mug80 Antibody

Shipped with Ice Packs
In Stock

Description

Mouse F4/80 Antibody (MAB5580)

Target: F4/80 (EMR1), a macrophage-specific surface glycoprotein.
Applications:

  • Flow cytometry detection in RAW 264.7 mouse monocyte/macrophage cell lines

  • Immunohistochemistry and immunofluorescence imaging

Key Research Findings:

ParameterData
Clone521204
Host SpeciesRat
IsotypeIgG2A
PurificationProtein A/G from hybridoma culture
Storage Stability12 months at -20°C to -70°C; 1 month at 2–8°C post-reconstitution

Functional Role:

  • Identifies tissue-resident macrophages in murine models .

  • Used to study macrophage activation in inflammatory diseases and cancer .

Anti-Human CD80 Antibody (MEM-233)

Target: CD80 (B7-1), a co-stimulatory molecule on antigen-presenting cells.
Applications:

  • Blocking CD28/CTLA-4 interactions in T-cell activation studies

  • Flow cytometry and immune checkpoint research

Comparative Efficacy:

AntibodyTarget EpitopeNeutralization BreadthClinical Stage
80RSARS-CoV S1 domainEarly pandemic variantsPreclinical (mouse models)
17T2Pan-neutralizing RBDOmicron subvariants (BA.2.86, XBB.1.16)Preclinical

Key Findings:

  • 80R reduced SARS-CoV lung titers by >4 logs in mice at 12.5 mg/kg .

  • 17T2 neutralizes BA.2.86 with IC₅₀ < 0.1 µg/mL via cryo-EM-confirmed RBD binding .

Antibodies Targeting EGFR (e.g., mAb 806)

Target: Overexpressed epidermal growth factor receptor in tumors.

Clinical Relevance:

  • Binds amplified/overexpressed EGFR without reacting to normal tissues .

  • Reactivity observed in 30–40% of glioblastomas and epithelial cancers .

Technical Considerations for Antibody Identification

  • Nomenclature Conflicts: "mu" may indicate murine origin, while "g80" could reference glycosylation sites or clone IDs.

  • Validation Steps:

    1. Epitope mapping (e.g., SPR or BLI for affinity measurements).

    2. Functional assays (neutralization, opsonization).

    3. Cross-reactivity screening using protein microarrays.

Product Specs

Buffer
Preservative: 0.03% Proclin 300
Composition: 50% Glycerol, 0.01M Phosphate Buffered Saline (PBS), pH 7.4
Form
Liquid
Lead Time
Made-to-order (14-16 weeks)
Synonyms
mug80 antibody; SPBC1D7.03 antibody; Meiotically up-regulated gene 80 protein antibody
Target Names
mug80
Uniprot No.

Target Background

Function
Plays a role in meiosis.
Database Links
Subcellular Location
Nucleus.

Q&A

What is mug80 and what is its significance in Schizosaccharomyces pombe research?

The mug80 protein (UniProt accession O14336) is a specific protein found in Schizosaccharomyces pombe (fission yeast), a model organism widely used in molecular and cellular biology research. The antibody against mug80 provides researchers with a tool for detecting and studying this protein in experimental settings. The antibody is particularly valuable for investigating cellular processes in S. pombe, which serves as an important model for studying eukaryotic cell biology, cell cycle regulation, and gene expression patterns .

Unlike some other research antibodies such as the F4/80 antibody that targets macrophage populations in mice, the mug80 antibody is highly specific to S. pombe, making it a specialized research reagent for studies focusing on this particular model organism .

What applications are validated for mug80 antibody in research settings?

The mug80 antibody has been validated for several key research applications:

  • Western Blotting (WB): For detection and semi-quantitative analysis of mug80 protein in cell lysates from S. pombe

  • Enzyme-Linked Immunosorbent Assay (ELISA): For quantitative measurement of mug80 protein in various experimental preparations

These applications allow researchers to investigate protein expression, localization, and potential interactions involving mug80 in S. pombe. When designing experiments, researchers should ensure proper identification of the antigen through appropriate controls .

Unlike more broadly applicable antibodies like monoclonal antibody A-80 (which recognizes tumor-associated cytoplasmic mucin-type glycoproteins across multiple tissue types), mug80 antibody has a narrower but more specialized application range focused on S. pombe research .

What are the optimal storage conditions for maintaining mug80 antibody activity?

To maintain optimal activity of the mug80 antibody, researchers should adhere to the following storage guidelines:

  • Store at -20°C or -80°C upon receipt

  • Avoid repeated freeze-thaw cycles, which can denature the antibody and reduce its efficacy

  • The antibody is supplied in a stabilizing buffer containing 50% glycerol, 0.01M PBS (pH 7.4), and 0.03% Proclin 300 as a preservative

This is consistent with general principles of antibody storage. For comparison, other research antibodies like the F4/80 monoclonal antibody also require similar cold storage conditions to maintain their specificity and binding efficacy .

