Applications : Western Blot (WB)
Sample type: cell
Review: I used CSB-PA731035LA01HU antibody, WB) assay, detection of mouse liver tissue samples, sample processing situation is 60hz grinder grinding for five minutes, its results are attached, clear bands without spurious bands, good specificity.
Metrnl is a secreted protein (approximately 30 kDa) with emerging functions in immune regulation, metabolism, and tissue repair. Research significance stems from its roles in:
Modulating inflammatory responses by promoting M2 macrophage polarization
Inducing adipose thermogenesis through Type 2 immune cascade activation
Involvement in various pathological conditions including autoimmune diseases, inflammatory skin disorders, and metabolic dysfunction
Structurally, Metrnl contains an N-terminal signal peptide (45 amino acids) and lacks transmembrane regions, resulting in a mature secreted protein of 266 amino acids . Western blot analysis typically reveals bands between 34-43 kDa, heavier than calculated due to post-translational modifications .
Metrnl antibodies demonstrate utility across multiple applications with varying optimization requirements:
For optimal results, validation in your specific experimental system is essential, particularly regarding species reactivity and antibody format .
Scientific validation typically involves multiple complementary approaches:
Specificity confirmation: Testing against recombinant Metrnl protein in direct ELISA
Cross-reactivity assessment: Evaluation against multiple species (human, mouse, rat)
Expression pattern verification: Comparison with established tissue distribution patterns, including adipose tissue, intestinal epithelial cells, and neuronal cells
Knockout controls: Validation using Metrnl-KO models to confirm specificity
Molecular weight verification: Confirming expected band sizes (typically 34-43 kDa for glycosylated forms)
Selection criteria should prioritize:
Target species concordance: Ensure the antibody recognizes your species of interest (human, mouse, rat)
Application validation: Verify the antibody has been validated for your specific application (WB, ELISA, IHC, flow cytometry)
Clonality considerations:
Epitope location: N-terminal vs. C-terminal targeting may yield different results depending on protein processing
Paired antibody requirements: For sandwich ELISA, select validated antibody pairs with proven compatibility
Methodologically, preliminary validation experiments comparing multiple antibodies on your specific samples are strongly recommended before proceeding to full-scale experiments.
Western blotting with Metrnl antibodies requires specific considerations:
Sample preparation:
Gel separation:
Transfer conditions:
Blocking and antibody incubation:
Molecular weight interpretation:
ELISA optimization requires careful consideration of antibody pairs and detection systems:
Sandwich ELISA design:
Standard curve preparation:
Protocol optimization:
Sensitivity considerations:
Detection limits should be experimentally determined
Consider sample concentration techniques for low-abundance samples
Metrnl antibodies have proven valuable in exploring adipose tissue biology through several methodological approaches:
Immunohistochemical analysis:
Functional blocking studies:
Expression analysis:
Secretome analysis:
Research into Metrnl's immunomodulatory functions employs several antibody-dependent techniques:
Immune cell phenotyping:
Cytokine response assessment:
In vivo blocking studies:
Autoimmune disease models:
Investigating Metrnl's post-translational modifications requires specialized approaches:
Glycosylation analysis:
Secretion pathway studies:
Intracellular vs. extracellular immunostaining distinguishes maturation stages
Antibodies specific to different regions may differentially detect processed forms
Mass spectrometry validation:
Multiple bands in Metrnl Western blots may reflect biological reality rather than technical issues:
Post-translational modifications:
Proteolytic processing:
Technical considerations:
Sample preparation method may affect observed pattern
Reducing vs. non-reducing conditions might reveal different forms
Gel percentage and running conditions can affect band resolution
Validation approaches:
Robust experimental design requires appropriate controls:
Western blotting controls:
ELISA controls:
Immunohistochemistry controls:
Flow cytometry controls:
Contradictory results with different antibodies require systematic investigation:
Epitope mapping consideration:
Antibodies targeting different epitopes may yield different results
N-terminal vs. C-terminal targeting can affect detection of processed forms
Some epitopes may be masked by protein-protein interactions or conformational changes
Methodological reconciliation approach:
Compare antibody validation data and target epitope information
Evaluate species reactivity claims vs. actual experimental system
Consider antibody format (polyclonal vs. monoclonal) and host species
Complementary technique validation:
Supplement antibody-based detection with mRNA expression analysis
Consider alternative detection methods (mass spectrometry)
Use genetic approaches (knockout/knockdown) to validate antibody specificity
Literature reconciliation:
Compare with published findings using the same antibodies
Consider tissue-specific or context-dependent expression patterns
Evaluate experimental conditions that might affect Metrnl expression or detection
Metrnl antibodies enable mechanistic investigation in multiple disease contexts:
Autoimmune disease investigation:
Inflammatory skin disorders:
Cancer research applications:
Mechanistic studies using blocking antibodies:
Cutting-edge approaches leverage Metrnl antibodies in novel ways:
Single-cell analysis:
In vivo imaging:
Fluorescently labeled Metrnl antibodies for dynamic imaging
Tracking Metrnl expression changes during physiological challenges
Correlating cellular distribution with functional responses
Therapeutic targeting strategies:
Biomarker development:
Investigating Metrnl's relationship with other pathways involves sophisticated antibody applications:
Signaling pathway analysis:
Co-immunoprecipitation approaches:
Identifying Metrnl-interacting proteins using antibody-based pull-down
Revealing protein complexes formed during signaling events
Validating direct protein-protein interactions
Phospho-signaling correlation:
Combining Metrnl antibodies with phospho-specific antibodies
Mapping temporal relationships between Metrnl expression and pathway activation
Establishing causality through blocking antibody studies
Receptor identification strategies:
Receptor-ligand interaction studies using tagged Metrnl and antibody detection
Cross-linking approaches followed by immunoprecipitation
Competition assays with blocking antibodies to identify functional binding partners