MTFR1 is a mitochondrial protein that regulates mitochondrial fission, a process critical for cellular energy distribution, apoptosis, and cancer progression . Dysregulation of MTFR1 has been implicated in lung adenocarcinoma (LUAD), where its overexpression correlates with aggressive tumor behavior, drug resistance, and poor patient prognosis .
The MTFR1 antibody has been rigorously validated across multiple studies for specificity and functionality:
Techniques:
Validation Metrics:
Proliferation: MTFR1 knockdown reduced LUAD cell proliferation by 40–60% (CCK-8 assay) .
Migration/Invasion: Suppression of MTFR1 decreased migration and invasion by 50–70% (Transwell assay) .
Drug Resistance: MTFR1 overexpression reduced cisplatin sensitivity via p-AKT/p-ERK pathways .
Metabolism: Enhanced glycolysis (ECAR increased by 1.5×) via AMPK/mTOR signaling .
MTFR1 drives oncogenic effects through:
AKT/ERK Signaling: Phosphorylates AKT and ERK/P38 to promote cell survival and chemoresistance .
AMPK/mTOR Axis: Modulates glycolytic metabolism (Warburg effect) by regulating p-AMPK and p-mTOR levels .
miR-29c-3p Regulation: Directly targeted by tumor-suppressive miR-29c-3p, which inversely correlates with MTFR1 expression (r = -0.68) .
Prognostic Biomarker: High MTFR1 expression predicts poor survival (HR = 2.1, 95% CI: 1.4–3.2) .
Therapeutic Target: Preclinical models show that MTFR1 inhibition sensitizes tumors to cisplatin and reduces metastasis .
Consistency: Overexpression validated in 85 LUAD tissue pairs (IHC) and TCGA/GEO datasets .
Limitations:
Develop MTFR1-targeted therapies (e.g., siRNA or small-molecule inhibitors).
Explore combinatorial strategies with cisplatin or immunotherapy.
Validate antibody performance in multi-center cohorts.
KEGG: dre:494035
UniGene: Dr.79625
MTFR1 is a 37 kDa protein that regulates mitochondrial fission processes. It is also known as CHPPR (Chondrocyte Protein with a Poly-Proline Region) and FAM54A2. MTFR1 plays a critical role in maintaining mitochondrial organization and influences mitochondrial aerobic respiration . The protein also affects mitochondrial dynamics, linking fission processes to broader cellular functions and energy balance .
Recent studies have revealed that MTFR1 is involved in cancer progression. It promotes proliferation, invasion, migration, and enhances glycolytic capacity in lung adenocarcinoma (LUAD) cells while inhibiting apoptosis . MTFR1 has also been implicated in drug resistance mechanisms, particularly resistance to cisplatin in cancer cells .
Multiple manufacturers offer MTFR1 antibodies with varying applications and specificities. The most commonly validated applications include:
Most commercially available MTFR1 antibodies are rabbit polyclonal antibodies, though mouse polyclonal options exist as well . Antibodies targeting different epitopes are available, including those against N-terminal, middle region, and C-terminal portions of the protein .
Most MTFR1 antibodies show reactivity to human MTFR1, with many also cross-reacting with mouse and rat orthologs due to sequence homology. According to the product specifications from multiple suppliers:
| Species | Reactivity Reported |
|---|---|
| Human | Most antibodies |
| Mouse | Many antibodies |
| Rat | Many antibodies |
| Dog | Some antibodies |
| Rabbit | Some antibodies |
When selecting an MTFR1 antibody for cross-species applications, it's advisable to check the validation data provided by manufacturers and perform preliminary validation experiments in your specific model system.
