MYLK2 (Myosin Light Chain Kinase 2) is a calcium/calmodulin-dependent serine/threonine kinase expressed exclusively in adult skeletal and cardiac muscle. The protein has several alternative names including MLCK2, skMLCK, KMLC, and myosin light chain kinase 2 skeletal/cardiac muscle isoform.
MYLK2 plays a crucial role in muscle contractility through the following mechanisms:
Catalyzes the phosphorylation reaction: ATP + [myosin light-chain] = ADP + [myosin light-chain] phosphate
Specifically phosphorylates a serine residue in the N-terminus of myosin light chain
Mediates the excitation-contraction coupling process following calcium release
This enzyme belongs to the protein kinase superfamily and CAMK Ser/Thr protein kinase family, with a calculated molecular weight of approximately 65 kDa. MYLK2 is implicated in cardiovascular disease processes when dysregulated, making it an important target for both basic muscle physiology research and pathological studies .
MYLK2 antibodies have been validated across multiple experimental applications with varying degrees of optimization. Based on comprehensive analysis of available products:
When planning experiments, researchers should consider that Western blotting provides the most consistent results across different MYLK2 antibody sources. For applications requiring spatial resolution (IHC/IF), additional validation steps are recommended to confirm specificity .
A methodical approach to MYLK2 antibody validation should include:
Multiple sources confirm successful detection of MYLK2 in:
Use tissues known to lack MYLK2 expression
Consider knockout/knockdown validation if available
Include isotype control antibodies in parallel experiments
Expected molecular weight detection (65 kDa)
Correct cellular localization (cytoplasmic)
Cross-reactivity assessment across species
Batch-to-batch consistency verification
Researchers should perform their own validation experiments rather than relying solely on manufacturer data. This includes titration experiments to determine optimal antibody concentration, which can vary significantly from published recommendations based on specific experimental conditions and detection methods .
Successful Western blot detection of MYLK2 requires specific technical optimizations:
Use skeletal muscle tissue as positive control
Optimize protein extraction with buffers containing protease inhibitors
For cell lines, verify MYLK2 expression levels before experimentation
Standard wet transfer protocols are suitable
Transfer time may need extension due to MYLK2's molecular weight
Primary antibody incubation: 1:1000-1:2000 dilution range shows consistent results
Overnight incubation at 4°C improves signal-to-noise ratio
Secondary antibody selection should match primary host species
When troubleshooting weak signals, extending primary antibody incubation time is more effective than increasing concentration
The predicted band size for MYLK2 is 65 kDa, though slight variations may occur due to post-translational modifications. Researchers should be aware that some antibodies may detect additional bands, requiring careful interpretation of results .
MYLK2 sequence homology varies across species, requiring strategic antibody selection for comparative studies:
The majority of available MYLK2 antibodies demonstrate reactivity with:
Human MYLK2 (most commonly validated)
Mouse MYLK2 (well validated)
Rat MYLK2 (well validated)
Limited validation for other species including avian, bovine, and porcine
Antibodies targeting conserved regions show broader cross-reactivity. Based on available data:
Antibodies targeting the central region (AA 330-450) show highest cross-species reactivity
N-terminal epitopes (AA 1-100) generally show more species-specific binding
C-terminal epitopes provide intermediate cross-reactivity
Perform preliminary validation experiments in each species of interest
Adjust antibody concentration based on species-specific binding efficiency
Consider epitope sequence alignment analysis before purchasing antibodies
For novel species applications, select antibodies raised against highly conserved regions
When planning comparative studies across species, researchers should confirm cross-reactivity experimentally rather than relying solely on manufacturer claims. Different applications may require different antibody selections even within the same study .
Detection of phosphorylated myosin light chains (the substrate of MYLK2) requires specialized approaches:
Anti-phospho myosin light chain antibodies are distinct from MYLK2 antibodies
These target the specific serine residue phosphorylated by MYLK2
Require separate validation from MYLK2 antibodies themselves
In vitro kinase assays:
Immunoprecipitate MYLK2 using anti-MYLK2 antibodies
Incubate with purified myosin light chain substrate and ATP
Detect phosphorylation via 32P incorporation or phospho-specific antibodies
Calcium/calmodulin dependence validation:
Pharmacological inhibition controls:
Include MYLK-specific inhibitors (e.g., ML-7, ML-9)
Establish dose-dependent inhibition curves
Use as negative controls in activity assays
Researchers investigating MYLK2 enzymatic function should consider a complementary approach using both anti-MYLK2 antibodies to detect the enzyme and phospho-specific antibodies to detect its substrate's phosphorylation state .
