MYL3, encoded by the MYL3 gene, is a 22 kDa protein that modulates myosin crossbridge kinetics by binding to the IQXXXRGXXXR motifs in the myosin head . It plays a pivotal role in regulating cardiac muscle contraction and has been implicated in familial hypertrophic cardiomyopathy (HCM) due to mutations clustering in its EF-hand domains .
Isoforms: Expressed in ventricular and slow skeletal muscles, distinct from MYL1 (fast skeletal) and MYL4 (atrial) .
Function: Modulates actin-myosin interaction via its lysine-rich N-terminal region .
Clinical Significance: Mutations linked to mid-left ventricular HCM and identified as a serum biomarker for drug-induced myotoxicity .
The MYL3 antibody is engineered to target specific epitopes of the MYL3 protein, enabling its detection in various experimental and diagnostic contexts.
Western Blot (WB): Detects ~22–27 kDa bands in human, mouse, and rat samples.
Immunohistochemistry (IHC): Localizes MYL3 in cardiac and skeletal tissues.
Immunofluorescence (IF): Visualizes MYL3 in chondrocytes and muscle cells.
Immunoprecipitation (IP): Studies MYL3-protein interactions (e.g., with myosin heavy chains).
The MYL3 antibody has been instrumental in elucidating MYL3’s roles in:
Mutations in MYL3 (e.g., M149V, R154H) disrupt myosin’s actin-binding affinity, leading to HCM .
Antibody-based assays confirm MYL3 as a diagnostic biomarker for drug-induced cardiomyopathy .
MYL3 inhibits clathrin-mediated endocytosis (CME) and senescence in chondrocytes, delaying osteoarthritis (OA) progression .
Overexpression of MYL3 reduces OA markers (e.g., SASP factors) in murine models .
MYL3 serves as a receptor for Nervous Necrosis Virus (NNV), facilitating viral internalization via macropinocytosis .
Antibody blockade (e.g., anti-MYL3 Abs) inhibits NNV infection in vitro and in vivo .
MYL3 (Myosin Light Chain 3) is an alkali light chain of myosin also referred to as ventricular isoform (MLC1v) and slow skeletal muscle isoform. It functions as a regulatory light chain that activates the mechanical movement of myosin chains, significantly impacting cardiac and skeletal muscle contraction. MYL3 interacts with proteins such as tropomyosin and troponin which are crucial for regulating muscle contraction . The protein does not bind calcium directly but plays an essential role in the proper functioning of cardiac and skeletal muscles through its phosphorylation state, which is critical for regulating muscle contraction . Notably, mutations in MYL3 have been identified as a cause of mid-left ventricular chamber type hypertrophic cardiomyopathy .
MYL3 has a calculated molecular weight of approximately 22 kDa, though observed molecular weights in laboratory testing often range between 22-27 kDa depending on post-translational modifications and experimental conditions . The human MYL3 protein shows high sequence identity (91%) with mouse MYL3, underscoring its strong evolutionary conservation . This conservation suggests its fundamental importance in muscle physiology across mammalian species. The structure of myosin, including MYL3, consists of a long asymmetric molecule featuring a globular head and a long tail, which facilitates interaction with actin filaments during muscle contraction .
MYL3 antibodies are versatile tools employed in multiple experimental methodologies:
Application | Description | Typical Dilutions |
---|---|---|
Western Blotting (WB) | Detecting MYL3 protein expression in tissue lysates | 1:500-1:50000 |
Immunohistochemistry (IHC) | Visualizing MYL3 in tissue sections | 1:20-1:2000 |
Immunofluorescence (IF) | Subcellular localization studies | 1:50-1:500 |
ELISA | Quantitative protein analysis | 1 μg/ml |
Immunoprecipitation (IP) | Protein-protein interaction studies | 0.5-4.0 μg for 1.0-3.0 mg lysate |
Flow Cytometry | Cellular analysis | 0.4 μg per 10^6 cells |
These applications have been validated across human, mouse, rat, and pig samples, making MYL3 antibodies valuable for comparative studies .
Selection of an appropriate MYL3 antibody requires consideration of multiple factors:
Target species reactivity: Verify cross-reactivity with your experimental model. Many MYL3 antibodies demonstrate reactivity with human, mouse, and rat samples, but specificity varies between products .
Application compatibility: Some antibodies perform better in certain applications. For example, monoclonal antibody 66286-1-Ig shows exceptional performance in Western blotting with dilutions up to 1:50000, while polyclonal antibody 10913-1-AP demonstrates broader application versatility across WB, IHC, IF/ICC, FC, and IP .
Epitope recognition: Consider which region of MYL3 your antibody recognizes. Antibodies targeting different epitopes (e.g., N-terminal vs. internal regions) may yield different results depending on protein conformation and post-translational modifications .
Clone type: Monoclonal antibodies offer higher specificity and reproducibility, while polyclonal antibodies may provide higher sensitivity and recognition of multiple epitopes .
Validation data: Review published literature and manufacturer validation data to confirm the antibody's performance in your specific application .
Rigorous experimental design with appropriate controls is essential:
Positive tissue controls: Include samples known to express MYL3 such as heart tissue, ventricular muscle, or slow skeletal muscle for validation .
Negative controls: Include tissues that do not express MYL3 or use secondary antibody-only controls to assess non-specific binding.
Blocking peptide controls: When available, use the immunizing peptide to compete with antibody binding and demonstrate specificity.
Loading controls: For Western blots, include housekeeping proteins (e.g., GAPDH, β-actin) to normalize MYL3 expression.
Isotype controls: For flow cytometry or immunohistochemistry, use isotype-matched irrelevant antibodies to assess background staining.
Species cross-reactivity validation: If working with non-human samples, verify antibody performance in your specific species of interest .
Sample preparation significantly impacts experimental success:
For Western Blotting:
Extract proteins using RIPA or NP-40 buffers containing protease inhibitors
Include phosphatase inhibitors if studying phosphorylation states
Optimal protein loading typically ranges from 20-50 μg per lane
Denature samples at 95-100°C for 5 minutes in reducing sample buffer
For Immunohistochemistry:
For formalin-fixed, paraffin-embedded samples, antigen retrieval with TE buffer pH 9.0 is recommended
Alternative antigen retrieval with citrate buffer pH 6.0 may be performed if needed
4-10 μm section thickness is optimal for visualization
For Immunofluorescence:
Fixation with 4% paraformaldehyde for 10-15 minutes at room temperature
Permeabilization with 0.1-0.5% Triton X-100 for intracellular proteins
Western blotting for MYL3 can be optimized with these technical considerations:
Gel percentage selection: Use 12-15% acrylamide gels for optimal resolution of MYL3 (22 kDa)
Transfer conditions: Employ semi-dry transfer at 15-20V for 30-45 minutes or wet transfer at 100V for 1 hour with methanol-containing transfer buffer to improve transfer of low molecular weight proteins
Blocking optimization: 5% non-fat dry milk in TBST is generally effective, though 3-5% BSA may reduce background for some antibodies
Primary antibody incubation:
Signal development: Enhanced chemiluminescence (ECL) with longer exposure times may be necessary for detecting low abundance MYL3
Expected band patterns: Anticipate bands at 22-27 kDa, with potential variation based on post-translational modifications
For optimal IHC results with MYL3 antibodies:
Antigen retrieval optimization:
Antibody dilution ranges:
Detection systems:
Counterstaining:
Light hematoxylin counterstaining provides optimal nuclear contrast
Avoid overstaining which can mask weak MYL3 signals
Tissue considerations:
Human cardiac and skeletal muscle tissues serve as excellent positive controls
Staining patterns should show cytoplasmic distribution in muscle fibers
Challenge | Possible Causes | Solution Strategies |
---|---|---|
Weak or no signal in WB | Insufficient protein, degradation, or low antibody sensitivity | Increase protein loading, ensure fresh samples with protease inhibitors, increase antibody concentration |
Multiple bands in WB | Cross-reactivity, protein degradation, or splice variants | Use monoclonal antibodies, optimize sample preparation, verify with alternative antibody |
High background in IHC | Insufficient blocking, excessive antibody, or endogenous peroxidase | Increase blocking time, optimize antibody dilution, include H₂O₂ blocking step |
Non-specific staining in IF | Inadequate blocking, overfixation, or autofluorescence | Use 5-10% normal serum from secondary antibody host, optimize fixation time, include quenching steps |
Inconsistent results between batches | Antibody lot variations or protocol inconsistencies | Use the same antibody lot for entire study, standardize protocols with detailed SOPs |
MYL3 demonstrates tissue-specific expression patterns that inform understanding of muscle physiology:
Cardiac expression: Predominantly expressed in ventricular myocardium as the ventricular isoform (MLC1v)
Skeletal muscle expression: Primarily found in slow skeletal muscle fibers (type I fibers)
Expression comparison:
Highest expression levels are typically observed in heart tissue
Moderate expression in slow skeletal muscle
Minimal or absent expression in fast skeletal muscle
Developmental regulation: Expression patterns change during development and in response to physiological or pathological conditions
Pathological alterations: Changes in MYL3 expression or phosphorylation state occur in various cardiac diseases, particularly hypertrophic cardiomyopathy
