MRPL58 is a peptidyl-tRNA hydrolase with a conserved Gly-Gly-Gln (GGQ) motif, enabling codon-independent translation termination in mitochondria . The antibody facilitates:
Ribosomal Assembly: Identifies MRPL58 in the 39S large subunit of mitochondrial ribosomes .
Termination Mechanism: Probes premature termination of peptidyl-tRNA during abortive elongation .
Mitochondrial Disorders: Links MRPL58 dysfunction to encephalomyopathy, optic atrophy, and Leigh syndrome .
Neurodegeneration: Investigates MRPL58’s role in Parkinson’s disease (PD) and reactive oxygen species (ROS) production .
Cancer: Analyzes MRPL58 expression in colorectal, breast, and lung cancers via IHC .
Phenotypic Outcomes:
Mitochondrial Translation:
Cancer Biomarkers:
MRPL58 (mitochondrial ribosomal protein L58) is an essential component of the human mitoribosome. It functions as a peptidyl-tRNA hydrolase within the mitochondrial large ribosomal subunit, acting as a codon-independent translation release factor that has lost stop codon specificity. This protein is critical for the termination of translation in mitochondria, particularly in cases of abortive elongation. MRPL58 hydrolyzes peptidyl-tRNAs that have been prematurely terminated, which enables the recycling of stalled mitochondrial ribosomes .
The significance of MRPL58 lies in its essential role in mitochondrial protein synthesis and cell viability. Knockout studies have demonstrated that MRPL58 deficiency results in apoptosis, decreased mitochondrial membrane potential and mass, and reduced cytochrome c oxidase activity . This makes MRPL58 an important target for studying mitochondrial translation dynamics and related disorders.
Available MRPL58 antibodies include polyclonal antibodies developed against the human MRPL58 protein. Specifically, rabbit-derived polyclonal antibodies against recombinant Protein Epitope Signature Tag (PrEST) antigen sequences are commercially available . These antibodies have been validated for several experimental applications, particularly Western blotting (WB) and immunocytochemistry (ICC) .
When selecting an appropriate MRPL58 antibody, researchers should consider:
Target species specificity (human MRPL58 shares approximately 73% identity with mouse and rat orthologs)
Required applications (validated vs. unvalidated uses)
Clonality (polyclonal vs. monoclonal)
Host species (to avoid cross-reactivity in multi-labeling experiments)
Storage requirements (-20°C for long-term; +4°C for short-term storage)
For optimal preservation of MRPL58 antibody activity, proper storage conditions are essential. The recommended storage protocol includes:
| Storage Duration | Temperature | Conditions |
|---|---|---|
| Short-term storage | +4°C | Avoid repeated freeze-thaw cycles |
| Long-term storage | -20°C | Aliquot to minimize freeze-thaw cycles |
| Shipping conditions | +20°C | Standard for domestic and international shipping |
Antibody degradation typically occurs through repeated freeze-thaw cycles, prolonged storage at inappropriate temperatures, or contamination. To maintain antibody efficacy:
Upon receipt, aliquot antibodies into smaller volumes based on typical experimental needs
Store aliquots at -20°C for long-term preservation
When using, thaw only the required aliquot at +4°C
Return unused portion to +4°C if planning to use within 1-2 weeks; otherwise, avoid refreezing
Proper storage ensures consistent experimental results and extends the usable lifetime of the antibody preparation.
MRPL58 antibodies have been validated for specific research applications, with Western blotting (WB) and immunocytochemistry (ICC) being the primary validated methods . Each application requires specific optimization:
Western Blotting (WB):
Recommended dilution: 1:500-1:1000 (optimization required for specific antibody lots)
Expected molecular weight: ~23 kDa
Sample preparation: Total cell lysates or mitochondrial fraction enrichment
Loading control recommendations: Use mitochondrial markers such as VDAC or COX IV for normalization
Immunocytochemistry (ICC):
Recommended dilution: 1:100-1:500
Fixation method: 4% paraformaldehyde followed by permeabilization
Expected pattern: Punctate cytoplasmic staining consistent with mitochondrial localization
Co-staining: Can be combined with mitochondrial markers like MitoTracker for confirmation
Additional applications may include immunoprecipitation for protein-protein interaction studies, though each new application requires validation by the researcher .
