MX1 antibodies are immunoassay reagents designed to specifically bind the MX1 protein, a 75–78 kDa GTPase induced by type I and III interferons (IFNs) during viral infections . These antibodies enable researchers to:
Localize MX1 expression in cells and tissues
Quantify protein levels in diagnostic and research settings
Investigate MX1's role in antiviral defense and disease progression
MX1 antibodies are used to elucidate MX1's role in blocking viral replication. Key findings include:
MX1 disrupts influenza virus ribonucleoprotein (vRNP) complexes by inhibiting PB2-NP protein interactions, reducing polymerase activity .
Murine MX1 preferentially targets avian-origin NP proteins over human-adapted variants, explaining species-specific antiviral efficacy .
Breast Cancer Prognosis: High MX1 protein expression correlates with aggressive tumor behavior (large size, high grade, hormone receptor negativity) and poor survival (HR = 1.5; p = 0.028) .
Therapeutic Response Prediction: MX1-positive patients show reduced benefit from chemotherapy compared to MX1-negative cohorts (p = 0.954 vs. p = 0.001) .
| Metric | High MX1 vs. Low MX1 |
|---|---|
| 5-Year Survival | 65% vs. 82% (BCSS; p = 0.006) |
| Distant Metastasis | 58% vs. 75% (DMFS; p = 0.011) |
| Chemotherapy Benefit | No significant improvement (p = 0.954) |
Data derived from a cohort of 845 patients
Structure: Contains GTPase and effector domains critical for antiviral activity .
Species-Specific Functions:
Regulation: Induced by IFN-α/β during viral infections but also activated by HSV-1 via truncated isoforms .
MX1 (also known as MxA in humans) is an interferon-induced dynamin-like GTPase with potent antiviral activity against a wide range of RNA viruses and some DNA viruses. It functions as a key component of the innate immune system's first line of defense against viral infections.
MX1 has a molecular weight of approximately 75-78 kDa and primarily localizes to the cytoplasm in humans . The protein contains a GTPase domain (amino acids 69-340) and a GTPase Effector Domain (GED) spanning amino acids 574-662 . Its antiviral mechanism involves:
Binding and inactivating viral ribonucleocapsids of negative-stranded RNA viruses
Sequestering viral nucleoproteins in perinuclear complexes
Preventing genome amplification, budding, and viral egress
Importantly, while human MX1 functions in the cytoplasm to block viral replication at stages proximal to transcription, mouse Mx1 acts in the nucleus to inhibit primary viral gene transcription, highlighting important species-specific differences .
MX1 expression is primarily induced by type I interferons (particularly IFN-alpha) and type III interferons. When viral RNA or DNA is detected by pattern recognition receptors (PRRs), interferons are produced, leading to MX1 upregulation .
MX1 is strongly induced upon interferon signaling as demonstrated in experimental settings. For example, human peripheral blood mononuclear cells (PBMCs) treated overnight with 20 μg/mL of Recombinant Human IFN-α show significantly increased MX1 expression detectable by western blot . Additionally, viral infections themselves can trigger MX1 expression, though some viruses like HSV-1 may generate truncated 54-57 kDa transcripts with altered function .
Beyond viral infections, MX1 regulation has been implicated in other physiological contexts:
MX1 is upregulated in response to endoplasmic reticulum stress (ERS)
Its expression may be altered in certain cancer types, with decreased expression observed in prostate cancer compared to normal tissue
MX1 antibodies have been validated for multiple research applications, each with specific optimization requirements:
Western Blotting (WB): Detects MX1 at approximately 75-78 kDa under reducing conditions. Optimal dilutions range from 1:1000 to 1:10,000 depending on the antibody
Immunohistochemistry (IHC-P): Various dilutions (1:100-1:500) are used for paraffin-embedded tissue sections, with recommended heat-induced epitope retrieval
Immunocytochemistry/Immunofluorescence (ICC/IF): Effective for cellular localization studies at dilutions of approximately 1:100
Flow Cytometry: Used for intracellular detection of MX1 in single cell suspensions
ELISA: For quantitative measurement of MX1 in serum and other biological fluids
When selecting an antibody, researchers should consider the target species (human MX1 shares only 49% amino acid sequence identity with mouse Mx1 over amino acids 412-630) , and whether the intended application has been validated by the manufacturer.
