mug138 Antibody

Shipped with Ice Packs
In Stock

Description

MUC13 Antibody

MUC13 is a transmembrane mucin glycoprotein overexpressed in epithelial cancers, including colorectal and gastric adenocarcinomas .

Key Research Findings

ParameterDetails
CloneEPR21901 (Rabbit monoclonal)
ApplicationsFlow cytometry, immunofluorescence, IHC (validated in colorectal and gastric cancer tissues)
SpecificityCytoplasmic and apical membrane staining in cancer cells
Secondary AntibodyGoat Anti-Rabbit IgG H&L (Alexa Fluor® 488 or HRP)
Control DataNo cross-reactivity in PBS-only or isotype control experiments

Functional Insights

  • MUC13 promotes cancer cell invasion and metastasis by modulating cell-matrix interactions .

  • In HT-29 colorectal adenocarcinoma cells, MUC13 co-localizes with tubulin, suggesting cytoskeletal involvement .

CD138 (Syndecan-1) Antibody

CD138 is a heparan sulfate proteoglycan critical for plasma cell identification and myeloma research .

Preclinical Efficacy Data

  • VIS832: Induces 1.5–76.4-fold higher neutralization titers compared to COVID-19 convalescent sera in early-phase trials . Synergizes with IMiDs/bortezomib in myeloma models .

  • Anti-Idiotype Antibodies: IM32 clone induces anti-melanoma responses by mimicking tumor-associated antigens .

Comparative Analysis

FeatureMUC13 AntibodyCD138 Antibody
Primary TargetEpithelial cancer biomarkers Plasma cells, myeloma
Therapeutic RelevanceUnder investigation for oncologyVIS832 in Phase 2-3 trials for myeloma
Diagnostic UseColorectal/gastric cancer detection Plasma cell disorders

Technical Considerations

  • Storage: Most antibodies require storage at 2–8°C or -20°C, with avoidance of freeze-thaw cycles .

  • Cross-Reactivity: Anti-mouse IgG2a antibodies show minimal interference with human immunoglobulins .

Product Specs

Buffer
Preservative: 0.03% Proclin 300
Constituents: 50% Glycerol, 0.01M Phosphate Buffered Saline (PBS), pH 7.4
Form
Liquid
Lead Time
Made-to-order (14-16 weeks)
Synonyms
mug138 antibody; SPAC2E11.12c antibody; SPACUNK4.12c antibody; Putative zinc protease mug138 antibody; EC 3.4.24.- antibody; Meiotically up-regulated gene 138 protein antibody
Target Names
mug138
Uniprot No.

Target Background

Function
Plays a role in meiosis.
Database Links
Protein Families
Peptidase M16 family
Subcellular Location
Cytoplasm.

Q&A

What is MUC13 and why is it significant in biomedical research?

MUC13 is an epithelial and hemopoietic transmembrane mucin that plays a critical role in cell signaling pathways. It is also known by several alternative names including DRCC1, RECC, UNQ6194/PRO20221, Mucin-13, and is notably described as "Down-regulated in colon cancer 1" . The significance of MUC13 lies in its differential expression patterns between normal and malignant tissues, making it a valuable biomarker in cancer research. Normal epithelial cells express highly glycosylated MUC13, while under-glycosylated variants are frequently observed in malignant transformations, providing a distinct marker for tumor-specific targeting .

What experimental applications are MUC13 antibodies validated for?

MUC13 antibodies, such as the mouse monoclonal anti-MUC13 antibody [C18], have been validated for multiple experimental techniques. The primary applications include immunohistochemistry on paraffin-embedded tissues (IHC-P) and immunocytochemistry/immunofluorescence (ICC/IF) . These applications enable visualization of MUC13 expression patterns in both tissue sections and cultured cells. Published studies have successfully employed MUC13 antibodies in human samples, particularly in colorectal tissue analyses where differential expression patterns can distinguish between normal and cancerous states .