For live-cell studies of MRPL58 function, researchers face the challenge of delivering antibodies across cell membranes. A promising "mix-and-go" strategy using cell-permeant bioadaptors has been developed for the cytosolic delivery of native antibodies to live mammalian cells . This approach offers several advantages for MRPL58 research:
It requires no prior genetic or chemical modifications of commercially available antibodies
The protocol operates under aqueous conditions at neutral pH
It allows for immediate bioavailability of the delivered antibody
It demonstrates minimal cytotoxicity compared to other delivery methods
The methodology involves:
Preparing cell-permeant bioadaptors (like CpA1, CpA2, or CpT) that bind to the Fc domain of antibodies
Simple mixing of the bioadaptor with the MRPL58 antibody
Direct application to cell cultures
GSH-triggered release of the antibody in the cytosol
Target engagement of the delivered antibody with endogenous MRPL58
Proper controls are essential for ensuring reliable and interpretable results when using MRPL58 antibodies. A comprehensive control strategy should include:
Positive Controls:
Cell lines with confirmed MRPL58 expression (e.g., HeLa cells)
Recombinant MRPL58 protein (when available)
Tissues with known high mitochondrial content (heart, liver)
Negative Controls:
MRPL58 knockout or knockdown samples (using CRISPR/Cas9 or siRNA)
Isotype control antibodies (matching host species but non-targeting)
Pre-absorption of antibody with immunizing peptide
Procedural Controls:
Secondary antibody-only control (to assess non-specific binding)
Loading controls for Western blot (mitochondrial and general proteins)
Staining controls for immunocytochemistry (cytosolic and nuclear markers)
Proper implementation of these controls helps distinguish genuine MRPL58 signals from artifacts and enables confident interpretation of experimental results .
Cross-reactivity can significantly impact experimental outcomes when using MRPL58 antibodies. The following strategies can help identify and mitigate such issues:
Identification of Cross-Reactivity:
Western blot analysis revealing unexpected bands
Staining patterns that don't match known MRPL58 subcellular localization
Signal in tissues/cells known to lack or have minimal MRPL58 expression
Mitigation Strategies:
Antibody Dilution Optimization: Test a range of dilutions to identify conditions that maximize specific binding while minimizing non-specific interactions.
Blocking Optimization: Experiment with different blocking agents (BSA, milk, serum) and concentrations.
Pre-absorption Control: Pre-incubate antibody with excess immunizing peptide to confirm specificity.
Validation in MRPL58-depleted Samples: Use CRISPR-knockout or siRNA-knockdown samples as negative controls.
Cross-Species Applications:
When using human MRPL58 antibodies in other species, consider the sequence homology. For example, human MRPL58 shares approximately 73% sequence identity with both mouse and rat proteins . This moderate homology may allow cross-species reactivity but requires careful validation.
Researchers frequently encounter technical challenges when using MRPL58 antibodies. Understanding common pitfalls and their solutions enables more reliable experimental outcomes:
Western Blot Challenges:
| Challenge | Potential Causes | Solutions |
|---|---|---|
| No signal or weak signal | Insufficient protein, antibody degradation, ineffective transfer | Increase protein loading, optimize antibody concentration, verify transfer efficiency |
| Multiple bands | Cross-reactivity, protein degradation, post-translational modifications | Use fresh lysates with protease inhibitors, optimize blocking, validate with MRPL58-depleted samples |
| Inconsistent results | Variable expression levels, loading errors, technical inconsistency | Use mitochondrial loading controls, standardize lysate preparation, maintain consistent protocols |
Immunocytochemistry Challenges:
| Challenge | Potential Causes | Solutions |
|---|---|---|
| High background | Insufficient blocking, excessive antibody, non-specific binding | Optimize blocking time/reagent, titrate antibody, increase washing steps |
| No mitochondrial pattern | Fixation issues, epitope masking, antibody specificity | Try alternative fixation methods, use antigen retrieval, validate antibody specificity |
| Variable cell-to-cell staining | Heterogeneous MRPL58 expression, inconsistent permeabilization | Analyze larger cell populations, standardize permeabilization protocol |
Technical Recommendations:
Sample preparation is critical—use fresh samples with appropriate protease inhibitors
For mitochondrial proteins like MRPL58, consider subcellular fractionation to enrich target