How should researchers design proper controls when using mug80 antibody?

Proper experimental design with mug80 antibody requires careful consideration of controls:

Control TypePurposeImplementation
Negative ControlDetermine background/non-specific bindingUse non-transfected S. pombe or strains lacking mug80 expression
Positive ControlConfirm antibody functionalityUse recombinant mug80 protein or known mug80-expressing samples
Isotype ControlAccount for non-specific bindingUse rabbit IgG (same isotype) in parallel experiments
Loading ControlNormalize protein quantification in WBUse housekeeping proteins specific to S. pombe

When interpreting results, researchers should compare experimental samples with these controls to distinguish genuine signals from artifacts. This approach is consistent with best practices used with other research antibodies, such as those used in studying human monoclonal antibodies in therapeutic applications .

What are the recommended protocols for optimizing Western blot analysis with mug80 antibody?

Western blot optimization for mug80 antibody should follow these methodological recommendations:

  • Sample Preparation:

    • Extract proteins from S. pombe using mild detergents to preserve epitope structure

    • Add protease inhibitors to prevent protein degradation

    • Heat samples at 95°C for 5 minutes in loading buffer before gel loading

  • Electrophoresis and Transfer:

    • Use 10-12% SDS-PAGE gels for optimal separation

    • Transfer proteins to PVDF or nitrocellulose membranes at 100V for 60-90 minutes

  • Blocking and Antibody Incubation:

    • Block membrane with 5% non-fat milk or BSA in TBST for 1 hour at room temperature

    • Incubate with mug80 antibody at a starting dilution of 1:1000 in blocking buffer

    • Optimize antibody concentration through titration experiments

    • Incubate overnight at 4°C for maximum sensitivity

This protocol is based on established principles similar to those used with other polyclonal antibodies, though specific optimization may be required for the unique characteristics of mug80 detection .

How can researchers integrate mug80 antibody studies with genomic and proteomic analyses?

Integration of mug80 antibody-based detection with multi-omics approaches can provide comprehensive insights into S. pombe biology:

  • Chromatin Immunoprecipitation (ChIP) Combined with Sequencing:

    • If mug80 has DNA-binding properties, ChIP-seq can identify genomic binding sites

    • Use mug80 antibody to pull down protein-DNA complexes

    • Sequence associated DNA to map interaction sites within the genome

  • Immunoprecipitation Coupled with Mass Spectrometry (IP-MS):

    • Use mug80 antibody for immunoprecipitation of protein complexes

    • Analyze via mass spectrometry to identify interaction partners

    • Map protein-protein interaction networks involving mug80

  • Integration with Transcriptomic Data:

    • Correlate mug80 protein levels (detected by the antibody) with RNA-seq data

    • Identify genes whose expression correlates with mug80 abundance or activity

This integrated approach shares conceptual similarities with methods used to study antibody-antigen interactions in other research contexts, such as the characterization of structure factors in antibody solutions .

What are the most effective approaches for troubleshooting non-specific binding issues with mug80 antibody?

When encountering non-specific binding with mug80 antibody, researchers should systematically address the issue:

ProblemPotential CauseTroubleshooting Approach
Multiple bands in Western blotCross-reactivity or protein degradation1. Increase washing stringency
2. Optimize antibody dilution
3. Use fresher samples with added protease inhibitors
High background in ELISAInsufficient blocking or wash steps1. Extend blocking time
2. Use alternative blocking agents
3. Increase wash buffer stringency
False positivesFc receptor binding1. Pre-block with species-specific serum
2. Use F(ab')2 fragments instead of whole IgG
3. Include additional blocking proteins

Verification of results should include complementary techniques such as RNA interference or genetic knockouts to confirm target specificity, similar to approaches used in therapeutic antibody development .

How can researchers assess and ensure batch-to-batch consistency of mug80 antibody?

Ensuring experimental reproducibility requires careful assessment of batch-to-batch antibody variation:

  • Quantitative Benchmarking Protocols:

    • Test each new batch against a reference standard

    • Perform titration experiments to determine effective working dilutions

    • Compare immunoreactivity patterns in well-characterized samples

  • Quality Control Metrics:

    • Specificity: Confirm single band at expected molecular weight in Western blots

    • Sensitivity: Determine limit of detection using standard curves

    • Reproducibility: Compare results across technical and biological replicates

  • Documentation Practices:

    • Maintain detailed records of antibody batch numbers used in experiments

    • Document any observed variations in performance

    • Consider establishing a reference sample repository for longitudinal comparisons

These quality control measures reflect general principles applied in antibody research, including those used in therapeutic monoclonal antibody development .

