MYOD1 (Ab-200) Antibody

Shipped with Ice Packs
In Stock

Description

Target Protein: MYOD1

MYOD1 (myogenic differentiation 1) is a transcription factor critical for skeletal muscle development. Key features include:

FeatureDetails
Gene ID4654 (Human)
UniProt IDP15172
Molecular Weight~35–45 kDa (observed); 34 kDa (calculated)
FunctionActivates muscle-specific genes; induces fibroblast-to-myoblast differentiation
Regulatory RoleCooperates with pRb to enforce cell cycle arrest in differentiated myoblasts

Research Applications

The MYOD1 (Ab-200) Antibody is validated for Western blot applications . While other MYOD1 antibodies (e.g., Rockland’s 200-301-H94 or Proteintech’s 18943-1-AP ) support additional methods like IHC, IF, and IP, the Ab-200 variant is specialized for WB.

Key Validation Notes:

  • Specificity: Recognizes MYOD1 at endogenous levels without cross-reactivity to unrelated proteins .

  • Species Reactivity: Confirmed in human, mouse, and rat samples .

  • Immunogen Design: Targets a conserved epitope (aa 198–202), enabling broad cross-species detection .

Biological Relevance of MYOD1

MYOD1 is essential for myogenic commitment:

  • Early Differentiation Marker: Expressed in myosatellite cells upon muscle damage or exercise .

  • Functional Redundancy: Compensated by Myf5 and MRF4 in knockout models, limiting developmental defects .

  • Transcriptional Mechanism: Binds muscle-specific gene promoters with Myf5 and Myogenin during myogenesis .

Comparative Analysis with Other MYOD1 Antibodies

AntibodyHostClonalityApplicationsKey Distinction
MYOD1 (Ab-200) RabbitPolyclonalWBTargets aa 198–202; no cross-reactivity
200-301-H94 MouseMonoclonalWB, IHC, IF, FC, IPRecognizes internal epitope; IgG1 isotype
18943-1-AP RabbitPolyclonalWB, IHC, IF, ChIP, ELISADetects phosphorylation-dependent MYOD1

Limitations and Considerations

  • Application Range: Restricted to WB, unlike broader-use alternatives .

  • Staining Patterns: Nuclear MYOD1 is undetectable in normal adult tissues but observed in fetal muscle and rhabdomyosarcomas .

Product Specs

Form
Supplied at 1.0 mg/mL in phosphate buffered saline (without Mg2+ and Ca2+), pH 7.4, 150 mM NaCl, 0.02% sodium azide and 50% glycerol.
Lead Time
Typically, we can ship your orders within 1-3 business days of receiving them. Delivery times may vary depending on the purchasing method or location. Please consult your local distributor for specific delivery details.
Synonyms
bHLHc1 antibody; Class C basic helix-loop-helix protein 1 antibody; MYF 3 antibody; Myf-3 antibody; MYF3 antibody; Myoblast determination protein 1 antibody; Myod 1 antibody; MYOD antibody; MYOD1 antibody; MYOD1_HUMAN antibody; Myogenic differentiation 1 antibody; Myogenic factor 3 antibody; Myogenic factor MYF 3 antibody; Myogenin D1 antibody; PUM antibody
Target Names
MYOD1
Uniprot No.

