nfuA Antibody, FITC conjugated

Shipped with Ice Packs
In Stock

Product Specs

Buffer
**Preservative:** 0.03% Proclin 300
**Constituents:** 50% Glycerol, 0.01M PBS, pH 7.4
Form
Liquid
Lead Time
Typically, we can ship your order within 1-3 business days of receipt. Delivery times may vary depending on the method of purchase and location. For specific delivery information, please consult your local distributor.
Synonyms
nfuA antibody; ECDH10B_3589 antibody; Fe/S biogenesis protein NfuA antibody
Target Names
nfuA
Uniprot No.

Target Background

Function
This antibody is involved in iron-sulfur cluster biogenesis. It binds a 4Fe-4S cluster, which it can transfer to apoproteins, facilitating the maturation of Fe/S proteins. Additionally, it may act as a scaffold or chaperone for damaged Fe/S proteins.
Database Links
Protein Families
NfuA family

Q&A

What is nfuA protein and what role does it play in bacterial systems?

nfuA (Fe/S biogenesis protein NfuA) is a crucial component in iron-sulfur cluster biogenesis pathways in bacterial systems. This protein binds a 4Fe-4S cluster and can transfer this cluster to apoproteins, actively intervening in the maturation of FeS proteins. It may also function as a scaffold/chaperone for damaged FeS proteins . The importance of nfuA lies in its contribution to iron homeostasis and electron transport chains in prokaryotic metabolic networks. This protein contains specific structural features that enable it to participate in complex Fe-S cluster assembly mechanisms essential for bacterial survival under various environmental conditions .

How does FITC conjugation affect antibody performance in research applications?

FITC conjugation significantly impacts antibody performance through several mechanisms:

  • Binding Affinity: Research demonstrates a negative correlation between FITC labeling index and binding affinity for target antigens. Antibodies with higher FITC labeling indices generally exhibit decreased target binding affinity .

  • Sensitivity vs. Specificity Trade-off: Antibodies with higher FITC labeling indices tend to produce more sensitive detection but may also yield increased non-specific staining, creating an important experimental consideration .

  • Spectral Properties: FITC exhibits excitation at approximately 495 nm and emission at approximately 520 nm, making it compatible with standard fluorescence detection systems but susceptible to photobleaching during extended imaging sessions .

  • pH Sensitivity: FITC fluorescence intensity is pH-dependent, with optimal performance at pH 8.0-9.0, which necessitates careful buffer preparation for consistent results .

These factors must be considered when selecting FITC-conjugated antibodies for specific research applications to balance fluorescence intensity with preserved binding functionality.

What are the optimal storage conditions for FITC-conjugated antibodies?

To maximize stability and functionality of FITC-conjugated antibodies:

  • Store at -20°C or -80°C for long-term preservation

  • Avoid repeated freeze-thaw cycles, which can damage both the antibody and the conjugated fluorophore

  • Protect from light exposure, as FITC is highly photosensitive

  • Store in appropriate buffer conditions, typically containing 50% glycerol, 0.01M PBS at pH 7.4, and a preservative such as 0.03% Proclin 300

  • Aliquot antibodies before freezing to minimize freeze-thaw events

Following these storage recommendations helps maintain both immunoreactivity and fluorescence properties over extended periods, ensuring reliable experimental outcomes.

How does the FITC/protein (F/P) ratio affect antibody binding affinity and experimental outcomes?

The FITC/protein (F/P) ratio is a critical parameter that influences both binding affinity and experimental performance:

  • Optimal Labeling Range: Research indicates that an F/P ratio of 2-6 frequently provides the best balance between fluorescence intensity and preserved binding affinity for most applications .

  • Impact on Binding Kinetics: Higher F/P ratios can interfere with antibody-antigen interactions by modifying crucial lysine residues within or adjacent to antigen-binding sites. According to experiments on FITC-conjugated antibodies, maximal molecular F/P ratios are reached rapidly under conditions of high reaction temperature, elevated pH (9.5), and concentrated protein solutions (25 mg/ml) .

  • Application-Specific Considerations: Flow cytometry applications may benefit from higher F/P ratios for enhanced signal detection, while applications requiring high specificity (like immunohistochemistry) generally perform better with lower F/P ratios .

