MRTO4 is an independent prognostic biomarker and oncogenic driver in HCC:
| Clinicopathological Feature | Association with MRTO4 Expression | P Value |
|---|---|---|
| Tumor Stage (T) | Positively correlated | <0.001* |
| Histologic Grade | Positively correlated | <0.001* |
| Metastasis (M) | No significant correlation | 0.553 |
| Lymph Node Involvement (N) | No significant correlation | 1.000 |
Cryo-EM studies reveal MRTO4’s involvement in pre-60S ribosomal particle maturation :
Nuclear Export Checkpoint: Associates with NMD3 and GTPBP4 to ensure ribosomal subunit quality control.
Dynamic Interactions:
MRTO4 expression is modulated by diverse stimuli:
| Compound/Stimulus | Effect on MRTO4 | Model System |
|---|---|---|
| Bisphenol A | ↓ Methylation & expression | Human/mouse cells |
| Cadmium | ↑ Expression | Mouse cells |
| 5-Fluorouracil | ↓ IC50 (enhanced efficacy) | HCC patients |
| Sorafenib | ↓ IC50 (enhanced efficacy) | HCC patients |
MRTO4 influences tumor microenvironment (TME) and drug responses:
Immune Checkpoints: Positively correlates with PD-1, CTLA-4, and LAG3 expression (P<0.05) .
Immunotherapy Prediction: Low MRTO4 expression associates with higher immunophenoscore (IPS), suggesting better anti-PD1/CTLA4 response .
Targeted Therapy: High MRTO4 expression enhances sensitivity to gemcitabine and sorafenib (P<1e-06) .
Genes co-expressed with MRTO4 in HCC are enriched in:
Ribosome Biogenesis: Spliceosome, RNA processing, and catalytic activity (GO/KEGG) .
Metabolic Reprogramming: Glycolysis/gluconeogenesis pathways (FDR<0.05) .
Therapeutic Targeting: Small-molecule inhibitors of MRTO4 could disrupt ribosome biogenesis in cancers .
Biomarker Validation: Prospective studies needed to confirm MRTO4’s utility in HCC stratification and immunotherapy guidance .
MRTO4 exemplifies the intersection of ribosomal biology and oncology, offering dual diagnostic and therapeutic potential. Its regulatory complexity underscores the need for integrated omics approaches to unravel context-specific roles in disease.
MRTO4 is a trans-acting factor involved in ribosome biogenesis, located on human chromosome 17q25.3 . It contains a C-terminal extension similar to the C-terminal part of ribosomal P proteins, which is significant for its cellular function . The protein plays a critical role in ribosome maturation, a fundamental process required for protein synthesis and cellular homeostasis .
Methodological approach for studying MRTO4's function:
Expression and purification of recombinant MRTO4
Ribosome profiling and polysome analysis
Co-immunoprecipitation to identify interaction partners
Subcellular localization studies using fluorescence microscopy
MRTO4 is significantly overexpressed in various tumors, including HCC, compared to normal tissues . Analyses from The Cancer Genome Atlas (TCGA) database and Gene Expression Omnibus (GEO) datasets (GSE121248 and GSE45267) have confirmed elevated expression of MRTO4 in HCC tissues compared to adjacent normal tissues .
Experimental approach:
RT-qPCR using primers specific for MRTO4 (Forward: TGGCCAACATGAGGAACAGC, Reverse: TTCATCAGATGGGCTCCGAC)
Immunohistochemistry of tissue microarrays
Western blotting with MRTO4-specific antibodies
Analysis of public databases (TCGA, GEO) for expression patterns
Human MRTO4 undergoes phosphorylation in vivo. Specifically, serines S229, S233, and S235, located within its acidic C-termini, have been identified as targets of phosphorylation by CK2 kinase in vitro . These modifications don't alter MRTO4's subcellular distribution under standard conditions but significantly affect its molecular behavior during ActD-induced nucleolar stress .
Methods for studying MRTO4 phosphorylation:
In vitro kinase assays with purified CK2
Phospho-specific antibodies
Mass spectrometry analysis of phosphorylation sites
Site-directed mutagenesis of target serines to alanines or phosphomimetic residues
MRTO4 enhances glycolysis in HCC cells primarily through the inhibition of ALDOB (Aldolase B) . This inhibition leads to metabolic reprogramming that favors glycolysis, a hallmark of cancer metabolism often referred to as the Warburg effect. The enhanced glycolysis driven by MRTO4 supports rapid cancer cell proliferation, invasion, and suppresses apoptosis in HCC cells .
