mfsd1 Antibody

Shipped with Ice Packs
In Stock

Product Specs

Buffer
Preservative: 0.03% Proclin 300
Constituents: 50% Glycerol, 0.01M PBS, pH 7.4
Form
Liquid
Lead Time
Made-to-order (14-16 weeks)
Synonyms
mfsd1 antibody; zgc:123187 antibody; Major facilitator superfamily domain-containing protein 1 antibody
Target Names
mfsd1
Uniprot No.

Target Background

Function
The mfsd1 Antibody targets a lysosomal transporter that plays a crucial role in maintaining liver homeostasis. This antibody is essential for ensuring the stability and lysosomal localization of GLMP.
Database Links

KEGG: dre:641486

UniGene: Dr.121245

Protein Families
Major facilitator superfamily
Subcellular Location
Lysosome membrane; Multi-pass membrane protein.

Q&A

What is MFSD1 and what cellular functions does it perform?

MFSD1 is a lysosomal membrane protein belonging to the major facilitator superfamily, characterized by 10-12 membrane-spanning domains. It functions primarily as a highly selective lysosomal dipeptide uniporter that exports lysine/arginine/histidine-containing dipeptides with a net positive charge from the lysosome lumen into the cytosol . MFSD1 plays crucial roles in:

  • Liver homeostasis (knockout mice develop splenomegaly and severe liver disease)

  • Cellular transport mechanisms necessary for maintaining cellular homeostasis

  • Regulation of cell migration by decreasing the activation status of β1 integrins

MFSD1 forms a critical complex with Glycosylated Lysosomal Membrane Protein (GLMP), with each protein being essential for maintaining normal levels of the other in lysosomes .

How can I select the appropriate MFSD1 antibody for my research?

When selecting an MFSD1 antibody, consider these critical parameters:

ParameterConsiderationsExample
Species reactivityEnsure compatibility with your model systemSome antibodies detect mouse, rat, and human MFSD1
ApplicationsVerify validation for your intended techniqueWB, IP, IF, and ELISA capabilities
Epitope locationConsider where the antibody binds relative to protein domainsN-terminal vs. C-terminal targeting
Validation dataLook for extensive validation in publicationsStudies showing antibody specificity in KO models
Format optionsAvailable conjugations (HRP, FITC, etc.)Various conjugated forms may be available

For validation, prioritize antibodies that have been tested in MFSD1 knockout systems, as this provides the strongest evidence of specificity .

Why is the predicted molecular weight of MFSD1 (~51 kDa) different from what I observe by immunoblot (~35 kDa)?

This discrepancy is a common observation among researchers. Despite the calculated molecular weight of 51 kDa, MFSD1 typically appears as a major band of approximately 35 kDa in immunoblot analyses . This difference may be attributed to:

  • The highly hydrophobic nature of membrane proteins, which can cause anomalous migration in SDS-PAGE

  • Potential posttranslational modifications affecting migration

  • Partial proteolysis, as evidenced by minor bands of smaller molecular weight often detected alongside the main band

Importantly, MFSD1 is not N-glycosylated despite containing two putative N-glycosylation sites (N76 and N449), as demonstrated by endoglycosidase treatments (PNGaseF and Endoglycosidase H) which fail to alter the apparent molecular weight .

What are the optimal conditions for detecting MFSD1 by western blotting?

For successful western blot detection of MFSD1:

StepRecommended ConditionsNotes
Protein extractionUse CHAPS-containing buffersCHAPS preserves MFSD1-GLMP interactions better than other detergents
Sample preparationAvoid boiling samplesHeat samples to 37°C for 30 min to prevent aggregation of transmembrane proteins
Gel percentage10-12% SDS-PAGEFor optimal resolution around 35 kDa range
TransferSemi-dry transfer (20V, 30 min)May provide better transfer of hydrophobic proteins
Blocking5% non-fat milk in TBST1 hour at room temperature
Primary antibody1-2 μg/mL in TBST with 1% BSAIncubate overnight at 4°C
VisualizationECL or fluorescent secondary antibodiesECL suitable for most applications

Be aware that multiple bands may be visible, with the major band at approximately 35 kDa. Validation using MFSD1 knockout samples is strongly recommended to confirm specificity .

How should I optimize immunofluorescence protocols for MFSD1 detection?

For robust immunofluorescence detection of MFSD1:

StepOptimal ConditionsRationale
Fixation4% paraformaldehyde for 10 min at RTPreserves membrane protein localization
Permeabilization0.1% Triton X-100 in PBS with 1% BSAEnables antibody access to intracellular targets while reducing background
Blocking1% BSA/0.1% Triton X-100 in PBS for 1h at RTReduces non-specific binding
Primary antibodyDilute according to manufacturer's recommendationTypically 1:100-1:500 for commercial antibodies
ControlsInclude MFSD1 knockout cellsEssential for validating specificity
Co-staining markersLAMP1/LAMP2 for lysosomes, GM130 for GolgiHelps identify subcellular localization

For co-localization studies, combine MFSD1 antibody with markers for lysosomes (LAMP1/LAMP2) to confirm lysosomal localization, as MFSD1 may also be detected in the Golgi apparatus when overexpressed .