How does mug80 antibody detection compare with other methods for studying S. pombe proteins?

Researchers should understand the relative advantages of different detection methodologies:

Detection MethodAdvantagesLimitationsComplementarity with mug80 Antibody
mug80 Antibody Detection- Specific protein detection
- Applicable to various sample types
- Can detect post-translational modifications
- Dependent on antibody quality
- May have cross-reactivity issues
- Semi-quantitative without standards
Primary method for protein detection
GFP/Fluorescent Protein Tagging- Live cell visualization
- Real-time dynamics
- No fixation artifacts
- Tag may affect protein function
- Genetic modification required
- Autofluorescence issues
Validate antibody detection with GFP-tagged versions
Mass Spectrometry- Unbiased detection
- Absolute quantification possible
- Multiple protein detection
- Complex sample preparation
- Expensive equipment
- Limited for low-abundance proteins
Use antibody for validation of MS findings
RNA-based Methods (RT-PCR, RNA-seq)- No antibody required
- Highly sensitive
- Genome-wide analysis possible
- Measures mRNA, not protein
- Post-transcriptional regulation missed
- No protein modification information
Correlate mRNA with protein levels detected by antibody

This comparative analysis helps researchers choose appropriate methods or combinations based on their specific research questions and available resources .

What insights can be gained from comparing research on mug80 with studies of other yeast proteins using similar antibody approaches?

Comparative analysis across different yeast proteins can provide valuable contextual insights:

  • Evolutionary Conservation Analysis:

    • Compare mug80 function and expression patterns with homologs in other yeast species

    • Use antibodies targeting related proteins in S. cerevisiae or other model organisms

    • Identify conserved vs. species-specific aspects of protein function

  • Methodological Cross-Referencing:

    • Adapt successful experimental designs from studies of well-characterized yeast proteins

    • Apply techniques optimized for detection of other low-abundance yeast proteins

    • Benchmark sensitivity and specificity relative to established antibody-based assays

  • Functional Network Integration:

    • Place mug80 in the context of known protein interaction networks in yeasts

    • Compare with data from high-throughput studies in related organisms

    • Identify potential functional relationships based on co-expression or co-localization patterns

This approach shares conceptual similarities with methods used to study antibody targets in other organisms, such as the monoclonal antibody F4/80, which has been extensively characterized in mouse macrophage research .

How might advances in antibody technology enhance future studies of mug80?

Emerging antibody technologies offer new possibilities for mug80 research:

  • Single-Domain Antibody Fragments:

    • Smaller size allows better penetration in fixed cells

    • Potential for improved access to sterically hindered epitopes

    • Enhanced stability under various experimental conditions

  • Recombinant Antibody Engineering:

    • Development of highly specific recombinant anti-mug80 antibodies

    • Creation of bispecific antibodies for co-detection with interaction partners

    • Modification of Fc regions to reduce background in specific applications

  • Site-Specific Conjugation Methods:

    • Precisely controlled labeling for super-resolution microscopy

    • Optimized conjugation strategies for quantitative proteomics applications

    • Development of proximity-labeling antibody derivatives for interaction studies

These technological advances could significantly expand the research applications of anti-mug80 antibodies, similar to how advances in monoclonal antibody technology have enabled new therapeutic applications in infectious disease research .

What methodological challenges remain in studying low-abundance proteins like mug80 in yeast systems?

Despite advances in antibody technology, several methodological challenges persist:

  • Detection Sensitivity Limitations:

    • Low natural abundance may require signal amplification methods

    • Need for subcellular fractionation to concentrate proteins from specific compartments

    • Development of more sensitive detection chemistries for Western blotting and ELISA

  • Temporal and Spatial Resolution:

    • Capturing transient expression or localization changes during cell cycle

    • Distinguishing between different post-translationally modified forms

    • Achieving single-cell resolution in heterogeneous populations

  • Cross-Platform Data Integration:

    • Reconciling quantitative differences between antibody-based and MS-based quantification

    • Integrating protein-level data with transcriptomic and genetic interaction datasets

    • Standardizing normalization methods across different experimental approaches

Addressing these challenges will require both technological innovations and improved experimental designs, similar to approaches being developed for studying complex protein systems in therapeutic antibody research .

Quick Inquiry

Personal Email Detected
Please use an institutional or corporate email address for inquiries. Personal email accounts ( such as Gmail, Yahoo, and Outlook) are not accepted. *
© Copyright 2025 TheBiotek. All Rights Reserved.