mxc Antibody

Shipped with Ice Packs
In Stock

Description

Fundamentals of MXC Protein

The Multi Sex Combs (Mxc) protein, encoded by the mxc gene in Drosophila, is a large 1837-amino acid protein containing several functional domains crucial for its activity . Mxc serves as a critical component of the histone locus body (HLB), a nuclear body that localizes to histone gene clusters and regulates histone mRNA biosynthesis . The protein is considered the functional ortholog of the human Nuclear Protein Ataxia-Telangiectasia (NPAT) .

Mxc plays multiple essential roles:

  • Recruitment of histone mRNA biosynthetic factors to the HLB

  • Regulation of cell cycle-dependent transcription of histone genes

  • Processing of histone mRNAs

  • Tumor suppression, particularly in hematopoietic tissues

Mutations in the mxc gene result in developmental abnormalities and can lead to malignant hyperplasia in larval hematopoietic tissues, making it an important model for studying leukemia-like conditions .

Structure and Domains of MXC Protein

The Mxc protein contains several distinct domains that contribute to its function. Understanding these domains is essential for developing and utilizing specific antibodies for research purposes.

Functional Significance of Domains

Research has demonstrated that multiple domains of Mxc are necessary for proper HLB assembly and histone mRNA biosynthesis . In particular:

  • The N-terminal LisH and SIF domains facilitate Mxc self-interaction, which is essential for HLB assembly

  • The middle region between amino acids 721 and 1481 is necessary for HLB assembly independent of the LisH and SIF domains

  • The C-terminal 195 amino acids are required for recruiting FLASH, an essential histone mRNA-processing factor, to the HLB

These domains provide specific targets for antibody development and research applications.

MXC Antibodies: Types and Properties

Multiple types of Mxc antibodies have been developed for research purposes, each targeting different regions of the protein and offering distinct applications.

Custom Research Antibodies

In addition to commercial options, researchers have developed custom antibodies for specific experimental purposes:

  • Antibodies against the C-terminal 169 amino acids of Mxc (MXC-C) for studying protein localization within the HLB

  • Antibodies against the N-terminal regions for studying domain-specific functions

  • Fluorescently tagged antibodies for live imaging studies of HLB dynamics

These custom antibodies have been instrumental in elucidating the spatial organization and dynamics of Mxc within the HLB.

Applications of MXC Antibodies in Research

Mxc antibodies have been employed in various research contexts, contributing significantly to our understanding of nuclear body formation, histone gene regulation, and developmental processes.

Immunofluorescence and Microscopy

One of the most important applications of Mxc antibodies is in super-resolution microscopy studies of HLB organization. Research has revealed that:

  • The N- and C-terminal regions of Mxc localize to different compartments within the HLB

  • MXC-C antibodies show that the C-terminus forms a "shell" around the HLB

  • N-terminal regions (detected with GFP-tagged Mxc) localize to the center of the HLB

These spatial differences have important functional implications for understanding how HLBs form and operate.

Molecular and Cellular Studies

Mxc antibodies have been crucial for:

  • Investigating protein-protein interactions within the HLB

  • Studying the recruitment of histone mRNA processing factors

  • Analyzing the effects of mutations on HLB assembly and function

  • Examining the cellular consequences of disrupted histone biosynthesis

These applications have provided insights into fundamental cellular processes and the mechanisms underlying disease development.

MXC in Drosophila Development and Disease Models

Research using Mxc antibodies has revealed critical roles for this protein in development and disease, particularly in Drosophila models.

Role in Normal Development

In normal development, Mxc:

  • Ensures proper histone gene expression during the cell cycle

  • Supports cell proliferation during development

  • Contributes to homeotic gene regulation, as evidenced by homeotic transformations in viable hypomorphic mxc alleles

MXC Mutations and Leukemia Models

Perhaps the most striking aspect of Mxc research involves its role in tumor suppression. In Drosophila:

  • Mutations in mxc (particularly the mxcmbn1 allele) result in malignant hyperplasia in larval hematopoietic tissues called lymph glands (LG)

  • This hyperplasia is caused by hyper-proliferation of immature LG cells

  • The mutant phenotype serves as a valuable model for leukemia research

Detailed studies using Mxc antibodies have revealed that:

  • Loss of HLB function, especially 3'-end processing of histone mRNAs, is critical for malignant LG hyperplasia