Target Background

Function
MYOD1 functions as a transcriptional activator, promoting the transcription of muscle-specific target genes and playing a crucial role in muscle differentiation. It collaborates with MYF5 and MYOG to co-occupy the core region of muscle-specific gene promoters during myogenesis. MYOD1 induces fibroblasts to differentiate into myoblasts. It interacts with and is inhibited by the twist protein, an interaction likely involving the basic domains of both proteins.
Gene References Into Functions
  1. This paradox is addressed by examining basic helix-loop-helix (bHLH) transcription factors ASCL1, ASCL2, and MYOD1, key mediators of lineage specification. Although the ASCL factors and MYOD1 exhibit distinct DNA motif preferences, this is not sufficient to explain the extent of their differential binding. All three factors can bind inaccessible chromatin and induce changes in chromatin accessibility and H3K27ac. PMID: 29500235
  2. ACL regulates the net amount of acetyl groups available, leading to alterations in acetylation of H3(K9/14) and H3(K27) at the MYOD locus, thereby increasing MYOD expression. PMID: 29241530
  3. It has been observed that the MYOD transcription factor can upregulate miR-223 expression by binding to an E-box region of the gga-miR-223 gene promoter during avian myoblast differentiation. IGF2 and ZEB1 are two target genes of miR-223. PMID: 28981085
  4. A high percentage, exceeding 25%, of BRAF(V600E) alleles may be associated with disease outcome in PTC patients. PMID: 27688110
  5. This study presents the first report of a MYOD1 (L122R) mutation in the largest cohort of 49 rhabdomyosarcomas reported to date, which are associated with a relatively aggressive clinical course. PMID: 27562493
  6. Cell transdifferentiation of primary skin fibroblasts by forced expression of the myogenic transcription factor MyoD was performed through quantitative analyses of gene expression and chromatin accessibility profiles. PMID: 28977539
  7. Analysis of the chromatin status of the Cdkn1c promoter and KvDMR1 in unresponsive compared to responsive cell types revealed that their differential responsiveness to MyoD-dependent induction of the gene does not solely involve their methylation status but rather the differential H3 lysine 9 dimethylation at KvDMR1. PMID: 27611768
  8. Data indicate that MeCP2 promotes gastric cancer (GC) cell proliferation via the FOXF1-mediated Wnt5a/beta-Catenin signaling pathway and suppresses GC cell apoptosis through MYOD1-mediated Caspase-3 signaling pathway. PMID: 28131747
  9. Findings on Pax7 and MyoD protein expression suggest that proliferation and differentiation of skeletal muscle stem cells are affected in ALS patients, and the myogenic processes cannot overcome the denervation-induced wasting. PMID: 27195289
  10. The molecular pathogenesis of radiotherapy-induced muscle fibrosis involves the TGF-beta1 pathway and its repression of MyoD expression. This study suggests a correlation between traditional swallow therapy/neuromuscular electrical stimulation combined therapy and the restoration of TGF-beta1/MyoD homeostasis in cervical muscles. PMID: 27144672
  11. Unmethylated MYOD1 gene is associated with chemoradiation resistance in Invasive Cervical Carcinoma. PMID: 26344356
  12. This study provides the first description of a human phenotype that appears to result from MYOD1 mutation. The presentation with Lethal fetal akinesia deformation sequence aligns with a significant body of data demonstrating that in the mouse, MyoD is a major controller of precursor cell commitment to the myogenic differentiation program. PMID: 26733463
  13. These results suggest that sarcoma metastasis can be partially controlled through Pax7/MyoD-dependent activation of miR-182, providing insight into the role of myogenic transcription factors in sarcoma progression. PMID: 26234681
  14. The mechanism of bakuchiol-induced myogenesis is described. PMID: 26902638
  15. These observations demonstrate for the first time that Wnt3a can directly activate MyoD expression through targeting cis-elements in the DE and the L fragment. PMID: 25651906
  16. Studies indicate that MyoD occupies multiple promoters that induce the transcription of genes vital for establishing the myogenic fate and is also implicated as a mediator of many chromatin modifying enzymes for their recruitment to myogenic enhancers. PMID: 24905980
  17. MUNC is not a classic cis-acting enhancer RNA (e-RNA) acting exclusively by stimulating the neighboring MyoD gene. PMID: 25403490
  18. MyoD acts to promote SC proliferation and transition of cells into differentiation, while myogenin is known to drive terminal differentiation. PMID: 25108351
  19. A recurring point mutation in MYOD1 is found in 10% of embryonal rhabdomyosarcomas with distinct clinical features and poor prognosis. PMID: 25002625
  20. Spindle cell and sclerosing rhabdomyosarcoma show recurrent MYOD1 mutations, consistent with a single pathological entity, regardless of age at presentation. PMID: 24824843