How should researchers interpret MUC13 staining patterns in normal versus cancerous tissues?

When interpreting MUC13 staining, researchers should analyze both intensity and localization patterns. In normal human colon samples stained with anti-MUC13 antibodies, expression typically follows a consistent, well-defined pattern . Staining protocols generally involve heat-mediated antigen retrieval with sodium citrate buffer (pH 6), followed by primary antibody incubation (typically at 10 μg/ml concentration) and detection using an HRP conjugated polymer system . Counterstaining with hematoxylin provides contextual cellular architecture. Altered expression patterns, including abnormal localization or intensity changes, may indicate pathological conditions. Always include appropriate controls - secondary-only controls are essential to confirm staining specificity and exclude non-specific binding artifacts .

What protocols optimize MUC13 antibody performance in immunofluorescence studies?

For optimal immunofluorescence results with MUC13 antibodies, researchers should follow a validated protocol sequence. Based on successful experiments with HT-29 colorectal adenocarcinoma cells, begin with methanol fixation (100%, 5 minutes), followed by permeabilization with 0.1% PBS-Triton X-100 for 5 minutes . Blocking should be performed with 1% BSA/10% normal goat serum/0.3M glycine in 0.1% PBS-Tween for 1 hour. MUC13 antibody concentration should be optimized based on your specific application, but 5 μg/ml with overnight incubation at 4°C has been validated . For visualization, secondary antibodies such as Goat Anti-Mouse IgG H&L (Alexa Fluor® 488) at 1/1000 dilution provide excellent results. Counter-staining cellular compartments (e.g., β-tubulin for cytoskeleton, DAPI for nuclei) facilitates interpretation of MUC13 localization patterns .

How can researchers validate antibody specificity for MUC13?

Antibody validation is application- and context-specific, requiring multiple complementary approaches following guidelines established by the International Working Group for Antibody Validation (IWGAV) . For MUC13 antibodies, implement at least one of these validation pillars: (1) Genetic strategies - use gene knockdown/knockout models to confirm specificity; (2) Orthogonal strategies - correlate protein detection with RNA-seq data across tissues/cell lines with varying MUC13 expression levels; (3) Independent antibody verification - compare staining patterns with multiple antibodies targeting different MUC13 epitopes; (4) Expression validation - confirm expected expression patterns in tissues with known MUC13 expression profiles; (5) Immunocapture followed by mass spectrometry . Correlation between protein detection signals and corresponding RNA-seq data (TPM values) across different cell lines provides particularly strong validation evidence, as demonstrated in other antibody systems .

How can MUC13 antibodies be modified for enhanced therapeutic potential?

Recent advances in antibody engineering suggest several modification strategies that could enhance MUC13 antibody therapeutic efficacy, similar to approaches used with MUC1 antibodies. Defucosylation of the Fc region has proven particularly effective in enhancing antibody-dependent cellular cytotoxicity (ADCC) mediated by natural killer (NK) cells . This post-translational modification increases binding affinity to Fc receptors on effector cells. Additionally, humanization of murine antibodies significantly reduces immunogenicity while preserving target specificity, extending the antibody's therapeutic window . When developing MUC13-targeted therapies, researchers should consider combination approaches with endocytosis inhibitors to increase epitope availability on tumor cell surfaces, although this approach may not necessarily further enhance ADCC mechanisms .

What experimental designs best evaluate anti-MUC13 antibody efficacy in preclinical models?

Preclinical evaluation of anti-MUC13 antibodies should follow rigorous protocols similar to those established for other tumor-specific antibodies. In vivo efficacy studies typically employ immunodeficient mouse models (e.g., BALB/c nu/nu) xenografted with human cancer cell lines expressing MUC13 . A protocol involving intraperitoneal cancer cell inoculation followed by antibody treatment (2 weeks post-inoculation) has been successfully employed for similar antibodies . Primary endpoints should include tumor-free fraction assessment and survival analysis at defined timepoints (e.g., 8 weeks post-treatment). Secondary endpoints should monitor potential toxicity through body weight measurements and complete blood counts, particularly white blood cell analysis . Statistical analysis using Fisher's exact test can determine significance between treatment groups. This experimental framework provides robust assessment of both efficacy and safety profiles.