Experimental design for studying MRTO4-mediated glycolysis:
Measurement of glycolytic parameters (glucose uptake, lactate production, extracellular acidification rate)
Expression analysis of glycolytic enzymes
ALDOB activity assays after MRTO4 modulation
Co-immunoprecipitation to confirm MRTO4-ALDOB interaction
Chromatin immunoprecipitation to identify potential transcriptional regulation
Kaplan-Meier survival analysis of TCGA data
Univariate and multivariate Cox regression analyses
Construction of nomograms for predicting HCC survival
ROC curve analysis to evaluate diagnostic performance
The table below shows the correlation between MRTO4 expression and clinical characteristics in HCC patients:
| Characteristics | Low expression of MRTO4 | High expression of MRTO4 | P value |
|---|---|---|---|
| Pathologic T stage | <0.001* | ||
| T1 | 112 (30.2%) | 71 (19.1%) | |
| T2 | 35 (9.4%) | 60 (16.2%) | |
| T3 | 32 (8.6%) | 48 (12.9%) | |
| T4 | 6 (1.6%) | 7 (1.9%) | |
| Tumor status | 0.040* | ||
| Tumor free | 112 (31.5%) | 90 (25.4%) | |
| With tumor | 68 (19.2%) | 85 (23.9%) | |
| Pathologic stage | <0.001* | ||
| Stage I | 103 (29.4%) | 70 (20%) | |
| Stage II | 33 (9.4%) | 54 (15.4%) | |
| Stage III | 33 (9.4%) | 52 (14.9%) | |
| Stage IV | 4 (1.1%) | 1 (0.3%) |
Data from TCGA database analysis
MRTO4 expression correlates significantly with immune cell infiltration in the tumor microenvironment (TME) . Studies show that:
TME scores (stromal scores, immune scores, and ESTIMATE scores) were significantly higher in the low MRTO4 group compared to the high MRTO4 group in HCC .
The average immunophenoscore (IPS) of the low MRTO4 group was significantly higher than that of the high MRTO4 group .
MRTO4 expression is positively correlated with tumor mutation burden (TMB) .
MRTO4 expression shows positive correlation with most immune checkpoint gene expressions in HCC .
Methodological approaches:
Single-sample Gene Set Enrichment Analysis (ssGSEA)
CIBERSORT for immune cell deconvolution
Spearman's correlation coefficient analysis
Analysis of immune checkpoint gene expression
Researchers have successfully employed multiple experimental models to investigate MRTO4 function:
In vitro cell models:
HCC cell lines (HepG2, MHCC97H)
Transfection with siRNA (si-MRTO4) or overexpression vectors (OE-MRTO4)
Functional assays: CCK8, TUNEL, clone formation, Transwell assay
In vivo models:
Bioinformatics approaches:
Drug sensitivity analysis shows significantly higher IC50 values for several chemotherapeutic agents in patients with low MRTO4 expression compared to those with high MRTO4 expression . Specifically:
5-fluorouracil: Lower sensitivity in low MRTO4 expression group
Gemcitabine: Lower sensitivity in low MRTO4 expression group
Sorafenib: Lower sensitivity in low MRTO4 expression group
This suggests MRTO4 expression levels could serve as a biomarker for predicting treatment response in HCC patients .
Methodological approach for drug sensitivity studies:
pRRophetic R package for predicting IC50 values
Cell viability assays after drug treatment in MRTO4-manipulated cells
Combination therapy experiments
Analysis of apoptotic markers and cell cycle progression
Given MRTO4's role in promoting HCC progression, several therapeutic approaches could be considered:
RNA interference strategies:
Small molecule inhibitors:
Targeting MRTO4's interaction with ALDOB
Inhibiting MRTO4's phosphorylation by CK2 kinase
Combination therapies:
MRTO4 inhibition combined with glycolysis inhibitors
MRTO4 targeting alongside conventional chemotherapeutics
Experimental approaches for validation:
In vitro efficacy studies in HCC cell lines
In vivo tumor models with MRTO4 inhibition
Pharmacokinetic and pharmacodynamic analyses
Assessment of glycolytic parameters after treatment
MRTO4 has an essential role in normal ribosome biogenesis , yet its overexpression promotes cancer progression . This dual functionality presents a challenge for therapeutic targeting.
