Western Blot (WB): Achieves detection limits <0.5 ng Myc-tagged protein with optimized ECL protocols
Flow Cytometry: Enables live-cell surface labeling at 1-5 μg/mL concentrations
Immunohistochemistry: Compatible with paraffin-embedded sections when using tyramide signal amplification
Traced MYC-tagged vesicular stomatitis virus matrix protein dynamics in live cells
Identified phosphorylation-dependent interactions of c-Myc with JNK kinases
Quantified MYC-HNRNPA1 complex formation in cancer cell nuclei
The monoclonal 9E10 clone shows superior specificity due to defined epitope recognition (C-terminal aa 410-419) , while polyclonal versions offer broader epitope coverage .
Apoptosis Regulation:
The 9E10 clone detected MYC-TRAIL complex formation in LA-12-induced apoptosis, revealing mitochondrial pathway activation .
Splicing Control:
Biotin-Myc antibodies helped identify MYC-mediated regulation of PKM isoform switching (M1→M2) in glioblastoma cells .
Cross-Species Utility:
Despite human origin, 9E10 maintains 89% reactivity with murine c-Myc due to conserved C-terminal residues .
Myc proto-oncogene protein is a 62 kDa transcription factor encoded by the c-Myc gene, located on human chromosome 8q24 . It functions as a critical regulator of cellular processes with multiple biological roles:
Binds DNA in both non-specific and specific manners, recognizing the core sequence 5'-CAC[GA]TG-3'
Regulates cellular proliferation, differentiation, apoptosis, and cell cycle progression
Positively regulates transcription of HNRNPA1, HNRNPA2, and PTBP1
Functions in somatic reprogramming and self-renewal of embryonic stem cells
Myc antibody, Biotin conjugated serves as a valuable tool for investigating these functions through various applications including flow cytometry, immunohistochemistry, and Western blot analysis. The biotin conjugation provides signal amplification through binding to streptavidin detection systems, enhancing sensitivity for detecting Myc in low-abundance scenarios.
Methodological approach: When designing experiments, consider that monoclonal antibodies offer higher consistency but may be affected if their specific epitope is modified or masked. Polyclonal antibodies provide more robust detection across various conditions but may show higher background. For critical quantitative studies, monoclonal antibodies are often preferred, while polyclonal antibodies may be more suitable for detecting denatured proteins or for initial screening.
For optimal flow cytometry results with Myc antibody, Biotin conjugated, follow these methodological guidelines:
Sample preparation:
Antibody titration:
Staining protocol:
Critical controls:
Analysis considerations:
Compensate for spectral overlap if using multiple fluorochromes
Use appropriate gating strategies to exclude dead cells and debris
Following these optimization steps ensures higher specificity and sensitivity when detecting Myc protein or Myc-tagged constructs in flow cytometry applications.
When encountering high background in immunohistochemistry using Myc antibody, Biotin conjugated, consider these methodological troubleshooting approaches:
Endogenous biotin blocking:
Tissue samples naturally contain endogenous biotin, particularly liver, kidney, and brain tissues
Prior to antibody incubation, block endogenous biotin using avidin/biotin blocking kit
Typical protocol: Incubate with avidin solution (15 min), wash, then incubate with biotin solution (15 min)
Antibody concentration optimization:
Buffer modifications:
Increase blocking protein concentration (5-10% normal serum)
Add 0.1-0.3% Triton X-100 to reduce non-specific binding
Consider adding 0.1-0.3% Tween-20 to wash buffers
Antigen retrieval evaluation:
Test different antigen retrieval methods (citrate buffer pH 6.0 vs. EDTA buffer pH 9.0)
Adjust retrieval duration (10-30 minutes)
Compare heat-induced vs. enzymatic retrieval methods
Tissue fixation considerations:
Overfixation can increase background
For new samples, optimize fixation time
For already fixed samples, increase antigen retrieval stringency
Alternative detection strategy:
If background persists, consider non-biotin detection systems
Try direct HRP or fluorophore-conjugated antibodies instead
Streptavidin reagent dilution:
Dilute streptavidin detection reagent further
Reduce incubation time with streptavidin conjugate
Washing protocol intensification:
Increase number of washes (5× instead of 3×)
Extend wash duration (10 minutes per wash)
Use gentle agitation during washing
Implementing these systematic troubleshooting approaches can significantly reduce background while maintaining specific Myc signal detection.