Successful detection of MYLK2 in tissue sections requires specific protocol optimizations:
TE buffer (pH 9.0) provides optimal results for most MYLK2 antibodies
Alternative: citrate buffer (pH 6.0) for antibodies where alkaline retrieval fails
Heat-induced epitope retrieval (HIER) is generally superior to enzymatic methods
Skeletal muscle: 10% neutral buffered formalin fixation (12-24h) recommended
Cardiac tissue: shorter fixation times (6-12h) may improve antigen accessibility
Paraffin sections: 4-6 μm thickness optimal for signal detection
Blocking: 5-10% normal serum from secondary antibody host species
Primary antibody concentration: Start with 1:100 dilution and titrate as needed
Incubation time: Overnight at 4°C generally yields superior results
Secondary detection: Biotin-streptavidin amplification may enhance sensitivity
Counterstaining: Hematoxylin (blue) provides optimal contrast with DAB detection
For double immunofluorescence studies, researchers should carefully select MYLK2 antibodies raised in different host species than antibodies against other targets of interest to avoid cross-reactivity of secondary antibodies .
When facing inconsistent results with MYLK2 antibodies, systematic troubleshooting should address:
No signal detected:
Multiple bands:
High background:
Weak or absent signal:
Avoid repeated freeze-thaw cycles (aliquot upon receipt)
For long-term storage, maintain at -20°C
For frequent use, store at 4°C for up to one month
Centrifuge antibody briefly before opening to collect solution
Detailed record-keeping of experimental conditions facilitates systematic troubleshooting and allows for identification of variables affecting antibody performance.
MYLK2 antibodies provide valuable tools for examining cardiac disease mechanisms:
MYLK2 mutations have been associated with HCM (identified as CMH10)
Antibodies can detect altered expression/localization in disease models
Quantitative analysis of MYLK2 levels correlates with disease progression
Tissue preparation:
Fresh-frozen cardiac tissue provides superior antigen preservation
Consider specific fixation protocols for MYLK2 detection
Sectioning thickness: 5-8 μm optimal for cardiac tissue
Co-localization studies:
Combine MYLK2 antibodies with markers of:
Sarcomeric structures (α-actinin, troponin)
Calcium handling proteins (SERCA2a, RyR2)
Pathological remodeling (fibrosis markers)
Quantitative analysis approaches:
Researchers should consider that MYLK2 expression and activity may be differentially regulated in cardiac versus skeletal muscle, necessitating tissue-specific protocol optimizations and controls .
Beyond standard detection applications, MYLK2 antibodies enable sophisticated research approaches:
Allows visualization of protein-protein interactions in situ
Can detect MYLK2 interactions with calcium/calmodulin and its substrates
Requires careful selection of antibody pairs raised in different host species
ChIP-grade MYLK2 antibodies can identify transcriptional regulatory mechanisms
Enables genome-wide binding site identification
Requires validation for chromatin immunoprecipitation specificity
Flow cytometry applications (optimized fixation/permeabilization required)
Mass cytometry (CyTOF) for multi-parameter analysis
Single-cell Western blotting for heterogeneity assessment
Use of fluorescently conjugated MYLK2 antibody fragments
Requires validation of antibody effect on MYLK2 function
Alternative: correlation with genetically encoded MYLK2 fusion proteins
These advanced applications generally require extensive validation and optimization beyond standard protocols. Researchers should conduct preliminary experiments to verify antibody suitability for these specialized techniques before proceeding with full-scale studies .
The format of MYLK2 antibodies significantly influences experimental results:
Unconjugated: Most versatile, allows custom secondary detection
Direct conjugates (e.g., biotin, fluorophores): Reduce steps, enable multiplexing
Enzyme conjugates (HRP, AP): Provide direct detection without secondaries
| Application | Recommended Format | Advantages | Limitations |
|---|---|---|---|
| WB | Unconjugated | Flexibility in detection, signal amplification | Requires secondary antibody |
| ELISA | Biotin/HRP conjugates | Direct detection, reduced steps | Less signal amplification |
| IF/IHC | Fluorophore conjugates | Direct visualization, multiplexing | Photobleaching concerns |
| Flow cytometry | Fluorophore conjugates | Direct detection, quantification | Limited signal amplification |
For multiplex fluorescence, select formats with non-overlapping emission spectra
For chromogenic IHC, enzyme conjugates or biotin systems provide optimal results
Consider background concerns when using direct conjugates in tissues with high autofluorescence
The biotin-conjugated MYLK2 antibody format offers particular advantages for techniques requiring signal amplification through streptavidin-based detection systems, while fluorophore conjugates are optimal for co-localization studies .
MYLK2 expression and function varies between muscle types, requiring tailored experimental approaches:
Skeletal muscle: Highest expression levels (fast-twitch > slow-twitch fibers)
Cardiac muscle: Significant expression but lower than skeletal muscle
Smooth muscle: Minimal MYLK2 (predominantly expresses MYLK1)
Fiber-type specific analysis:
Co-staining with fiber-type markers (MHC isoforms)
Serial section analysis for fiber typing
Correlation of MYLK2 levels with contractile properties
Tissue preparation considerations:
Skeletal muscle: Critical to maintain fiber orientation during sectioning
Cardiac muscle: Attention to regional differences (atria vs. ventricles)
Control for post-mortem degradation effects on phosphorylation status
Functional correlation approaches: