MTURN (Maturin neural progenitor differentiation regulator homolog) is a protein encoded by the MTURN gene (Gene ID: 222166) in humans . This protein plays a crucial role in cell cycle regulation and neural progenitor differentiation. Research indicates that MTurn functions as a cell cycle regulator, controlling cell division and proliferation processes . Understanding MTurn's function is particularly important in neurodevelopmental research and cancer studies, as it provides insights into the mechanisms underlying neural differentiation and potentially cancer progression.
The protein is also known by several aliases including:
Although the search results primarily discuss polyclonal MTurn antibodies, understanding the general differences between polyclonal and monoclonal antibodies is crucial for researchers:
Polyclonal MTurn antibodies (like PACO60917 and PA5-56177):
Are produced in rabbits or other host animals against MTurn protein or specific peptide sequences
Recognize multiple epitopes on the MTurn protein
Offer high sensitivity due to binding multiple epitopes
May show batch-to-batch variation
The MTurn Polyclonal Antibody (PACO60917) has been purified using Protein G, with a purity of >95%
Monoclonal antibodies (general principles):
When selecting an MTurn antibody for research, consider the specific application requirements and whether sensitivity or specificity is more critical for your experimental design.
Proper validation of MTurn antibodies is critical for ensuring experimental rigor, especially given concerns about the "antibody crisis" in research . For optimal MTurn antibody validation:
Knockout/knockdown controls: The gold standard for antibody validation is testing in knockout or knockdown systems. This approach has been demonstrated to be superior to other types of controls, particularly for Western Blots and immunofluorescence imaging .
Positive and negative tissue controls: Test the antibody on tissues known to express or not express MTurn. Human cerebellum shows strong positivity for MTurn in neuronal cells and serves as an excellent positive control .
Multiple antibody approach: Use antibodies from different manufacturers or those targeting different epitopes of MTurn to confirm findings.
Recombinant protein controls: Several MTurn antibodies have been validated against recombinant MTurn protein. The PACO60917 antibody, for example, was validated using recombinant Zebrafish Maturin protein (1-133AA) .
Specificity testing: Test for cross-reactivity with related proteins or in species the antibody is not designed to target.
Remember that YCharOS found that "an average of ~12 publications per protein target included data from an antibody that failed to recognize the relevant target protein" , highlighting the importance of rigorous validation.
For optimal Western blot results with MTurn antibodies, consider the following methodological details:
Sample preparation:
Use appropriate lysis buffers that preserve protein structure
Include protease inhibitors to prevent degradation
Determine optimal protein loading amount (typically 20-50 μg)
Dilution optimization:
Incubation conditions:
Primary antibody: Typically overnight at 4°C or 2 hours at room temperature
Secondary antibody: Usually 1 hour at room temperature
Include washing steps with TBST or PBST between incubations
Detection systems:
For fluorescent detection: Use appropriate secondary antibodies conjugated to fluorophores
For chemiluminescent detection: Use HRP-conjugated secondary antibodies and suitable detection reagents
Controls:
Positive control: Use recombinant MTurn protein
Negative control: Use samples known not to express MTurn
Loading control: Use housekeeping proteins (β-actin, GAPDH, etc.)
Troubleshooting:
For high background: Increase blocking time or antibody dilution
For weak signal: Decrease antibody dilution or increase exposure time
For non-specific bands: Optimize blocking conditions or increase washing steps
The performance and shelf-life of MTurn antibodies can be significantly affected by storage conditions and buffer composition:
For maximum shelf-life and performance, researchers should:
Aliquot antibodies upon receipt to minimize freeze-thaw cycles
Follow manufacturer's specific storage recommendations
Check for signs of degradation (precipitation, cloudiness) before use
Validate antibody performance periodically if stored for extended periods
When analyzing antibody data, particularly in serological studies, researchers can employ sophisticated statistical approaches to differentiate between antibody-positive and antibody-negative populations:
Finite Mixture Models (FMMs): These statistical models are widely used in antibody data analysis to classify individuals into antibody-positive or antibody-negative groups . While Gaussian mixture models are commonly used, more flexible approaches using Scale Mixtures of Skew-Normal distributions can better account for asymmetry often observed in antibody data.