Proper storage and handling of Myc antibody, Biotin conjugated is crucial for maintaining its activity and specificity. Based on manufacturer recommendations and best practices:
Upon receipt, centrifuge the vial briefly to collect contents at the bottom
Prepare multiple small-volume aliquots (10-20 μl) in sterile microcentrifuge tubes
Record lot number, date received, and aliquot creation date
Store aliquots at recommended temperature in a non-frost-free freezer
When using, thaw a single aliquot rapidly at room temperature or on ice
After use, return to appropriate storage temperature immediately
For partially used aliquots, minimize contamination risk with sterile technique
Monitor performance over time with consistent positive controls
Following these storage and handling protocols will maximize the shelf life and performance consistency of Myc antibody, Biotin conjugated across experiments.
Proper experimental validation requires comprehensive controls when using Myc antibody, Biotin conjugated:
Essential controls for experimental validation:
Positive controls:
Negative controls:
Method-specific controls:
For flow cytometry:
Unstained cells for autofluorescence assessment
Secondary reagent only (streptavidin-fluorophore without primary antibody)
Single-color controls for compensation
For Western blot:
For ELISA:
Standard curve with recombinant protein
Blank wells (all reagents except sample)
Signal inhibition with competing peptide
For IHC/ICC:
Secondary reagent only control
Tissue/cells known to be negative for Myc
Absorption control (antibody pre-incubated with immunizing peptide)
Specificity validation techniques:
Antibody validation in Myc-knockdown cells
Parallel testing with alternative clones/antibodies
Cross-validation with non-biotin conjugated Myc antibody
Mass spectrometry confirmation of immunoprecipitated proteins
Biotin conjugation offers distinct advantages and limitations compared to other conjugation methods for Myc antibodies:
Methodological considerations for choosing biotin conjugation:
Signal amplification requirements:
Choose biotin conjugation when detecting low-abundance targets
The biotin-streptavidin system provides significant signal enhancement through multiple biotin binding sites on streptavidin (up to 4 biotin molecules per streptavidin)
Detection system flexibility:
Biotin conjugation allows selection of different detection reagents (fluorescent, enzymatic, or nanoparticle streptavidin conjugates) with the same primary antibody
This enables adaptation to different experimental platforms without changing the primary antibody
Tissue-specific considerations:
For tissues with high endogenous biotin (liver, kidney, brain), consider alternatives or implement stringent blocking steps
For formalin-fixed paraffin-embedded tissues, biotin conjugation often provides superior sensitivity after antigen retrieval
Application-specific optimization:
Understanding these differences helps researchers select the appropriate Myc antibody conjugation based on specific experimental requirements and sample characteristics.
When using Myc antibody, Biotin conjugated for detecting Myc-tagged fusion proteins, consider these critical methodological aspects:
Tag positioning effects:
Clone selection rationale:
Application-specific protocol adjustments:
For flow cytometry:
For immunoprecipitation:
Optimized lysis buffers to preserve epitope accessibility
Pre-clearing lysate with Protein G beads reduces background
For immunohistochemistry:
Antigen retrieval methods may affect tag detection
Consider epitope masking during fixation
Potential artifacts and limitations:
Tag-induced conformational changes may alter protein function
High expression levels may cause aggregation affecting detection
Multiple Myc tags (e.g., 3× Myc) increase sensitivity but may affect protein function
Competition with endogenous Myc for antibody binding
Validation strategies:
Confirm tag presence by sequencing before experiments
Include untagged controls
Compare detection using anti-tag vs. anti-protein antibodies
Validate cellular localization against known patterns
Cross-reactivity considerations:
Endogenous c-Myc could interfere with detection of Myc-tagged proteins
In cancer cell lines with high c-Myc expression, consider additional controls
Some natural proteins contain Myc-like epitopes that may cross-react
Quantification methods:
Careful consideration of these factors ensures reliable and specific detection of Myc-tagged fusion proteins across different experimental applications.