For successful Western blot detection of MTFR1, consider the following protocol optimizations:
Sample preparation:
NETN buffer has been successfully used for MTFR1 detection in immunoprecipitation experiments
Include protease inhibitors in all lysis buffers
Determine optimal protein loading (40 μg of total protein has been successful in published studies )
Electrophoresis conditions:
10-12% SDS-PAGE gels are recommended for optimal resolution of the 37 kDa MTFR1 protein
Always include positive controls (A549, HCT 116, HepG2, or SW480 cells have shown good MTFR1 expression )
Antibody dilution and detection:
Primary antibody dilutions of 1:500-1:2000 are typically effective
Overnight incubation at 4°C may improve specific signal
Use appropriate HRP-conjugated secondary antibodies
MTFR1 usually appears as a single band at approximately 37 kDa
Troubleshooting:
If high background occurs, increase blocking time or adjust antibody dilution
For weak signals, consider longer exposure times or signal enhancement systems
Validate results using multiple antibodies targeting different epitopes
Successful immunohistochemistry (IHC) with MTFR1 antibodies requires attention to several key parameters:
Tissue fixation and processing:
Formalin-fixed paraffin-embedded (FFPE) tissues have been successfully used with MTFR1 antibodies
Consistent fixation times (typically 24-48 hours) are important for reproducible results
Fresh tissue sections yield optimal results
Antigen retrieval:
Heat-induced epitope retrieval (HIER) is generally recommended
Test both citrate buffer (pH 6.0) and EDTA buffer (pH 9.0) to determine optimal conditions
Ensure sufficient retrieval time while preventing tissue damage
Antibody concentration:
Start with manufacturer-recommended dilutions (typically 1:40-1:500 for MTFR1 antibodies)
Perform titration experiments to determine optimal concentration for your specific tissue
Consider signal amplification systems for low-expressing tissues
Controls and interpretation:
Include positive control tissues (thyroid cancer tissue has been documented to show strong MTFR1 expression )
Use both positive and negative controls in every experiment
MTFR1 typically shows cytoplasmic staining with a mitochondrial pattern
Consider digital image analysis for quantitative assessment
Comprehensive validation of MTFR1 antibody specificity should include multiple complementary approaches:
Genetic validation:
Use MTFR1 knockdown/knockout controls generated with siRNA, shRNA, or CRISPR-Cas9
Studies have successfully used shRNA constructs to knock down MTFR1 in cancer cell lines
Observe the corresponding decrease in signal with specific antibodies
Positive and negative controls:
Use cell lines with known MTFR1 expression levels (A549, HCT 116, HepG2, and SW480 cells express MTFR1 at detectable levels )
Compare with non-expressing or low-expressing cell lines or tissues
Multiple detection methods:
Confirm results across different applications (WB, IHC, IF)
Correlate protein detection with mRNA expression data
Recombinant protein control:
When available, use purified recombinant MTFR1 as a positive control
Consider peptide competition assays where the immunizing peptide blocks specific binding
Multiple antibodies:
Compare results using antibodies targeting different epitopes of MTFR1
Consistent detection across multiple antibodies increases confidence in specificity
Expected molecular weight verification:
MTFR1 antibodies are valuable tools for investigating the role of this protein in cancer progression through multiple experimental approaches:
Expression analysis in clinical samples:
Immunohistochemistry with MTFR1 antibodies can evaluate expression across tumor stages and grades
Studies have shown that MTFR1 is upregulated in lung adenocarcinoma tissues compared to normal lung tissues
High MTFR1 expression correlates with poor prognosis, advanced clinical stage, lymph node metastasis, and larger tumor size in LUAD
Functional studies:
Western blot with MTFR1 antibodies can confirm successful manipulation of MTFR1 expression in knockout or overexpression studies
Research has demonstrated that MTFR1 overexpression stimulates proliferation, invasion, migration, and glycolytic capacity while inhibiting apoptosis of LUAD cells
Knockdown of MTFR1 has shown opposite effects, reducing cancer cell growth and aggressiveness
Mechanistic investigations:
Immunoprecipitation with MTFR1 antibodies can identify protein-protein interactions
Studies have identified that MTFR1 may exert its biological functions through the AMPK/mTOR signaling pathway
MTFR1 has also been shown to promote drug resistance via p-AKT and p-ERK/P38 signaling pathways
Regulatory pathway analysis:
MTFR1 is directly targeted by miR-29c-3p, and this regulatory relationship can be studied using MTFR1 antibodies to confirm protein level changes
Combined analysis of MTFR1 expression and miRNA levels can provide insights into regulatory mechanisms
Therapeutic potential assessment:
MTFR1 antibodies can monitor changes in expression following treatment with various therapeutic agents
Evaluating MTFR1 expression in drug-resistant cell lines (such as A549/DDP cells) can reveal its role in resistance mechanisms
MTFR1 antibodies provide powerful tools for investigating mitochondrial dynamics and fission processes:
Localization studies:
Immunofluorescence with MTFR1 antibodies can visualize the protein's distribution in relation to mitochondria
Co-staining with mitochondrial markers (MitoTracker, TOMM20) can confirm mitochondrial localization
Super-resolution microscopy can provide detailed analysis of MTFR1 at fission sites
Dynamic regulation analysis:
Time-course experiments with MTFR1 antibodies can track expression changes during induced mitochondrial stress
Western blot analysis can detect post-translational modifications that might regulate MTFR1 activity
Subcellular fractionation followed by Western blot can assess MTFR1 distribution between cytosolic and mitochondrial compartments
Protein-protein interaction studies:
Co-immunoprecipitation with MTFR1 antibodies can identify interactions with known fission proteins (DRP1, FIS1, MFF)
Proximity ligation assays can visualize and quantify protein interactions in situ
Mass spectrometry analysis of immunoprecipitated complexes can identify novel interactors
Functional perturbation approaches:
Combined use of MTFR1 antibodies with genetic manipulation (knockdown/overexpression) can validate the effects on mitochondrial morphology
Live-cell imaging with mitochondrial markers can track dynamic changes in mitochondrial network organization
Quantitative analysis:
Digital image analysis of immunofluorescence data can provide metrics of mitochondrial morphology (size, number, interconnectivity)
Correlation of MTFR1 levels with mitochondrial network parameters can establish functional relationships
MTFR1 has been implicated in cancer drug resistance, particularly to cisplatin in lung adenocarcinoma. MTFR1 antibodies enable comprehensive investigation of this phenomenon:
Expression analysis in resistant models:
Western blot with MTFR1 antibodies can compare expression in paired sensitive and resistant cell lines
Studies have shown that inhibition of MTFR1 expression could promote the sensitivity of A549/DDP cells (cisplatin-resistant) to cisplatin
Immunohistochemistry can assess MTFR1 expression in patient samples before and after treatment
Signaling pathway analysis:
MTFR1 expression has been linked to activation of p-AKT and p-ERK/P38 signaling pathways in drug-resistant cells
Western blot with phospho-specific antibodies can monitor these pathways in relation to MTFR1 manipulation
Co-immunoprecipitation with MTFR1 antibodies can identify relevant interacting proteins in the resistance mechanism
Experimental model design:
Create resistance models by exposing cells to increasing concentrations of chemotherapeutic agents
Use MTFR1 antibodies to track expression changes during resistance development
Manipulate MTFR1 expression in sensitive and resistant cells to assess its direct role in resistance
Mechanistic investigations:
Combine MTFR1 antibody-based detection with functional readouts like cell viability, apoptosis, and drug uptake
Investigate metabolic alterations associated with MTFR1-mediated resistance
Analyze mitochondrial dynamics changes in resistant cells using immunofluorescence
Therapeutic targeting assessment:
Test combination approaches using MTFR1 inhibition with conventional chemotherapy
Evaluate miR-29c-3p (which targets MTFR1) as a potential therapeutic approach
Monitor MTFR1 expression changes in response to various targeted therapies
Inconsistent results across different experimental platforms when using MTFR1 antibodies can be systematically addressed through the following approaches:
Understand method-specific differences:
Each detection method measures different aspects of MTFR1 expression and localization
Different antibodies may recognize epitopes that are differentially accessible in various applications
Post-translational modifications may affect antibody binding in application-specific ways
Antibody selection considerations:
Test multiple MTFR1 antibodies targeting different epitopes
Compare monoclonal (higher specificity) with polyclonal (multiple epitopes) antibodies
Validate each antibody in each specific application rather than assuming cross-application performance
Protocol optimization:
For Western blot: Optimize lysis conditions, sample preparation, and gel percentage
For IHC/IF: Test different fixation methods, antigen retrieval protocols, and detection systems
For IP: Evaluate different lysis buffers and binding conditions
Sample preparation variables:
Consider the impact of cell culture conditions on MTFR1 expression
Standardize sample collection and processing
Test the stability of MTFR1 under various storage conditions
Quantification approaches:
Use digital image analysis with consistent parameters
Include calibration standards where possible
Apply the same quantification methodology across experiments
Validation with orthogonal methods:
Correlate protein detection with mRNA levels
Confirm functional consequences through phenotypic assays
Use genetic manipulation (overexpression/knockdown) to create reference standards
Several common issues may arise when working with MTFR1 antibodies. Here are strategies to address them:
High background in immunoblotting:
Increase blocking time or concentration (5% BSA or milk)
Optimize antibody concentration (test dilutions from 1:500-1:2000)
Include additional washing steps with higher detergent concentration
Use more specific secondary antibodies with minimal cross-reactivity
Weak or absent signal:
Confirm MTFR1 expression in your samples (use positive controls like A549 cells )
Try alternative extraction methods to improve protein recovery
Increase protein loading (up to 40-50 μg)
Consider signal enhancement systems or longer exposure times
Test antibodies against different epitopes, as some may be inaccessible
Multiple bands in Western blot:
Include appropriate positive and negative controls
Test freshly prepared samples to rule out degradation
Use more specific antibodies or optimize blocking conditions
Consider the possibility of isoforms or post-translational modifications
Poor immunohistochemical staining:
Optimize antigen retrieval (test both citrate and EDTA-based methods)
Adjust antibody concentration and incubation time
Test different detection systems (polymer-based vs. ABC method)
Consider amplification systems for low-expressing tissues
Ensure proper tissue fixation and processing
Immunoprecipitation difficulties:
Test different lysis buffers to maintain protein interactions
Pre-clear lysates to reduce non-specific binding
Optimize bead type and binding conditions
Include appropriate controls (IgG, input, unbound fraction)
Proper quantification and presentation of MTFR1 expression data is essential for publication. Consider these best practices:
Western blot quantification:
Use densitometry software to measure band intensity
Normalize to appropriate loading controls (β-actin, GAPDH, or mitochondrial markers)
Present data as fold change relative to control samples
Include representative blot images showing all experimental conditions
Report the molecular weight of detected bands (37 kDa for MTFR1 )
Immunohistochemistry quantification:
Use standardized scoring systems (H-score, Allred, or percentage positive cells)
Consider both staining intensity and proportion of positive cells
Employ digital image analysis for objective quantification
Have multiple observers score samples independently to ensure reliability
Present representative images of different staining patterns
Immunofluorescence data:
Quantify signal intensity with appropriate background subtraction
Assess co-localization with mitochondrial markers using established metrics
Present data as mean fluorescence intensity or percent co-localization
Include scale bars and magnification information
Show representative images with appropriate controls
Statistical analysis:
Apply appropriate statistical tests based on data distribution
Include sufficient sample sizes (n values) for statistical power
Report both statistical significance (p-values) and effect sizes
Use consistent statistical methods across different experiments
Address potential confounding variables in your analysis
Data visualization:
Present quantitative data in graphs with error bars representing variation
Use consistent axes and scaling across related experiments
Include all data points in addition to means when sample size is small
Consider heat maps for complex expression patterns across multiple samples
Use color-blind friendly palettes for accessibility
Publication requirements:
Include detailed methods sections describing antibody source, catalog number, and dilutions
Report specific protocols used for quantification
Provide all necessary controls (positive, negative, loading, etc.)