  • Quantitative Impact: Studies demonstrate that overconjugation can reduce antibody functionality by up to 70% compared to optimally conjugated preparations .

This relationship between conjugation density and antibody performance underscores the importance of selecting appropriately labeled antibodies for specific experimental applications.

What methodological approaches can optimize FITC-conjugated antibody performance in flow cytometry?

Maximizing FITC-conjugated antibody performance in flow cytometry requires systematic optimization:

  • Concentration Titration:

    • Prepare serial dilutions (typically 2-fold) starting from manufacturer's recommended concentration

    • Analyze signal-to-noise ratio for each dilution

    • Select concentration at or just above the inflection point of the resulting curve

    • For nfuA antibody applications, initial concentration ranges of 1-5 μg/ml provide a useful starting point

  • Buffer Optimization:

    • FITC performs optimally at pH 7.4-8.0

    • Include protein (0.1-5% BSA) to reduce non-specific binding

    • For bacterial targets, consider specialized permeabilization buffers containing 0.1% saponin or Triton X-100

  • Control Integration:

    • Include unstained controls to establish autofluorescence baselines

    • Use isotype controls conjugated to FITC at identical concentrations

    • Implement fluorescence-minus-one (FMO) controls for multi-parameter experiments

    • For bacterial experiments, include both positive (E. coli K12) and negative control species

  • Instrument Configuration:

    • Optimize voltage settings for the FITC channel

    • Perform compensation when using multiple fluorophores

    • Standardize instrument settings using fluorescent calibration beads

  • Data Analysis Methods:

    • Calculate staining index: (MFI positive - MFI negative)/(2 × SD of negative)

    • For heterogeneous samples, consider both percentage positive and median fluorescence intensity

    • Apply appropriate gating strategies to exclude aggregates and non-specific binding events

This systematic approach enables reliable and reproducible flow cytometry data when working with FITC-conjugated nfuA antibodies.

How can researchers troubleshoot weak or absent FITC fluorescence signals?

When faced with weak or absent FITC fluorescence signals, implement this structured troubleshooting approach:

  • Antibody Integrity Assessment:

    • Verify fluorophore activity by spotting diluted antibody on filter paper and examining under UV light

    • Check storage conditions, focusing on temperature history and light exposure

    • Review antibody specification sheet for recommended handling procedures

  • Target Accessibility Verification:

    • For bacterial targets like nfuA, optimize cell wall permeabilization protocols

    • Test alternative fixation methods (paraformaldehyde, methanol, or acetone)

    • Ensure adequate permeabilization for intracellular targets

    • Consider epitope masking due to protein-protein interactions

  • Signal Amplification Strategies:

    • Implement indirect detection using unlabeled primary antibody with FITC-conjugated secondary

    • Consider biotinylated primary antibody with streptavidin-FITC detection

    • For critically low signals, explore tyramide signal amplification techniques

    • Adjust antibody concentration (try up to 5× recommended concentration)

  • Technical Parameter Optimization:

    • Extend incubation times (overnight at 4°C)

    • Adjust buffer pH to 8.0 for optimal FITC fluorescence

    • Reduce washing stringency to preserve weak signals

    • For fluorescence microscopy, increase exposure time or detector gain

  • Expression Verification:

    • Test different bacterial growth conditions that may affect nfuA expression

    • Verify protein expression through alternative methods (Western blot)

    • Consider expression timing in relation to growth phase or stress conditions

Methodical application of these troubleshooting approaches will help identify and resolve factors contributing to suboptimal FITC fluorescence signals.

What protocols yield optimal FITC-conjugation to antibodies?

Achieving optimal FITC conjugation to antibodies requires precise control over reaction conditions:

  • Protein Preparation:

    • Begin with high-purity IgG (>95%), preferably isolated by DEAE Sephadex chromatography

    • Ensure protein is in appropriate buffer (typically carbonate or borate buffer at pH 9.0-9.5)

    • Remove interfering amines (Tris, glycine) through dialysis or buffer exchange

  • Reaction Conditions:

    • Optimal conjugation occurs at:

      • pH 9.5 (critical for efficient reaction)

      • Room temperature

      • Initial protein concentration of 25 mg/ml

      • Reaction time of 30-60 minutes

    • Prepare FITC in anhydrous DMSO at 1-10 mg/ml immediately before use

    • Add FITC solution dropwise while gently stirring protein solution

  • Purification Methods:

