How to validate MTERF1 antibody specificity for mitochondrial protein studies?
Perform knockout validation using CRISPR/Cas9-edited cell lines (e.g., HCT116 or HT29 CRC cells) to confirm antibody signal loss in MTERF1-deficient models .
Combine subcellular fractionation (mitochondrial isolation) with Western blotting to verify mitochondrial localization .
Use peptide competition assays with the immunogen sequence (e.g., aa 1-200 of human MTERF1) to test binding specificity .
What experimental models are suitable for studying MTERF1's role in mitochondrial transcription?
In vitro transcription assays: Use templates containing LSP (light-strand promoter) or HSP (heavy-strand promoter) with recombinant MTERF1 to assess termination efficiency .
Xenograft tumor models: Compare MTERF1-overexpressing vs. knockdown CRC cell lines (e.g., HT29 and HCT116) to evaluate tumor growth and mitochondrial OXPHOS activity .
How to resolve contradictions in MTERF1's reported roles in transcription termination vs. replication fork regulation?
What methodologies detect MTERF1's impact on mitochondrial genome stability?
How to address nonspecific binding in MTERF1 immunoprecipitation (IP) studies?
Why do some studies report MTERF1 as oncogenic while others emphasize housekeeping roles?
Context-dependent analysis:
Experimental design: Compare cell-type-specific interactomes using BioID or APEX2 proximity labeling.