Optimize fixation and permeabilization for ICC to preserve mitochondrial morphology
Consider dual labeling with established mitochondrial markers to confirm localization
Validating antibody specificity is essential for generating reliable scientific data. For MRPL58 antibodies, a multi-faceted validation approach is recommended:
Genetic Validation:
CRISPR/Cas9 Knockout: Generate MRPL58-null cell lines as negative controls (note that complete knockout may affect cell viability due to MRPL58's essential function)
siRNA or shRNA Knockdown: Create transient or stable MRPL58-depleted cells and confirm signal reduction
Overexpression: Transfect cells with MRPL58 expression constructs and verify signal increase
Biochemical Validation:
Peptide Competition: Pre-incubate antibody with immunizing peptide to block specific binding
Immunoprecipitation-Mass Spectrometry (IP-MS): Confirm that MRPL58 is the primary protein captured by the antibody
Orthogonal Antibodies: Use multiple antibodies targeting different epitopes of MRPL58
Functional Validation:
Subcellular Localization: Confirm mitochondrial localization using co-staining with established markers
Size Verification: Ensure detected band matches the predicted molecular weight (~23 kDa)
Expression Pattern: Verify higher expression in tissues with abundant mitochondria
MRPL58 antibodies offer powerful tools for studying mitochondrial translation defects implicated in various diseases. Advanced research applications include:
Investigating Mitochondrial Disease Mechanisms:
Protein-Protein Interaction Studies: Immunoprecipitation with MRPL58 antibodies can reveal interactions with other mitoribosome components or translation factors
Mitoribosome Assembly Analysis: Using MRPL58 antibodies to track mitoribosome assembly defects in patient-derived cells
Translation Termination Studies: Investigating MRPL58's role in rescuing stalled mitoribosomes in disease contexts
Disease Model Applications:
Research shows that MRPL58 (ICT1) gene knockout results in serious mitochondrial defects including:
Apoptosis
Decreased mitochondrial membrane potential
Reduced mitochondrial mass
These phenotypes parallel certain mitochondrial diseases, making MRPL58 antibodies valuable for investigating:
Mitochondrial encephalomyopathies
Oxidative phosphorylation disorders
Neurodegenerative diseases with mitochondrial involvement
Experimental Design Strategy for Disease Models:
Compare MRPL58 levels and localization between patient-derived and control cells
Assess correlation between MRPL58 function and mitochondrial translation efficiency
Examine potential compensatory mechanisms through related factors like MTRFR, which plays a similar role in rescuing stalled mitoribosomes
Investigate MRPL58 post-translational modifications that may be altered in disease states
MRPL58 functions within the complex architecture of the mitochondrial ribosome, making antibodies against this protein valuable for studying multi-protein assemblies. Key considerations include:
Experimental Approaches for Complex Analysis:
Co-Immunoprecipitation (Co-IP):
Optimize lysis conditions to maintain mitoribosome integrity
Use mild detergents (e.g., 0.5-1% Digitonin or 0.5% NP-40)
Consider crosslinking to capture transient interactions
Analyze precipitates for other mitoribosomal proteins and associated factors
Proximity Labeling:
Engineering MRPL58 fusions with BioID or APEX2
Identifying neighboring proteins in the mitoribosomal environment
Comparing interactome differences between normal and pathological states
Structural Analysis Integration:
Technical Considerations:
Research has revealed that the interaction between subunits in mitochondria is not as extensive as in bacteria, with many bridges formed by mitochondria-specific RNA and protein components. The reduced peripheral contacts may result in increased conformational flexibility of mitoribosomal subunits . These structural insights suggest:
Sample preparation must preserve native mitoribosome conformation
Detergent choice and concentration are critical for maintaining complex integrity
Buffer conditions should mimic the mitochondrial environment
MRPL58 belongs to a family of peptidyl-tRNA hydrolases that includes MTRFR, which plays a similar role in rescuing stalled mitoribosomes. Advanced research applications using MRPL58 antibodies can help delineate their distinct and overlapping functions:
Comparative Analysis Approaches:
Functional Redundancy Studies:
Selective knockdown of either MRPL58 or MTRFR followed by antibody-based detection of the remaining protein
Assessment of compensatory upregulation
Mitochondrial translation efficiency measurements under single vs. double depletion
Substrate Specificity Investigation:
Immunoprecipitation of MRPL58 vs. MTRFR to identify differentially associated tRNAs or nascent peptides