Approaches to address this conflict:
Therapeutic window exploration:
Determine differential expression levels between normal and cancer cells
Identify cancer-specific vulnerabilities related to MRTO4 overexpression
Targeting cancer-specific interactions:
Focus on MRTO4-ALDOB interaction in cancer cells
Target post-translational modifications specific to cancer contexts
Conditional targeting strategies:
Cancer-specific promoters for gene therapy approaches
Tumor microenvironment-responsive drug delivery systems
Synthetic lethality approaches:
Identify genes that, when inhibited alongside MRTO4, cause selective cancer cell death
Based on published research, the following have proven effective:
RT-qPCR primers for MRTO4:
Control gene primers (GAPDH):
Antibodies:
While specific antibodies were not detailed in the search results, researchers typically use:
Anti-MRTO4 antibodies for Western blotting and immunohistochemistry
Phospho-specific antibodies for detecting MRTO4 phosphorylation states
Tagged recombinant MRTO4 (with FLAG, HA, or GFP tags) for localization studies
To comprehensively analyze MRTO4's impact on cancer cell metabolism:
Glycolytic pathway analysis:
Measure glucose uptake using fluorescent glucose analogs
Quantify lactate production with colorimetric or enzymatic assays
Assess extracellular acidification rate (ECAR) using Seahorse XF analyzer
Measure expression and activity of key glycolytic enzymes
Metabolomics approaches:
Untargeted metabolomics to identify broader metabolic changes
Targeted analysis of glycolytic intermediates
Stable isotope tracing to track carbon flow through metabolic pathways
Energy metabolism assessment:
Oxygen consumption rate (OCR) measurement
ATP production assays
Analysis of mitochondrial function
Integration with functional assays:
Correlate metabolic changes with proliferation, invasion, and survival phenotypes
Use metabolic inhibitors to rescue MRTO4-induced phenotypes
Based on the research, effective bioinformatic approaches include:
Expression analysis across cancer types:
Retrieval of mRNA expression data from TCGA, GEO, and other databases
Differential expression analysis between tumor and normal tissues
Expression correlation with clinical parameters
Survival analysis:
Kaplan-Meier curves using the 'survival' package in R
Univariate and multivariate Cox regression analysis
Construction of predictive nomograms with the 'rms' R package
Functional analysis:
Gene Ontology (GO) enrichment analysis
Kyoto Encyclopedia of Genes and Genomes (KEGG) pathway analysis
Protein-Protein Interaction (PPI) network construction using STRING database and visualization with Cytoscape 3.9.1
Immune and microenvironment analysis:
ESTIMATE algorithm for stromal and immune scores
ssGSEA for immune cell infiltration analysis
CIBERSORT for detailed immune cell type evaluation
Drug sensitivity prediction:
pRRophetic R package for predicting IC50 values of different drugs
While MRTO4's roles in ribosome biogenesis and cancer metabolism are established, several emerging areas warrant investigation:
Stress response pathways:
Immune regulation:
Post-transcriptional regulation:
Possible roles in RNA processing or stability
Interactions with non-coding RNAs
Methodological approaches for exploring these roles:
RNA-seq and CLIP-seq analyses
Proximity labeling proteomics
Single-cell transcriptomics under various stress conditions
Immune cell co-culture systems
Researchers may encounter contradictory findings regarding MRTO4 function. These contradictions can be addressed through:
Cell type-specific analyses:
Compare MRTO4 function across different cell types and cancer subtypes
Determine context-dependent effects
Temporal dynamics studies:
Analyze MRTO4 function at different time points
Use inducible systems for temporal control of MRTO4 expression
Dose-dependent effects evaluation:
Study effects of varying levels of MRTO4 overexpression or knockdown
Determine thresholds for different cellular responses
In vivo validation:
Confirm in vitro findings in appropriate animal models
Use tissue-specific conditional knockout models
Multi-omics integration:
Combine transcriptomics, proteomics, and metabolomics data
Use systems biology approaches to model complex interactions
Several cutting-edge technologies could significantly enhance MRTO4 research:
CRISPR-based technologies:
CRISPR activation/interference for precise modulation of MRTO4 expression
Base editing for introducing specific mutations
CRISPR screens to identify synthetic lethal interactions
Advanced imaging techniques:
Super-resolution microscopy for detailed localization studies
Live-cell imaging to track MRTO4 dynamics
FRET/BRET for studying protein-protein interactions in real-time
Single-cell technologies:
Single-cell RNA-seq to capture heterogeneity in MRTO4 expression
Single-cell proteomics for protein-level analysis
Spatial transcriptomics to understand tissue context
Organoid models:
Patient-derived organoids for personalized MRTO4 studies
Co-culture systems with immune cells to study microenvironment interactions
AI and machine learning approaches:
Prediction of MRTO4 interaction networks
Identification of novel therapeutic targets in MRTO4-related pathways
Integration of multi-omics data for comprehensive understanding
MRTO4 is a nucleolar component involved in ribosome assembly. It shares significant similarity with the ribosomal protein P0 and competes for binding to the 25S rRNA GAR domain . The human MRTO4 protein consists of 239 amino acids and has a molecular weight of approximately 29.9 kDa . It is typically expressed in E. coli for recombinant protein production and is often tagged with a His-tag for purification purposes .
MRTO4 is primarily involved in the early stages of ribosome assembly. It binds to pre-ribosomal particles and is later replaced by the ribosomal protein P0 during the maturation process . This replacement is crucial for the proper formation of functional ribosomes. MRTO4’s role in mRNA turnover and ribosome assembly makes it an essential protein for maintaining cellular homeostasis and efficient protein synthesis .
Research on MRTO4 has provided insights into its biophysical characteristics and its role in ribosome assembly. Studies have shown that MRTO4 has a typical α-helix structure and possesses rRNA-binding domains and translation factor binding domains . These structural features are essential for its function in ribosome assembly and mRNA turnover.
Recombinant MRTO4 is used in various research applications, including studies on ribosome assembly, protein synthesis, and cellular homeostasis. The availability of recombinant MRTO4 allows researchers to investigate its interactions with other ribosomal proteins and its role in the overall process of ribosome biogenesis .