Threshold determination: Establish appropriate cutoff values based on:
Control populations
Statistical approaches (e.g., 3 standard deviations above negative control mean)
ROC curve analysis to optimize sensitivity and specificity
Median Fluorescence Intensity (MFI) analysis: For bead-based assays, MFI values can be analyzed as both:
Multi-parameter analysis: When evaluating multiple antibody characteristics, consider using:
For complex datasets with multiple antibody measurements, unbiased machine learning approaches can help identify discriminating features and patterns that might not be apparent through conventional analysis.
Knockout validation: Testing in MTurn knockout systems is the gold standard approach:
Epitope mapping: Identify the specific region of MTurn recognized by the antibody:
Helps predict potential cross-reactivity with similar epitopes in other proteins
Important when working with antibodies raised against specific peptides
Batch testing: Different antibody lots may have varying specificity profiles:
Test new lots against previously validated lots
Document lot-specific behavior for reproducibility
Multiple detection methods: Confirm findings using orthogonal approaches:
Combine antibody-based detection with mass spectrometry or other non-antibody methods
Use antibodies targeting different MTurn epitopes
Species cross-reactivity assessment: Important for comparative studies:
Ensuring that antibodies accurately recognize their intended MTurn sequence target requires rigorous validation:
Full sequence validation: This involves confirming the complete amino acid sequence of the target protein and the antibody's recognition region:
Mass spectrometry-based validation:
Middle-up LC-QTOF (Liquid Chromatography-Quadrupole Time-of-Flight) approach allows for molecular weight determination of protein domains
Middle-down LC-MALDI in-source decay (ISD) provides protein sequencing information
Ultra High Resolution (UHR) QTOF mass spectrometry can provide accurate mass and isotopically resolved molecular weight determination
Immunogen sequence verification:
Orthogonal approaches:
Combining epitope mapping with structural analysis
Using multiple antibodies targeting different regions of MTurn
Comparing antibody recognition patterns with predicted protein domains
These validation approaches are particularly important for MTurn research, as the protein has multiple aliases and potential isoforms that could complicate antibody recognition.
Multiplexing allows researchers to simultaneously detect MTurn alongside other neural markers, providing richer data on neural differentiation and development:
Multicolor immunofluorescence:
Use MTurn antibodies with different fluorophore-conjugated secondaries
Combine with antibodies against other neural markers (e.g., SOX2, Nestin, DCX)
Careful antibody panel design is required to avoid spectral overlap
Mass cytometry (CyTOF):
Label MTurn antibodies with rare earth metals
Enables simultaneous detection of 40+ markers without fluorescence spillover
Requires specialized equipment but offers high-dimensional data
Multiplexed immunohistochemistry:
Sequential staining with MTurn and other antibodies
Tyramide signal amplification allows for multiple rounds of staining
Enables co-localization studies in tissue sections
Single-cell multi-omics:
Similar to the approach used with Dextramer® reagents, MTurn antibodies can be integrated with single-cell analysis platforms
Combines antibody detection with gene expression and VDJ sequence analysis
Provides simultaneous information on protein expression, gene expression, and other cellular characteristics
Multiplex ELISA and bead-based assays:
Conjugate MTurn antibodies to distinct beads
Allows quantification alongside other neural markers in solution
Enables high-throughput screening in developmental studies
When designing multiplex experiments, consider potential antibody cross-reactivity, optimal fixation conditions for all targets, and appropriate controls for each marker in the panel.
