MMTAG2 Antibody

Shipped with Ice Packs
In Stock

Product Specs

Buffer
The antibody is provided as a liquid solution in phosphate-buffered saline (PBS) containing 50% glycerol, 0.5% bovine serum albumin (BSA), and 0.02% sodium azide.
Form
Liquid
Lead Time
We typically dispatch orders within 1-3 business days of receipt. Delivery times may vary depending on the shipping method and destination. For specific delivery time estimates, please consult your local distributor.
Synonyms
MMTAG2 antibody; C1orf35Multiple myeloma tumor-associated protein 2 antibody; hMMTAG2 antibody
Target Names
MMTAG2
Uniprot No.

Q&A

How can researchers validate the specificity of MMTAG2 antibodies in experimental models?

Validation requires a multi-step approach:

  • Knockout Controls: Use CRISPR/Cas9-engineered cell lines lacking MMTAG2 to confirm absence of signal in Western blot (WB) or immunofluorescence (IF) .

  • Blocking Peptide Assays: Pre-incubate antibodies with immunogen peptides (e.g., residues 10–59 or C-terminal regions) to abolish binding . For example, GeneBio Systems validated blocking peptides to ensure site-specific recognition .

  • Cross-Species Reactivity: Test antibody performance in human, mouse, and rat tissues, as polyclonal antibodies may exhibit variable affinity due to sequence divergence .

Table 1: Key validation parameters for MMTAG2 antibodies

ParameterMethodExpected Outcome
SpecificityKnockout cell WBNo band at ~34 kDa
Epitope MappingPeptide ELISA (1:20,000–40,000)≥80% signal reduction with peptide
Cross-ReactivityMulti-species IF/ICCConsistent subcellular localization

What are optimal conditions for MMTAG2 antibody applications in Western blotting?

Optimal performance depends on:

  • Dilution Range: 1:500–1:2,000 for WB, adjusted based on sample type (e.g., 1:1,000 for cell lysates vs. 1:500 for tissue homogenates) .

  • Buffer Composition: Include 5% non-fat milk or BSA in TBST to reduce non-specific binding .

  • Antigen Retrieval: For formalin-fixed tissues, use citrate buffer (pH 6.0) with 20-minute heat-mediated retrieval .

Critical Note: Prolonged storage at -20°C in 50% glycerol preserves activity, but repeated freeze-thaw cycles degrade IgG integrity .

How does immunogen peptide design influence MMTAG2 antibody performance?

The immunogen’s amino acid sequence determines epitope recognition:

  • N-terminal peptides (e.g., residues 10–59) target unstructured regions, improving accessibility in denatured WB samples .

  • C-terminal peptides may detect post-translational modifications (e.g., phosphorylation) but require native conformation preservation in IF/ICC .

  • Species Conservation: Peptides with >90% homology across human, mouse, and rat enhance cross-reactivity .

How can discrepancies in MMTAG2 detection across tissue types be resolved?

Discrepancies often arise from:

  • Tissue-Specific Isoforms: Alternative splicing generates truncated variants undetected by antibodies targeting full-length epitopes . RNA-seq data (e.g., GTEx Consortium) can guide isoform-aware experimental design.

  • Post-Translational Modifications (PTMs): Phosphorylation or ubiquitination may block epitope access. Use phosphatase inhibitors (e.g., PhosSTOP) during lysis or employ PTM-specific antibodies .

  • Fixation Artifacts: Compare fresh-frozen vs. paraffin-embedded tissues using antigen retrieval optimization .

Case Study: Abbexa’s antibody (1:500–1:3,000 dilution) detected a 34 kDa band in human myeloma cells but showed weaker reactivity in mouse spleen due to PTM differences .

What strategies improve signal-to-noise ratios for low-abundance MMTAG2 in plasma samples?

  • Immunoprecipitation (IP) Coupled WB: Use Protein A/G beads to concentrate MMTAG2 from large-volume samples (e.g., 1 mL plasma) .

  • Signal Amplification: Tyramide-based systems (e.g., PerkinElmer Opal) enhance IF sensitivity 10–100x .

  • Cross-Validation: Pair WB with ELISA (detection limit: 0.06 ng/mL) for quantitative validation .

Table 2: Comparison of detection methodologies

MethodSensitivitySample RequirementKey Limitation
WB~1 ng/mL20–50 µg proteinSemi-quantitative
ELISA0.06 ng/mL100 µL plasmaRequires high-affinity pairs
IF/ICCSingle-cell levelFixed cellsSubjective quantification

How can MMTAG2 antibody data be integrated with multi-omics approaches in cancer research?

  • Transcriptome Correlation: Compare MMTAG2 mRNA levels (RNA-seq) with protein abundance (WB/ELISA) in patient cohorts to identify post-transcriptional regulation .

  • Proteomic Mapping: Combine immunocapture-MS to identify MMTAG2-binding partners (e.g., chromatin remodelers) .

  • Clinical Outcome Analysis: Use multiplex IHC to correlate MMTAG2 expression with survival metrics in myeloma biopsies .

Example: A 2025 study linked high MMTAG2 levels to neutrophil degranulation pathways via GO analysis, suggesting roles in tumor microenvironment modulation .

Methodological Best Practices

  • Reproducibility: Include at least two antibodies targeting distinct epitopes (e.g., N-terminal vs. C-terminal) to confirm findings .

  • Quantification: Normalize WB signals to housekeeping genes (e.g., GAPDH) using densitometry software (ImageJ, Licor) .

  • Ethical Compliance: Adhere to institutional guidelines for human/mouse tissue use, as specified in NIH Gene ID 79169 documentation .

Quick Inquiry

Personal Email Detected
Please use an institutional or corporate email address for inquiries. Personal email accounts ( such as Gmail, Yahoo, and Outlook) are not accepted. *
© Copyright 2025 TheBiotek. All Rights Reserved.