Cell lysate preparation: PBMCs or other cell types can be treated with type I interferons (e.g., 20 μg/mL IFN-α) overnight to induce MX1 expression
Running conditions: Use reducing conditions with appropriate immunoblot buffer systems
Visualization: HRP-conjugated secondary antibodies followed by chemiluminescent detection yield specific bands at approximately 75 kDa
Fixation: Formalin/PFA-fixed paraffin-embedded sections are commonly used
Antigen retrieval: Heat-induced epitope retrieval with basic retrieval reagents is recommended before antibody incubation
Detection systems: Both fluorescent secondary antibodies and chromogenic detection methods (such as HRP-DAB) have been successfully employed
Cell preparation: Immersion fixation of cells, with particular success reported in IFN-α-treated PBMCs
Signal enhancement: Counterstaining with DAPI helps visualize nuclear context for the cytoplasmic MX1 signal
Expected pattern: MX1 shows specific localization to the cytoplasm in human cells
For quantitative measurement of MX1 protein in biological fluids such as serum or saliva, ELISA is the method of choice:
Detection range: Commercial ELISA kits typically have detection ranges of 1.56-100 ng/mL
Sensitivity: Minimum detectable dose is typically less than 0.65 ng/mL
Methodology: Double-antibody sandwich ELISA methods are commonly employed
Sample types: Successfully used for both serum and saliva samples
Key considerations for accurate quantification:
Regular calibration of pipettes is essential for reliable results
Standards should be run on each plate for proper quantitation
Spectrophotometric measurements should be taken within 10 minutes of stopping the reaction
MX1 has emerged as a potential biomarker in several clinical contexts:
Sjögren's Syndrome: MX1 levels have been associated with disease activity, with research indicating a potential relationship between serum MX1 levels and the EULAR Sjögren's Syndrome Disease Activity Index (ESSDAI)
Clinical correlations: Serum levels of MX1 in patients without Raynaud phenomenon were significantly higher than in those with Raynaud phenomenon (p: 0.029)
Therapeutic monitoring: Lower MX1 levels have been observed in patients using hydroxychloroquine, suggesting potential utility in monitoring treatment response
MX1 downregulation has been observed in prostate cancer compared to normal prostate tissue
Loss of MX1 expression is associated with decreased relapse-free survival in prostate cancer patients
Positive correlation has been observed between MX1 and HMOX1 (heme oxygenase 1) expression in prostate cancer patients
Anti-MX1 autoantibody levels, particularly IgA, have been identified as significant predictors of prognosis in patients with non-IPF idiopathic interstitial pneumonias
Multivariate analysis has shown that anti-MX1 IgA antibody levels >0.312 were associated with higher hazard ratios for disease progression (HR: 7.602, 95% CI: 2.013-28.70, p=0.003)
To investigate MX1's antiviral activity, researchers have employed various experimental approaches:
Viral challenge models: Comparing viral replication kinetics in cells with normal vs. depleted/overexpressed MX1
Subcellular localization studies: Using immunofluorescence to track MX1 and viral components
Biochemical interaction assays: Investigating direct binding between MX1 and viral components
Multimerization studies: Examining the role of MX1 oligomerization in its antiviral function
MX1 is normally expressed at low levels but is strongly induced by interferons. For positive controls:
Treat cells with type I interferons (20 μg/mL IFN-α overnight is effective for PBMCs)
Alternatively, simulate viral infection using poly(I:C) or other TLR agonists
Human MX1 shares only 49% amino acid sequence identity with mouse Mx1 in certain regions . To avoid cross-reactivity issues:
Carefully select antibodies validated for your species of interest
Include appropriate negative controls (such as MX1 knockout samples or IFN-receptor knockout cells)
Consider using recombinant MX1 protein as a positive control for antibody validation
Human MX1 is predominantly cytoplasmic, while mouse Mx1 is nuclear . When interpreting localization data:
Be mindful of species-specific differences
Use appropriate subcellular markers to confirm localization patterns
Consider that truncated forms of MX1 may show altered localization patterns
Positive control: Lysates from IFN-α-treated cells (PBMCs or A549 cells are commonly used)
Negative control: Untreated cells or MX1-knockdown cells
Loading control: Housekeeping proteins to normalize expression levels