  21. MyoD was required for the induction of FGF21 gene transcription by mitochondrial dysfunction. PMID: 25055037
  22. This study analyzes a mutation in MYOD1 that may have a role in the progression of embryonal rhabdomyosarcoma and may be associated with mutations altering PI3K-AKT pathway components. PMID: 24793135
  23. MYOD1 homozygous mutations are frequent, recurrent, and pathognomonic events in adult-type spindle cell Rhabdomyosarcoma. PMID: 24272621
  24. While expression of MyoD in a proliferating tumor is insufficient to prevent tumor progression, its expression in the cerebellum hinders medulloblastoma genesis. PMID: 24092238
  25. Direct reprogramming of fibroblasts to myocytes via bacterial injection of MyoD protein. PMID: 23438194
  26. MYOD1-transduced amnion-derived cells are capable of expressing dystrophin, which is necessary for myogenic differentiation. PMID: 22727434
  27. CRABP2 promotes myoblast differentiation and is modulated by the transcription factors MyoD and Sp1 in C2C12 cells. PMID: 23383201
  28. SREBP-1 regulates muscle protein synthesis through the downregulation of the expression of MYOD1, MYOG, and MEF2C factors. PMID: 23226416
  29. This study, utilizing both primary human muscle cells and RD rhabdomyosarcoma cells, demonstrates that MyoD binds in a similar genome-wide pattern in both tumor and normal cells but binds poorly at a subset of myogenic genes that fail to activate in the tumor cells. PMID: 23230269
  30. Promoter gene hypermethylation of the MYOD-1 gene increases significantly with age in normal individuals and thus may offer potential as a putative biomarker for colorectal cancer. PMID: 22591756
  31. Human squamous cell carcinomas and malignant melanomas contain significantly more Myo/Nog cells than basal cell carcinomas. PMID: 22621191
  32. Results suggest that MyoD and TIP120B potentiate each other at the gene expression and post-translation levels, respectively, potentially promoting myogenesis cooperatively. PMID: 22613845
  33. The involvement of HUWE1 in the ubiquitination and proteasomal degradation of MyoD was described. PMID: 22277673
  34. BAF60c-MyoD complex directs the recruitment of SWI/SNF to muscle loci in response to differentiation cues. PMID: 22068056
  35. Data demonstrate a radical acceleration of iPSC creation with a fusion gene between Oct4 and the powerful transactivation domain (TAD) of MyoD. PMID: 21732495
  36. Utilizing MYOD1, this study shows that a nucleosome-depleted region at the minimal enhancer region allows reprogramming to be initiated, which occurs in response to signals such as the forced expression of Myod1 in fibroblasts. PMID: 22153073
  37. The myofibroblasts demonstrate the capacity for de-differentiation and proliferation by modulation of endogenous levels of MyoD. PMID: 21440539
  38. MyoD can play an active role in Alveolar rhabdomyosarcoma (ARMS) by augmenting Pax7-FKHR function. PMID: 21321994
  39. Increases in MYOD indicate that one week of conventional resistance exercise may enhance myogenic activity, including satellite cell proliferation and differentiation, in younger men. PMID: 21326383
  40. Mef2d, Six4, and p38alpha MAPK function coordinately as regulators of a master regulator to mediate the expression of MyoD target genes. PMID: 20716948
  41. Knockdown of MyoD and PEA3 attenuated MDR1 expression and increased the sensitivity of multidrug-resistant cancer cells to cytotoxic drugs that were transported by P-gp in SGC7901/VCR cells. PMID: 20980337
  42. Transgenic Pax7 and MyoD are not essential for myogenic differentiation and participation of bone marrow-derived myogenic progenitors in muscle regeneration. PMID: 20333749
  43. Calpain 3 participates in the establishment of the pool of reserve cells by decreasing the transcriptional activity of the key myogenic regulator MyoD via proteolysis independently of the ubiquitin-proteasome degradation pathway. PMID: 20139084
  44. MYOD1 hypermethylation plays a significant role in colorectal cancer and may be a novel prognostic factor. PMID: 14767572
  45. MyoD modulates the rate of Id1 degradation, suggesting a dynamic interplay of these factors. PMID: 15163661
  46. Hypermethylation of MYOD1 is statistically significantly associated with poor disease outcome in cervical cancer. PMID: 15251938
  47. Degradation is modulated by E12 and E47. PMID: 16007194
  48. This review highlights studies of molecular mechanisms by which the muscle-specific myogenic basic helix-loop-helix protein MyoD interacts with other regulatory factors to coordinate gene expression in a controlled and ordered manner. PMID: 16099183
  49. The expression of MyoD1 was more sensitive but less specific in patients with rhabdomyosarcoma. PMID: 16435141
  50. The results establish that cdk9/cyclin T2a-mediated coactivation of MyoD depends on serine 37 phosphorylation. PMID: 16841087

