MRPS2 (Mitochondrial Ribosomal Protein S2) is a nuclear-encoded protein that forms part of the small 28S subunit of mitochondrial ribosomes. It belongs to the universal ribosomal protein uS2 family and plays a critical role in mitoribosome formation, stability, and mitochondrial translation . Mammalian mitoribosomes differ significantly from prokaryotic ribosomes, with an estimated 75% protein to rRNA composition (compared to prokaryotic ribosomes where this ratio is reversed) . The calculated and observed molecular weight of human MRPS2 is approximately 33kDa .
Functionally, MRPS2 is essential for proper mitochondrial protein synthesis, which impacts cellular energy production through oxidative phosphorylation. Research targeting this protein helps elucidate mechanisms of mitochondrial translation and associated pathologies.
MRPS2 antibodies are versatile research tools employed across multiple experimental techniques:
| Application | Common Uses | Typical Dilutions |
|---|---|---|
| Western Blotting (WB) | Protein detection and quantification | 1:1000-1:5000 |
| ELISA | Quantitative protein measurement | Varies by kit |
| Immunohistochemistry (IHC) | Tissue localization studies | Optimization required |
| Immunocytochemistry (ICC) | Cellular localization | Optimization required |
| Immunofluorescence (IF) | Co-localization with other markers | Optimization required |
These applications allow researchers to investigate MRPS2 expression levels, cellular/subcellular localization, and interactions with other proteins across different experimental contexts .
Selection of an appropriate MRPS2 antibody should be based on several critical factors:
Epitope specificity: Consider whether you need an antibody targeting the N-terminal, C-terminal, or full-length (AA 1-296) protein. Different epitopes may expose different functional domains or be more accessible depending on your experimental conditions .
Host species: Rabbit-derived polyclonal antibodies are most common for MRPS2 detection, but mouse-derived antibodies are also available. Select based on compatibility with your secondary detection system and to avoid cross-reactivity with other antibodies in multi-labeling experiments .
Species reactivity: Verify that the antibody recognizes MRPS2 in your species of interest. Most commercial antibodies target human MRPS2, though some cross-react with mouse or rat homologs .
Application compatibility: Ensure the antibody has been validated for your specific application (WB, ELISA, IHC, etc.). Some antibodies perform well in denatured conditions (WB) but poorly in native conditions (IHC) .
Conjugation: Determine whether you need an unconjugated antibody or one directly labeled with fluorophores (FITC), enzymes (HRP), or tags (Biotin) based on your detection method .
For optimal MRPS2 detection using Western blotting, follow these methodological recommendations:
Sample preparation:
Extract total protein from cells/tissues using a buffer containing protease inhibitors
Include mitochondrial enrichment steps for enhanced detection
Denature samples in loading buffer containing SDS and reducing agent at 95°C for 5 minutes
Gel electrophoresis:
Transfer and blocking:
Transfer to PVDF membranes (0.2μm pore size) at 100V for 1 hour
Block with 5% non-fat milk or BSA in TBST for 1 hour at room temperature
Antibody incubation:
Detection:
This protocol can be further optimized based on specific antibody recommendations from manufacturers.
Rigorous validation of MRPS2 antibody specificity is crucial for generating reliable research data. Employ the following comprehensive validation strategy:
Positive and negative controls:
Use tissues/cells with confirmed high MRPS2 expression as positive controls
Include tissues/cells with low or no MRPS2 expression as negative controls
Consider using MRPS2 knockout or knockdown samples as definitive negative controls
Molecular weight verification:
Peptide competition assay:
Orthogonal method comparison:
Compare results with alternative antibodies targeting different MRPS2 epitopes
Correlate protein detection with mRNA expression data
Use mass spectrometry to confirm identity of immunoprecipitated protein
Signal correlation with biological context:
Verify appropriate subcellular localization (mitochondrial)
Confirm expected expression patterns across tissues/cell types
Validate signal modulation under conditions known to affect MRPS2 expression
This multi-faceted approach provides robust evidence of antibody specificity and experimental reliability.