  • The reduction in normal histone mRNA levels and generation of abnormal polyadenylated histone mRNAs contribute to the hyperplastic phenotype

  • Ectopic expression of these abnormal histone mRNAs is sufficient to reproduce the hyperplasia

Immune System Interaction with MXC Mutant Tumors

Recent research has uncovered fascinating interactions between the immune system and mxc mutant tumors:

  • Hemocytes (blood cells) recognize lymph gland tumors in mxcmbn1 mutants

  • Matrix metalloproteinases (MMP1 and MMP2) are highly expressed in these tumors

  • Basement membrane components in the tumors are reduced and ultimately lost

  • Reactive oxygen species (ROS) accumulate in hemocytes due to dual oxidase induction

These findings provide insights into how the innate immune system recognizes and responds to tumor cells, which may have broader implications for understanding immune surveillance in cancer.

MXC and Human NPAT: Comparative Analysis

The human ortholog of Drosophila Mxc is Nuclear Protein Ataxia-Telangiectasia (NPAT), encoded by the gene implicated in ataxia telangiectasia . This evolutionary relationship provides an important translational aspect to Mxc research.

Implications for Human Disease

The role of Mxc mutations in causing leukemia-like phenotypes in Drosophila raises important questions about whether NPAT dysfunction might contribute to human malignancies. Research suggests:

  • NPAT dysfunction could potentially disrupt normal histone biosynthesis

  • This disruption might contribute to genomic instability and cancer development

  • Targeting NPAT or its regulatory pathways might represent a potential therapeutic approach

Further research using anti-NPAT antibodies in human systems is needed to fully explore these possibilities.

Future Directions in MXC Antibody Research

Several promising avenues for future research using Mxc antibodies are emerging:

Enhanced Antibody Technologies

Development of:

  • More specific domain-targeting antibodies

  • Better fluorescent tagging strategies for live imaging

  • Novel super-resolution microscopy compatible antibodies

  • Improved quantitative assays for Mxc function

Translational Applications

Potential applications include:

  • Using insights from Mxc/NPAT research to develop new cancer biomarkers

  • Exploring therapeutic approaches targeting histone biosynthesis pathways

  • Developing diagnostic tools based on histone mRNA processing defects

The ongoing refinement of antibody technologies and research methodologies continues to open new possibilities for understanding the fundamental biology of Mxc and its human ortholog NPAT.

Product Specs

Buffer
Preservative: 0.03% Proclin 300
Composition: 50% Glycerol, 0.01M Phosphate Buffered Saline (PBS), pH 7.4
Form
Liquid
Lead Time
Made-to-order (14-16 weeks)
Synonyms
mxc antibody; Interferon-induced GTP-binding protein MxC antibody; IFN-inducible antiviral protein MxC antibody; Interferon-inducible MxC protein antibody
Target Names
mxc
Uniprot No.

Target Background

Database Links
Protein Families
TRAFAC class dynamin-like GTPase superfamily, Dynamin/Fzo/YdjA family
Subcellular Location
Cytoplasm.

Q&A

What are the current leading methods for rapid discovery of monoclonal antibodies?

Recent advances in antibody discovery have significantly accelerated the development timeline from identification to characterization. The most efficient current approaches include:

  • Microfluidics-enabled single-cell encapsulation: This technique combines microfluidic encapsulation of antibody-secreting cells (ASCs) into an antibody capture hydrogel with flow cytometry-based sorting, enabling high-throughput interrogation at rates of 10^7 cells per hour .

  • Single B-cell antibody technologies: Techniques isolating antibody-encoding genes from individual B cells overcome limitations of traditional hybridoma methods by preserving natural heavy and light chain pairing .

  • Genome-edited mouse models: The HUGO-Ab mouse model with endogenous VH and VL genes replaced by fully human sequences produces fully human antibodies when combined with single B-cell screening18.

  • Recombinant antibody screening: Dual-expression vector systems using Golden Gate cloning enable rapid screening of recombinant monoclonal antibodies with membrane-bound antibody expression .

MethodThroughputTime to AntibodyPreservation of Native PairingReference
Microfluidics + FACS10^7 cells/hour2 weeksYes
Hybridoma technologyMedium4-8 weeksYes
Single B-cell PCRLow-Medium2-4 weeksYes
Phage displayHigh2-4 weeksNo

How do antibody-secreting cells (ASCs) compare to other sources for therapeutic antibody discovery?