Show More

Hide All

Database Links

HGNC: 7611

OMIM: 159970

KEGG: hsa:4654

STRING: 9606.ENSP00000250003

UniGene: Hs.181768

Subcellular Location
Nucleus.

Q&A

What is MYOD1 and what is its biological function?

MYOD1 (Myoblast Determination Protein 1) functions as a transcriptional activator that promotes transcription of muscle-specific target genes and plays a crucial role in muscle differentiation. Together with MYF5 and MYOG, it co-occupies muscle-specific gene promoter core regions during myogenesis. MYOD1 has the capacity to induce fibroblasts to differentiate into myoblasts. Its activity is regulated through interaction with the twist protein, likely involving the basic domains of both proteins .

Recent research has revealed that MYOD1 also functions as a clock amplifier in skeletal muscle, enhancing the amplitude of BMAL1 expression and creating a feed-forward regulatory loop between MYOD1 and the core clock gene BMAL1 in skeletal muscle . MYOD1 works synergistically with BMAL1:CLOCK to amplify the circadian expression of muscle-specific, clock-controlled genes such as Titin-cap (Tcap) .

What applications are MYOD1 antibodies typically used for in research?

MYOD1 antibodies are utilized across multiple experimental applications:

  • Immunohistochemistry on paraffin-embedded tissues (IHC-P) for examining MYOD1 expression in muscle tissues and rhabdomyosarcomas

  • Western blotting (WB) for detecting and quantifying MYOD1 protein expression

  • ChIP-seq experiments investigating genome-wide MYOD1 binding sites and regulatory elements

  • Studying muscle development and differentiation processes

  • Investigating transcriptional regulation during myogenesis

  • Examining circadian rhythm regulation in skeletal muscle

  • Diagnostic marker for rhabdomyosarcomas and other muscle-derived tumors

How specific are MYOD1 antibodies, and what cross-reactivity considerations are important?

MYOD1 antibody specificity varies by clone and manufacturer. For example, the 5.2F mouse monoclonal antibody specifically recognizes an epitope within amino acids 3-56 in the N-terminus of mouse MYOD1 and does not cross-react with other myogenic factors including myogenin, Myf5, or Myf6 .

When selecting a MYOD1 antibody, researchers should consider:

  • The specific epitope recognized by the antibody

  • Validated species reactivity (human, mouse, rat, etc.)

  • Potential cross-reactivity with other myogenic regulatory factors

  • Validation data in relevant applications (IHC, WB, ChIP, etc.)

  • Published validation studies demonstrating specificity

How can MYOD1 antibodies be optimized for ChIP-seq experiments to study muscle-specific enhancers?

Optimizing MYOD1 antibodies for ChIP-seq requires careful consideration of several technical parameters:

Protocol Optimization:

  • Fixation conditions: Typically 1% formaldehyde for 10 minutes

  • Sonication parameters: Target chromatin fragments of 200-500bp

  • Antibody concentration: Titrate to determine optimal amount (typically 2-5μg per reaction)

  • Washing stringency: Balance between reducing background and maintaining specific signal

Data Analysis Considerations:

  • Research has shown that approximately 30% of condition-specific muscle enhancers are bound by MYOD1

  • MYOD1 binding at enhancers is often accompanied by recruitment of additional transcription factors including c-Jun, Jdp2, Meis, and Runx1

  • MYOD1 binding correlates with enhancer-associated histone modifications such as H3K4me1 and H3K27ac

  • Consider proximity to genes involved in muscle development and differentiation when analyzing binding sites

Validation Strategies:

  • Compare MYOD1 binding sites with enhancer marks (H3K4me1, H3K27ac)

  • Perform motif enrichment analysis around binding sites to identify E-box elements

  • Use reporter assays to validate functional activity of identified enhancers

  • Compare with published datasets of MYOD1 binding in similar cell types

What are the critical considerations when using MYOD1 antibodies to study temporal dynamics of muscle differentiation?