Successful MRPS2 immunostaining in fixed tissues requires careful optimization of several parameters:
Fixation method selection:
For formalin-fixed paraffin-embedded (FFPE) tissues: Use 10% neutral-buffered formalin, fix for 24-48 hours
For frozen sections: Fix with 4% paraformaldehyde for 10-15 minutes
Consider dual fixation with glutaraldehyde for enhanced mitochondrial preservation
Antigen retrieval optimization:
Test heat-induced epitope retrieval methods:
Citrate buffer (pH 6.0) at 95-100°C for 20 minutes
EDTA buffer (pH 8.0) at 95-100°C for 20 minutes
Tris-EDTA buffer (pH 9.0) at 95-100°C for 20 minutes
Enzymatic retrieval may be less effective for mitochondrial proteins
Blocking and permeabilization:
Block with 5-10% normal serum from secondary antibody host species
Add 0.1-0.3% Triton X-100 for improved antibody penetration
Consider including 0.3% hydrogen peroxide to block endogenous peroxidases
Antibody concentration titration:
Test serial dilutions of primary antibody (1:100, 1:200, 1:500, 1:1000)
Optimize incubation time and temperature (overnight at 4°C often yields best results)
Consider signal amplification systems for low-abundance detection
Counterstaining and controls:
Use mitochondrial markers (e.g., TOMM20) for co-localization confirmation
Include DAPI nuclear counterstain for cellular context
Run parallel negative controls (no primary antibody, isotype control)
This methodical approach helps achieve specific MRPS2 staining while minimizing background and false-positive signals.
Investigating mitochondrial translation defects using MRPS2 antibodies requires sophisticated experimental approaches:
Co-immunoprecipitation (Co-IP) strategies:
Use MRPS2 antibodies to pull down associated mitoribosomal components
Analyze protein complexes by mass spectrometry to identify abnormal interactions
Compare complex formation between healthy and disease models
Recommended buffer: 150mM NaCl, 50mM Tris-HCl pH 7.4, 1% NP-40, with protease inhibitors
Sucrose gradient analysis:
Prepare mitochondrial lysates from cells/tissues
Separate on 10-30% sucrose gradients (centrifugation at 100,000g for 4 hours)
Collect fractions and analyze by Western blot with MRPS2 antibody
Assess ribosomal subunit assembly by comparing MRPS2 distribution across fractions
Proximity labeling approaches:
Generate MRPS2-BioID or MRPS2-APEX2 fusion proteins
Identify proximal proteins in healthy vs. defective mitochondria
Validate interactions with MRPS2 antibody-based techniques
Translation activity correlation:
Measure mitochondrial translation using 35S-methionine pulse labeling
Correlate translation activity with MRPS2 levels/localization
Perform rescue experiments with wild-type MRPS2 in defective models
Super-resolution microscopy:
Utilize MRPS2 antibodies in STORM or STED microscopy
Examine spatial organization of mitochondrial translation machinery
Quantify changes in nanoscale distribution in disease states
These advanced techniques provide mechanistic insights into how MRPS2 dysfunction contributes to mitochondrial translation defects.
When faced with contradictory results using MRPS2 antibodies across different techniques, implement the following systematic troubleshooting approach:
Epitope accessibility assessment:
Different techniques expose different protein conformations
Western blotting: Denatured epitopes accessible
Immunohistochemistry/Immunofluorescence: Native/fixed epitopes accessible
Solution: Test antibodies targeting different regions of MRPS2 (N-terminal, C-terminal)
Consider epitope mapping to identify exactly which amino acids are recognized
Cross-reactivity investigation:
| Antibody ID | Epitope Region | Western Blot | IHC | IF | IP | Species Cross-Reactivity |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Anti-MRPS2 #1 | N-Terminal | +++ | + | ++ | - | Human |
| Anti-MRPS2 #2 | C-Terminal | ++ | +++ | + | ++ | Human, Rat |
| Anti-MRPS2 #3 | Full-length (1-296) | +++ | ++ | +++ | + | Human only |
Fixation and preparation variables:
Systematically test multiple fixation protocols
Compare fresh vs. frozen vs. FFPE samples
Evaluate different antigen retrieval methods
Document all experimental conditions to identify critical variables
Orthogonal validation approaches:
This comprehensive approach helps resolve technical contradictions and identifies the most reliable conditions for each experimental context.