RNA-protein crosslinking followed by antibody-based purification
Mass spectrometry analysis of bound substrates
Localization and Dynamics:
Biological Significance:
Research has shown that loss of MTRFR gene function causes mitochondrial translation defects, leading to encephalomyopathy, while MRPL58 is essential for cell viability . Understanding their differential roles has implications for:
Developing targeted therapies for mitochondrial translation disorders
Identifying compensatory mechanisms that could be therapeutically enhanced
Understanding the evolution of translation termination mechanisms in mitochondria
Emerging antibody delivery technologies offer exciting possibilities for MRPL58 research beyond traditional applications. The cell-permeant bioadaptor approach represents a significant advancement in this field:
Advanced Delivery Technologies:
The "mix-and-go" strategy using cell-permeant bioadaptors (CpA1, CpA2, and CpT) offers several advantages:
No need for antibody modification
Operation under physiological conditions
Immediate bioavailability of delivered antibodies
Lower cytotoxicity compared to electroporation or lipid-based methods
Future Applications for MRPL58 Research:
Live-Cell Mitochondrial Translation Monitoring:
Delivery of fluorescently-labeled MRPL58 antibodies for real-time visualization
Tracking mitoribosome dynamics during translation cycles
Observing responses to stress conditions or drug treatments
Targeted Protein Degradation:
Therapeutic Development:
Potential for delivering function-blocking antibodies against mutant MRPL58
Testing mitochondrial translation modulators in patient-derived cells
Developing targeted approaches for mitochondrial diseases
This technology achieves delivery efficiency comparable to electroporation (approximately 95% positive cells) while offering advantages in throughput and cell viability .
As research on mitochondrial translation expands, new methodologies are emerging to study MRPL58's role in quality control and stress responses:
Innovative Methodological Approaches:
Mitoribosome Profiling:
Adapting ribosome profiling techniques specifically for mitoribosomes
Using MRPL58 antibodies to selectively isolate translating mitoribosomes
Mapping translation pauses and termination events at single-nucleotide resolution
Organelle-Specific Proximity Labeling:
Combining mitochondrial targeting with engineered MRPL58 variants
Identifying quality control factors that interact with MRPL58 during stress
Comparing interactomes under normal vs. oxidative stress conditions
Multi-omics Integration:
Correlating MRPL58 protein levels/modifications with mitochondrial proteomics and transcriptomics
Developing predictive models of mitochondrial translation efficiency
Identifying biomarkers for mitochondrial dysfunction
Research Implications:
Studies have shown that MRPL58 knockout results in decreased mitochondrial membrane potential and cytochrome c oxidase activity . These findings suggest MRPL58 plays a key role in maintaining mitochondrial function during stress, with potential implications for:
Aging research and intervention strategies
Neurodegenerative disease mechanisms
Cancer metabolism and therapeutic targeting
Quantitative analysis of MRPL58 using antibody-based assays offers significant potential for translational research applications:
Quantitative Methodologies:
Multiplexed Antibody Assays:
Simultaneous detection of MRPL58 alongside other mitochondrial markers
Correlation with mitochondrial function parameters
Development of "mitochondrial health indices" for patient samples
High-Content Imaging Analysis:
Automated quantification of MRPL58 levels and localization patterns
Machine learning approaches to identify subtle phenotypic changes
Correlation with clinical outcomes in patient-derived samples
Absolute Quantification Strategies:
Developing quantitative Western blot protocols with recombinant standards
Mass spectrometry-based absolute quantification using antibody enrichment
Standardization across laboratories for clinical application
Translational Applications:
Research on related mitochondrial translation factors has already demonstrated biomarker potential. For example, ribosomal protein S18 (RPS18) and ribosome recycling factor (RRF) have been identified as high-confidence biomarkers for early Parkinson's disease . Similarly, MRPL58 quantification could provide insights into:
Mitochondrial disease progression and treatment response
Neurodegenerative disease risk assessment
Cancer prognosis and therapy selection
Integrating these quantitative approaches with clinical data could establish MRPL58 as a valuable biomarker for mitochondrial dysfunction across multiple disease contexts.