When studying temporal dynamics of muscle differentiation using MYOD1 antibodies, researchers should consider:

Sampling Timepoints:

  • Early differentiation (0-24h): Focus on initial MYOD1 binding events

  • Mid differentiation (24-72h): Examine activation of downstream targets

  • Late differentiation (72h+): Assess maintenance of muscle-specific gene expression

Technical Considerations:

  • Use standardized cell culture conditions to minimize variability

  • Include appropriate controls at each timepoint

  • Consider dual staining with proliferation markers (early) and differentiation markers (late)

  • Quantify both MYOD1 expression levels and nuclear localization

  • Process all samples in parallel for time-course experiments when possible

Analysis Strategies:

  • Quantify the percentage of MYOD1-positive nuclei at each timepoint

  • Measure changes in MYOD1 signal intensity over time

  • Correlate MYOD1 binding with expression of downstream targets

  • Compare wildtype cells with those manipulated to alter differentiation kinetics

How can researchers use MYOD1 antibodies to investigate the circadian regulation of muscle gene expression?

Recent research has revealed MYOD1's role in circadian regulation. To investigate this function:

Experimental Design:

  • Synchronize cells using serum shock or dexamethasone treatment

  • Collect samples at regular intervals across a 24-48 hour period

  • Use MYOD1 antibodies in combination with antibodies against core clock proteins (BMAL1, CLOCK)

  • Consider bioluminescence reporters (e.g., Bmal1P-Luc) to monitor circadian oscillations

Key Findings to Consider:

  • MYOD1 enhances the amplitude of Bmal1 expression through binding to a non-canonical E-box motif (5'-CAGGGA-3') in the Bmal1 promoter

  • MYOD1 works synergistically with BMAL1:CLOCK to amplify circadian expression of muscle-specific genes

  • Approximately 30% of circadian genes in muscle are directly targeted by MYOD1

  • Gene ontology analysis shows that circadian MYOD1 target genes are enriched for muscle structure and development functions

Analytical Approach:

  • Quantify amplitude changes in clock gene expression

  • Analyze phase relationships between MYOD1, BMAL1, and target genes

  • Examine co-localization of MYOD1 with clock proteins in myonuclei

  • Compare circadian phenotypes in wildtype versus MYOD1-deficient models

What are the optimal conditions for using MYOD1 antibodies in immunohistochemistry on muscle tissue samples?

Sample Preparation:

  • Fixation: 10% neutral buffered formalin for 24-48 hours

  • Processing: Standard paraffin embedding procedures

  • Sectioning: 4-5μm sections on positively charged slides

  • Antigen retrieval: Heat-induced epitope retrieval in citrate buffer (pH 6.0) or EDTA buffer (pH 9.0)

Staining Protocol Optimization:

  • Primary antibody dilution: Titrate to determine optimal concentration

  • Incubation time: Overnight at 4°C often yields best results

  • Detection system: Polymer-based detection systems provide good signal-to-noise ratio

  • Counterstaining: Hematoxylin provides good nuclear contrast

Expected Results:

  • MYOD1 staining should be nuclear

  • Positive in myoblasts in developing muscle tissue

  • Strong expression in tumor cell nuclei of rhabdomyosarcomas

  • Generally not detected in normal adult muscle tissue

Controls:

  • Positive control: Rhabdomyosarcoma tissue

  • Negative control: Normal adult skeletal muscle (minimal expression)

  • Technical negative: Primary antibody omission

What troubleshooting steps should researchers take when MYOD1 antibody staining yields inconsistent results?