MYL3 antibodies provide valuable tools for cardiovascular research:
Hypertrophic cardiomyopathy (HCM) studies:
Cardiac development research:
Track MYL3 expression during cardiomyocyte differentiation
Examine isoform switching during heart development
Cardiac injury models:
Therapeutic development:
Analysis of MYL3 phosphorylation requires specific methodological approaches:
Phosphorylation significance:
Sample preparation:
Include phosphatase inhibitors in all buffers during sample preparation
Avoid freeze-thaw cycles that may affect phosphorylation status
Consider using phosphorylation-specific antibodies when available
Analytical techniques:
Phos-tag SDS-PAGE can resolve phosphorylated from non-phosphorylated forms
2D gel electrophoresis separates phosphorylated isoforms based on charge differences
Mass spectrometry provides precise identification of phosphorylation sites
Controls and standards:
Include both phosphatase-treated and untreated samples as controls
Use positive controls with known phosphorylation states
Quantification approaches:
Densitometric analysis of Western blots with phospho-specific antibodies
Ratio analysis of phosphorylated to total MYL3 provides normalization
MYL3 antibodies have emerging applications in stem cell research:
Cardiomyocyte differentiation monitoring:
MYL3 serves as a terminal differentiation marker for ventricular cardiomyocytes
Antibodies enable tracking of differentiation efficiency in stem cell protocols
Engineered heart tissue assessment:
Evaluating MYL3 expression and localization in tissue-engineered cardiac constructs
Comparing engineered tissues to native myocardium
Single-cell analysis:
Flow cytometry with MYL3 antibodies enables sorting of cardiomyocyte populations
Immunofluorescence allows evaluation of cellular heterogeneity in differentiated cultures
Functional maturation studies:
Correlation of MYL3 expression patterns with functional parameters in developing cardiomyocytes
Assessment of isoform switching during maturation
Multiple techniques leveraging MYL3 antibodies can elucidate protein interaction networks:
Co-immunoprecipitation (Co-IP):
Proximity ligation assay (PLA):
Detect in situ protein-protein interactions with spatial resolution
Requires MYL3 antibody and antibody against suspected interaction partner
Immunofluorescence co-localization:
Cross-linking coupled with immunoprecipitation:
Chemical cross-linking preserves transient interactions
MYL3 antibodies pull down cross-linked complexes
Mass spectrometry following immunoprecipitation:
Unbiased identification of MYL3 interaction partners
Quantitative approaches can compare interactions under different conditions
Detecting MYL3 mutations requires integrated methodological approaches:
Antibody-based detection of mutant proteins:
Wild-type specific antibodies may show reduced binding to mutant forms
Comparing staining patterns between wild-type and mutant samples
Expression level analysis:
Quantitative Western blotting to assess potential changes in protein stability
qPCR validation of transcriptional effects
Subcellular localization studies:
Immunofluorescence to detect altered localization of mutant proteins
Co-staining with sarcomeric markers to assess incorporation into myofibrils
Functional impact assessment:
Phosphorylation state analysis of mutant proteins
Correlation with functional parameters in cardiomyocyte models
Patient-derived samples:
Comparing antibody staining patterns in biopsy samples from patients with MYL3 mutations
Validating findings in engineered cell models expressing specific mutations
Implementation of rigorous quality control enhances experimental reliability:
Antibody validation checklist:
Confirm target specificity through knockout/knockdown controls
Verify recognition of recombinant MYL3 protein
Test cross-reactivity with closely related proteins (e.g., other myosin light chains)
Compare results with multiple antibodies recognizing different epitopes
Batch testing protocols:
Always test new antibody lots against previous lots
Maintain reference samples for consistency checks
Document lot-specific optimal dilutions
Storage and handling:
Application-specific validation:
Validate each antibody independently for each application
Establish clear acceptance criteria for each experimental system
Technological advances are expanding the utility of MYL3 antibodies:
Super-resolution microscopy:
Nanoscale visualization of MYL3 integration within sarcomeric structures
Improved resolution of structural changes in disease models
In vivo imaging approaches:
Fluorescently-labeled MYL3 antibody fragments for live imaging
Non-invasive monitoring of cardiac damage markers
Multiplexed detection systems:
Simultaneous visualization of multiple sarcomeric proteins
Mass cytometry for single-cell protein profiling
Antibody engineering:
Recombinant antibody fragments with improved tissue penetration
Bi-specific antibodies for novel detection approaches
AI-assisted image analysis:
Automated quantification of staining patterns
Machine learning algorithms for pattern recognition in complex tissues