Make raw data available in supplementary materials or repositories
MTFR1 antibodies provide essential tools for exploring the intricate connection between mitochondrial fission and cancer metabolism:
Expression correlation studies:
Western blotting with MTFR1 antibodies can quantify expression across cell lines with different metabolic phenotypes
Studies have demonstrated that MTFR1 overexpression enhances glycolytic capacity in cancer cells
Comparing MTFR1 levels with glycolytic markers (such as GLUT1, HK2, LDHA) can establish functional relationships
Mitochondrial morphology assessment:
Immunofluorescence with MTFR1 antibodies enables visualization of mitochondrial network fragmentation
Research has shown that mitochondrial dynamics affect cancer cell metabolism, with fission often promoting a glycolytic phenotype
Quantitative image analysis can correlate MTFR1 expression with mitochondrial fragmentation and metabolic parameters
Functional metabolic analysis:
MTFR1 manipulation (knockdown/overexpression) verified by antibody detection can be correlated with:
Glycolytic capacity (extracellular acidification rate, glucose consumption, lactate production)
Oxidative phosphorylation (oxygen consumption rate, ATP production)
Metabolite profiles using mass spectrometry
Studies have demonstrated that MTFR1 knockdown impairs glycolytic capacity of cancer cells
Pathway interaction studies:
Co-immunoprecipitation with MTFR1 antibodies can identify interactions with:
Therapeutic targeting approaches:
MTFR1 antibodies can monitor expression changes after treatment with:
Metabolic inhibitors (targeting glycolysis or OXPHOS)
Mitochondrial fission/fusion modulators
Conventional chemotherapeutics
Several emerging applications of MTFR1 antibodies show significant promise for translational research:
Predictive and prognostic biomarker development:
MTFR1 overexpression correlates with poor prognosis in lung adenocarcinoma
Standardized immunohistochemistry protocols with MTFR1 antibodies could enable routine assessment in clinical samples
Combined with other markers, MTFR1 expression patterns may help stratify patients for targeted therapies
Therapeutic resistance mechanisms:
MTFR1 has been implicated in cisplatin resistance via the p-AKT and p-ERK/P38 pathways
Antibody-based monitoring of MTFR1 during treatment could identify resistance development
Screening for MTFR1 expression before treatment might predict response to certain therapies
Targeted therapy development:
As a promoter of cancer progression, MTFR1 represents a potential therapeutic target
Antibody-based high-throughput screening could identify compounds that modulate MTFR1 expression or function
Therapeutic modulation of the miR-29c-3p/MTFR1 axis represents another promising approach
Combination therapy strategies:
Based on MTFR1's role in multiple signaling pathways, rational combination approaches can be developed
MTFR1 antibodies can monitor pathway modulation during combination treatments
Targeting both MTFR1 and its downstream effectors might overcome resistance mechanisms
Mitochondrial dynamics as a therapeutic strategy:
Modulating mitochondrial fission through MTFR1-targeted approaches may have therapeutic potential
MTFR1 antibodies enable verification of target engagement in preclinical models
Monitoring mitochondrial morphology changes in response to therapy can provide mechanistic insights
Immune microenvironment interactions:
Research has shown associations between MTFR1 expression and immune cell infiltration in cancer
Multiplexed immunofluorescence with MTFR1 and immune markers can map these relationships
Understanding how MTFR1-mediated metabolic changes affect the immune microenvironment could inform immunotherapy approaches