Common Issues and Solutions:

IssuePossible CausesTroubleshooting Steps
Weak or no signalInsufficient antigen retrieval, Low antibody concentration, Degraded epitopeTry stronger antigen retrieval methods, Increase antibody concentration, Use fresher tissue samples
High backgroundExcessive antibody concentration, Insufficient blocking, Non-specific bindingReduce antibody concentration, Extend blocking time, Add additional blocking agents (BSA, normal serum)
Cytoplasmic instead of nuclear stainingFixation issues, Non-specific antibody, Post-mortem changesCheck fixation protocol, Try different antibody clone, Use fresher samples
Variability between samplesInconsistent processing, Tissue heterogeneity, Technical variationStandardize processing protocol, Use tissue microarrays for comparison, Process samples in batches

Verification Steps:

  • Validate antibody specificity using positive and negative control tissues

  • Consider western blot validation on muscle tissue lysates

  • Try alternative MYOD1 antibody clones

  • Consult literature for expected staining patterns in your specific tissue/cell type

What considerations are important when performing Western blotting with MYOD1 antibodies?

Sample Preparation:

  • Extraction buffer: Include protease inhibitors and phosphatase inhibitors

  • Nuclear extraction: Consider specialized nuclear extraction protocols as MYOD1 is primarily nuclear

  • Sample handling: Process rapidly and keep samples cold to prevent degradation

  • Loading control: Use nuclear proteins like Lamin B or histone H3 as loading controls

Technical Parameters:

  • Expected molecular weight: MYOD1 appears at approximately 45 kDa

  • Recommended gel percentage: 10-12% SDS-PAGE gels typically work well

  • Transfer conditions: Semi-dry or wet transfer at appropriate voltage

  • Blocking: 5% non-fat dry milk or BSA in TBST for 1 hour at room temperature

Potential Challenges:

  • Multiple bands: May represent post-translational modifications or degradation products

  • Weak signal: MYOD1 expression is relatively low in many cell types; consider enriching nuclear fractions

  • Background: Optimize antibody dilution and washing conditions

  • Quantification: Ensure linear range of detection when performing quantitative analysis

How can MYOD1 antibodies be effectively used in ChIP-qPCR to validate specific target sites?

Experimental Design:

  • Target selection: Choose sites based on literature or preliminary ChIP-seq data

  • Primer design: Design primers flanking predicted binding sites with amplicons of 80-150bp

  • Controls: Include known MYOD1 binding sites as positive controls and gene deserts as negative controls

  • Replicates: Perform biological triplicates and technical duplicates

Protocol Optimization:

  • Chromatin shearing: Optimize sonication conditions for fragments of 200-500bp

  • Antibody amount: Typically 2-5μg per ChIP reaction, but should be titrated

  • Wash stringency: Balance between reducing background and maintaining specific signal

  • Elution conditions: Optimize for maximum recovery of immunoprecipitated DNA

Data Analysis:

  • Quantification: Calculate percent input or fold enrichment over IgG control

  • Validation criteria: Significant enrichment (typically >2-fold) over control regions

  • Correlation: Compare enrichment patterns with gene expression data

  • Motif analysis: Confirm presence of E-box motifs or related sequences at binding sites

Target Considerations Based on Literature:

  • MYOD1 binds to a non-canonical E-box motif (5'-CAGGGA-3') in the Bmal1 promoter

  • Approximately 30% of condition-specific muscle enhancers are bound by MYOD1

  • MYOD1 binding often correlates with enhancer marks H3K4me1 and H3K27ac

What are the considerations when using MYOD1 antibodies to study the assembly of transcriptional complexes at muscle enhancers?

Based on recent research, MYOD1 plays a critical role in enhancer assembly:

Key Biological Insights:

  • MYOD1 mediates recruitment of Set7, H3K4me1, H3K27ac, p300, and RNA Polymerase II to enhancers

  • Muscle enhancers are modulated through coordinated binding of transcription factors including c-Jun, Jdp2, Meis, and Runx1

  • These transcription factors are recruited to muscle enhancers in a MYOD1-dependent manner

  • Genome-wide analysis revealed c-Jun and MYOD1 co-localize within a narrow window on 54% of muscle enhancers

Experimental Approaches:

  • ChIP-seq for MYOD1 together with enhancer marks (H3K4me1, H3K27ac)

  • Sequential ChIP to determine co-occupancy of MYOD1 with cofactors

  • Comparison of enhancer mark deposition in wildtype vs. MYOD1-deficient cells

  • Mass spectrometry to identify MYOD1-associated proteins at enhancers

Analytical Considerations:

  • Examine binding sites for canonical and non-canonical E-box motifs

  • Analyze spatial relationships between MYOD1 binding and enhancer marks

  • Consider the timing of MYOD1 binding relative to enhancer activation

  • Integrate with gene expression data to correlate enhancer activity with transcriptional output

How can dual immunofluorescence with MYOD1 antibodies be optimized to study co-localization with other transcription factors?