Post-translational modifications (PTMs) can significantly impact MRPS2 antibody recognition, creating important experimental considerations:
Known PTMs affecting MRPS2:
Phosphorylation: May occur at serine/threonine residues
Acetylation: Potential modification at lysine residues
Ubiquitination: Can signal for protein degradation
These modifications can mask or alter epitopes recognized by antibodies
Modification-sensitive detection strategies:
Use phosphatase treatment prior to Western blotting to remove phosphorylation
Compare reducing vs. non-reducing conditions to assess disulfide involvement
Test sample preparation with/without deubiquitinating enzymes
Consider generating modification-specific antibodies for specialized studies
Experimental approach to assess PTM interference:
Compare antibody reactivity in samples treated with:
Phosphatase inhibitors (maintains phosphorylation)
HDAC inhibitors (maintains acetylation)
Proteasome inhibitors (accumulates ubiquitinated forms)
Examine mobility shifts in Western blots that may indicate modified forms
Use 2D gel electrophoresis to separate MRPS2 isoforms by charge and size
Technical recommendations:
For phosphorylation studies: Include calyculin A or okadaic acid in lysis buffers
For acetylation detection: Add trichostatin A during sample preparation
For detecting all forms: Use antibodies targeting regions less prone to modification
When possible, validate findings with mass spectrometry to identify specific modifications
Understanding the impact of PTMs on antibody recognition is crucial for accurate interpretation of experimental data, particularly when studying regulatory mechanisms affecting MRPS2 function.
Weak or inconsistent MRPS2 signals in Western blots can be systematically improved through the following optimization strategies:
Sample preparation optimization:
Ensure complete protein extraction with appropriate lysis buffers
Add protease inhibitor cocktail to prevent degradation
Consider mitochondrial enrichment to concentrate MRPS2 protein
Avoid repeated freeze-thaw cycles of protein samples
Verify protein concentration using reliable methods (BCA assay)
Technical parameter adjustment:
Increase protein loading (up to 50-75μg per lane)
Optimize primary antibody concentration (try 1:500 instead of 1:1000)
Extend primary antibody incubation time (up to 48 hours at 4°C)
Switch membrane type (PVDF may give better results than nitrocellulose)
Reduce washing stringency (lower salt concentration in wash buffer)
Signal enhancement strategies:
Antibody selection considerations:
Positive control implementation:
This comprehensive troubleshooting approach addresses the most common causes of weak or inconsistent MRPS2 signals in Western blotting.
For publication-grade research using MRPS2 antibodies, implement these rigorous quality control measures:
Pre-experimental validation:
Verify antibody specificity through knockout/knockdown controls
Document antibody lot number, catalog number, and vendor
Perform titration experiments to determine optimal concentration
Conduct cross-reactivity testing against related mitochondrial ribosomal proteins
Experimental controls:
Include positive controls (tissues/cells with confirmed MRPS2 expression)
Run negative controls (tissues/cells lacking MRPS2 expression)
Use technical replicates (minimum 3) to assess reproducibility
Include loading controls appropriate for the subcellular fraction
For mitochondrial proteins, consider VDAC or COX IV as loading controls
Quantification and statistical analysis:
Normalize MRPS2 signals to appropriate loading controls
Present data from multiple independent experiments (n≥3)
Apply appropriate statistical tests based on data distribution
Report effect sizes alongside p-values
Include representative images alongside quantitative data
Documentation and reporting:
Create detailed tables of antibody characteristics:
| Antibody Information | Details |
|---|---|
| Target | MRPS2 (Mitochondrial Ribosomal Protein S2) |
| Host Species | Rabbit |
| Clonality | Polyclonal |
| Immunogen | Recombinant Human MRPS2 (AA 1-296) |
| Applications Validated | WB (1:1000), ELISA, IHC (1:200) |
| Detected Molecular Weight | 33kDa |
| Species Reactivity | Human |
| Catalog Number | ABIN7142256 |
| Lot Number | [specific to experiment] |
| RRID | [Research Resource Identifier] |
Report detailed methodologies including blocking conditions, incubation times/temperatures
Disclose any image processing or quantification methods
Include supplementary validation data if space-limited in main manuscript
Antibody validation reporting:
Follow antibody validation guidelines from journals and societies
Document multiple antibody validation approaches used
Share original, unmodified blot/image data in supplementary materials
Consider publicly sharing validation data through repositories
These quality control measures ensure experimental rigor and reproducibility when using MRPS2 antibodies in scientific publications.