How can I validate the specificity of my MFSD1 antibody?

Thorough validation is crucial for ensuring reliable results with MFSD1 antibodies. Implement these strategies:

  • Genetic knockout controls: Test antibody in MFSD1 knockout cells or tissues - the most definitive validation method

  • RNAi approaches: Compare staining in cells with MFSD1 knockdown via shRNA

  • Overexpression systems: Test detection of tagged (HA, GFP) and untagged MFSD1

  • Peptide competition: Pre-incubate antibody with the immunizing peptide to block specific binding

  • Multiple antibodies: Test different antibodies targeting distinct MFSD1 epitopes

  • Multiple detection methods: Confirm findings across techniques (Western blot, IF, IHC)

Published studies have validated MFSD1 antibody specificity using knockout mice, which showed complete absence of staining in MFSD1 knockout tissues by immunoblotting, immunohistochemistry, and immunofluorescence .

How can I investigate MFSD1-GLMP interactions in my experimental system?

MFSD1 and GLMP form a tightly linked lysosomal membrane protein complex essential for each protein's stability. To investigate this interaction:

MethodProtocol HighlightsConsiderations
Co-immunoprecipitationUse CHAPS buffer (crucial for preserving interaction); avoid other detergents which disrupt the complex Detection is highly detergent-dependent; CHAPS is essential
Proximity ligation assayVisualizes protein interactions in situ with <40 nm proximityMaintains cellular context of interactions
GLMP knockoutGenerate GLMP knockout cells to observe MFSD1 mislocalization to Golgi Helps establish dependency relationship
Rescue experimentsTransfect GLMP knockout cells with HA-tagged GLMP to restore MFSD1 lysosomal localization Confirms specific interaction versus clonal differences
Confocal microscopyCo-stain for MFSD1, GLMP, and organelle markersVisualizes co-localization patterns

Research has shown that GLMP knockout leads to reduced MFSD1 protein levels and mislocalization from lysosomes to the Golgi apparatus, which can be rescued by reintroduction of GLMP .

What approaches can I use to study MFSD1 trafficking to lysosomes?

MFSD1 contains a dileucine-based sorting motif (LL motif at positions 23-24) in its cytosolic N-terminus that is critical for lysosomal targeting. To study MFSD1 trafficking:

  • Mutagenesis approaches:

    • Generate LL/AA mutants (L23A/L24A) to disrupt lysosomal sorting and observe plasma membrane mislocalization

    • Create internal epitope-tagged constructs (e.g., HA-tag between TMD1 and TMD2) for surface detection

  • Trafficking assays:

    • Surface biotinylation followed by streptavidin pull-down to quantify plasma membrane localization

    • Flow cytometry analysis of surface expression using antibodies against internal tags

  • Live-cell imaging:

    • Use fluorescently tagged MFSD1 to track trafficking in real-time

    • Employ pH-sensitive fluorescent proteins to distinguish between different compartments

  • Endocytosis inhibition:

    • Treat cells with endocytosis inhibitors to assess the contribution of endocytic pathways to MFSD1 trafficking

The dileucine motif in MFSD1 is essential, as mutation to alanines (LL/AA) causes dramatic mislocalization to the plasma membrane, with approximately 20% of cells showing surface expression compared to only 2% for wild-type MFSD1 .

How can I measure MFSD1 transport activity in lysosomal systems?

To assess MFSD1's function as a dipeptide transporter:

ApproachMethodologyKey Considerations
Immunopurified lysosomesIsolate lysosomes using magnetic beads and Tmem192-3xHA as bait protein Allows direct measurement of lysosomal metabolites
Targeted metabolomicsUse LC-MS/MS to quantify dipeptide accumulation in lysosomes Focus on lysine/arginine/histidine-containing dipeptides
Whole-cell patch-clampMeasure electrophysiological properties to determine transport mode Can distinguish between uniporter vs. exchanger mechanisms
Reconstitution systemsExpress MFSD1 in proteoliposomes for defined substrate transport assaysProvides clean system for transport kinetics
Comparative analysisCompare WT vs. MFSD1 knockout cells/lysosomes MFSD1-deficient lysosomes show >80-fold increase in certain dipeptides (e.g., KP)

Research has identified MFSD1 as a uniporter that selectively exports lysine, arginine, or histidine-containing dipeptides with net positive charge from lysosomes .

What are the most reliable methods for generating and validating MFSD1 knockout cell lines?