Protocol Optimization:

  • Primary antibody selection: Choose MYOD1 antibodies raised in different species than antibodies against other factors

  • Sequential staining: Consider sequential rather than simultaneous antibody incubation if cross-reactivity occurs

  • Signal amplification: Tyramide signal amplification can enhance detection of low abundance transcription factors

  • Fluorophore selection: Choose fluorophores with minimal spectral overlap

Specific Co-localization Targets:

  • MYOD1 with BMAL1 and CLOCK: These have been shown to be in close proximity within myonuclei

  • MYOD1 with other myogenic factors (Myf5, myogenin, MRF4)

  • MYOD1 with co-factors like c-Jun, Jdp2, Meis, and Runx1

Analysis Approaches:

  • Calculate Pearson's or Mander's coefficients for quantitative co-localization assessment

  • Perform proximity ligation assay (PLA) to detect proteins within 40nm of each other

  • Use super-resolution microscopy for detailed nuclear localization patterns

  • Quantify co-occupancy at specific genomic loci using sequential ChIP (ChIP-reChIP)

How should researchers interpret MYOD1 antibody results in the context of muscle disease models?

Understanding the expected MYOD1 expression patterns in different conditions aids in result interpretation:

Expression Patterns in Different Conditions:

  • Rhabdomyosarcomas: Strong nuclear MYOD1 expression (particularly useful in poorly differentiated tumors)

  • Developing muscle: Nuclear expression in myoblasts

  • Normal adult muscle: Minimal to no expression

  • Regenerating muscle: May show increased MYOD1 expression

Interpretation Challenges:

  • False negatives may occur due to improper fixation or processing

  • Weak non-specific staining should not be interpreted as positive

  • Consider co-staining with other muscle-specific markers (desmin, myogenin)

  • Quantitative assessment should consider both staining intensity and percentage of positive nuclei

Research Applications:

  • When studying muscle disease models, compare MYOD1 expression patterns with published diagnostic criteria

  • Consider temporal dynamics, as MYOD1 expression changes during muscle development and regeneration

  • In gene expression studies, correlate MYOD1 protein levels with mRNA expression

How can researchers leverage MYOD1 antibodies to investigate the interface between circadian rhythm and muscle metabolism?

Recent discoveries about MYOD1's role in circadian regulation open new research directions:

Experimental Approaches:

  • Time-course ChIP-seq to map temporal dynamics of MYOD1 binding

  • Metabolic profiling of wildtype vs. MYOD1-deficient muscle at different circadian timepoints

  • Bioluminescence assays using clock gene reporters in the presence/absence of MYOD1

  • Investigation of MYOD1-dependent metabolic genes with circadian expression patterns

Key Findings to Consider:

  • Gene ontology analysis revealed that circadian MYOD1 target genes are enriched for muscle structure and development functions

  • MYOD1 enhances the amplitude of Bmal1 expression, creating a feed-forward regulatory loop

  • MYOD1 synergizes with BMAL1:CLOCK to amplify circadian expression of muscle-specific genes

  • Approximately 30% (536 genes) of circadian genes in muscle are directly targeted by MYOD1

Methodological Considerations:

  • Synchronize cells to establish a common circadian phase

  • Collect samples at multiple timepoints spanning at least 24 hours

  • Consider both the phase and amplitude of circadian oscillations

  • Control for confounding variables like feeding time and activity levels in animal models

Quick Inquiry

Personal Email Detected
Please use an institutional or corporate email address for inquiries. Personal email accounts ( such as Gmail, Yahoo, and Outlook) are not accepted. *
© Copyright 2025 TheBiotek. All Rights Reserved.