    • Separate optimally labeled antibodies from under- and over-labeled proteins using gradient DEAE Sephadex chromatography

    • Remove unconjugated FITC using gel filtration or extensive dialysis

    • Consider specialized purification protocols based on starting antibody characteristics

  • Quality Control Assessment:

    • Determine F/P ratio spectrophotometrically:

      • Measure absorbance at 280 nm (protein) and 495 nm (FITC)

      • Calculate ratio using established formulas accounting for FITC contribution to A280

    • Verify activity through immunoassay comparison with unconjugated antibody

    • Document lot-specific characteristics for experimental reproducibility

These methodological parameters have been experimentally validated to produce FITC-antibody conjugates with optimal balance between fluorescence intensity and preserved binding affinity.

How can researchers reduce background fluorescence when using FITC-conjugated antibodies?

Minimizing background fluorescence requires implementing multiple strategic approaches:

  • Sample Preparation Optimization:

    • Optimize fixation protocols (overfixation increases autofluorescence)

    • Process samples consistently to minimize variation

    • For bacterial samples, consider media components that may contribute to background

  • Blocking Enhancement:

    • Implement extended blocking (1-2 hours) with 5-10% normal serum

    • Apply dual blocking strategy: serum followed by 1-5% BSA

    • For bacterial samples with potential Fc receptors, include specific Fc receptor blocking reagents

  • Antibody Selection and Handling:

    • Choose antibodies with optimal F/P ratios (typically 2-6)

    • Use the minimum effective concentration determined through titration

    • Prepare fresh dilutions immediately before use

    • Centrifuge diluted antibody briefly to remove aggregates

  • Washing Optimization:

    • Increase wash number and duration after antibody incubation

    • Add 0.05-0.1% Tween-20 to wash buffers

    • Include one high-salt wash (0.5M NaCl) for stubborn background

    • Ensure complete buffer removal between washing steps

  • Autofluorescence Reduction Treatments:

    • Sodium borohydride (0.1%, 10 minutes) for aldehyde-induced fluorescence

    • Sudan Black B (0.1-0.3% in 70% ethanol) for general background reduction

    • Short UV exposure before staining to reduce natural autofluorescence

  • Detection and Analysis Strategies:

    • Implement spectral unmixing for autofluorescence separation

    • Use confocal microscopy to reduce out-of-focus fluorescence

    • Apply computational background correction using appropriate controls

    • For flow cytometry, optimize voltage settings to maximize signal separation

These methodological approaches should be systematically tested to identify the most effective combination for specific experimental systems when working with FITC-conjugated nfuA antibodies.

What methods can verify the specificity of nfuA Antibody, FITC conjugated?

Confirming the specificity of nfuA Antibody, FITC conjugated requires a multi-faceted validation approach:

  • Genetic Controls:

    • Compare staining between wild-type and nfuA knockout bacterial strains

    • Implement gene silencing (antisense RNA) to reduce nfuA expression

    • Create overexpression systems to verify signal proportionality to expression level

    • Signal should correlate directly with genetic manipulation of target expression

  • Protein-Level Verification:

    • Perform Western blot analysis to confirm recognition of protein at expected molecular weight

    • Conduct immunoprecipitation followed by mass spectrometry identification

    • Implement protein competition assays using purified recombinant nfuA protein

    • Pre-incubate antibody with purified antigen before staining to demonstrate signal reduction

  • Cross-Reactivity Assessment:

    • Test antibody against related bacterial species with known nfuA homology

    • Examine sequence homology between target and potential cross-reactive proteins

    • Include negative control species lacking nfuA homologs

    • Bioinformatically identify proteins with similar epitopes and test cross-reactivity

  • Methodological Controls:

    • Implement isotype controls at identical concentrations

    • Perform secondary-only controls for indirect detection methods

    • Test different fixation and buffer conditions to ensure consistent staining pattern

    • Verify localization pattern matches known biological distribution of nfuA

  • Alternative Detection Methods:

    • Compare results with alternative nfuA detection methods

    • Use antibodies targeting different epitopes of nfuA protein

    • Correlate antibody staining with functional assays for iron-sulfur cluster assembly

    • Consistent results across different detection methods support specificity

This comprehensive validation approach provides robust evidence for antibody specificity, which is increasingly required for publication and reproducibility in scientific research.