Several cutting-edge antibody technologies could significantly enhance MTurn research:
Recombinant antibody development:
The YCharOS study demonstrated that recombinant antibodies outperformed both monoclonal and polyclonal antibodies across all assays tested
Converting hybridoma-derived monoclonal antibodies to recombinant formats improves reproducibility
Several initiatives now make antibody sequences publicly available, allowing researchers to produce their own recombinant versions
Nanobodies and single-domain antibodies:
Affinity maturation enhancement:
Boston Children's Hospital labs have developed methods to enhance affinity maturation and help B cells make more broadly protective antibodies
These approaches could potentially be applied to develop more specific MTurn antibodies
One method involves introducing antibody genomes into mouse B cells and allowing affinity maturation to happen, generating improved antibodies
On-target functional modulation:
Systems serology approaches:
These advances promise to improve the specificity, reproducibility, and functional utility of antibodies for MTurn research, potentially overcoming limitations of current reagents.
To investigate MTurn's role in neural progenitor differentiation, researchers can design targeted experiments using antibody-based approaches:
Temporal expression analysis:
Track MTurn expression across neural differentiation timepoints
Correlate with known differentiation markers
Use quantitative Western blot or immunofluorescence with MTurn antibodies
Spatial localization studies:
Employ immunohistochemistry to map MTurn distribution in developing neural tissues
Co-stain with markers of different neural progenitor populations
Use super-resolution microscopy for subcellular localization
Functional inhibition experiments:
Apply neutralizing antibodies to block MTurn function
Monitor effects on progenitor proliferation, migration, and differentiation
Compare to genetic knockdown/knockout approaches
Interaction partner identification:
Use MTurn antibodies for co-immunoprecipitation
Identify binding partners by mass spectrometry
Validate interactions with proximity ligation assays
Patient-derived cell studies:
Compare MTurn expression in neural progenitors from patients with neurodevelopmental disorders versus controls
Assess correlation between MTurn expression patterns and clinical phenotypes
Use patient-specific iPSCs differentiated to neural lineages
Experimental design should include appropriate controls:
Genetic controls (knockdown/knockout)
Developmental stage controls
Regional specificity controls
Antibody validation controls
By combining these approaches, researchers can build a comprehensive understanding of MTurn's role in neural development and potentially identify therapeutic targets for neurodevelopmental disorders.
Researchers commonly encounter several challenges when working with MTurn antibodies:
Non-specific binding:
Problem: Background staining or multiple bands in Western blots
Solution: Optimize blocking conditions (try different blocking agents like BSA, milk, or commercial blockers)
Increase antibody dilution or perform absorption controls
Inconsistent results between batches:
Species cross-reactivity issues:
Fixation sensitivity:
Problem: Loss of epitope recognition after certain fixation methods
Solution: Test multiple fixation protocols (PFA, methanol, acetone)
Consider epitope retrieval methods for FFPE tissues
Reproducibility challenges:
To improve experimental outcomes, researchers should document all experimental conditions in detail, including:
Exact antibody catalog number and lot
Dilution and incubation conditions
Sample preparation methods
Blocking and washing conditions
Detection system specifications
To build a robust understanding of MTurn function, researchers should complement antibody-based approaches with orthogonal techniques:
Genetic approaches:
CRISPR/Cas9 knockout or knockdown of MTurn
Overexpression studies with tagged variants
Compare phenotypes with antibody neutralization results
Transcriptomic analysis:
RNA-seq to identify genes co-regulated with MTurn
Single-cell RNA-seq to map expression in specific cell populations
Correlate protein levels (antibody-detected) with mRNA expression
Functional assays:
Cell proliferation, migration, and differentiation assays
Electrophysiological measurements in neural systems
Behavioral studies in model organisms with MTurn manipulation
Structural biology:
X-ray crystallography or cryo-EM of MTurn protein
Use structure to interpret antibody epitope mapping data
Structure-function correlation studies
Mass spectrometry:
Proteomic analysis to identify interaction partners
Post-translational modification mapping
Absolute quantification to validate antibody-based quantification
When integrating these approaches, consider: