containing 1% Triton X-100 or NP-40
Phosphatase inhibitors should be included when studying MET in the context of signaling pathway activation
MET processing generates multiple molecular forms that can be detected using appropriate techniques:
Full-length MET vs. cleaved products:
Full-length MET: ~145 kDa precursor and ~170 kDa mature form (glycosylated)
Alpha chain: ~50 kDa (after furin cleavage)
Beta chain: ~145 kDa (after furin cleavage)
MET cytoplasmic fragment: ~60 kDa (after gamma-secretase processing)
Optimization strategies:
Use gradient gels (4-15%) to better separate different MET forms
Include protease inhibitors in lysis buffer to prevent artificial processing
Compare results with domain-specific antibodies targeting different regions of MET
Perform immunoprecipitation followed by Western blot to enrich for specific forms
Experimental design:
Induce MET cleavage with PMA treatment (100 nM, 30 min) to generate the cytoplasmic fragment
Use selective protease inhibitors to block specific processing steps
Compare MET forms in different cellular compartments using subcellular fractionation
MET (Ab-1313) Antibody can support ADC research in several ways:
Target validation and expression profiling:
Mechanism of action studies:
Complementary research with therapeutic antibodies:
Research indicates that ideal ADC antibody components should facilitate effective internalization, have high antigen affinity, and demonstrate low immunogenicity . MET (Ab-1313) Antibody can serve as a tool in evaluating these properties for MET-targeting ADCs.
When studying MET trafficking and degradation:
Experimental design considerations:
Time-course experiments: Monitor MET levels at multiple time points (0, 15, 30, 60, 120 min, 4, 8, 24 hr) after stimulation with HGF
Inhibitor studies: Use lysosomal inhibitors (chloroquine, bafilomycin A1) or proteasomal inhibitors (MG132, bortezomib) to distinguish between degradation pathways
Subcellular fractionation: Separate membrane, cytosolic, and nuclear fractions to track MET localization
Live-cell imaging: Combine with fluorescently tagged MET constructs to complement antibody-based detection methods
Technical protocol optimization:
Include both detergent-soluble and -insoluble fractions in analysis
Use gentle lysis conditions to preserve protein-protein interactions
Consider pulse-chase experiments with biotinylation to track specific populations of MET
Compare results between total MET detection (using MET Ab-1313) and phospho-specific MET antibodies
Research findings context:
Research has shown that biparatopic antibodies can inhibit MET recycling, promoting lysosomal trafficking and degradation of MET, whereas conventional antibodies may have different effects on trafficking . MET (Ab-1313) can serve as a valuable tool to quantify these changes in total MET levels.
In the context of cross-reactivity research:
Epitope mapping and cross-reactivity assessment:
Applications in disease research:
Recent studies have identified cross-reactivity between EBV-specific antibodies and human proteins in multiple sclerosis
Similar methodologies could be applied to investigate potential cross-reactivity of MET-targeting antibodies with other RTKs or related proteins
This approach is particularly relevant for assessing off-target effects of therapeutic antibodies
Methodological approach:
Competitive binding assays between MET (Ab-1313) and therapeutic antibodies
Sequential immunoprecipitation experiments to identify shared binding targets
Protein array screening to systematically assess cross-reactivity
Validation through site-directed mutagenesis of potential epitopes