What are the best practices for quantifying nfuA protein expression using FITC-conjugated antibodies?

Accurate quantification of nfuA protein expression requires rigorous methodological practices:

  • Standard Curve Implementation:

    • Generate standards using recombinant nfuA protein at known concentrations

    • Process standards identically to experimental samples

    • Create calibration curves relating fluorescence intensity to protein quantity

    • Include reference bacterial strains with known nfuA expression levels in each experiment

  • Flow Cytometry Quantification:

    • Use fluorescent calibration beads to convert arbitrary units to Molecules of Equivalent Soluble Fluorochrome (MESF)

    • Apply consistent instrument settings across experiments

    • Calculate specific fluorescence index: (Sample MFI - Isotype Control MFI)

    • For bacterial samples, consider both percentage of positive cells and median fluorescence intensity

  • Microscopy-Based Quantification:

    • Implement identical exposure settings for all samples

    • Include fluorescence standards in each imaging session

    • Define consistent regions of interest for analysis

    • Perform background subtraction using adjacent negative areas

    • Calculate integrated density (area × mean fluorescence intensity)

  • Data Normalization Approaches:

    • Normalize to total protein content of samples

    • For bacterial samples, normalize to cell number or optical density

    • In flow cytometry, consider normalization to cell size using forward scatter

    • In microscopy, normalize to cell area using appropriate cellular markers

  • Statistical Analysis Requirements:

    • Perform measurements in triplicate at minimum

    • Calculate coefficient of variation to assess measurement precision

    • Apply appropriate statistical tests based on data distribution

    • Report both raw and normalized data when appropriate

    • Include effect sizes alongside p-values

This methodological framework ensures robust and reproducible quantification of nfuA protein expression using FITC-conjugated antibodies across various experimental platforms.

How do experimental conditions affect FITC fluorescence in research applications?

Multiple experimental parameters significantly impact FITC fluorescence intensity and stability:

  • pH Effects:

    • FITC fluorescence is highly pH-dependent with maximum intensity at pH 8.0-9.0

    • Fluorescence decreases dramatically below pH 7.0

    • Different bacterial compartments may have varying pH values, affecting signal localization

    • Buffer selection critically influences fluorescence consistency

  • Photobleaching Considerations:

    • FITC exhibits significant photobleaching under prolonged light exposure

    • Rate of photobleaching depends on illumination intensity and duration

    • Antifade reagents can extend fluorescence stability

    • Imaging parameters should be standardized to ensure comparable data collection

  • Temperature Influences:

    • Higher temperatures accelerate photobleaching

    • Antibody binding kinetics vary with temperature (4°C, room temperature, 37°C)

    • Fluorescence quantum yield can be temperature-dependent

    • Standardize temperature conditions for consistent results

  • Chemical Environment Factors:

    • Presence of reducing agents (DTT, β-mercaptoethanol) can affect thiourea bonds

    • High protein concentrations may quench fluorescence

    • Certain buffer components may interfere with fluorescence

    • Metal ions can quench FITC fluorescence through complex formation

  • Experimental Design Considerations:

    • For bacterial experiments, growth phase affects nfuA expression

    • Signal collection timing relative to sample preparation influences intensity

    • Number and duration of washing steps impact signal-to-noise ratio

    • Fixation method alters epitope accessibility and background fluorescence

Understanding and controlling these parameters is essential for generating reproducible and comparable data when using FITC-conjugated antibodies in research applications.

How can researchers optimize nfuA Antibody, FITC conjugated for bacterial immunofluorescence studies?