Positive tissue control: Human thymus has been validated for MX1 detection
Antibody controls: Include secondary-only controls to assess background
Counterstains: DAPI for nuclear visualization helps confirm cytoplasmic localization of MX1
Standard curve: Include a full range of standards (typical range: 1.56-100 ng/mL)
Sample dilutions: Run samples at multiple dilutions to ensure they fall within the linear range
Technical replicates: Include duplicate or triplicate measurements to assess reproducibility
Research has revealed important correlations between MX1 expression and clinical outcomes in several disease contexts:
MX1 is among the most consistently downregulated genes in prostate cancer compared to normal prostate tissue
Loss of MX1 expression is associated with decreased relapse-free survival in prostate cancer patients
MX1 exhibits a significant positive correlation with HMOX1 (heme oxygenase 1) in prostate cancer patients
Higher anti-MX1 autoantibody levels, particularly IgA isotype, serve as significant predictors of good prognosis in patients with non-IPF idiopathic interstitial pneumonias
Multivariate Cox regression analysis showed that anti-MX1 IgA antibody (>0.312) was associated with hazard ratios of 7.602 (95% CI: 2.013-28.70, p=0.003) when adjusted for selected parameters
Recent research has uncovered an intriguing relationship between MX1 and endoplasmic reticulum stress (ERS):
MX1 is upregulated in response to endoplasmic reticulum stress
ERS can trigger both apoptosis and autophagy in prostate cancer cells
MX1 silencing has been shown to reverse ERS, suggesting a functional role in stress response pathways
MX1 enhances ER stress-mediated cell death after influenza virus infection
This relationship suggests a broader role for MX1 beyond direct antiviral activity, potentially connecting innate immunity with cellular stress response pathways.
When selecting an MX1 antibody, researchers must consider the trade-offs between monoclonal and polyclonal options:
Specificity: Examples include rabbit monoclonal antibodies like D3W7I and EPR24485-19 and mouse monoclonal antibodies like clone E-5
Consistency: Provide superior lot-to-lot consistency and continuous supply
Applications: Often validated for specific applications like western blot (1:1000), immunoprecipitation (1:50), and IHC (1:160-1:200)
Epitope targeting: Target specific regions, such as the C-terminal region of MX1
Available formats: Often available in multiple formats including conjugated versions (HRP, FITC, PE, Alexa Fluor)
Recognition: Can recognize multiple epitopes on the MX1 protein
Examples: Goat anti-human MX1 polyclonal antibodies have been used successfully for detecting MX1 in PBMCs and thymus tissue
Applications: Often work well across multiple applications including western blot, IHC, and ICC/IF
Immunogens: Typically raised against recombinant fragments of human MX1, such as amino acids 1-200 or 1-250
The choice depends on research needs: monoclonals offer consistency and specificity for defined epitopes, while polyclonals may provide more robust detection across different applications and sample preparations.
To investigate MX1's position in interferon signaling pathways:
Interferon stimulation experiments:
Treat cells with different concentrations of IFN-α (e.g., 20 μg/mL for PBMCs)
Include time course analysis (30 minutes to 24 hours) to capture dynamics
Measure MX1 protein levels by western blot or immunofluorescence
Compare with other interferon-stimulated genes (ISGs) to establish the temporal regulation pattern
Pathway inhibition studies:
Use JAK/STAT pathway inhibitors to confirm the canonical induction mechanism
Employ siRNA knockdown of STAT1/STAT2 to assess dependence on these transcription factors
Test alternate induction pathways (e.g., via ER stress inducers) to determine if MX1 can be upregulated independently of interferon signaling
Functional assays:
Compare antiviral activity in cells with normal vs. depleted MX1 levels
Assess viral replication kinetics using reporter viruses or viral titer measurements
Document subcellular distribution patterns using immunofluorescence before and after viral challenge
Proteomic approaches:
Perform immunoprecipitation followed by mass spectrometry to identify MX1-interacting proteins following interferon stimulation
Use proximity labeling to identify context-specific interaction networks
These methodological approaches provide complementary data on MX1's regulation and function within the interferon response pathway.