ASCs (plasma cells and plasmablasts) provide several advantages over other antibody sources:

  • They are enriched for high-affinity antibodies that have undergone somatic hypermutation and affinity maturation in vivo.

  • ASCs from recovered patients yield antibodies with direct therapeutic potential, as demonstrated in SARS-CoV-2 studies .

  • When screened using the microfluidic approach described in , researchers achieved a remarkably high hit rate (>85% of characterized antibodies bound the target).

  • ASCs yielded exceptionally potent neutralizing antibodies against SARS-CoV-2 with sub-nanomolar affinities (<1 pM) and low neutralizing concentrations (<100 ng/ml) .

What analytical techniques are essential for comprehensive characterization of monoclonal antibodies?

Thorough characterization of monoclonal antibodies requires multiple complementary techniques as outlined in search result :

Chromatographic Methods:

  • Ion-exchange chromatography (IEX): Standard for characterizing charge variants, critical for stability and process consistency

  • Size-exclusion chromatography (SEC): Evaluates aggregation and fragmentation

  • Mixed-mode chromatography: Particularly useful for complex bispecific antibody formats

Electrophoretic Methods:

  • Capillary electrophoresis (CE): High resolving power for separating mAbs and analogs

  • Capillary gel electrophoresis (CGE): Size-based characterization

  • Capillary isoelectric focusing (cIEF): Charge heterogeneity assessment

  • Capillary zone electrophoresis (CZE): Purity analysis

Spectroscopic Methods:

  • Nuclear Magnetic Resonance (NMR): Provides highly specific High Order Structure information

  • Mass spectrometry: Identifying post-translational modifications and sequence verification

Immunological Methods:

  • Enzyme-Linked Immunosorbent Assay (ELISA): Measures binding affinity and avidity

  • Surface Plasmon Resonance (SPR): Determines binding kinetics and equilibrium dissociation constant

A comprehensive characterization strategy should include multiple orthogonal methods that evaluate both physical and chemical attributes of the antibody .

How do post-translational modifications impact monoclonal antibody functionality and characterization?

Post-translational modifications (PTMs) significantly influence monoclonal antibody properties:

  • Impact on charge distribution: PTMs can alter the charge profile of antibodies, affecting their biological properties and necessitating ion-exchange chromatography analysis .

  • Conformational effects: Modifications can change the higher-order structure, potentially impacting binding affinity and specificity.

  • Heterogeneity assessment: PTMs create product variants that must be characterized using capillary electrophoresis and other analytical techniques.

  • Stability considerations: Certain modifications (e.g., oxidation, deamidation) may compromise long-term stability and shelf-life.

Researchers should implement a systematic characterization approach that identifies and quantifies PTMs to ensure consistent efficacy and safety of monoclonal antibodies .

How are breakthrough broadly neutralizing antibodies against SARS-CoV-2 variants being developed?

Recent research has yielded several strategies for developing antibodies capable of neutralizing multiple SARS-CoV-2 variants:

  • Targeting conserved epitopes: High-throughput screening of B cells from infected individuals has identified antibodies targeting evolutionarily constrained regions of the spike protein that are less susceptible to mutation .

  • Bispecific antibody approach: Researchers have developed dual-antibody constructs (CoV2-biRN) where one antibody anchors to the relatively conserved N-terminal domain (NTD) while another targets the receptor-binding domain (RBD), effectively neutralizing all known variants through omicron .

  • Structure-guided engineering: Understanding the molecular interactions between antibodies and their viral targets enables rational modification to maintain binding despite viral mutations .

  • Antibody escape analysis: Comprehensive mapping of mutations that enable viral escape from antibody neutralization helps identify antibodies with high barriers to resistance .

Study results demonstrate the effectiveness of these approaches:

  • The bispecific CoV2-biRN antibodies significantly reduced viral load in mouse models infected with the omicron variant .

  • Certain class III and IV monoclonal antibodies (e.g., S309) maintained activity against Omicron subvariants while many other therapeutic antibodies lost effectiveness .

What are the key considerations for assessing monoclonal antibody developability during early-stage research?

Predicting the developability of monoclonal antibodies during early screening stages is crucial for selecting candidates with the highest likelihood of successful development. Key considerations include:

  • Physicochemical properties: Evaluate self-interaction tendency, aggregation propensity, thermal stability, and colloidal stability .