Optimizing nfuA Antibody, FITC conjugated for bacterial immunofluorescence requires tailored protocols:

  • Bacterial Sample Preparation:

    • Harvest bacteria at appropriate growth phase for nfuA expression

    • Gently wash cells to remove media components that may contribute to background

    • Fix with 4% paraformaldehyde (10-15 minutes) or 70% ethanol (30 minutes)

    • Optimize permeabilization for cell wall penetration (lysozyme treatment followed by 0.1% Triton X-100)

  • Immunostaining Protocol Development:

    • Block with 5% BSA containing 0.05% Tween-20 for 30-60 minutes

    • Apply FITC-conjugated nfuA antibody at optimized concentration (typically 2-10 μg/ml)

    • Incubate at room temperature for 1-2 hours or overnight at 4°C

    • Wash extensively (5-6 times) with PBS containing 0.05% Tween-20

  • Microscopy Parameter Optimization:

    • Mount in anti-fade medium containing DAPI for nuclear counterstaining

    • Use appropriate filter sets for FITC (excitation ~495 nm, emission ~520 nm)

    • Optimize exposure settings to prevent photobleaching

    • Acquire Z-stacks for three-dimensional distribution analysis

    • Implement deconvolution for improved resolution

  • Controls Implementation:

    • Include bacterial strains with known nfuA expression profiles

    • Implement genetic knockouts or silencing for specificity confirmation

    • Use isotype control antibodies at identical concentrations

    • Include unstained samples to assess autofluorescence

  • Image Analysis Methods:

    • Establish consistent thresholding parameters

    • Quantify signal intensity relative to cell area

    • Perform colocalization analysis with subcellular markers

    • Apply appropriate statistical analysis for multiple experimental replicates

These optimized protocols enhance detection specificity and signal quality when studying nfuA distribution in bacterial systems using FITC-conjugated antibodies.

What are the recommended data table formats for reporting FITC-antibody experimental results?

Effective reporting of FITC-antibody experimental results requires standardized data table formats:

Table 1: Antibody Characteristics and Validation Parameters

ParameterSpecificationValidation MethodResult
Target ProteinnfuA (Fe/S biogenesis protein)Western blotSingle band at expected MW
Host SpeciesRabbitN/AN/A
Antibody TypePolyclonalN/AN/A
FITC ConjugationDirect conjugationSpectrophotometric analysisF/P Ratio: 3.2
Cross-ReactivityTested against 3 bacterial speciesFlow cytometrySpecific to E. coli strains
Optimal Concentration5 μg/mlTitration analysisSignal-to-noise ratio: 15:1
Storage Conditions-20°C, protected from lightStability testing>95% activity after 6 months

Table 2: Flow Cytometry Quantification of nfuA Expression

Sample IDTreatment% Positive CellsMedian Fluorescence IntensityStaining IndexNormalizing Factor
EC-WT-01Untreated92.3 ± 3.11253 ± 11242.51.00
EC-WT-02Oxidative Stress97.8 ± 1.22875 ± 23598.21.00
EC-KD-01nfuA Knockdown88.5 ± 4.3358 ± 4211.31.00
EC-OE-01nfuA Overexpression98.2 ± 0.85632 ± 387194.61.00

Table 3: Microscopy Quantification Parameters

ParameterMeasurement MethodControl ValueExperimental ValueStatistical Significance
Mean Fluorescence IntensityIntegrated density per cell125 ± 18875 ± 112p < 0.001
Signal-to-Background RatioPeak signal / adjacent background3.2 ± 0.412.5 ± 1.8p < 0.001
Colocalization CoefficientPearson's correlation with marker X0.12 ± 0.050.78 ± 0.09p < 0.001
Subcellular Distribution% signal in compartment Y18 ± 5%72 ± 8%p < 0.001

Table 4: Experimental Conditions Optimization

ParameterTest RangeOptimal ValueEvaluation MetricNotes
Fixation MethodPFA, MeOH, Acetone4% PFA, 15 minSignal intensity and morphologyPFA preserved epitope accessibility
Permeabilization0.1-0.5% Triton X-1000.2% Triton X-100, 10 minAntibody penetrationHigher concentrations increased background
Blocking Solution1-10% BSA5% BSA with 0.05% Tween-20Background reductionDual blocking improved specificity
Incubation Time1h, 2h, 4h, Overnight2 hours, RTSignal-to-noise ratioLonger incubation did not improve signal

These standardized table formats facilitate comprehensive reporting of experimental parameters, validation metrics, and quantitative results, enhancing reproducibility and transparency in research using FITC-conjugated nfuA antibodies .

Quick Inquiry

Personal Email Detected
Please use an institutional or corporate email address for inquiries. Personal email accounts ( such as Gmail, Yahoo, and Outlook) are not accepted. *
© Copyright 2025 TheBiotek. All Rights Reserved.