For creating robust MFSD1 knockout models:

  • CRISPR-Cas9 approach:

    • Target early exons for complete functional disruption

    • Use validated gRNAs (e.g., sequence: 5′-GGCGGTGTTCCCGTTCATC-3′ has been successful)

    • Co-express GFP for FACS-based single-cell sorting

  • Validation strategies:

    • Genomic verification: PCR and sequencing of target region

    • Transcript analysis: qPCR with MFSD1-specific primers

    • Protein detection: Western blotting and immunofluorescence with MFSD1 antibodies

    • Phenotypic confirmation: Assess dipeptide accumulation in lysosomes

  • Controls:

    • Generate multiple independent clones to rule out clonal artifacts

    • Create rescue cell lines re-expressing MFSD1 to confirm specificity of phenotypes

    • Consider conditional knockout systems for essential genes

Successful MFSD1 knockout has been achieved in multiple cell types including MC-38, HEK293, and MEFs, with complete absence of protein confirmed by multiple detection methods .

Why might I observe different subcellular localization patterns when staining for MFSD1?

MFSD1 localization can vary based on experimental conditions:

Observed LocalizationPossible ExplanationsValidation Approach
Predominantly lysosomalNormal endogenous expression pattern Co-stain with LAMP1/LAMP2
Golgi apparatus presenceOverexpression artifacts Compare endogenous vs. overexpressed levels
Golgi localization without lysosomal signalGLMP deficiency Check GLMP expression; rescue with GLMP transfection
Plasma membrane mislocalizationMutation in dileucine motif (LL/AA) Verify construct sequence
Mixed patternClonal heterogeneity in cell populationsUse single-cell clones or FACS to purify populations

How can I distinguish between true signal and background when using MFSD1 antibodies?

To ensure reliable detection and minimize background:

  • Essential controls:

    • MFSD1 knockout cells/tissues as negative controls

    • Secondary antibody-only controls to assess non-specific binding

    • Isotype-matched control antibodies for immunoprecipitation experiments

  • Optimization strategies:

    • Titrate primary antibody concentration

    • Test different blocking reagents (BSA vs. serum vs. commercial blockers)

    • Optimize permeabilization conditions for intracellular access

  • Signal validation:

    • Confirm consistent molecular weight in western blots (~35 kDa major band)

    • Verify expected subcellular localization pattern (primarily lysosomal)

    • Assess correlation with MFSD1 expression levels across tissues (highest in kidney and spleen)

  • Advanced approaches:

    • Use two different antibodies targeting distinct epitopes

    • Compare detection of tagged vs. untagged MFSD1 in transfected systems

Researchers have validated MFSD1 antibody specificity using knockout models, which provides the strongest evidence for specific detection .

How can I investigate the relationship between MFSD1 function and cancer cell migration/metastasis?

MFSD1 has been implicated in regulating cell migration through affecting β1 integrin recycling:

Experimental ApproachMethodologyKey Findings
Migration assaysCompare migration rates between MFSD1 knockout and wild-type cellsMFSD1-deficient cells show faster migration and increased focal adhesion turnover
Metastasis modelsExperimental and spontaneous metastasis mouse models with MFSD1 knockdown cellsLoss of MFSD1 enables higher levels of metastasis
Integrin recyclingTrack integrin trafficking using antibodies against active vs. inactive β1 integrinsMFSD1 increases recycling of inactive β1 integrins back to cell surface
Metabolite profilingAnalyze changes in lysosomal metabolites upon MFSD1 deletionAlterations in metabolite environment affect proteins involved in integrin recycling
Rescue experimentsRe-express MFSD1 in knockout cells to restore normal phenotypeConfirms specificity of observed effects

MFSD1 decreases the activation status of β1 integrin by increasing the recycling of inactive β1 integrins to the cell surface. Loss of MFSD1 leads to alterations in the endo-lysosomal metabolite environment, affecting proteins involved in inactive β1 integrin recycling and contributing to increased metastatic potential .

What emerging techniques might advance our understanding of MFSD1 function?

TechniqueApplication to MFSD1 ResearchPotential Insights
Cryo-EMStructural determination of MFSD1-GLMP complexMolecular basis of transport mechanism and substrate specificity
Single-molecule imagingReal-time visualization of MFSD1 trafficking and dynamicsTemporal regulation of MFSD1 localization and function
Spatial metabolomicsMapping of dipeptide distribution in cellular compartmentsComprehensive understanding of MFSD1's impact on metabolite gradients
OptogeneticsLight-controlled activation/inhibition of MFSD1 transportTemporal control over MFSD1 function to assess acute vs. chronic effects
Genome-wide CRISPR screensIdentify genes that modify MFSD1-associated phenotypesDiscovery of new components in MFSD1 regulatory pathways

These advanced approaches could help resolve outstanding questions about MFSD1's precise transport mechanism, substrate specificity, and physiological roles in different tissues and disease states.

Quick Inquiry

Personal Email Detected
Please use an institutional or corporate email address for inquiries. Personal email accounts ( such as Gmail, Yahoo, and Outlook) are not accepted. *
© Copyright 2025 TheBiotek. All Rights Reserved.