MRPS2 antibodies offer valuable tools for investigating mitochondrial disease mechanisms through these advanced approaches:
Diagnostic biomarker development:
Quantify MRPS2 levels in patient tissues/cells vs. healthy controls
Correlate MRPS2 abundance with mitochondrial translation efficiency
Assess MRPS2 incorporation into mitoribosomal complexes
Develop immunoassays for detecting abnormal MRPS2 expression/localization
Pathophysiological mechanism elucidation:
Use MRPS2 antibodies to assess mitoribosome integrity in disease models
Perform proximity labeling to identify altered MRPS2 protein interactions
Correlate mitochondrial translation defects with MRPS2 dynamics
Implement time-course studies to track disease progression at molecular level
Therapeutic response monitoring:
Evaluate MRPS2 expression/localization changes during treatment
Assess normalization of mitoribosome assembly following intervention
Develop companion diagnostic applications using MRPS2 antibodies
Create quantitative assays correlating MRPS2 status with clinical outcomes
Genetic variant characterization:
Analyze impact of MRPS2 mutations on protein expression/stability
Compare mutant vs. wild-type MRPS2 localization using immunofluorescence
Assess functional consequences using antibody-based functional assays
Validate pathogenicity of variants of uncertain significance
Mitochondrial quality control pathway investigation:
Track MRPS2 turnover under normal vs. stressed conditions
Study MRPS2 involvement in mitochondrial unfolded protein response
Examine MRPS2 fate during mitophagy using co-localization studies
Assess MRPS2 as a marker for mitochondrial homeostasis
These applications demonstrate how MRPS2 antibodies can advance understanding of fundamental disease mechanisms and potentially inform therapeutic approaches for mitochondrial disorders.
Integration of MRPS2 antibodies with cutting-edge imaging technologies enables powerful new approaches to mitochondrial research:
Super-resolution microscopy applications:
STED microscopy: Achieves ~30-50nm resolution to visualize individual mitoribosomes
STORM/PALM: Single-molecule localization microscopy reveals MRPS2 nanoscale organization
SIM: Structured illumination provides ~100nm resolution for mitoribosome distribution studies
Implementation protocol: Use highly specific primary MRPS2 antibodies with minimal cross-reactivity, followed by fluorophore-conjugated secondary antibodies optimized for super-resolution techniques
Live-cell imaging strategies:
Combine mini-antibody fragments (Fab, nanobodies) against MRPS2 with cell-penetrating peptides
Implement SNAP/CLIP-tag labeling of MRPS2 for pulse-chase dynamics
Use split-GFP complementation to visualize MRPS2 interactions in living cells
Track mitoribosome assembly/disassembly in real-time during cellular stress
Correlative light and electron microscopy (CLEM):
Localize MRPS2 via immunofluorescence, then examine ultrastructure of same region
Use immunogold labeling with MRPS2 antibodies for precise electron microscopy localization
Implement cryo-CLEM to preserve native structures during MRPS2 visualization
Quantify spatial relationships between mitoribosomes and other mitochondrial structures
Expansion microscopy protocols:
Physically expand samples 4-10x using polyelectrolyte hydrogels
Use standard confocal microscopy to achieve effective super-resolution imaging of MRPS2
Perform multiplexed immunolabeling to examine MRPS2 in context of other mitochondrial components
Recommended protocol: Post-fixation immunolabeling using MRPS2 antibodies at 1:100-1:200 dilution
Volumetric imaging approaches:
Implement tissue clearing techniques (CLARITY, iDISCO) compatible with MRPS2 immunolabeling
Perform light-sheet microscopy to visualize MRPS2 distribution throughout intact tissues
Create 3D reconstructions of mitochondrial networks with MRPS2 localization
Quantify spatial heterogeneity of MRPS2 expression across different cellular regions