  • Sequence optimization: Identify and modify problematic regions in the antibody sequence that might compromise stability or manufacturability .

  • High-throughput screening: Implement efficient workflows capable of assessing hundreds to thousands of molecules using minimal amounts of purified material (<100 μg) .

  • Complementarity-determining region (CDR) design: Optimize the binding loops that determine antigen specificity while maintaining structural integrity .

  • Public antibody sequences: Consider starting with naturally occurring "public" antibody sequences that are shared across multiple individuals, as these may have inherently favorable properties. Research indicates that 6% of therapeutic CDR-H3 sequences have direct matches in highly public repertoires .

What strategies can overcome antibody cross-reactivity issues in multiplex detection systems?

Cross-reactivity presents significant challenges in multiplex immunoassays. Several approaches can minimize this issue:

  • Cross-adsorbed secondary antibodies: Use secondary antibodies specifically treated to remove cross-reactivity with immunoglobulins from non-target species .

  • Epitope mapping and antibody engineering: Identify and modify regions of antibodies that contribute to non-specific binding while preserving target recognition.

  • Blocking optimization: Careful selection of blocking reagents and protocols to minimize background signal without compromising specific detection.

  • Sequential detection protocols: In some cases, performing sequential rather than simultaneous detection can reduce cross-reactivity concerns.

  • Validation through multiple methods: Confirm specificity using orthogonal techniques such as western blot, immunofluorescence, and immunohistochemistry, as demonstrated with the Human MxA/Mx1 antibody in search result .

Researchers should validate each antibody individually before incorporating it into multiplex systems and include appropriate controls to identify potential cross-reactivity issues .

How can researchers address batch-to-batch variability in monoclonal antibody production?

Batch-to-batch variability can significantly impact experimental reproducibility. Several strategies can mitigate this challenge:

  • Recombinant antibody production: Switch from hybridoma-derived to recombinant antibodies expressed in defined systems for improved consistency.

  • Comprehensive characterization: Implement robust analytical protocols to verify each batch meets predefined specifications for structure, post-translational modifications, and biological activity .

  • Reference standard comparison: Maintain well-characterized reference standards and compare new batches against these standards using quantitative assays.

  • Design of Experiments (DoE) approach: Combine Design of Experiments with high-throughput screening to optimize production conditions and identify critical parameters affecting consistency, as demonstrated for mixed-mode resins in bispecific antibody purification .

  • Stable cell line development: For hybridoma-derived antibodies, ensure stable culture conditions and monitoring of cell line performance.

Implementing these strategies during antibody production and characterization can substantially reduce variability and improve experimental reproducibility.

How are single-cell technologies revolutionizing antibody discovery for infectious diseases?

Single-cell technologies are transforming the antibody discovery landscape:

  • Integrated genotype-phenotype linkage: New methods maintain the critical connection between antibody sequence and function by analyzing individual B cells, enabling more efficient selection of candidates with desired properties .

  • Rapid pandemic response: These technologies accelerate the timeline from patient sample to therapeutic antibody candidate, demonstrated by the development of potent SARS-CoV-2 neutralizing antibodies within 2 weeks .

  • Comprehensive repertoire analysis: Single-cell approaches enable deep mining of immune repertoires from convalescent patients, revealing unexpected diversity and cross-reactivity patterns .

  • Function-guided selection: Rather than selecting based solely on binding, researchers can prioritize antibodies with specific functional properties like virus neutralization or Fc-mediated effector functions .

  • Engineering opportunities: The detailed understanding of antibody sequence-function relationships enables rational engineering to enhance properties like breadth of protection against variant strains .

These advances have particular relevance for pandemic preparedness, allowing rapid identification of therapeutic candidates in response to emerging pathogens.

What role do Fc engineering and modifications play in optimizing therapeutic antibody efficacy and safety?

Fc engineering has become critical for optimizing therapeutic antibody properties:

  • Mitigating antibody-dependent enhancement (ADE): For infectious disease applications, Fc modifications can eliminate potential ADE risk while preserving protective functions, as demonstrated with SARS-CoV-2 antibodies effective at very low doses (0.25-4 mg/kg) in animal models despite lacking Fc-receptor binding .