Optimizing antigen retrieval is crucial for successful immunohistochemistry with Myc antibody, Biotin conjugated. Here's a methodological approach to optimization:
Comprehensive antigen retrieval optimization protocol:
Heat-induced epitope retrieval (HIER) buffer comparison:
| Buffer Type | Composition | pH | Advantages | Limitations |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Citrate | 10mM Sodium Citrate | 6.0 | Gentle, widely compatible | May be insufficient for some fixatives |
| Tris-EDTA | 10mM Tris, 1mM EDTA | 9.0 | More aggressive, better for overfixed tissues | Can damage some tissues |
| EDTA | 1mM EDTA | 8.0 | Good for nuclear antigens like Myc | May require longer incubation |
| Commercial retrieval solutions | Various | Various | Optimized formulations | Higher cost |
HIER method comparison:
Microwave heating: 3 × 5 minutes at 95-98°C with cooling periods
Pressure cooker: 5 minutes at full pressure
Water bath: 30-40 minutes at 95-98°C
Steamer: 20-30 minutes at 95-98°C
Systematic testing of each method with consistent timing and temperature monitoring is recommended
Enzymatic retrieval alternatives:
Proteinase K (10-20 μg/ml, 10-15 minutes at 37°C)
Trypsin (0.05%, 15-20 minutes at 37°C)
Pepsin (0.5%, 15 minutes at 37°C)
Note: Enzymatic methods may work better for some fixatives but risk epitope destruction
Combined retrieval approach:
Sequential HIER followed by mild enzymatic treatment
Monitor tissue integrity throughout
Optimization variables to test systematically:
Temperature (80°C, 90°C, 95°C, 100°C)
Duration (10, 20, 30, 40 minutes)
pH (6.0, 8.0, 9.0)
Cooling period (immediate vs. gradual cooling)
Tissue-specific considerations:
Fixation duration affects retrieval requirements
Tissue type influences optimal method (e.g., lymphoid tissues vs. epithelial)
Sample age (older FFPE blocks may require more aggressive retrieval)
Success evaluation metrics:
Signal intensity of known positive controls
Signal-to-noise ratio
Tissue morphology preservation
Subcellular localization accuracy (nuclear for Myc)
Consistency across replicate sections
Troubleshooting guidance:
No signal: Increase retrieval time/temperature
Excessive background: Decrease retrieval time/temperature
Tissue damage: Reduce retrieval intensity, switch methods
Nuclear washing: Adjust fixation for future samples, modify retrieval
By systematically testing these variables with appropriate controls, researchers can identify the optimal antigen retrieval protocol for Myc detection in their specific tissue samples, improving both sensitivity and specificity of Myc antibody, Biotin conjugated in immunohistochemistry applications.
Advanced multiplexing with Myc antibody, Biotin conjugated requires careful experimental design and execution. Here are methodological approaches for successful multi-parameter detection:
Sequential multiplexing approaches:
Tyramide signal amplification (TSA) method:
Apply Myc antibody, Biotin conjugated
Detect with streptavidin-HRP
Develop with tyramide-fluorophore (e.g., TSA-Cy3)
Microwave to strip antibodies while preserving covalently bound fluorophore
Repeat with additional markers
Advantages: High sensitivity, minimal cross-reactivity
Limitations: Time-consuming, risk of epitope damage during stripping
Spectral unmixing approach:
Simultaneously apply multiple antibodies with distinct conjugates
Image using spectral detection system
Computationally separate overlapping fluorophore signals
Advantages: Faster protocol, no stripping required
Limitations: Requires specialized equipment, complex analysis
Panel design considerations:
| Factor | Recommendation | Rationale |
|---|---|---|
| Host species combination | Use antibodies from different species | Prevents cross-reactivity of secondary reagents |
| Subcellular localization | Combine markers with distinct patterns | Facilitates visual separation (e.g., nuclear Myc with membrane markers) |
| Signal strength balancing | Match antibody dilutions to equalize signals | Prevents dominant signals from obscuring weaker ones |
| Fluorophore selection | Choose fluorophores with minimal spectral overlap | Reduces bleed-through and simplifies analysis |
| Order of application | Apply lowest abundance target first | Maximizes detection of limiting epitopes |
Technical solutions for biotin-based multiplexing:
Blocking endogenous biotin:
Apply avidin/biotin blocking kit before antibody incubation
Critical for tissues with high endogenous biotin (liver, kidney)
Distinguishing multiple biotinylated antibodies:
Apply in sequential rounds with intermediate stripping
Use size-distinct streptavidin conjugates (quantum dots of different sizes)
Employ proximity ligation assay (PLA) techniques for co-localization studies
Advanced detection strategies:
Multi-spectral imaging systems:
Leica Stellaris or Zeiss LSM systems with spectral detectors
Allow separation of closely overlapping fluorophores
Mass cytometry (CyTOF) approach:
Use metal-tagged antibodies instead of fluorophores
Eliminates spectral overlap issues
Allows simultaneous detection of 40+ markers
Cyclic immunofluorescence:
Image initial markers, then chemically inactivate
Repeat with new antibody sets (up to 60 markers on same sample)
Optimization and validation:
Control samples:
Single-stained controls for each marker
Fluorescence-minus-one (FMO) controls
Isotype controls for each species/isotype
Cross-reactivity testing:
Apply secondary reagents alone to confirm specificity
Test for unexpected binding between assay components
Quantitative validation:
Compare multiplexed results to single-stained samples
Ensure consistent signal intensity and localization patterns
Data analysis approaches:
Cell segmentation algorithms for single-cell quantification
Co-localization analysis using Pearson's or Mander's coefficients
Machine learning classification of complex cellular phenotypes