What methodologies are employed for radiolabeling MUC13 antibodies?

While specific radiolabeling protocols for MUC13 antibodies aren't detailed in the search results, established methods for similar antibodies provide a transferable framework. The radiolabeling process typically begins with antibody conjugation to a bifunctional chelator, followed by radionuclide addition . For alpha-emitter radiolabeling (e.g., 213Bi), the process involves adding the antibody conjugate (approximately 0.1 mg) to pH-adjusted 213Bi eluate with a 5-minute reaction time . The reaction is quenched with 10 μl of 1.5 mg/mL DTPA, and the labeled product is purified using size exclusion chromatography (e.g., NAP-10 column) with PBS elution . Quality control should assess both radiochemical yield (typically 50-60% without decay correction) and radiochemical purity (>90% is considered acceptable) .

How is the immunoreactivity of radiolabeled MUC13 antibodies evaluated?

Immunoreactivity assessment is crucial to ensure that radiolabeling doesn't compromise antibody function. The standard methodology involves incubating the radiolabeled antibody with serial dilutions of target cells expressing MUC13 . Specifically, approximately 10 ng of labeled antibody is added to duplicate samples of serially diluted cell suspensions (maximum concentration ~5×10^6 cells/mL) . After 3-hour incubation at room temperature with agitation, followed by centrifugation and PBS washing (twice), the cell-bound radioactivity is measured using a gamma counter . Calculating the fraction of bound activity relative to total applied activity establishes the immunoreactive fraction according to the Lindmo assay methodology. This approach verifies that the antibody maintains target recognition capacity post-radiolabeling, essential for both imaging and therapeutic applications.

What dosimetric calculations are essential for radioimmunotherapy with MUC13 antibodies?

Comprehensive dosimetric assessments are fundamental for translational research with radiolabeled MUC13 antibodies. Key calculations include identifying dose-limiting organs (typically bone marrow for systemic administration) and determining the time-integrated activity per unit mass (Ã/m measured in Bq·s·kg^-1) . The absorbed dose (D) is calculated using the equation:

D=A~m×Δ×ΦD = \frac{\tilde{A}}{m} \times \Delta \times \Phi

Where Δ represents the mean energy of the particles per nuclear transformation and Φ is the absorbed fraction (assumed to be 1 for alpha particles) . For intraperitoneal administration, the absorbed dose to the peritoneum is calculated as 50% of the equilibrium dose of the injected fluid . Sophisticated biokinetic modeling should incorporate antibody-specific parameters such as the number of antigens per cell (typically in the range of several hundred thousand for mucin targets) .

How are therapeutic outcomes measured and analyzed in MUC13 antibody studies?

Therapeutic efficacy assessment requires robust experimental design and statistical analysis. Primary outcome measures typically include tumor-free fraction determination at predefined endpoints (e.g., 8 weeks post-treatment) . In a typical experimental design with three groups (control, low-dose, high-dose), statistical significance is evaluated using Fisher's exact test between treatment and control groups . A successful therapeutic outcome would demonstrate significantly higher tumor-free fractions in treatment groups compared to controls. For example, in comparable radioimmunotherapy studies, tumor-free fractions of 0.55 and 0.78 were achieved with different activity doses compared to 0.15 in control groups . Safety assessments should run in parallel, monitoring white blood cell counts and body weight for potential toxicity signals. Dose-response relationships provide critical insights for optimizing therapeutic windows and translation toward clinical applications.

Quick Inquiry

Personal Email Detected
Please use an institutional or corporate email address for inquiries. Personal email accounts ( such as Gmail, Yahoo, and Outlook) are not accepted. *
© Copyright 2025 TheBiotek. All Rights Reserved.