  • Half-life extension: Strategic modifications to the Fc region can significantly extend antibody circulation time, enabling less frequent dosing regimens.

  • Effector function modulation: Engineering can enhance or eliminate specific effector functions (ADCC, ADCP, CDC) depending on the therapeutic mechanism required.

  • Reduced immunogenicity: Modifications to minimize interaction with immune components can lower the risk of anti-drug antibody development.

  • Tissue targeting: Certain Fc modifications can influence tissue distribution and penetration properties of therapeutic antibodies.

These engineering approaches enable fine-tuning of antibody properties beyond simple target binding, creating therapeutics with optimized efficacy, safety, and pharmacokinetic profiles .

How can monoclonal antibodies improve diagnostic accuracy for emerging infectious diseases?

Monoclonal antibodies have demonstrated significant value for infectious disease diagnostics, particularly for emerging pathogens:

  • Rapid serodiagnosis: Lateral flow immunoassays using monoclonal antibodies enable point-of-care testing with high specificity, as demonstrated in a study of SARS-CoV-2 seroprevalence where 77.6% of participants with acute smell/taste loss showed SARS-CoV-2 antibodies .

  • Symptom correlation: The same study revealed that new loss of smell was significantly more prevalent in SARS-CoV-2 antibody-positive individuals (93.4% vs. 78.7%, p<0.001), while taste loss was equally prevalent in both antibody-positive and negative groups .

  • Telemedicine integration: Antibody-based diagnostics can be effectively deployed through telemedicine platforms, allowing remote confirmation of infection while minimizing exposure risk .

  • Early biomarker identification: Monoclonal antibodies targeting specific viral proteins can identify infection before seroconversion, potentially enabling earlier intervention.

Clinical FindingAntibody Positive (%)Antibody Negative (%)p-valueOdds Ratio (95% CI)
Smell loss93.4%78.7%<0.0012.86 (1.27-6.36)
Taste loss90.2%89.0%0.738Not significant

These findings suggest that carefully selected antibody-based diagnostics can significantly improve early detection and management of emerging infectious diseases .

What innovations in antibody engineering could address the challenge of viral escape mutations?

Several innovative approaches are being developed to create antibodies that remain effective despite viral evolution:

  • Structure-guided multi-epitope targeting: Designing antibodies that simultaneously bind to multiple conserved epitopes, making viral escape through mutation statistically unlikely .

  • Bispecific anchoring strategy: As described in search result , using one antibody component to anchor to a conserved region while another component provides neutralizing activity has shown promise against all SARS-CoV-2 variants through omicron.

  • Broad sarbecovirus neutralization: Some antibodies (like DH1047) demonstrate cross-reactivity against multiple sarbecoviruses including SARS-CoV, SARS-CoV-2 and bat coronaviruses, suggesting conserved epitopes that could be targeted for pan-coronavirus protection .

  • Machine learning approaches: Computational methods to predict likely escape mutations can guide antibody design toward epitopes with higher genetic constraints.

  • Cocktail optimization: Systematic design of antibody combinations targeting non-overlapping epitopes to create barriers to viral escape.

These approaches represent promising directions for developing "future-proof" antibody therapeutics that maintain efficacy despite viral evolution .

How might large-scale antibody repertoire data mining inform next-generation therapeutic antibody discovery?

Analysis of antibody repertoire data is revealing patterns that could revolutionize therapeutic antibody discovery:

  • Public antibody sequences: Recent mining of 4 billion human antibody sequences across 135 bioprojects identified 270,000 highly public CDR-H3 sequences (occurring in at least 5 different projects), with 6% of therapeutic CDR-H3 sequences having direct matches in this public repertoire .

  • Starting point optimization: Rather than beginning antibody discovery from scratch, starting with naturally occurring public sequences may provide inherent advantages in developability.

  • Genetic features of successful therapeutics: Analysis of approved antibody therapeutics reveals patterns in V-gene usage and CDR-H3 length that could guide candidate selection .

  • Cross-reactive potential: Large-scale data mining can identify antibodies with natural cross-reactivity against related antigens, valuable for developing broadly protective therapeutics .

Quick Inquiry

Personal Email Detected
Please use an institutional or corporate email address for inquiries. Personal email accounts ( such as Gmail, Yahoo, and Outlook) are not accepted. *
© Copyright 2025 TheBiotek. All Rights Reserved.